Immaculately Preserved Funerary Statues Found in Pompeii
The statues were located in the necropolis of Porto Sarno, which was first discovered in 1998 when archaeologists came upon 50 cremation burial sites. Researchers believe the latest discoveries depict two real people of high social status who lived in Porto Sarno, rather than mythical gods. It's a notable glimpse into the society's power dynamics and its burial rituals.Archaeologists found the statues at the top of a huge mausoleum featuring and entry wall, at the top of which both statues had been installed. The statues are painstakingly detailed, with great time taken to evoke the people they depicted. Researchers say even the jewelry on their bodies and the folds of their clothing were represented by the statues.
'The two life-size figures are sculpted separately on two different tuff ashlars. However, the two reliefs are perfectly united, appearing to be a single sculpture,' lead author Llorenç Alapont and his fellow researchers wrote of their discoveries in a study published by the E-Journal of the Excavations of Pompeii. 'Both the bodies and heads of the well-to-do young married couple are shown frontally in high relief, proudly wanting to emphasize their status through the language of imagery.'
The female statue has a symbol carved into its midsection which archaeologists posit is indicative of her religious involvement within the community. some believe she may have been a priestess who represented the god Ceres. At the time, becoming a priestess was a desirable and attainable goal for many women.
'It is clear that there were priestesses of Ceres in Pompeii, but this statue provides new evidence of the importance of the cult in the city,' the study explained. 'In addition, the cult of Ceres has been linked to the popular classes. The ostentation of the female relief may suggest that the status of priestess was still reserved for women belonging to a relatively high social standing. These sculptures belong to a large class of funerary reliefs made between the first century BC and the first century AD,' the archaeological team explained. 'Nevertheless, these types of sculptures are very rare in southern Italy. It is even more unusual to find reliefs of priestesses holding their religious objects.'
The statues have been moved within the archaeological site to the Palaestra Grand, where scientists are hard at work restoring them. They will be displayed during this month's exhibition Being a Woman in Ancient Pompeii, which opens April 16.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scientific American
2 days ago
- Scientific American
Sam Kean's New Book Dinner with King Tut Explores the Wild World of Experimental Archaeology
Rachel Feltman: For Scientific American 's Science Quickly, I'm Rachel Feltman. Experimental archaeology takes a hands-on approach to understanding the past. Instead of just studying ancient objects researchers re-create them. They build 30-foot medieval catapults, perform ancient surgeries with stone tools and prepare authentic Roman banquets using techniques so traditional, not even your nonna would recognize them. The goal is to understand not just what our ancestors made but how they made it—and what it felt like to live in their world. Our guest today is Sam Kean, a science writer who's written seven books. His latest is called Dinner with King Tut, and it explores the world of experimental archaeology. He's tried his hand at everything from ancient brain surgery to mummifying a fish, and he's here to tell us all about it. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. Thanks so much for coming on to chat today. Sam Kean: Well, thanks for having me. Feltman: So what exactly is experimental archaeology, and how did you get interested in it? Kean: Experimental archaeology involves doing things—so making things, re-creating things from the past. And I got into it because I'd always had a bit of a gripe with archaeology, traditional dirt archaeology, in that I think it's a fascinating field; you learn so much about humankind and these big, meaty questions about us—you know, who we are, where we came from—these really important questions about deep human history. So I really like that aspect of traditional archaeology. But every time I would go to an archaeological site, I found it so boring [laughs] to be there. It was just a bunch of sunburned people sitting around with brushes and dental picks, picking out little pot shards from the dirt. It just seemed like the most unimaginable tedium possible. And so there was always this disconnect in my mind between the big, important, cool things archaeology wrestled with and the day-to-day work of the field. But experimental archaeology got me excited because again, they were doing things, they were making things: re-creating lost recipes, making ancient stone tools—everything from that up to, you know, people making giant catapults and boats and sending those off on the ocean. So it really got me excited 'cause you're much more active, and it's a very sensory-rich field, too. So I felt like it was a lot more immersive and it was more involved and kind of immersed in the past than you get from traditional archaeology. Feltman: Hmm, and for people who aren't familiar with the idea of experimental archaeology, what are some of the projects from recent years that stand out in your mind as particularly exciting, that our listeners might wanna go learn more about? Kean: Well, for the book