Asia's plastic leakage to environment to rise 70% by 2050: OECD
Describing the region as a "hotspot for plastic pollution," the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development said in its report that mismanaged plastic waste remains a major concern, with 8.4 million tons leaking to the environment there in 2022.
"Informal and unsafe practices, such as open burning and dumping, persist in most ASEAN countries and China, especially in rural areas," the Regional Plastics Outlook said, referring to the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations.
Plastic waste is a major environmental issue, polluting rivers and oceans and posing health risks to wildlife and humans as microplastics enter the body.
The OECD projects that annual leakage into environment in the region could reach 14.1 million tons in 2050, of which 5.1 million tons could reach rivers, coastal areas and oceans.
The countries in the region differ widely in waste management capabilities and measures to curb plastics demand remain underutilized in most of them, it said.
Due partly to rapid population growth and urbanization, plastic use in the 13 countries surged almost ninefold from 17 million tons in 1990 to 152 million tons in 2022, with more than half used for short-lived applications such as packaging, the OECD said.
As over half of the plastic used in the region has a lifespan of less than five years, much of it quickly becomes waste. Regional plastic waste rose from 10 million tons in 1990 to 113 million tons in 2022.
Ambitious actions, including bans on single-use plastics and taxes, could cut plastic use in the region by 28 percent, raise the recycling rate to 54 percent, and reduce mismanaged waste by 97 percent, it added.
Talks for an international legally binding treaty on plastics pollution resumed on Tuesday in Geneva after the previous talks last year in Busan, South Korea, collapsed with countries split over measures on plastic output curbs and plastic waste management.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nikkei Asia
2 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
Huge Vietnam smart city backed by Japan's Sumitomo moves forward
The project will feature residential areas, office buildings and shopping facilities, as seen in this artist rendering. (North Hanoi Smart City) YUJI NITTA and KENTO HIRASHIMA August 20, 2025 03:25 JST HANOI/TOKYO -- Japan's Sumitomo Corp. will start work on a long-delayed project to build a $4.2 billion smart city outside Vietnam's capital, advancing a bet on the Southeast Asian nation's real estate sector.
The Diplomat
15 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Southeast Asia's Tax Policy Discussion Needs Some Counterintuitive Thinking
The two most important underlying economic factors of the next decade in Southeast Asia will be taxation and demography. Most countries will face a decline in working-age adults (taxpayers) and a major increase in retirees (sappers of state money). People are living longer, yet the elderly are going to have fewer relatives to look after them. In many countries in the region, pension systems are either non-existent or already at breaking point, while the intended pension-by-property solution has backfired in most countries. Most healthcare systems are certainly not ready for the pending increase in demand. All of this comes as governments need to get creative with revenue collection. One little-spoken-about impact of the Trump tariffs is that with most Southeast Asian governments agreeing to cut duties on U.S. imports to nearly zero, they're losing a significant chunk of their revenue. Indeed, this and the boom in free trade agreements mean that Southeast Asian governments are having to rely far more on domestic taxes, instead of customs and excise (the usual source of funds), at the same time as revenue collection must massively increase. The expected rational response will be to coerce people into paying higher taxes. However, cheaper, more effective ways are available. For instance, taxpayers could be given a list of five areas in which they want their money to be spent. For example: education, healthcare, defense, public infrastructure, and social development. From the five, they would select three. A ministry would collect all the votes and aggregate them. At a national level, 50 percent of all taxes would be allocated into a common fund, from which the government could spend as it sees fit. But the other 50 percent would be divided up based on how taxpayers voted. This wouldn't significantly alter how governments allocate their expenditures since the percentages involved would be relatively small. And if only a small percentage of people voted for defense spending, say, then the government could still allocate more towards security from the 50 percent common fund. First, this system would make taxpaying seem like a personal investment. If you're particularly aggrieved by the state of your country's education system (maybe you've got young kids) or healthcare system (you're getting old) but aren't bothered by issues such as transport infrastructure or the military, you would be more inclined to think that your money is going to be returned to you in the future. This could alleviate the negative sentiment that your money will be wasted by the government. Second, it would be a useful way of learning what public services the masses actually want their government to deliver. Third, it would greatly reduce a government or leader's ability to indulge in wasteful megaprojects. Yes, they might have 50 percent of the revenue to play with, but they won't control all of it. Another idea. Most human activity is unconsciously motivated by two main things: status-seeking