
Palestine Action ban could 'undermine efforts to counter real terrorist organisations'
Scots trade unionists have warned a vote to proscribe Palestine Action could "undermine efforts to counter real terrorist organisations".
MPs voted by an overwhelming majority last night to ban the activist group after it broke into an RAF base in England and spray-painted several aircraft. Six people were later arrested after Palestine Action shared footage of the break-in on social media.
The group previously broke into a Thales defence factory in Glasgow in 2022, causing £1,130,783 in damages using pyrotechnics and smoke bombs.
The decision to ban Palestine Action, which amends the Terrorism Act 2000, is expected to be signed by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and come into effect later this week.
Once in effect, supporting Palestine Action will become a criminal offence, with membership or expressing support for the direct action group punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
But the decision has been questioned by the Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC).
Dave Moxham, STUC Deputy General Secretary, told the Record: "It is one thing to oppose the activities of Palestine Action using the courts if laws are broken, but completely another to proscribe it as a terrorist organisation.
"Last night's vote shifts the goal posts on the definition of terrorism. The Government is overreaching in a way that could have a profound impact on the rights of protest and freedom of expression. It also potentially undermines efforts to counter real terrorist organisations which advocate violence against the civilian population.'
The Aberdeen Trades Union Council also questioned the ban and called for other Scottish trade union members to speak up on the issue.
In a statement, it said: "Despite mass peaceful protest against the genocide in Gaza, the British State remains complicit in the erasure of the Palestinian people.
"We stand in support of Palestine Action – a direct action group that has been protesting against the supply of weapons by the UK government to the Israeli Military. Spraying paint and breaking windows is not terrorism. Israel's genocidal war is.
"We condemn government repression of the rights of protesters. As a movement we will do everything we can to defend civil disobedience and oppose Parliament's proscription of Palestine Action."
Anas Sarwar, the Scottish Labour leader, this week backed Cooper's decision to ban the group.
"I'm all for freedom of speech. I'm all for freedom of protest. And people have been expressing their views very strongly," he told the Record.
"But people who use the name of Palestine to cross a red line, to break into RAF facilities, to attempt to tamper with RAF jets, are doing a disservice to the cause they claim to represent.
"There are so many phenomenal pro-Palestinian organisations who do not fall for acts of vandalism, or attacks on our defence infrastructure, or who fall into prejudice and hate, but who rightly speak out against violence and for peace - not just peace abroad, but peace and security here at home too.
"Those people who use the name of Palestine to do such horrific actions should face the full force of the law. So I do support the actions of the Home Secretary."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

South Wales Argus
26 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Palestine Action ban would have free speech ‘chilling effect', appeal court told
Earlier on Friday Huda Ammori, the group's co-founder, unsuccessfully asked the High Court to temporarily block the Government from designating the group as a terrorist organisation, before a potential legal challenge against the decision to proscribe it under the Terrorism Act 2000. The move is to come into force at midnight after judge Mr Justice Chamberlain refused the bid for a temporary block, however lawyers for Ms Ammori took her case to the Court of Appeal on Friday evening. Proscribing the group under anti-terror laws would make membership of, or support for, the direct action group a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison (Lucy North/PA) In his decision refusing the temporary block, Mr Justice Chamberlain said: 'I have concluded that the harm which would ensue if interim relief is refused but the claim later succeeds is insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in maintaining the order in force.' Blinne Ni Ghralaigh KC, for Ms Ammori, said that the judge wrongly decided the balance between the interests of her client and the Home Office when deciding whether to make the temporary block. She said: 'The balance of convenience on the evidence before him, in our respectful submission, fell in favour of the claimant having regard to all of the evidence, including the chilling effect on free speech, the fact that people would be criminalised and criminalised as terrorists for engaging in protest that was not violent, for the simple fact that they were associated with Palestine Action. 'He had evidence before him of the evidence on possible employment rights and education rights and the right to liberty and he failed properly to determine that the balance of convenience fell in the claimant's favour.' She also told the Court of Appeal that Mr Justice Chamberlain 'failed properly to consider' that banning the group 'would cause irreparable harm'. Ms Ni Ghralaigh said: 'There was significant evidence before him to demonstrate the chilling effect of the order because it was insufficiently clear.' She continued that the ban would mean 'a vast number of individuals who wished to continue protesting would fall foul of the proscription regime due to its lack of clarity'. The barrister added: 'He failed to consider that the proscription regime was not necessary in a democratic society, because it wasn't proportionate to the aims sought, because there were alternative methods available to prevent the serious damage to property that was an issue.' Ben Watson KC, for the Home Office, told the Court of Appeal that Mr Justice Chamberlain gave a 'detailed and careful judgment' which was 'all the more impressive given the time constraints'. He added that the judge 'was entitled to reach the conclusion that he did'. The barrister said: 'The judge conducted a very careful analysis of all the matters he relied upon.' Mr Watson also said that the judge was 'alive' to the possible impacts of the ban, including the potential 'chilling effect' on free speech. 'There was no error by the judge in concluding that there was a serious question to be tried while at the same time acknowledging that he couldn't, on the material in front of him, say that it had strong prospects of success,' he added. The Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr, sitting with Lord Justice Lewis and Lord Justice Edis, said that they hoped to give a judgment on the appeal shortly after 10pm. Baroness Carr said: 'We will have a decision for you before midnight.'