I got to attend an authentic Roman banquet [laughs], which was pretty cool. I got to try my hand at ancient surgery and tattooing. There's a lot of food stuff out there; that's probably the best entrée for people wanting to get involved, is just try to make some ancient recipes—you know, some heirloom grains, things like that. I made a fish mummy at one point for the book, and that was surprisingly easy to do, so you can mummify a fish or, you know, another small animal, something like that. So there's a lot of cool things to do, and it kind of runs the gamut, again, from everyday things like food and tools all the way up to catapults and boats and people—making human mummies, even stuff like that. So there's really a range of activities. Feltman: Yeah, well, and I think even some folks who, you know, have maybe come across some of these projects, like people making perfume that smells like a mummy, might be surprised at how hands-on you were able to get in the book. Could you tell us some more about some of the things you were able to experience while you were researching? Kean: Yeah, so, like, the catapult I got to see was pretty amazing. This guy made a 30-foot tall, medieval—authentic medieval catapult. And we spent a day out—he built this in Utah—we spent a day out there in the mountains, throwing these giant garden stones around at this wall that he had built that was 250 yards away, and it was pretty magical being out there and getting to see this thing fire—being able to fire it myself, actually. So that stands out as something. That, that was probably the most fun thing I did for the book, was [laughs] seeing that giant catapult. Then there were some things, some days, that were really painful and awful. Like, the, the surgery that I mentioned that I did, it was a, a surgery called a trepanation, so you're removing a bit of the skull, essentially. And it's startling to think about, but this is one of the most ancient surgeries ... Feltman: Mm. Kean: That we know of. It's thousands and thousands of years old, and it involves, you know, kind of brain surgery, of all things. And we know that people survived it because we can see new bone growth around the rim of skulls that we found with holes in it, so we know that people survived this operation. And I tried it out not on a human, on a deer head, at a sort of a survivalist school, an experimental-archaeology school in Maine, and they made some stone tools for me, so I gotta try it, you know, pretty authentic. And the stone tools worked really well at first. You can get a really, really sharp edge on a stone tool, and obsidian even—it's a type of volcanic rock—you can get a sharper edge on that than even modern surgical-steel scalpels ... Feltman: Wow. Kean: They form a really, really sharp edge. The problem with stone tools is that they wear down quickly ... Feltman: Right. Kean: And so after I made the first, initial cut—I was removing a triangular-shaped piece—after I, I made the initial cut, the one leg of the triangle, it went really well for the first cut, but after that the stone tool got worn down, and after that it was just a war of attrition ... Feltman: Mm. Kean: Of me sort of grinding my way through this skull. I was just sitting there—there were flies biting me; it was hot. I was really upset and getting frustrated. But that was a good learning experience in and of itself, just to show you what something basic like medicine was like back then. And the emotions eventually became an important part of the process. Learning things like that, you know, you get frustrated, but it really stuck with me, and it made me appreciate just how difficult things were for our ancestors and made me appreciate the fact that they did all this work and we wouldn't be here if they hadn't. Feltman: Yeah, did those hands-on experiences change your perspective of the past in any other ways, beyond just appreciating how difficult things were? Kean: It made me appreciate how good some of the technology was. Feltman: Mm. Kean: I was surprised at how—yeah, that you can get stone tools that are very, very sharp, form a very nice edge. I think we have sort of a narrow view of technology nowadays. We think about electronic gizmos as technology; they're sort of synonymous, almost, in our minds. But they were really good about practical chemistry, everyday biology—you know, observing other creatures, observing plants, things like that. And I think we've lost some of that nowadays. So it did open my mind up and helped me appreciate the really nice technologies that people had in the past. Feltman: And you mentioned in the book that experimental archaeology is sometimes dismissed as kind of, like, a showy form of theater more than a science. What would you argue is the scientific value of sort of actively re-creating the past? Kean: There are some cases where we just don't have information about how people did things. So the best examples of that in the book are with Egyptian mummies and how they built the pyramids in Egypt. We just don't know how they did things, especially with the pyramids [laughs]; we have no idea how they did that, which is kind of embarrassing for archaeologists, that they don't know this, but we just don't have any information. So by running these experiments you can learn things and you can rule some things out. So I think it's valuable 'cause it can actively teach us things about the past. And I think by doing certain things, even something basic like making