logo
How Young Men Feel About Potential US War With Iran

How Young Men Feel About Potential US War With Iran

Newsweek7 hours ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
For many young American men, the idea of another war halfway around the globe doesn't spark the kind of clear-cut patriotism it once did.
Unlike older generations that rallied around military action, polls show that younger voters are more apprehensive about supporting intervention abroad.
A late-May survey by the Young Men Research Project (YMRP), conducted with YouGov among 1,079 American men aged 18 to 29, found a modest plus-12 margin supporting U.S.-backed regime change in Iran (39 percent support vs. 27 percent oppose), while 34 percent remained unsure. Notably, party differences were minimal: Democrats favored regime change by plus-20, Republicans by plus-18, and both groups showed comparable uncertainty.
Support was strongest among young men who prize physical strength (plus-33 margin) and those identifying as Trump Republicans (plus-36 margin), each with about one-quarter uncertain. However, men advocating broader calls for increased masculinity were notably less enthusiastic, with a plus-16 margin.
The survey was conducted before Israel's airstrikes and before serious U.S. discussions of involvement. Since then, President Donald Trump ordered airstrikes against three key Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend. In retaliation, Iran fired missiles at a U.S. military base in Qatar on Monday.
A ceasefire was agreed to between Iran and Israel on Monday. But the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) has accused Iran of violating the ceasefire and said it will strike Tehran in retaliation. Iran's military has denied any such violation.
President Donald Trump speaks from the East Room of the White House in Washington on June 21, 2025, after the U.S. military struck three Iranian nuclear and military sites, joining Israel's effort to decapitate the...
President Donald Trump speaks from the East Room of the White House in Washington on June 21, 2025, after the U.S. military struck three Iranian nuclear and military sites, joining Israel's effort to decapitate the country's nuclear program. More
Carlos Barria/AP
Growing Reluctance Toward War
Amid such an uncertain environment, further polling indicates growing hesitation among young Americans about military involvement in the Middle East. An Economist/YouGov survey from mid-June found only 16 percent of 18- to 29-year-olds supported U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict, with 53 percent opposed and 31 percent unsure, mirroring national attitudes.
In the same poll, 59 percent of men said they oppose U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict, while only 19 percent supported U.S. action.
Similarly, a J.L. Partners poll in mid-June reported that only 40 percent of men overall supported U.S. action in Iran, with 45 percent opposed. Support shrank to 28 percent among the youngest voters, while 45 percent disapproved.
Among the youngest voters, support was even smaller. Only 28 percent said they supported U.S. airstrikes, while 45 percent said they disapprove.
Such polls are in line with national surveys which suggest that Americans largely do not support U.S. military action in Iran. A YouGov/Economist survey, conducted from June 20 to 23, 2025, found that public opinion shifted sharply after Donald Trump announced that the U.S. had bombed Iranian nuclear facilities. Among all U.S. adults, just 29 percent said the U.S. should carry out such strikes, while 46 percent said it should not.
The Washington Post found modestly higher support than YouGov did for the U.S. military bombing Iran. In the poll, 25 percent of adults supported "the U.S. military launching airstrikes against Iran over its nuclear program," while 45 percent were opposed.
The poll also found that 82 percent of Americans were either "somewhat" or "very" concerned about getting involved in a full-scale war with Iran.
Meanwhile, analysis by pollster G. Elliott Morris showed that just 21 percent of Americans said last week that they supported U.S. involvement in Iran, while 57 percent opposed.
The Trump Factor
But when broken down by party affiliation, poll results reveal a striking pattern.
In the YouGov/Economist poll, support for U.S. military action in Iran among Democrats fell from 16 percent before Trump's announcement to just 5 percent after. Meanwhile, Republican support soared from 34 percent to 70 percent. Independents showed a smaller shift, with support rising from 11 percent to 26 percent.
The J.L. Partners poll showed that support for U.S. military action against Iran is strongest among Trump's most devoted base. Two-thirds of self-identified "MAGA Republicans" (65 percent) back U.S. strikes, far surpassing support among "Traditional Republicans" (51 percent). Most Republican voters also view Israel's war with Iran as a shared American cause, with 63 percent saying "Israel's war is America's war"—a figure that rises to 67 percent among MAGA Republicans.
On how long the conflict should last, 59 percent of MAGA Republicans say the U.S. should fight until Iran's nuclear program is destroyed, compared to 28 percent who prefer negotiations. Among all voters, however, a majority (53 percent) favored pausing attacks to pursue diplomacy, while only 30 percent want to continue military action.
Generational Shift Away From War
Polls also show that support for military intervention in Iran is lower than it was for previous interventions in the Middle East, analysis by Morris shows.
In the immediate aftermath of 9/11, military action in Afghanistan had near-universal approval. A staggering 88 percent of Americans supported the U.S. invasion in 2001, while just 10 percent opposed it. That support remained high in the lead-up to the Iraq War in 2003, with 71 percent backing the strikes and 27 percent against.
By 2014, public enthusiasm had cooled significantly. When the U.S. launched operations against ISIS, support had dropped to 54 percent, with opposition rising to 41 percent.
And compared to past conflicts, the American public—especially young people—are far more hesitant about war.
During World War II, after Japan bombed Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, Americans largely embraced military service and supported the war effort with strong patriotism. Gallup polls from the 1940s showed more than 90 percent support for U.S. involvement.
However, attitudes changed dramatically during the Vietnam War. By the late 1960s and early 1970s, many Americans opposed the war, influenced by rising casualties and graphic media coverage. In 1970, Gallup found that about 60 percent of Americans supported the conflict.
After Vietnam, American's views on war became more conditional, particularly among young people. The 1990-91 Gulf War initially received broad support. But skepticism returned with the protracted wars in Iraq and Afghanistan after 2001. Pew Research Center surveys from the mid-2000s showed declining support as those conflicts dragged on.
In recent years, young Americans have grown increasingly reluctant to endorse military interventions. A 2021 Cato Institute survey found millennials and Gen Z are less supportive of war compared to older generations. Economic concerns and a preference for diplomacy over military force also factor into their attitudes.
The YMRP survey results reinforce these complexities. Young men experiencing financial hardship showed much less support. Those reporting financial instability had just a +1 support margin, and those believing the economy was worsening actually opposed the policy by a small margin (-1), both with high uncertainty (41 percent). In contrast, financially stable young men supported the policy by +24, and those optimistic about the economy showed a +36 margin.
Declining Support For Trump Among Young Men
The changing mindset may also be contributing to Trump's falling approval among young voters. While young men helped fuel Trump's victory in 2024—with 53 percent of those aged 18 to 44 supporting him, up from 45 percent in 2020—recent polling suggests that support has eroded.
Analysis by YouGov shows Trump's net approval among 18- to 29-year-olds has dropped from +5 at the start of his second term to -39—a 44-point swing. The decline is far steeper than in other age groups. Among voters aged 30 to 44, Trump's net approval now stands at -13, down from -6. Among those 45 to 64, it fell from +12 to -5. Among voters 65 and older, it has remained steady at -4.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tensions Grow Between Iran and the U.N. Nuclear Watchdog
Tensions Grow Between Iran and the U.N. Nuclear Watchdog

