logo
RCA ad hoc panel clash intensifies over Bihani's leadership

RCA ad hoc panel clash intensifies over Bihani's leadership

Time of India20-05-2025

Jaipur: Internal conflict within the
(RCA) ad hoc committee has escalated. Four of the six committee members convened a meeting at RCA Academy here on Monday, criticising committee convenor and BJP MLA
, accusing him of autocratic leadership in cricket administration.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The meeting, initiated by committee member Dhananjai Singh Khimsar, was attended by fellow members
, Ratan Singh and Harish Chandra Singh. The group alleged that he has not convened a single meeting in the past two months and is using RCA for political gain.
"Bihani has turned the committee into a den of politics, sidelining its purpose of promoting cricket," Khimsar stated.
Dharamveer Singh further alleged that Bihani made baseless match-fixing accusations against Rajasthan Royals, which the committee opposed.
In response, Bihani reportedly issued notices to district cricket associations aligned with the ad hoc committee, a move described as 'malicious' by Dharamveer, who is the secretary of Pali District Cricket Association (DCA).
The dissenting members expressed concerns over the convenor's 'unilateral decision-making', claiming it undermined the committee's collective responsibility and violated the principles of transparency and accountability.
Sources close to the RCA indicate that the discord stems from ongoing power struggles and differing visions for the association's future, particularly as it navigates a transitional phase following administrative upheaval.
The four members have called for an immediate review of the convenor's actions.
In response, Bihani, who serves as the treasurer of the Sri Ganganagar DCA, has called for a separate meeting at KL Saini Stadium on May 25.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Meanwhile, secretary of Sri Ganganagar DCA Vinod Saharan has come out in support of Bihani. Saharan labeled committee member Dharamveer a 'Congress agent'.
He accused Dharamveer and others of undermining the sport for political motives.
Later in the evening, convenor Bihani disaffiliated Pali DCA from RCA.
The Pali DCA has vowed to challenge this decision, citing it as further evidence of Bihani's overreach and vindictive approach.
"Bihani has no power to disaffiliate any district," Dharamveer added.
Pictures of Pak players removed: RCA removed photos of Pakistani cricketers, including Danish Kaneria, from its academy. The ad-hoc committee, prioritising national sentiment, acted amid media scrutiny, while retaining group photos featuring Pakistani players alongside other international captains.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why the US must stop playing snake charmer to Pakistan
Why the US must stop playing snake charmer to Pakistan