bread or beer or something like that, you start to ask more questions and different questions, and it teaches you aspects of the process that you would not have thought to ask about otherwise. And there were some cases in the book as well where—there was one instance with a chef and one instance with a, a hairdresser who got interested in Roman archaeology, and they read these papers by classicists, by historians, by archaeologists, and they, even within a few paragraphs, realized that [the authors] had no idea what they were talking about [laughs]: they didn't know how to cook properly; they didn't know how to style hair properly. And because [the chef and the hairdresser] had this outside expertise they could make a lot of progress. These people who didn't have the expertise were just theorizing without any real evidence or basis ... Feltman: Mm. Kean: For their conclusion. So it can help you avoid going down wrong paths, and in some cases it can answer questions or evoke questions that we just wouldn't ask otherwise. Feltman: Yeah, very cool, and I mean, I'm sure this really runs the gamut, but in your experience who are the people who are creating these experiments? You know, how are they getting interested in these questions? Kean: Yeah, it really does run the gamut. In some cases they are traditional professors or credentialed archaeologists who realize they couldn't answer the questions they wanted to if they didn't try some experiments out, so they just decided to try 'em out. And in some cases, I think, they wanted to connect with their area of study a little bit more. And again, it's such a sensory-rich field—you feel more immersed in the past when you do these kind of things—so it helped them have a deeper connection with their field. Then there are amateurs, people who just got obsessed [laughs] with some topic—and amateurs in the best sense of the word, in that they just loved the topic and wanted to learn all they could about it. They're not getting paid to do it, but they have a deep knowledge of the field, and they just decided to try something new and different. So they are a part of the field as well. And then another really important aspect is there's a lot of native and Indigenous communities who have either kept traditions alive or they're trying to revive traditions that got stamped out by colonialism, missionaries, whatever the case was. And in a lot of cases they're the ones going to the archaeologists and teaching them how things were based on either things they have kept alive or lore they might know. So all of those groups are kind of working together, and I think that's part of the fun of the field, is that you can get insights from a lot of different people in a lot of different places. So it was fun to meet all of 'em. Feltman: Did any of the experiments you participated in in the book change the way you do things in everyday life? Like, I don't know, for example, have you picked up some Roman culinary techniques [laughs] or anything of that nature? Kean: One thing it did do: I sort of view the world itself a little differently in that ... Feltman: Mm-hmm. Kean: Before I would walk down the street where I live in D.C., and there were a lot of trees in this neighborhood, but before to me it was just sort of this green canopy overhead; it was almost like decoration. And now I see it and I, I'm better about telling individual trees apart—you know, 'This is this type of tree. This is this type of tree.' And I also look at the trees differently because I can see them as, you know, a resource: the wood that they have—the acorns that they have are a food source. So I look at things like that differently, and—even, like, rocks on the ground, I can look at those and say, 'Oh, that'd be a good hammerstone for making tools,' or 'That's a good type of rock to make a tool with.' So I feel a little more connected in the sense that it's not just, again, decoration, it's more, you know, their resources, and I feel like I understand that aspect of nature better because of the experiences I had. Feltman: And is there anything that you really wanted to try that you, you weren't able to? Kean: I did get to do, in Micronesia, a little bit with navigation there. So I got to go out in a boat, and they taught me a few things about navigation. I would really love, at some point, to get way out into Polynesia, maybe, even and be on an authentic ship like they used thousands of years ago and just sort of set sail and, you know, head out for an island you can't see over the horizon and just navigate with all of the amazing tricks they knew about, you know, the stars but also looking at wave patterns, wind patterns, migration patterns of birds. So at some point I'd love to take a long ocean trip on one of those authentic ships. Feltman: Very cool. Well, thank you so much for coming on to talk about the book. I'm sure our listeners will love it, so this has been great. Kean: Well, thanks for having me. Feltman: That's all for today's episode. Don't forget to check out Dinner with King Tut for more on the wild world of experimental archaeology. We'll be back on Monday with our usual news roundup. Science Quickly is produced by me, Rachel Feltman, along with Fonda Mwangi, Kelso Harper and Jeff DelViscio. This episode was edited by Alex Sugiura. Shayna Posses and Aaron Shattuck fact-check our show. Our theme music was composed by Dominic Smith. Subscribe to Scientific American for more up-to-date and in-depth science news.
