
Democratic Support for Expanding Border Wall Surges by Double Digits: Poll
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Democrats' support for a southern border remains minimal compared to Republicans, though the percentage of left-leaning Americans who support expansion of a wall between the United States and Mexico has increased double digits in the past six years, according to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center.
Why It Matters
Border crossings have drastically decreased under the current administration of President Donald Trump, fulfilling one of his major campaign promises to prevent illegal immigrants from entering the country. Trump's mass deportation efforts, which have included immigrant raids criticized by portions of the American public, have extended into other federal policies including more severe travel bans and visa restrictions.
What To Know
A 56 percent majority of Americans now favor expanding the wall along the U.S. border with Mexico, up from 46 percent in 2019, according to a survey of 5,044 people conducted from June 2 to June 8 by the Pew Research Center.
While Republican support for a border wall remains high, with roughly 88 percent supporting wall expansion, Democratic support for expansion has increased to 27 percent—up from 14 percent in 2019.
Migrants turn themselves in to U.S. Customs and Border Patrol officers after crossing over a section of border wall into the U.S. on January 5 in Ruby, Arizona.
Migrants turn themselves in to U.S. Customs and Border Patrol officers after crossing over a section of border wall into the U.S. on January 5 in Ruby, Arizona.In total, 42 percent approve and 47 disapprove of the Trump administration's overall approach to immigration. Divisions in views on immigration shift based on partisanship.
About 78 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents approve of the administration's approach to immigration, including 51 percent who strongly approve. Just 12 percent disapprove.
Democratic antipathy toward the Trump administration's policies are more striking, with 81 percent of Democrats and Democratic leaners disapproving. Among them, 53 percent strongly disapprove. About 9 percent approve.
Respondents also said that current policies will cost taxpayers more money (53 percent) rather than save money (29 percent). A majority also said that these policies will make the U.S. economy weaker (46 percent) instead of stronger (34 percent).
Just about two in 10 (19 percent) said immigration policies won't have much of an economic impact either way.
Terrell County, Texas, Sheriff Thad Cleveland told Newsweek on Tuesday that his community near the southern border had a little activity in March and April, but May and June have been "really slow."
He said there's also a Department of Defense presence.
"I attribute the decrease to Trump's voice on the issue and additional support brought to the border," Cleveland said. "During the Biden administration I often said it would take a president with a strong voice letting the world know you can't come to America, [it] would have the biggest impact for illegal entries.
"I still think we, Terrell County, will see an increase as other portions of the border continue to see resources."
Cleveland does wonder how long the policies and resources will be sustained, saying that eventually "something has to give." He's looking to lawmakers and not Trump for long-term answers.
"President Trump has done his part, now Congress must do their part and pass legislation to continue to add technology, infrastructure and manpower, as well as ensuring a future president can't come in and open the borders as was done the previous four years," the sheriff said.
Following the heightened period of the COVID-19 pandemic, border crossings under former President Joe Biden surged from the end of 2021 through early 2024, hitting a peak of 370,883 in December 2023.
The Pew survey also shows that Hispanic (83 percent) and Black (78 percent) adults are more likely than Asian (63 percent) and white (58 percent) adults to say that undocumented immigrants should be able to stay if they meet certain requirements.
Overall, 38 percent of white adults and 30 percent of Asian adults said there should be a national effort to deport immigrants illegally in the country. In contrast, 17 percent of Black adults and 14 percent of Hispanic adults shared that sentiment.
What People Are Saying
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in its announcement Monday about a new app for legal border crossings: "Those who use the CBP Home mobile app to self-deport receive cost-free travel, forgiveness of any civil fines or penalties for failing to depart the United States, and a $1,000 exit bonus, paid after their return is confirmed through the app. If they already submitted their intent to depart using previous versions of CBP Home, they will not need to resubmit."