New York Times

time9 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Tensions Grow Between Iran and the U.N. Nuclear Watchdog

The United Nations' nuclear watchdog was regularly inspecting Iranian nuclear sites until Israel began its bombing campaign on June 13. The war that followed shut the agency's inspectors out of them. Now the watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, is trying to get back in — just when Iran may be moving to kick it out entirely. Amid simmering tensions with the agency, which some Iranian officials accuse of helping Israel justify its attacks, Iran's hardliner-dominated parliament voted on Wednesday to 'suspend' cooperation with the agency and bar its inspectors from the country, according to state news media. Though the move was so far no more than symbolic — the legislation would need approval from a higher Iranian authority before taking effect — its passage is another show of defiance from Iran. While it may perhaps a signal that Iran will renew its nuclear ambitions despite the U.S. and Israeli strikes on its facilities, the vote could simply be a tactic to gain leverage in any new negotiations with the Trump administration over its nuclear program. One of the I.A.E.A.'s main purposes is to monitor nuclear activity in Iran and other countries, including all those who have signed on to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. The goal is to keep them from building nuclear weapons. Iran is a party to the treaty, while Israel is not. The I.A.E.A. still has some oversight in Israel, which has not confirmed or denied having nuclear weapons, but is widely believed to have them. Under its agreement with Iran, the I.A.E.A. is supposed to inspect the nuclear facilities Iran has publicly declared, including those at Natanz and Fordo that the United States bombed over the weekend. Israeli officials say there may be other, secret nuclear sites that Iran has not told the watchdog about. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Trump slams intel report, hits Spain at NATO summit
Trump slams intel report, hits Spain at NATO summit