and social copying. For smaller businesses, plaques could be given to display on their premises, indicating that they have paid their taxes for that year. Thus, the absence of a plaque would show customers that the owner hasn't done their duty, making taxpaying a socially reinforced practice. One might combine this with some other form of social embarrassment. In Pakistan, I'm told the authorities have for centuries hired transgender people as tax collectors: the idea is to embarrass business owners into paying, which apparently works quite well. Additionally, state titles could be given to the highest taxpayers. Thailand already does this in a way. So, too, does the Philippines. It also exists in a somewhat different guise in Cambodia, where the honorific oknha (lord) is given to individuals who donate money to the ruling party. Such titles could instead be conferred on people who pay their taxes. There could be fancy awards parties for the rich to flaunt their status as taxpayers. Importantly, titles should be given and taken away each year. For example, they would only be given to the top 50 taxpayers for that year. If you drop out of this index the following year, your title is taken away and given to someone else. When I moved to Phnom Penh, it took me a while to realize why tycoons would drive around in the city's potholed, asphalt-stripped streets in Lamborghinis and Ferraris. People think of 'conspicuous consumption' as showing off luxury and wealth, but it's actually about conspicuous impracticality. By traveling in the least practical way, the tycoons were signalling that they could easily afford the costly repairs. It's the same reason why a male peacock grows such a big, cumbersome plumage that makes them more liable to be attacked by predators. It's also why deer grow the most debilitating antlers and why some people choose to walk around the most violent neighborhoods in expensive jewellery that screams, 'try to rob me if you think you're tough enough.' I also suspect it's the root motivation behind philanthropy. Maybe giving your money away is virtue status-signalling, but it's also a public display that you have enough money that you can afford to spaff some of it on other people. Given this universal impulse, a government could include an option for people or businesses to pay more tax than is required. A 10 percent, 20 percent, or 30 percent surcharge on top of what's expected, for instance. Those who pay this voluntarily would receive some sort of public recognition, a way for them to peacock their seemingly self-effacing act: 'I am so rich that I can afford to pay more taxation than I should.'
Asahi Shimbun
15 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
India, China envoys discuss border peace, trade to boost cooperation
China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi attends the 15th East Asia Summit Foreign Ministers' meeting during the 58th Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Foreign Ministers' meeting and related meetings at the Convention Centre in Kuala Lumpur on July 11, 2025. (Pool via REUTERS) NEW DELHI--Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar and his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi on Monday discussed border peace, trade issues and bilateral exchanges, aiming to strengthen cooperation between the two countries. 'We had productive conversations on our economic and trade issues, pilgrimages, people-to-people contacts, river data sharing, border trade, connectivity and bilateral exchanges,' Jaishankar said. He added that the discussions would contribute to building a stable, cooperative and forward-looking relationship between India and China. The Chinese foreign minister said exchanges and dialogue at all levels between both countries had been gradually restored and bilateral relations were returning to cooperation, a Chinese readout showed. Wang also urged both sides, as major countries, to set an example for other developing countries to unite and strengthen themselves, according to the statement. China and India should establish 'correct strategic understanding, regard each other as partners and opportunities, not as rivals or threats,' the statement cited Wang as saying. Wang arrived in the Indian capital on Monday for a two-day visit during which he will hold the 24th round of border talks with Indian National Security Adviser Ajit Doval and also meet Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Earlier in the day, Jaishankar had said that discussing border issues was very important because the basis for any positive momentum in India-China ties was the ability to jointly maintain peace in border areas. 'Having seen a difficult period in our relationship, our two nations now seek to move ahead. This requires a candid and constructive approach from both sides,' Jaishankar told Wang in his opening remarks. It is also important for the two countries to pull back their troops amassed along their disputed border in the western Himalayas since a deadly border clash in 2020, Jaishankar said. Wang's visit comes days before Modi travels to China - his first visit in seven years - to attend the summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, a regional political and security group that also includes Russia. Relations between the Asian giants began to thaw in October after New Delhi and Beijing reached a milestone pact to lower military tensions on their Himalayan border following talks between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Modi in Russia. Ties between the two countries deteriorated sharply following a military clash on that border in the summer of 2020 in which 20 soldiers from India and four from China were killed.
