logo
Trump gives drugmakers 60 days to slash prescription drug prices

Trump gives drugmakers 60 days to slash prescription drug prices

NBC News7 days ago
President Donald Trump sent letters to more than a dozen major drugmakers Thursday demanding that they lower the cost of prescription drugs in the U.S. within 60 days.
In the letters — which Trump published on his social media platform Truth Social — the drugmakers were told to offer the 'full portfolio' of their existing medications to Medicaid patients at the same prices paid abroad, also known as the 'most favored nation' rule.
He also told drugmakers to 'guarantee' that patients on Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance get the same lower prices that are paid abroad for all newly approved drugs 'both upon launch and moving forward.'
He also demanded that drugmakers return any additional revenues earned abroad to U.S. taxpayers, and create a 'direct to consumer' option for certain medications that would also be offered at lower prices.
'Make no mistake: a collaborative effort towards achieving global pricing parity would be the most effective path for companies, the government, and American patients,' Trump wrote in the letters. 'But if you refuse to step up, we will deploy every tool in our arsenal to protect American families from continued abusive drug pricing practices.'
It's unclear, experts say, whether Trump has the authority to force drugmakers to lower the cost of their prescription drugs without the help of Congress.
What's more, any attempt to do so is likely to be met with fierce pushback from the drug industry.
'It may take more than a tough letter from the President to motivate the pharmaceutical industry to drop their prices,' said Tricia Neuman, executive director of the program on Medicare policy at KFF, a nonpartisan health policy research group.
'The voluntary approach hasn't worked so far to drive down drug prices,' she added. 'Drug prices tend to go down when compelled by law or in response to competition.'
Trump has repeatedly complained — during both terms — that people in the U.S. pay far more for prescription drugs than people in other countries.
Indeed, prescription drug prices in the United States are notoriously high — up to 10 times more than in other nations of similar size and wealth, according to the Rand Corp., a public policy think tank.
More than 3 in 4 adults in the U.S. say the cost of medications is unaffordable, according to a poll from KFF.
In May, Trump signed an executive order instructing federal health officials to renew an effort to implement the 'most favored nation' rule — a strategy he pursued unsuccessfully during his first term.
The 17 letters were sent Thursday to major drugmakers such as Eli Lilly, GSK, Pfizer, Merck, Johnson & Johnson, Amgen, Novo Nordisk and Novartis.
NBC News has reached out to all 17 companies for comment.
A spokesperson for Novo Nordisk said the company 'remains focused on improving patient access and affordability, and we will continue to work to find solutions that help people access the medication they need.'
A spokesperson for Johnson & Johnson said the company was still reviewing the letter, and referred NBC News to the pharmaceutical industry's top lobbying group, PhRMA, for comment.
PhRMA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The Trump administration does have another tool at its disposal to lower the cost of prescription drugs: Medicare drug pricing negotiations.
Signed into law by President Joe Biden through the Inflation Reduction Act, the provision allows Medicare to negotiate prices on the costliest medications.
The first round of negotiations is estimated to save Medicare $6 billion in 2026, when the prices are expected to go into effect.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Metals Gain as Chinese Trade Data Indicates Robust Demand
Metals Gain as Chinese Trade Data Indicates Robust Demand

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Metals Gain as Chinese Trade Data Indicates Robust Demand

(Bloomberg) -- All base metals advanced in London as data pointed to surprising strength in China's imports and exports — suggesting a healthy demand in the world's most important market for industrial commodities. All Hail the Humble Speed Hump Mayor Asked to Explain $1.4 Billion of Wasted Johannesburg Funds Three Deaths Reported as NYC Legionnaires' Outbreak Spreads Major Istanbul Projects Are Stalling as City Leaders Sit in Jail PATH Train Service Resumes After Fire at Jersey City Station Despite tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump, growth in shipments from China unexpectedly accelerated in July as suppliers turned to alternative markets. The total value of exports jumped 7.2% from a year earlier, beating economists' forecasts for 5.6% growth. China's manufacturers have increasingly leaned on exports to offset softer growth at home, a trend that helps sustain demand for commodities. Metals are widely used to make industrial products like air conditioners, cars and consumer goods that are sold abroad. Copper imports were also stronger-than-expected, said Zhou Xiao'ou, an analyst with Zijin Tianfeng Futures Co. Purchases of the unwrought metal and products reached 480,000 tons in June, the highest level this year. Russian shipments and cargoes from Chinese-owned mines in Africa may have replaced those rerouted to the US to beat the Trump administration's tariff deadline, she said. Aluminum on the London Metal Exchange gained for a third day, rising 0.6% to $2,625 a ton by 11:25 a.m. London time. Copper was up 0.4% and zinc increased 1%. --With assistance from Sarah Chen and Jack Ryan. Russia's Secret War and the Plot to Kill a German CEO The Pizza Oven Startup With a Plan to Own Every Piece of the Pie AI Flight Pricing Can Push Travelers to the Limit of Their Ability to Pay A High-Rise Push Is Helping Mumbai Squeeze in Pools, Gyms and Greenery Government Steps Up Campaign Against Business School Diversity ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Digital Weight Loss App Noom Undercuts Wegovy With Low-Price Offer
Digital Weight Loss App Noom Undercuts Wegovy With Low-Price Offer