The Hill

time13 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump slams intel report, hits Spain at NATO summit

Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here Happy Wednesday! It's another hot day in D.C., so stay hydrated and don't forget your sunscreen!: In today's issue: The White House has spent today disputing several news outlets' reporting that the U.S. strikes against Iran did not decimate the country's nuclear program. If you missed the reporting: CNN, The New York Times and NBC News all cited an internal preliminary classified report that determined Saturday's bombing only set Iran's nuclear program back by a few months, challenging President Trump's assessment that the strikes set the country back years or destroyed it entirely. 💡 Why this matters: Carrying out the strike against Iran was a sophisticated maneuver in foreign policy. Even if the initial report is correct in that it pushed back Iran's nuclear program by just a few months, that's still a win for the White House. But Trump has set the bar incredibly high by suggesting the U.S. strikes decimated Iran's nuclear materials, setting Tehran back by decades. Trump closed out the NATO summit this morning with a wide-ranging press conference but spent much of it pushing back on the reporting. He even equated the Iran strikes to WWII: Trump compared the U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear sites to dropping atomic bombs in Japan near the end of World War II. 'It was so devastating. Actually, if you look at Hiroshima or if you look at Nagasaki, you know, that ended a war, too,' Trump said. 'This ended a war in a different way, but it was so devastating.' ^ Keep in mind that roughly 200,000 people were killed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. He also dismissed the report's assessment that Iran moved its nuclear materials before the strike: 'If you knew about that material, it's very hard and very dangerous to move,' Trump said. Earlier this morning, Trump bashed the news outlets as 'scum.' From Trump: 'This was an unbelievable hit by genius pilots and genius people in the military, and they're not being given credit for it because we have scum that's in this room. And not all of you are … CNN is scum. MSDNC is scum. The New York Times is scum. They're bad people. They're sick,' Trump said. 'And what they've done is they're trying to make this unbelievable victory into something less.' 📹 Watch Trump vent about the reporting His team publicly backed him up: The president's national security team strongly disagreed with the reporting on the initial internal assessment. ➤ Vice President Vance posted a scathing critique of American media, arguing it is 'full of the least curious, least insightful people in our country.' 🔎 Read Vance's criticism ➤ Secretary of State Marco Rubio argued to Politico that Iran is now 'much further away from a nuclear weapon.' ➤ Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth says there is an investigation into how the report was leaked. During Trump's NATO news conference, Hegseth stepped up to the microphone and accused the media of trying 'to find a way to spin it for their own political reasons to try to hurt President Trump or our country.' ^ Oh, by the way. Trump referred to Hegseth as 'Secretary of War,' noting the position used to be called that. 'We feel like warriors,' Trump said. 📹 Watch For what it's worth: An Iran Foreign Ministry spokesperson says that Saturday's bombing 'badly damaged' its nuclear installations. Keep in mind: The report's conclusion could easily change — it is an early assessment, after all. Without any inspections on the ground, it's hard to know how successful the strikes were. Here's a helpful Brookings Institution explainer on measuring the strike's success. President Trump wrapped the NATO summit with a press conference. While that Iran report was on the top of his mind, he had plenty of other matters to discuss. 🗨️ Follow today's live blog ➤ TIDBIT — UH, NO COMMENT: NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte referred to Trump as 'Daddy' this morning after the president used harsh language to bash Israel and Iran for continuing strikes despite a fragile ceasefire agreement. 📹 Watch— it's around the one-minute mark. Cuomo bested in NYC primary: Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) conceded to 33-year old New York State Assembly member Zohran Mamdani (D) on Tuesday night in the city's mayoral primary, delivering an absolute stunner. Nearly every poll consistently showed Cuomo in the lead, despite Mamdani closing the gap in several surveys. Cuomo also had a stacked list of Democratic endorsements, including former President Clinton and former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg. Meanwhile, Mamdani landed a few high-profile progressive endorsements — like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) — but was still considered an underdog against the New York powerhouse. Votes are still being tallied, but Cuomo didn't wait to concede, telling supporters 'tonight was Assemblyman Mamdani's night.' Why this matters: Democrats have struggled to find their footing while trying to repair their damaged image after the 2024 elections. Mamdani is a democratic socialist and ran as an anti-establishment Democrat. He called for free buses, free childcare, a rent freeze and tax increase on wealthy taxpayers. What to know about Mamdani His win is notable because progressives have had some big losses over the last year, including several high-profile progressives, like former Reps. Cory Bush (D-Mo.) and Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.) losing their primaries. 📝Five takeaways Related, via The New York Times: 'Why Ranked-Choice Voting Could Have a Pivotal Effect on the Mayor's Race' ➤ TIDBITS: 📹 Wow: Watch Former New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio (D) react to Cuomo's loss. He railed on Cuomo. 📹 Watch the clip There was an ~outlier~ poll predicting this outcome: The Economist's Mike Bird posted a screenshot of 'the single best poll for Zohran in the run-up to the election, discounted as a wild outlier at the time, undershot his actual first-round percentage of the vote by about eight percentage points.' The House and Senate are in. President Trump has left the Netherlands. (All times EST) This afternoon: Trump leaves the Netherlands and returns to Washington. 4:15 p.m.: Two Senate votes. 📆Today's agenda 4:15 p.m.: First and last House votes. 📆Today's agenda 🍓 Celebrate: Today is National Strawberry Parfait Day. 🥤 Tbh, the Dubai chocolate craze is not overhyped: Shake Shack is leaning into the craze over the combination of pistachio, toasted kataifi shredded phyllo and chocolate. It has created a shake with those flavors. 🎸 I would simply faint: Taylor Swift made a surprise appearance at a charity concert in Nashville. 📹 Watch Because you made it this far: If you aren't craving a mozzarella stick already, this record-breaking cheese pull will surely change that.

