Who is Ahmed al-Doush? Bank of America analyst gets 10-year prison Sentence in Saudi; here's why
Ahmed al-Doush, a father of four and senior business analyst at Bank of America, reportedly received a 10-year prison sentence in Saudi Arabia over a single, seven-year-old tweet.
According to the Times of London, the Saudi authorities declared a 2018 post on al-Doush's Twitter account a threat to national security, resulting in the severe punishment to the 41-year-old British national.
Speaking to the outlet, his wife Nour al-Doush said that her husband missed their 10-year wedding anniversary and the birth of their fourth child. 'How many more family milestones will he have to miss before the [UK government agencies] sit up and take action?' she asked.
The Mirror cited a second unproven Saudi government claim that al-Doush was in touch with a Saudi critic who was living in exile and whom his family believed was the father of one of his associates.
The Sudanese father was initially detained by the officers in August of last year at the King Khalid airport. They did not disclose any charges or the reason behind his detention to him or his then-pregnant wife, as per reports.
The family then returned to Manchester, but al-Doush was detained after being charged on Monday and then imprisoned in a maximum-security facility, according to the Times.
Also Read: Trump asks Saudi Crown Prince MBS 'How Do You Sleep at Night?' in bizarre speech, takes dig at Tim Cook
Al-Doush's attorneys contend that the protracted imprisonment without charge, the solitary confinement, and the questioning without a lawyer available were flagrant violations of his right to proper representation and a fair trial.
'The fact that it is still unclear what tweet forms the basis of the charge, even after conviction and even to the UK government, further demonstrates the fair trial violations,' Haydee Dijkstal, a lawyer based in the UK, told Times.
The attorney further said Saudi prison officials told al-Doush not to discuss the proceedings or his incarceration circumstances with his family.
The Times stated that the United Kingdom's Foreign Office has received an urgent request for intervention while it has not yet met with the al-Doush family.
Al-Doush never tweeted against Saudi Arabia, claimed his family, adding that he used to occasionally post about the political climate in his home country of Sudan, which they believe led to his detention.
British Foreign Minister David Lammy reportedly spoke with Prince Faisal bin Farhan bin Abdullah of Saudi Arabia about the situation, but Al-Doush's supporters say the steps are insufficient.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Amid White House Peace Push, Trump Calls Musk Mentally Gone; But Is Elon Even Listening?
New Delhi: Just a day after X (formerly Twitter) lit up with signs of a possible ceasefire between the two alpha billionaires of American influence, US President Donald Trump has poured cold water over any reconciliation talk. Asked by ABC News if he would speak to Musk after their very public clash, he scoffed, 'You mean the man who has lost his mind? I am not particularly interested in talking to him.' Classic Trump, doubling down even when the temperature seems to be cooling. There is an odd symmetry here. Musk, who had just hinted at making peace – replying 'You are not wrong' to billionaire investor Bill Ackman's call for the two to settle their feud for the sake of the nation – now finds himself ghosted by the very man he might have tried to reach out to. 'I am not even thinking about Elon. He has got a problem, the poor guy has got a problem,' Trump told CNN with dismissive finality during a June 6 interview. And while the White House reportedly flirted with the idea of brokering a peace call, as per Politico, other sources quickly knocked that down – saying no such call had been scheduled. So now, America's two most powerful disruptors remain locked in a bizarre standoff that is half-reality TV and half-national policy debate. This feud is not only personal, it is political and economic. It started when Trump lashed out during a White House appearance, accusing Musk of betrayal over criticism of his tax and spending bill. Musk hit back hard. He accused Trump's trade policies of potentially triggering a recession and even dragged the former president's links to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein into the public arena. Then came the bizarre twist – Trump, clearly furious, threatened to cancel U.S. government contracts with Tesla CEO Elon Musk's companies. In retaliation, Musk posted that he would 'retire' the Dragon spacecraft – a vehicle crucial to NASA. The internet melted down. But a few hours and likely a few backchannel calls later, Musk reversed course: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' In this verbal space race, it is hard to tell who is steering the ship and who is punching holes in the hull. Whether this ends in detente or total decoupling remains unclear, but what is certain is this – the Trump-Musk saga has become a defining narrative of America's political tech complex where egos, economics and electoral stakes collide like celestial bodies on a crash course.