Scottish Sun
29 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Top Scots civil servant now paid £180,000 moaned about long work days & joked about video game distraction
Newly unearthed texts sent during the pandemic also show the Scottish Government's new Permanent Secretary calling Boris Johnson 'irresponsible' MOAN-DARIN Top Scots civil servant now paid £180,000 moaned about long work days & joked about video game distraction Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A TOP civil servant now on a £180,000 salary was last night blasted for moaning about his long working days. Joe Griffin also joked to a colleague about being distracted from playing the video game Tetris. Sign up for the Politics newsletter Sign up 2 Joe Griffin with First Minister John Swinney 2 Griffin joked to a colleague about being distracted playing the classic video game Tetris Credit: Alamy Newly unearthed texts sent during the pandemic also show the Scottish Government's new Permanent Secretary calling Boris Johnson 'irresponsible'. The WhatApp messages were sent while Mr Griffin was £100,000-a-year Director of Safer Communities. They emerged a week after Scotland's highest-ranked mandarin provoked anger by ruling home-working staff should not automatically be disciplined if they refuse to return to offices at least two days a week. Scottish Tory MSP Murdo Fraser hit out: 'Scots who lost loved ones or saw their business go to the wall during the pandemic will have little sympathy for this senior official moaning about long days. 'Mr Griffin also has a duty to steer clear of criticising politicians or his neutrality will be called into question.' Chats from December 2020 obtained under freedom of information show his reply to an official who asked if a winter planning meeting was 'really needed'. He said cancellation 'probably wouldn't go down well', then added: 'We should be prepared to do that in future — not just sleepwalk into even longer days becoming standard. 'Today started with pre-cabinet call for Humza (Yousaf) at 8.30am, in part to brief on a paper 87 pages long issued at 10.30pm.' In a discussion about a meeting with John Swinney on November 17, 2020, another staffer was told by Mr Griffin they'd 'rudely interrupted my Tetris'. By January 2021, then Prime Minister Mr Johnson was 'optimistic' Covid restrictions would be loosened. Anas Sarwar promises to tackle Scotland's 'unfair' tax system Mr Griffin hit out that this 'shows you how irresponsible the PM's promises are'. Mr Griffin was appointed as Permanent Secretary formally on April 7. In 2021, he was appointed as Director General for Education and Justice before becoming the head of the External Affairs Division. A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Throughout the pandemic, the focus and intention of ministers, clinicians and officials was to protect people of Scotland from the harms of Covid-19, including providing advice and information about how to stay safe.'

Rhyl Journal
39 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Some consequences of Palestine Action ban ‘overstated', says High Court judge
Huda Ammori, the co-founder of Palestine Action, asked the High Court to temporarily block the Government from banning the group as a terrorist organisation, before a potential legal challenge against the decision to proscribe it under the Terrorism Act 2000. Judge Mr Justice Chamberlain refused to grant the temporary block, finding there was a 'strong public interest in maintaining the order in force'. Lawyers for Palestine Action will now make a last-minute bid at the Court of Appeal to challenge this decision, as the ban is expected to come into force at midnight. In a 26-page judgment, Mr Justice Chamberlain said that 'some of the consequences feared by the claimant and others who have given evidence are overstated' if the temporary block was refused, but a later challenge against the ban succeeded. He continued: 'It will remain lawful for the claimant and other persons who were members of Palestine Action prior to proscription to continue to express their opposition to Israel's actions in Gaza and elsewhere, including by drawing attention to what they regard as Israel's genocide and other serious violations of international law. 'They will remain legally entitled to do so in private conversations, in print, on social media and at protests.' He added: 'It follows that it is hyperbole to talk of the claimant or others being 'gagged' in this respect, as the claimant has alleged. 'They could not incur criminal liability based on their past association with a group which was not proscribed at the time. 'That said, there is no doubt that there will be serious consequences if the order comes into effect immediately and interim relief is refused.' The judge later said that if people choose to continue to express support for Palestine Action post-proscription, they may face criminal consequences, adding: 'This, however, is the intended effect of the order. It is how it achieves its aim of disrupting the activities of the proscribed organisation.' The proposal to ban the group was approved by both the House of Commons and the House of Lords earlier this week and would make membership and support for the direct action group a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Some 81 organisations are already proscribed under the 2000 Act, including Hamas, al Qaida and National Action. At the High Court hearing on Friday, Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, asked the court to suspend the 'ill-considered' and 'authoritarian abuse of statutory power' until a hearing in the wider legal challenge, due around July 21. The hearing later in July is expected to deal with whether Ms Ammori can bring a High Court challenge over the planned proscription. Ben Watson KC, for the Home Office, told the High Court there was an 'insuperable hurdle' in the bid to temporarily block the banning of the group, adding it could challenge the Home Secretary's decision at the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission, a specialist tribunal, rather than at the High Court. Following the High Court's decision on Friday, Ms Ammori said: 'The Home Secretary is rushing through the implementation of the proscription at midnight tonight despite the fact that our legal challenge is ongoing and that she has been completely unclear about how it will be enforced, leaving the public in the dark about their rights to free speech and expression after midnight tonight when this proscription comes into effect. 'Hundreds of thousands of people across the country have expressed support for Palestine Action by joining our mailing list, following and sharing our social media content and signing petitions, and many, including iconic figures like Sally Rooney, say they will continue to declare 'we are all Palestine Action' and speak out against this preposterous proscription, demonstrating how utterly unworkable it will be.'