As international student numbers fall, we must ask ourselves an important question
The Department's data compares the number of new students from April 2024 to April 2025, with many sectors recording massive falls in numbers including, English language (ELICOS) (down 49 per cent) VET (down 67 per cent) and school (down 23 per cent), while the higher education sector is only down 2 per cent.
The Department's data also shows that the desire for diversity, cited in the 2021 to 2030 Australian Strategy for International Education, is not being fulfilled, with 57 per cent of all international students coming from just five source countries - China (23 per cent), India (17 per cent), Nepal (8 per cent), Vietnam (5 per cent) and Philippines (4 per cent).
Indeed, many cohorts have had their numbers slashed, including those from Latin America.
The number of visa grants for English studies has halved from 35,596 to 17,999 between August and December 2024, with Colombia hardest hit, numbers falling from 24.9 per cent to 8.5 per cent of visas granted.
Another concerning trend revealed in the Education Department's latest data release is that in both higher education and VET, the most popular courses are in management and commerce.
While this area of study is likely very useful for students who are returning to their home country, it's hardly an area where Australia is facing pressing skills shortages.
With visa refusals continuing en masse both offshore and onshore, the Administrative Review Tribunal, already at capacity, now has about 100,000 pending cases, 34,000 of these being student visa refusals.
This begs a fundamental question for the international education sector now, which is: What constitutes a genuine student?
This is where the issue lies and what many in the sector are waiting to have fully clarified by the government, since it is upon this definition that refusals are based, many quite subjectively.
Should we be permitting only those who have the obvious skill sets to fill skills shortages in Australia to enter, or to study in these areas, only if they have previous experience and studies that are relevant?
Or should we also be encouraging those who wish to study business or marketing at VET level just to have an experience of studying outside of their countries, to then go back home and spread the message of what a great country Australia is, otherwise known as "soft diplomacy"?
The reality is that Home Affairs visa processing officers don't seem to clearly know what the government's objective is currently. We are seeing decisions made that leave qualified engineers, architects and would-be tradies, who could help solve the country's housing crisis, either appealing their visa rejection or simply giving up and going home or to an alternate study destination.
Recently, I spoke with some students from Colombia, many of whom had their visas refused.
Some were well-qualified engineers who could have ably assisted in addressing the urgent and growing shortage of engineers in the country.
They simply can't understand why their visas were refused, and believe a marked increase in the number of people applying for protection visas from Colombia and other Latin American countries could be unfairly impacting their chances, as legitimate and qualified students, of having their study visas approved.
In the meantime, we keep hearing of good quality education providers in both the English and VET sectors, collapsing, one after another, while poor quality operators continue to thrive under the radar.
When you go nuclear, you get left with the cockroaches.
Yes, a clean-up of the sector is necessary, but at this point we are risking severe economic consequences - job losses amongst Australians, 240,000 of whom have been employed in the sector, and reputational challenges where Australia is not seen as the once friendly country it was.
The government may well be pleased with the dramatic reduction in student numbers, but there will be significant unintended consequences of this policy in the coming years.
Decisive action needs to be taken, and now, before it's too late and we are left as we were after two years of border closures, with the country crying out for skilled workers and both businesses and the economy reeling from the impact.
The latest international student data from Australia's Department of Education paints an increasingly grim scenario for the international education sector due to a steep decline in the number of new students.
The Department's data compares the number of new students from April 2024 to April 2025, with many sectors recording massive falls in numbers including, English language (ELICOS) (down 49 per cent) VET (down 67 per cent) and school (down 23 per cent), while the higher education sector is only down 2 per cent.
The Department's data also shows that the desire for diversity, cited in the 2021 to 2030 Australian Strategy for International Education, is not being fulfilled, with 57 per cent of all international students coming from just five source countries - China (23 per cent), India (17 per cent), Nepal (8 per cent), Vietnam (5 per cent) and Philippines (4 per cent).
Indeed, many cohorts have had their numbers slashed, including those from Latin America.
The number of visa grants for English studies has halved from 35,596 to 17,999 between August and December 2024, with Colombia hardest hit, numbers falling from 24.9 per cent to 8.5 per cent of visas granted.
Another concerning trend revealed in the Education Department's latest data release is that in both higher education and VET, the most popular courses are in management and commerce.
While this area of study is likely very useful for students who are returning to their home country, it's hardly an area where Australia is facing pressing skills shortages.