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Digital Weight Loss App Noom Undercuts Wegovy With Low-Price Offer

Popular digital weight loss app,Noom (NOOM) undercuts Novo Nordisk's (NYSE:NVO) Wegovy by offering quarter-dose packs at $119 for the first month, aiming to broaden access to GLP-1 therapy. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 1 Warning Sign with NVO. Noom will then charge $199 monthly for the same 0.6 mg dose, versus Wegovy's standard 2.4 mg at over $1,300 per month. Its GLP-1Rx program adds compounded semaglutide up to 1.2 mg at $149 in month one and $279 thereafter. Noom also sells generic liraglutide alongside Eli Lilly's Zepbound (NYSE:LLY) at $349, creating a tiered pricing ladder to suit different budgets. Rival Hims and Hers Health (NYSE:HIMS) offers compounded semaglutide for $199 per month on a prepaid plan, putting pressure on Noom to prove its lower-price strategy can win share. Noom says the move cuts cost barriers and could drive a surge in its digital weight-loss subscriptions. Lower-tier pricing may fuel subscriber growth and recurring revenue in the $50 B obesity-treatment will watch Noom's Q2 earnings on Aug 23 for subscriber counts, margin trends and guidance. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

US lenders weighed reputation rules, not politics, in closing accounts, sources say
US lenders weighed reputation rules, not politics, in closing accounts, sources say

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US lenders weighed reputation rules, not politics, in closing accounts, sources say

By Nupur Anand and Saeed Azhar NEW YORK (Reuters) -Decisions by some major U.S. banks to close accounts were based on rules around reputational risk, people familiar with the matter said, pushing back on President Donald Trump's accusation that he and his conservative supporters were denied services for political reasons. Trump on Tuesday renewed his criticism of JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, saying they discriminated against him by refusing to accept hundreds of millions of dollars in deposits. While banks have been careful not to contradict the president directly and provoke his ire, two industry sources cited regulations under the former President Joe Biden's administration that forced them to weigh reputational risks as the reason lenders have dropped clients or avoided others. The sources declined to be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter. One bank was concerned about this issue when dealing with Trump because of his legal woes during the Biden administration, the first source said. Spokespeople for JPMorgan and Bank of America both said they do not consider political affiliations in banking decisions and welcomed Trump's efforts to change regulations. A source familiar with the matter said that JPMorgan continues to have a banking relationship with members of the Trump family and it also banks a number of campaign accounts linked to Trump. The White House did not immediately respond to a request seeking comment. BIDEN ERA RULES Under the Biden era, regulators who oversaw the banks would judge the lenders' compliance with the rules, which banks said were based on subjective judgments by government supervisors, the first industry source said. Banks were also concerned about whether regulators would punish them for providing services to individuals who faced legal proceedings, like Trump, the first and second sources said. The main U.S. bank regulators -- the Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency -- have all directed its supervisors this year to stop considering reputational risk when examining banks, a metric that had drawn industry complaints for being too subjective. "The heart of the problem is regulatory overreach and supervisory discretion," the Bank Policy Institute, an industry group, said in a statement. A looming executive order expected as early as this week would instruct regulators to review banks for "politicized or unlawful debanking" practices, according to a draft reviewed by Reuters. Banks also plan to use the current debate to push the government to clarify anti-money laundering laws and establish a clear federal standard on fair access to financial services, the third source said. NOT ISOLATED Trump's criticism echoed longstanding "debanking" complaints from Republicans, who have accused Wall Street banks of "woke capitalism," as well as denying services to gunmakers, fossil-fuel companies and others perceived to be aligned with the political right. Earlier this year, the Trump organization sued Capital One for closing 300 accounts related to the group. The closures came after thousands of Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. Capital One declined to comment beyond its earlier legal filings. Trump also drew headlines in January when he blasted banks for debanking at a gathering of business leaders in Davos, Switzerland. Paul Chesser, director, corporate integrity project at the conservative-leaning National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC), cited former Kansas Governor and Senator Sam Brownback as among the conservatives who were debanked by JPMorgan and other banks. Brownback wrote in the New York Post that JPMorgan had abruptly canceled his newly opened account for the National Committee for Religious Freedom in 2022. The JPMorgan spokesperson said the decision to close the accounts was not related to politics. "The Senator is fully aware why his accounts were closed," the spokesperson said, without elaborating on the reasons for the closure. Brownback told Reuters he had been given five different reasons by the bank for the account closure and was not certain what the final explanation was. NLPC has raised debanking concerns with BofA and JPMorgan through shareholder proposals, which were not included in the banks' proxies, Chesser said. Bank supervision by government regulators is a mostly confidential process that limits banks from explaining to clients why they are declined services. "Customers should not be in the dark about why they are being de-banked," said Chesser. "Nobody got any explanation. They're totally left in the dark. And that is probably the number one priority." Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store