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Peacemaker Or Patron Of Peril? Pakistan's Hollow Gratitude To Saudi Arabia Over India ‘Ceasefire' Reeks of Hypocrisy
New Delhi: In a political theatre draped in hypocrisy and delusion, Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's June 6 Eid pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia has revealed more than diplomatic pleasantries, it has exposed Islamabad's deeply flawed obsession with projecting itself as a peace-seeking nation, while covertly fuelling terror and instability across South Asia. While Indian security forces continue to grapple with Pakistan-backed cross-border terrorism, the latest being the April 22 deadly Pahalgam attack that killed 26 civilians, Sharif had the gall to thank Saudi Arabia for mediating 'peace' between India and Pakistan. Yes, the same Pakistan whose soil has birthed masterminds like Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar now pretends to be a sobered neighbour seeking dialogue. Shehbaz's post-Eid rendezvous with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman became a diplomatic masquerade. Pakistan's PM went as far as commending Riyadh's 'positive and constructive' role in de-escalating recent Indo-Pak tensions. But let us not forget: there was no ceasefire agreement because India needed mediation. It was a tactical decision from New Delhi, calibrated, controlled and backed by military superiority. India, unlike Pakistan, does not run to foreign patrons for a bailout every time tensions flare. It responds with surgical strikes, diplomatic isolations, or, most recently, tough measures like suspending the Indus Waters Treaty, choking Pakistan's already struggling agrarian economy. Islamabad calling it 'Indian aggression' is laughable. The real aggression has always flowed from Rawalpindi's GHQ, not Raisina Hill. Pakistan's Saudi Paradox It is ironic and almost insulting that Pakistan speaks of 'responsible restraint' while praising Saudi Arabia for 'peacemaking', even as ISI-trained militants infiltrate Indian borders. This charade seems more like Islamabad seeking validation for a narrative that has lost global credibility. India has made it clear – terror and talks cannot go together. When New Delhi responds, it does so with clarity, whether it is by revoking Article 370, neutralising terrorists with pinpoint military operations or weaponising diplomacy at global forums like the FATF, where Pakistan continues to oscillate on grey lists. Pakistan's efforts to internationalise every skirmish with India, now disguised under the veil of 'Saudi mediation', are nothing but attempts to cover up its diplomatic failures and domestic chaos. The recent Eid-ul-Adha trip, painted as a triumph, only further illustrated Pakistan's dependence on external crutches to remain relevant on the global stage. Meanwhile, India continues to handle its security and diplomacy with maturity. It does not need foreign intervention to speak for it. India's stance is firm: if Pakistan wants peace, it must first stop exporting terror. Can Saudi Arabia Play a Real Strategic Role? The honest answer is yes, but only if it chooses substance over symbolism. Riyadh holds leverage over Islamabad, not just diplomatically but economically, given the billions in aid and loans Saudi Arabia has extended to keep Pakistan afloat. If the Kingdom truly wishes to play a constructive role in South Asia, it should use that leverage to demand accountability from Pakistan's military and intelligence networks that perpetuate terrorism. It should push for genuine de-radicalisation, not lavish state banquets while terror training camps operate across the LOC. The Kingdom's credibility as a regional power hinges not on polite diplomacy, but on tough conversations behind closed doors. Enough of This Farce India sees the visit a bizarre gratitude Pakistan extended to Saudi Arabia over a supposed 'ceasefire' with New Delhi. There was no such peace deal, just India deciding when and how to engage. After all, why would the world's most populated democracy entertain a dialogue with a rogue state where democracy itself is a puppet of the military? Sharif may find joy in royal luncheons and chauffeured rides by the Saudi Crown Prince. But no amount of hospitality or photo-ops can erase Pakistan's record as the fountainhead of terrorism in South Asia. India does not need a peace certificate from a state that harbours fugitives and celebrates terrorists as martyrs. And if Saudi Arabia truly wants to play peacemaker, it should first urge Pakistan to dismantle its terror infrastructure. Until then, these symbolic gestures and orchestrated hugs in palaces will remain what they truly are – diplomatic illusions in a house of cards.
NDTV
3 hours ago
- NDTV
Turkmenistan Says 'Gateway To Hell' Fire, Raging For Over 50 Years, Tamed
Quick Read Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed. An enormous fire known as the 'Gateway to Hell' has burned in Turkmenistan for over 50 years. The Darvaza Gas Crater ignited in 1971 during a Soviet experiment to address methane leaks. Efforts to burn off methane led to the longest man-made fire in history, causing environmental damage. An enormous fire has been raging in Turkmenistan for more than 50 years and nobody has been able to tame it - yet. Known as the 'Gateway to Hell', the Darvaza Gas Crater is a massive gas well that got ignited back in 1971, when Soviet scientists tried to experiment with it. Back then, Turkmenistan was part of Soviet Union, and scientists were looking for a solution to the region's excessive methane problem. They traveled deep inside the Karakum desert and dug a gigantic hole to study the methane leaks emanating in the area. They accidentally drilled right into an underground gas field. Assuming that the fastest way to eradicate the methane leak problem was to burn it off, the scientists decided to ignite it. What followed next has become longest-ever continuously burning man-made fire in history. Though it fueled Turkmenistan's economy by becoming a tourist attraction, the 'Gateway to Hell' has caused severe environmental damage. Far from solving the methane problem, the blaze has been spewing out massive quantities of methane, a gas that contributes greatly to climate change. The current government in Turkmenistan took a pledge to do whatever it can to stop the huge blaze. This week, in a sudden announcement, they said that they have managed to significantly reduced the giant gas field fire "that has been raging for more than half a century". Officials said that the fire has been "reduced three-fold", but did not specify in what time frame. Speaking to news agency AFP, Irina Luryeva, a director at state-owned energy company Turkmengaz said, "Whereas before a huge glow from the blaze was visible from several kilometres away, hence the name 'Gateway to Hell', today only a faint source of combustion remains." "Numerous wells have been drilled around the fire to capture methane," she said at an environmental conference in Turkmenistan's capital Ashgabat on Thursday. Turkmenistan is one of the world's most closed countries and is estimated to have the world's fourth largest gas reserves. It is also the world's biggest emitter of methane through gas leaks, according to the International Energy Agency - a claim denied by the authorities. According to a report in British daily The Guardian, Methane leaks alone from Turkmenistan's two main fossil fuel fields causes more global heating a year than the entire carbon emissions of the UK.