With visa refusals continuing en masse both offshore and onshore, the Administrative Review Tribunal, already at capacity, now has about 100,000 pending cases, 34,000 of these being student visa refusals.
This begs a fundamental question for the international education sector now, which is: What constitutes a genuine student?
This is where the issue lies and what many in the sector are waiting to have fully clarified by the government, since it is upon this definition that refusals are based, many quite subjectively.
Should we be permitting only those who have the obvious skill sets to fill skills shortages in Australia to enter, or to study in these areas, only if they have previous experience and studies that are relevant?
Or should we also be encouraging those who wish to study business or marketing at VET level just to have an experience of studying outside of their countries, to then go back home and spread the message of what a great country Australia is, otherwise known as "soft diplomacy"?
The reality is that Home Affairs visa processing officers don't seem to clearly know what the government's objective is currently. We are seeing decisions made that leave qualified engineers, architects and would-be tradies, who could help solve the country's housing crisis, either appealing their visa rejection or simply giving up and going home or to an alternate study destination.
Recently, I spoke with some students from Colombia, many of whom had their visas refused.
Some were well-qualified engineers who could have ably assisted in addressing the urgent and growing shortage of engineers in the country.
They simply can't understand why their visas were refused, and believe a marked increase in the number of people applying for protection visas from Colombia and other Latin American countries could be unfairly impacting their chances, as legitimate and qualified students, of having their study visas approved.
In the meantime, we keep hearing of good quality education providers in both the English and VET sectors, collapsing, one after another, while poor quality operators continue to thrive under the radar.
When you go nuclear, you get left with the cockroaches.
Yes, a clean-up of the sector is necessary, but at this point we are risking severe economic consequences - job losses amongst Australians, 240,000 of whom have been employed in the sector, and reputational challenges where Australia is not seen as the once friendly country it was.
The government may well be pleased with the dramatic reduction in student numbers, but there will be significant unintended consequences of this policy in the coming years.
Decisive action needs to be taken, and now, before it's too late and we are left as we were after two years of border closures, with the country crying out for skilled workers and both businesses and the economy reeling from the impact.
The latest international student data from Australia's Department of Education paints an increasingly grim scenario for the international education sector due to a steep decline in the number of new students.
The Department's data compares the number of new students from April 2024 to April 2025, with many sectors recording massive falls in numbers including, English language (ELICOS) (down 49 per cent) VET (down 67 per cent) and school (down 23 per cent), while the higher education sector is only down 2 per cent.
The Department's data also shows that the desire for diversity, cited in the 2021 to 2030 Australian Strategy for International Education, is not being fulfilled, with 57 per cent of all international students coming from just five source countries - China (23 per cent), India (17 per cent), Nepal (8 per cent), Vietnam (5 per cent) and Philippines (4 per cent).
Indeed, many cohorts have had their numbers slashed, including those from Latin America.
The number of visa grants for English studies has halved from 35,596 to 17,999 between August and December 2024, with Colombia hardest hit, numbers falling from 24.9 per cent to 8.5 per cent of visas granted.
Another concerning trend revealed in the Education Department's latest data release is that in both higher education and VET, the most popular courses are in management and commerce.
While this area of study is likely very useful for students who are returning to their home country, it's hardly an area where Australia is facing pressing skills shortages.
With visa refusals continuing en masse both offshore and onshore, the Administrative Review Tribunal, already at capacity, now has about 100,000 pending cases, 34,000 of these being student visa refusals.
This begs a fundamental question for the international education sector now, which is: What constitutes a genuine student?
This is where the issue lies and what many in the sector are waiting to have fully clarified by the government, since it is upon this definition that refusals are based, many quite subjectively.
Should we be permitting only those who have the obvious skill sets to fill skills shortages in Australia to enter, or to study in these areas, only if they have previous experience and studies that are relevant?
Or should we also be encouraging those who wish to study business or marketing at VET level just to have an experience of studying outside of their countries, to then go back home and spread the message of what a great country Australia is, otherwise known as "soft diplomacy"?
The reality is that Home Affairs visa processing officers don't seem to clearly know what the government's objective is currently. We are seeing decisions made that leave qualified engineers, architects and would-be tradies, who could help solve the country's housing crisis, either appealing their visa rejection or simply giving up and going home or to an alternate study destination.
Recently, I spoke with some students from Colombia, many of whom had their visas refused.