Fed's Powell repeats warning about tariffs as some GOP senators accuse him of bias
Fed's Powell repeats warning about tariffs as some GOP senators accuse him of bias

The Hill

time13 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Fed's Powell repeats warning about tariffs as some GOP senators accuse him of bias

WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said Wednesday that President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs will likely push up inflation in the coming months, even as some Republican senators suggested the chair was biased against the duties. On the second day of his twice-yearly testimony before the House and Senate, Powell said that consumers will likely have to shoulder some of the cost of the import taxes. Most Fed officials support cutting rates this year, Powell added, but the central bank wants to take time to see how inflation changes in the months ahead. 'There will be some inflation from tariffs coming,' Powell said under questioning from members of the Senate Banking Committee. 'Not yet, but over the course of the coming months.' Powell noted that the duties would likely cost hundreds of billions of dollars annually, and 'some of that is going to fall on the consumer. We're just kind of waiting to see more data on that.' Some GOP senators criticized Powell, however, for characterizing tariffs as a potential driver of inflation. Sen. Pete Ricketts, a Republican from Nebraska, argued that the duties could simply act as a one-time increase in prices that wouldn't fuel inflation. And Sen. Bernie Moreno, a Republican from Ohio, echoed some of Trump's complaints about Powell's reluctance to cut rates and accused Powell of political bias. 'You should consider whether you are looking at this through a fiscal lens or a political lens because you just don't like tariffs,' Moreno said. Powell didn't respond. But the Fed chair reiterated that most central bank officials do support cutting the Fed's key rate this year. And Powell added that it is possible that tariffs won't increase inflation by very much. Trump has sharply criticized Powell for not reducing borrowing costs, calling him a 'numbskull' and a 'fool.' Trump has pushed for rate cuts in order to reduce the interest costs the federal government pays on its debt. Yet some Fed officials have pushed back against that view, saying that it's not their job to lower the government's borrowing costs. So far, inflation has steadily cooled this year despite widespread concerns among economists about the impact of tariffs. The consumer price index ticked up just 0.1% from April to May, the government said last week, a sign that price pressures are muted. Compared with a year ago, consumer prices rose 2.4% in May, up from a yearly increase of 2.3% in April. Yet most economists on Wall Street expect that Trump's tariffs will lift inflation this year, to about 3% to 3.5% by the end of this year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store