First Post

time40 minutes ago

  • First Post

Why the US must stop playing snake charmer to Pakistan

Washington must finally walk away from the fantasy that Pakistan can be charmed, coaxed, or reasoned with. It is not an ally. It is a state that uses terrorism as a tool of foreign policy read more Pakistan, the so-called front-line ally in the US-led Global War on Terror, never laid down its fangs. It played both sides. Representational image: REUTERS For two decades, Washington has acted as the dutiful snake charmer—flute in hand, eyes fixed on a writhing cobra, pretending that if the music continues, the serpent will stay docile. But the charade has gone on too long. Pakistan, the so-called front-line ally in the US-led Global War on Terror, never laid down its fangs. It played both sides. It gave shelter to Osama bin Laden. It protected the Taliban. It nourished Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT)—a group originally built with the support of Osama bin Laden and Abdullah Azzam—under the pretext of strategic necessity. And all the while, it looked Washington in the eye and called itself a partner in peace. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This was not a strategic misstep—it was a betrayal with global consequences. Nowhere is this duplicity more evident than in Pakistan's handling of Lashkar-e-Taiba. The group responsible for the 2008 Mumbai attacks was not just a regional irritant. It was, and remains, a transnational jihadist organisation forged in the crucible of the Afghan war, funded and armed with the blessing of al-Qaeda's founding fathers. Today, LeT operates in plain sight, under new banners like Jamaat-ud-Dawa and Falah-e-Insaniat, with its top leadership given state protection and its charity wings treated as legitimate civil society actors. When India dropped bombs on Muridke, the headquarters of Lashkar, Pakistani police and military figures attended the funerals. What has the US done in response? Token sanctions. Tactical warnings. And continued aid. The contrast with how the US treated the United Kingdom during the HSBC scandal is telling—and damning. After it was discovered that HSBC had allowed money laundering tied to terrorist groups and drug cartels, Washington didn't hesitate. It sent FBI agents across the Atlantic. It dictated terms. It made the UK's Serious Fraud Office (SFO) toe the line. Lisa Osofsky, a former FBI counsel, was catapulted to the top of the SFO after impressing British officials during that very compliance campaign. America treated its closest ally with no ambiguity. It demanded results—and it got them. Why wasn't Pakistan treated the same way? The HSBC scandal was not some isolated banking mishap. It was intrinsically linked to what the Americans found in the aftermath of the Abbottabad raid. Osama bin Laden was not living in isolation. He was in contact with operatives tied to British-registered charities operating in Pakistan. This wasn't conjecture—it was evidence-based. The financial trails exposed during the HSBC investigation led straight back to the same ecosystem that allowed bin Laden to flourish in Pakistan for years. Yet somehow, the same rigour, the same accountability, and the same coercive diplomacy never made their way to Islamabad. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD At the centre of exposing this global scandal stood Senator Carl Levin—a rare voice of moral clarity in a landscape increasingly defined by compromise and cognitive dissonance. As chair of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Levin oversaw a 2012 report that accused HSBC of facilitating money laundering for drug cartels, sanctioned regimes, and terrorist organisations. One of his most damning findings was that HSBC's affiliates in Pakistan and the Gulf were funnelling money linked to organisations with ties to al-Qaeda and Lashkar-e-Taiba. HSBC wasn't just sloppy. It had actively circumvented anti-money laundering rules. It stripped identifying data from transactions. It ignored internal compliance warnings. It operated correspondent banking relationships with entities flagged by intelligence agencies. And when caught, it escaped criminal prosecution with a $1.9 billion deferred prosecution agreement—a punishment Levin rightly condemned as toothless. Levin understood what the US intelligence community, the State Department, and Wall Street preferred to ignore: the War on Terror was being lost not just in Kabul or Benghazi but in boardrooms and compliance departments. He warned that allowing banks to operate above the law sent a 'terrible message'—and he was right. Despite the gravity of his findings, no HSBC executive went to prison. The institution was declared too big to fail. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This indulgence has continued—both financially and diplomatically. Pakistan's military was allowed to stage a theatre of indignation over the Abbottabad raid. No senior figure in the ISI was arrested. No structural reform followed. Hafiz Saeed made more public appearances than Pakistan made actual arrests. And the so-called civilian leadership continued to play the role of hapless spectators—when in reality, they were co-authors of the script. Even more troubling is how this pattern has now crept into Washington's Indo-Pacific calculations. Many Indians had hoped that their growing partnership with the United States—especially under the Quad framework—would translate into a more principled stance on terrorism and national security. Yet Donald Trump's behaviour during Operation Sindoor has left a bitter taste. At a moment of national trauma, when Indian forces were routing terror infrastructure across the Line of Control, Trump chose to turn the crisis into a bargaining chip. He offered mediation. He floated backroom deals. He played the crisis for leverage with both sides. The result? Indian policymakers and citizens alike feel short-changed. The promise of shared values has been replaced by transactional manoeuvring. Washington cannot credibly claim to support India against terrorism while giving oxygen to the very state that engineers cross-border attacks. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The fear that pushing Pakistan too hard will destabilise a nuclear power or drive it into China's arms is no longer valid. Pakistan is already in China's grip—politically, economically, and militarily. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is not a development project—it's a dependency pact. Beijing holds the leash. Washington should stop pretending it holds influence in Islamabad when the decisions are being made in Rawalpindi and approved by Beijing. Washington must finally walk away from the fantasy that Pakistan can be charmed, coaxed, or reasoned with. It is not an ally. It is a state that uses terrorism as a tool of foreign policy. A state that shields the architects of global jihad. A state that has lied, manipulated, and deflected while its own people suffer under the boot of military rule and its neighbours burn from the flames of its proxy wars. It is time for the US to abandon the role of the snake charmer. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Let the serpent face the consequences of its own venom. The author is a strategist in international relations and economic development. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.