Some were well-qualified engineers who could have ably assisted in addressing the urgent and growing shortage of engineers in the country.
They simply can't understand why their visas were refused, and believe a marked increase in the number of people applying for protection visas from Colombia and other Latin American countries could be unfairly impacting their chances, as legitimate and qualified students, of having their study visas approved.
In the meantime, we keep hearing of good quality education providers in both the English and VET sectors, collapsing, one after another, while poor quality operators continue to thrive under the radar.
When you go nuclear, you get left with the cockroaches.
Yes, a clean-up of the sector is necessary, but at this point we are risking severe economic consequences - job losses amongst Australians, 240,000 of whom have been employed in the sector, and reputational challenges where Australia is not seen as the once friendly country it was.
The government may well be pleased with the dramatic reduction in student numbers, but there will be significant unintended consequences of this policy in the coming years.
Decisive action needs to be taken, and now, before it's too late and we are left as we were after two years of border closures, with the country crying out for skilled workers and both businesses and the economy reeling from the impact.
The latest international student data from Australia's Department of Education paints an increasingly grim scenario for the international education sector due to a steep decline in the number of new students.
The Department's data compares the number of new students from April 2024 to April 2025, with many sectors recording massive falls in numbers including, English language (ELICOS) (down 49 per cent) VET (down 67 per cent) and school (down 23 per cent), while the higher education sector is only down 2 per cent.
The Department's data also shows that the desire for diversity, cited in the 2021 to 2030 Australian Strategy for International Education, is not being fulfilled, with 57 per cent of all international students coming from just five source countries - China (23 per cent), India (17 per cent), Nepal (8 per cent), Vietnam (5 per cent) and Philippines (4 per cent).
Indeed, many cohorts have had their numbers slashed, including those from Latin America.
The number of visa grants for English studies has halved from 35,596 to 17,999 between August and December 2024, with Colombia hardest hit, numbers falling from 24.9 per cent to 8.5 per cent of visas granted.
Another concerning trend revealed in the Education Department's latest data release is that in both higher education and VET, the most popular courses are in management and commerce.
While this area of study is likely very useful for students who are returning to their home country, it's hardly an area where Australia is facing pressing skills shortages.
With visa refusals continuing en masse both offshore and onshore, the Administrative Review Tribunal, already at capacity, now has about 100,000 pending cases, 34,000 of these being student visa refusals.
This begs a fundamental question for the international education sector now, which is: What constitutes a genuine student?
This is where the issue lies and what many in the sector are waiting to have fully clarified by the government, since it is upon this definition that refusals are based, many quite subjectively.
Should we be permitting only those who have the obvious skill sets to fill skills shortages in Australia to enter, or to study in these areas, only if they have previous experience and studies that are relevant?
Or should we also be encouraging those who wish to study business or marketing at VET level just to have an experience of studying outside of their countries, to then go back home and spread the message of what a great country Australia is, otherwise known as "soft diplomacy"?
The reality is that Home Affairs visa processing officers don't seem to clearly know what the government's objective is currently. We are seeing decisions made that leave qualified engineers, architects and would-be tradies, who could help solve the country's housing crisis, either appealing their visa rejection or simply giving up and going home or to an alternate study destination.
Recently, I spoke with some students from Colombia, many of whom had their visas refused.
Some were well-qualified engineers who could have ably assisted in addressing the urgent and growing shortage of engineers in the country.
They simply can't understand why their visas were refused, and believe a marked increase in the number of people applying for protection visas from Colombia and other Latin American countries could be unfairly impacting their chances, as legitimate and qualified students, of having their study visas approved.
In the meantime, we keep hearing of good quality education providers in both the English and VET sectors, collapsing, one after another, while poor quality operators continue to thrive under the radar.
When you go nuclear, you get left with the cockroaches.
Yes, a clean-up of the sector is necessary, but at this point we are risking severe economic consequences - job losses amongst Australians, 240,000 of whom have been employed in the sector, and reputational challenges where Australia is not seen as the once friendly country it was.
The government may well be pleased with the dramatic reduction in student numbers, but there will be significant unintended consequences of this policy in the coming years.