Business Upturn
4 days ago
- Business Upturn
Global High-Throughput Screening Market to Surpass USD 50.2 Billion by 2029
By GlobeNewswire Published on August 13, 2025, 05:30 IST Delray Beach, FL, Aug. 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — North America Leads Today, Asia Pacific to Record Fastest Growth The global high throughput screening market, valued at US$25.7 billion in 2023, stood at US$28.8 billion in 2024 and is projected to advance at a resilient CAGR of 11.8% from 2024 to 2029, culminating in a forecasted valuation of US$50.2 billion by the end of the period. This growth is propelled by surging R&D investments in drug discovery, strategic government funding, and the increasing adoption of automation in life sciences research. Download PDF Brochure: What Is Driving the Market Now? HTS adoption is accelerating due to innovations in automation, miniaturization, and high-content screening, which significantly reduce discovery timelines and enhance precision in identifying therapeutic candidates. Grants such as the USD 7.8 million awarded to the University of Pittsburgh for advanced drug discovery systems underscore growing institutional and government commitment to high-impact research. Why Does This Matter for Global Pharma and Biotech Leaders? The market represents a critical enabler for competitive advantage in lead discovery, target validation, compound profiling, and hit identification—processes essential for pipeline acceleration. While high instrument costs remain a barrier, particularly for automated liquid handling and high-resolution imaging systems, emerging markets such as China and India offer lucrative opportunities with strong government support and an expanding pharmaceutical manufacturing base. Who Are the Key Stakeholders? The HTS ecosystem spans pharmaceutical giants, biotechnology innovators, academic institutions, and technology providers, all collaborating to enhance assay development and manage the rising complexity of biological data. The consumables segment—driven by recurring purchases of reagents and kits—dominates the market, ensuring steady demand as HTS workflows expand globally. Request Sample Pages: Where Is Growth Coming From? North America currently leads, fueled by advanced HTS infrastructure, robust funding for life science research, and a thriving biotech sector. Asia Pacific is projected to be the fastest-growing region, supported by a diverse patient base, strong pharmaceutical capabilities, and favorable regulatory environments. How Are Market Leaders Responding? Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. maintains global leadership through an extensive portfolio of automated systems, screening instruments, and consumables, underpinned by 3% annual R&D investment and strategic alliances. Agilent Technologies, Inc. offers highly customizable workflows via BioTek detection instruments and Gen6 software, strengthened by acquisitions such as e-MSion (US) to enhance mass spectrometry capabilities. Merck KGaA delivers a diverse portfolio of reagents, instruments, software, and services, leveraging global reach and deep customer relationships across pharma, academia, and government sectors. Market Outlook As automation, AI-driven data analysis, and advanced assay development converge, HTS will remain at the forefront of pharmaceutical innovation. Decision-makers who strategically invest in HTS capabilities today will be best positioned to accelerate therapeutic pipelines, capture market share, and deliver faster, more targeted treatments to market. For more information, Inquire Now Discover Connected Healthcare Market Opportunities: Drug Screening Market Carrier Screening Market Cell based Assays Market Label Free Detection Market Life Science Instrumentation Market Get access to the latest updates on High-Throughput Screening Companies and High-Throughput Screening Market Size Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash GlobeNewswire provides press release distribution services globally, with substantial operations in North America and Europe.
Gizmodo
08-08-2025
- Gizmodo
After Mount Vesuvius Demolished Pompeii, People Returned to Live Among the Ruins
In 79 CE, Mount Vesuvius erupted in what would become one of humanity's most infamous ancient tragedies. Tens of centuries later, archaeologists eagerly dug through the ash and pumice to rediscover the buried Roman cities of Pompeii and Herculaneum in all their preserved glory. In their eagerness, however, they may have missed an important layer of history. While working in the Insula meridionalis—the southern quarter of Pompeii's ancient urban center—archaeologists uncovered evidence confirming the hypothesis that, after 79 CE, people returned to live among Pompeii's ruins for hundreds of years. The team's findings, which they describe in a study published this week in Pompeii's excavation's E-Journal, shed light on events that have long lived in the shadow of better-studied history. 'The epochal episode of the destruction of the city in 79 AD has monopolized memory,' Gabriel Zuchtriegel, director general of Pompeii's archaeological park and co-author of the study, said in a park statement. 'In the enthusiasm of reaching the levels of '79, with wonderfully preserved frescoes and still-intact furnishings, the faint traces of the site's reoccupation were literally removed and often swept away without any documentation.' Not all survivors of that terrible day would have had the means to start over somewhere else. According to the researchers, this could explain why some may have returned to the destroyed city, whose upper levels were still visible above the ashes. Soon enough, vegetation would have also grown back. The returning former residents may have also been joined by other people 'with nothing to lose,' according to the statement. After all, there were riches to be found among the ashes and victims' bodies. As such, life returned to Pompeii. People lived among the ruins of the buildings' upper floors, using the former ground floors as cellars and caves to set up fireplaces, ovens, and mills. Archaeological evidence suggests that the new community was likely a precarious settlement without the usual ancient Roman infrastructure and services. Nonetheless, the settlement lasted until the 5th century CE. Another devastating volcanic eruption may have played a role in the city's final abandonment. 'Thanks to the new excavations, the picture is now clearer: post-79 Pompeii re-emerges,' Zuchtriegel explains. 'Instead of a city, [it's] a precarious and grey agglomeration, a kind of camp, a favela among the still-recognizable ruins of the Pompeii of old.' Footprints Reveal Ancient Escape From Vesuvius—1,800 Years Before Pompeii's Destruction Emperor Tito had actually tasked two ex-consuls with promoting the re-founding of Pompeii and Herculaneum. Needless to say, the mission was a failure. 'In these cases, we archaeologists feel like psychologists of memory buried in the earth: we bring out the parts removed from history,' concluded Zuchtriegel. 'This phenomenon should lead us to a broader reflection on the archaeological unconscious, on everything that is removed or obliterated or remains hidden, in the shadow of other apparently more important things.'