What Happens Next
The Trump administration's immigration efforts have received praise from none other than immigrants in the U.S. Immigrant voters, who favored Democrats by 32 points on immigration policy in 2020, now trust Republicans more on the issue by 8 points—a seismic 40-point swing in four years, according to an analysis of the American National Election Studies (ANES) by CNN's Harry Enten.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures fall amid uncertainty over whether US will join Israel's attack on Iran
US stock futures fell as investors braced for ongoing Israel-Iran hostilities that could draw in the US, along with the Federal Reserve's upcoming interest rate decision. Futures attached to the Dow Jones Industrial Average (YM=F), the benchmark S&P 500 (ES=F), and the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 (NQ=F) slipped 0.3%. President Trump met with his national security team on Tuesday to discuss Israel and Iran, raising speculation that the US could join Israel's attack. The White House did not provide any details on the meeting, and the president spoke with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu afterward. Iran has reportedly readied missiles for strikes on US bases in the event the US takes action. Stocks fell during the day on Tuesday and oil jumped as Trump appeared to more directly align with Israel's aims in Iran, saying "our patience is wearing thin" and calling for "unconditional surrender" from Iran. Reports also circulated ahead of his national security meeting that the president is seriously considering joining Israel's strikes. The developments marked a dramatic shift from the day before, when Iran said that it wanted to reach a ceasefire and return to the negotiating table on its nuclear program. Read more: The latest on Trump's tariffs Prior to Israel's opening salvo on Iran Friday, Wall Street anticipated the Fed's next interest rate announcement would dominate market news this week. The central bank is due to reveal its decision on Wednesday at 2 p.m. ET, and analysts expect policymakers to hold rates steady. The Fed's "dot plot" and Fed Chair Jerome Powell's comments at a 2:30pm ET press conference will be in high focus as investors seek clues as to whether two rate cuts are still on the table this year. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Christina Bohannon announces 3rd run for Iowa's 1st Congressional District
Democrat Christina Bohannan announced her third consecutive run for Iowa's 1st Congressional District in the 2024 race between Bohannan and Congresswoman Mariannette Miller-Meeks. Miller-Meeks won by a less than one percent margin. Bohannan says she plans to run on a campaign of focusing on people in the district instead of political parties and Washington D.C. 'I didn't know whether I would run again, but I have been getting hundreds of calls, emails, texts and good old fashioned letters in the mail from people really strongly encouraging me to run again,' Bohannon told Our Quad Cities News. 'You know, they met me during the course of the campaign. I spent the better part of the last four years I traveled to every corner of the district and talking to people.' As of right now, two other Democrats Bob Kraus and Travis Terrell are also in the race for the seat. In response to Bohannan's announcement, a spokesperson for the National Republican Congressional Committee said in part, 'There's no doubt whoever comes out of this liberal rat race will be sent send packing when Iowans re-elect America First fighter Mariannette Miller-Meeks next fall.' Iowa GOP Chairman Jeff Kaufmann also responded, saying in part, 'Two-time loser Christina Bohannan is back, trying for strike three in a crowded primary where even her own party knows she can't win.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


New York Times
13 minutes ago
- New York Times
Federal Judge Certifies Class Action for Transgender People Seeking Passports
A federal judge in Boston granted class-action status to transgender and nonbinary Americans on Tuesday in a lawsuit challenging a U.S. State Department policy that requires passports to reflect only the holder's sex recorded on their original birth certificate. The order extends a preliminary injunction blocking the State Department from enforcing the policy against six plaintiffs to apply to all class members who apply for or update passports while the case proceeds. In the earlier order from April, U.S. District Judge Julia E. Kobick concluded that the passport policy likely violates the Fifth Amendment's equal protection guarantee because it discriminates based on sex and is 'rooted in irrational prejudice toward transgender Americans.' The State Department filed an appeal of the preliminary injunction last week. The government maintains that it has a strong interest in passports that accurately reflect the holder's sex. The State Department adopted the new policy earlier this year to comply with an executive order from President Trump directing all government agencies to limit official recognition of transgender identity and mandating that federal documents reflect what it termed the 'immutable biological classification as either male or female.' In court documents, plaintiffs argued that a mismatch between the sex listed on their passport and their gender identity puts them at risk of suspicion and hostility that other Americans do not face. During the first weeks of Mr. Trump's administration, several plaintiffs received passports with an 'F' or 'M' marker contrary to the one they had requested. Another learned that selecting an 'X' marker, indicating a nonbinary gender identity, was no longer an option, though it had been allowed since 2022. The government argued against certifying trans and nonbinary passport holders as a legal class in the case, contending that gender identity is subjective and that a class-wide injunction would create an undue administrative burden. Judge Kobick, who was nominated by former President Joseph R. Biden Jr., found that those claims did not outweigh significant harm faced by transgender and nonbinary passport holders. She noted that plaintiffs in the case had described being forced to 'effectively 'out' themselves every time they presented their passports,' leading to anxiety and fear safety fears. 'These are the types of injuries that cannot adequately be measured or compensated by money damages or a later-issued remedy,'' she wrote.