Decisive action needs to be taken, and now, before it's too late and we are left as we were after two years of border closures, with the country crying out for skilled workers and both businesses and the economy reeling from the impact.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
2 days ago
- The Age
Trump and Putin claim ‘great progress' – but leave Alaska early with no deal
On Ukraine, Putin thanked Trump for striving to understand the situation, and claimed the war was about addressing 'fundamental threats to our security'. He said he agreed with Trump that 'the security of Ukraine should be ensured as well'. 'I have every reason to believe that moving down this path we can come – and the sooner the better – to the end of the conflict in Ukraine,' Putin said, according to the official translator. A planned one-on-one meeting between Trump and Putin was replaced by a three-on-three meeting that also included US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and his Russian counterpart, Sergei Lavrov, as well as Trump's envoy, Steve Witkoff, and Putin's foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov, a former Russian ambassador to the United States. That meeting lasted about 2½ hours, and a mooted working lunch featuring other cabinet ministers was scrapped. Putin's jet departed Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage after just over five hours on the ground. At the end of the press conference, Trump said he would speak to Putin again soon and probably see him again soon. Putin replied, in English: 'Next time in Moscow.' Trump responded: 'Oh, that's an interesting one. I don't know, I'll get a little heat on that one, but I can see it possibly happening.' The encounter marked the first time Putin has met a sitting US president since Joe Biden in 2021, before he launched his full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. The International Criminal Court has issued an arrest warrant for Putin which would make him liable for arrest in more than 120 countries. But on Friday (Saturday AEST) he was welcomed to American soil with a handshake from Trump, a photo opportunity and a short ride on the tarmac in the presidential car, the Beast. There was no immediate response from Zelensky, and the news conference occurred in the middle of the night, European time. But in an earlier video message, he criticised ongoing Russian strikes on Ukraine, even as Putin departed for Alaska. 'On the day of negotiations they are killing as well, and that speaks volumes,' Zelensky said. 'Everyone needs a just end to the war. Ukraine is ready to work as productively as possible to bring the war to an end and we count on a strong position from America. Everything will depend on this – the Russians factor in American strength.' John Herbst, a former US ambassador to Ukraine who is now senior director of the Atlantic Council's Eurasia Centre, said he would withhold judgment until details of the meeting were reported and confirmed. Television network Newsmax reported Putin had dropped his objection to teaching the Ukrainian language in Russian-controlled areas of Ukraine, and that discussions would continue about how to implement a ceasefire. 'If you go simply by what we saw at the very, very brief, un-Trump-like press conference, it looked like he really didn't get anything from Putin to justify calling it a productive meeting,' Herbst said. Loading He said it looked as though Russia was set to escape further US sanctions, which would be a victory for Putin. Dora Chomiak, the chief executive of US-based Ukrainian charity Razom, said Putin remained the sole obstacle to peace. 'The idea that Putin believes there is a positive deal for him in the near future is deeply alarming,' she said in Anchorage.
7NEWS
2 days ago
- 7NEWS
Talks between Russian president Vladimir Putin and US president trump end as summit stretches on
US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin have met face-to-face for almost three hours on Friday. The two world leaders discussed Moscow's war in Ukraine, seeking an end to the deadliest conflict in Europe in 80 years. There was no immediate word on whether the talks had produced any progress toward a ceasefire in the war, a goal that Trump had set at the outset. Trump and Putin, along with top foreign-policy aides, conferred in a room at an Air Force base in Anchorage, Alaska in their first meeting since 2019. A blue backdrop behind them had the words 'Pursuing Peace' printed on it. Trump's publicly stated aim for the talks was to secure a halt to the fighting and a commitment by Putin to meet swiftly with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to negotiate an end to the war, which began when Russia invaded its neighbour in February 2022. Earlier in the week, Trump said he would know if Putin was serious about peace within minutes of seeing him. He also threatened to walk out of the talks if they were unproductive. Putin recalls 'root' reason for war Putin and Trump addressed the media in a press conference after their talk, and both provided a statement, but did not take questions from reporters. Putin said in a press conference following his talk with Trump, that Russia's primary reason for the war would need to be eliminated for the war to end. 'The situation in Ukraine has to do with the fundamental threats to our security,' Putin said. 'We're convinced that in order to to make the settlement lasting and long term, we need to eliminate all the primary roots, primary causes of that conflict.' 'To consider all legitimate concerns of Russia and to reinstate a just balance of security in Europe and in the world on the whole. 