Court to hear Tahawwur Rana's 26/11 plea for family contact on 9 June
Court to hear Tahawwur Rana's 26/11 plea for family contact on 9 June

Business Standard

time43 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Court to hear Tahawwur Rana's 26/11 plea for family contact on 9 June

Tahawwur Rana, accused in the 26/11 Mumbai attacks case and extradited from the US, seeks court approval to communicate with family while in judicial custody New Delhi A Delhi court is scheduled to hear on June 9 a plea filed by Tahawwur Hussain Rana, accused in the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks case, seeking permission to communicate with his family members. Rana, a 64-year-old Canadian national of Pakistani origin, is currently in judicial custody following his extradition from the United States. He is alleged to have conspired with David Coleman Headley alias Daood Gilani, a US citizen and key conspirator in the attacks, along with operatives of Lashkar-e-Taiba, Harkat-ul-Jihadi Islami, and other Pakistan-based individuals. Rana was brought to India after the US Supreme Court on April 4 dismissed his plea challenging the extradition. On Wednesday, Special Judge Chander Jit Singh took on record the reply submitted by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) and directed the jail authorities to file their response. The court also permitted Tihar Jail officials to respond based on the NIA's submission. Details of 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks The 26/11 attacks were carried out by 10 armed men from Pakistan who entered Mumbai via the sea route on November 26, 2008. The attackers targeted several locations, including a railway station, two hotels, and a Jewish Chabad house, resulting in 166 deaths over a nearly 60-hour-long siege. Only one of the attackers, Ajmal Kasab, was captured alive. He was executed on November 21, 2012, after exhausting all legal remedies. Legal representation and court proceedings Senior advocate Dayan Krishnan and Special Public Prosecutor Narender Mann are representing the NIA in the case.

Espionage case: Youtuber Jasbir Singh sent to 3 days Police custodyy
Espionage case: Youtuber Jasbir Singh sent to 3 days Police custodyy

India Gazette

timean hour ago

  • India Gazette

Espionage case: Youtuber Jasbir Singh sent to 3 days Police custodyy

Mohali (Punjab) [India], June 4 (ANI): A court in Mohali sent YouTuber Jasbir Singh, who has been found associated with a Pakistani espionage network, to 3-day Police custody on Wednesday, said State Special Operations Cell (SSOC) DSP Pawan Sharma. Jasbir Singh, who operates a YouTube channel called 'Jaan Mahal,' has been found associated with PIO Shakir alias Jutt Randhawa, part of a terror-backed espionage network. He also maintained close contact with Haryana-based YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra (arrested for spying) and Ehsan-ur-Rahim alias Danish, a Pakistani national and expelled Pak High Commission official. 'Singh, a resident of Village Mahlan, Rupnagar, who operates a YouTube channel called 'Jaan Mahal', has been found associated with PIO Shakir, alias Jutt Randhawa, part of a terror-backed espionage network,' DGP Punjab Police said. 'He also maintained close contact with Haryana-based YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra, who was earlier arrested for alleged spying and Ehsan-ur-Rahim alias Danish, a Pakistani national and expelled Pak High Commission official,' the DGP Punjab Police added. 'Investigations have revealed that Jasbir attended the Pakistan National Day event in Delhi on Danish's invitation, where he met Pakistani Army officials and vloggers. He travelled to Pakistan on three occasions (2020, 2021, 2024), and his electronic devices contained multiple Pakistan-based numbers, now under detailed forensic scrutiny,' the police said in a post on X. After Jyoti Malhotra's arrest, Jasbir attempted to erase all traces of his communications with these PIOs to avoid detection. An FIR has been registered at SSOC, Mohali. Notably, on May 26, the court sent Jyoti to judicial custody for fourteen days. The YouTuber was arrested for allegedly sharing sensitive information and being in continuous contact with a Pakistani citizen. She allegedly met a Pakistani officer, Ahsan-ur-Rahim, in Delhi, travelled to Pakistan twice, and shared sensitive information. During the preliminary investigation, the woman told the police that she went to the Pakistan High Commission in Delhi in 2023 to apply for a visa and met a man named Ahsan-ur-Rahim, alias Danish. Following her arrest, Inspector General of Police (IGP) CID Crime Branch, Sarthak Sarangi, said that facts are being verified. 'We have just received information that YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra visited Puri's Jagannath temple and posted a video regarding it on Instagram. She also visited Chilika and Konark. She was in touch with a YouTuber from Odisha. We are verifying all the facts. We are in touch with our counterparts in Haryana regarding Jyoti Malhotra,' the police official said. (ANI)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store