'And I agree with President Trump, as he has (said) today, that naturally, the security of Ukraine should be ensured as well. 'Naturally, we are prepared to work on that. I would like to hope that the agreement that we've reached together will help us bring closer to that goal and will pave the path towards peace in Ukraine.' Putin's suggested that a subsequent summit take place in the Russian capital — a request he made in English — prompting Trump to acknowledge that agreeing to his proposal would be highly controversial. But Trump didn't completely shut the door to it: 'That's an interesting one, I'll get a little heat on that one ... but I could see it possibly happening.' President Donald Trump's former national security adviser John Bolton commented after the press conference, that Putin walked away from the meeting with the upper hand. 'He escaped sanctions. He's not facing a ceasefire. The next meeting is not set ... It's far from over, but I'd say Putin achieved most of what he wanted. Trump achieved very little.' 'Trump did not lose, but Putin clearly won. Trump didn't come away with anything, except more meetings.' 'Not here to negotiate for Ukraine' Zelenskiy, who was not invited to the summit, and his European allies fear Trump might sell out Ukraine by essentially freezing the conflict with Russia and recognising — if only informally — Russian control over one-fifth of Ukraine. Trump sought to assuage such concerns as he boarded Air Force One, saying he would let Ukraine decide on any possible territorial swaps. 'I'm not here to negotiate for Ukraine, I'm here to get them at a table,' he said. Asked what would make the meeting a success, he told reporters: 'I want to see a ceasefire rapidly ... I'm not going to be happy if it's not today ... I want the killing to stop.' Once on the ground in Alaska, Trump greeted Putin on a red carpet on the base's tarmac. The two shook hands warmly and touched each other on the arm before riding in Trump's limo to the summit site nearby. The initial talks also included US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Trump's special envoy to Russia Steve Witkoff, Russian foreign policy aide Yury Ushakov and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. Trump hopes a truce in the war that Putin started will bring peace to the region as well as bolster his credentials as a global peacemaker worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize. For Putin, the summit is already a big win that he can portray as evidence that years of Western attempts to isolate Russia have unravelled and that Moscow is retaking its rightful place at the top table of international diplomacy. Putin is wanted by the International Criminal Court, accused of the war crime of deporting hundreds of children from Ukraine. Russia denies allegations of war crimes and the Kremlin has dismissed the ICC warrant as null and void. Russia and the United States are not members of the court. Both Moscow and Kyiv deny targeting civilians in the war. But thousands of civilians have died in the conflict, the vast majority of them Ukrainian. A conservative estimate of dead and injured in the war in Ukraine — from both sides combined — totals 1.2 million people, Trump's envoy to Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, said in May. Trump, who once said he would end Russia's war in Ukraine within 24 hours, conceded on Thursday it had proven a tougher task than he had expected. He said if Friday's talks went well, quickly arranging a second, three-way summit with Zelenskiy would be more important than his encounter with Putin. Zelenskiy said Friday's summit should open the way for a 'just peace' and three-way talks that included him, but added that Russia was continuing to wage war. A Russian ballistic missile earlier struck Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region, killing one person and wounding another. 'It's time to end the war, and the necessary steps must be taken by Russia. We are counting on America,' Zelenskiy wrote on messaging app Telegram. Zelenskiy has ruled out formally handing Moscow any territory and is also seeking a security guarantee backed by the United States. Trump said before the summit that there is mutual respect between him and Putin. 'He is a smart guy, been doing it for a long time, but so have I ... We get along,' Trump said of Putin. He also welcomed Putin's decision to bring businesspeople to Alaska. 'But they're not doing business until we get the war settled,' he said, repeating a threat of 'economically severe' consequences for Russia if the summit goes badly.
West Australian
2 days ago
- West Australian
Vladimir Putin reacts to press at Donald Trump meeting in Anchorage, Alaska
Russian President Vladimir Putin sat beside US President Donald Trump in Anchorage, Alaska, with his reaction to a rather unruly press pack quickly going viral. The two world leaders had arrived at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson for the historic meetings that could determine the future of Ukraine. On arrival, Mr Putin was greeted with a literal red carpet surrounded by US military fighter jets on display, as well as a flyover from a US B-2 stealth bomber. After a short ride in Mr Trump's presidential car, The Beast, the two presidents sat side-by-side for a photo opportunity before the free press took their opportunity to seek answers from Mr Putin. Marking one of the first times in years that Mr Putin had been available to the media, shouting quickly commenced. The Russian leader did not look impressed, even pulling a face as journalists yelled over each other. Mr Putin eventually put his hands to his mouth before attempting to shout something. The Russian President speaks some English, but usually uses a translator.
