‘Star Wars' From Darth Maul's Perspective Sounds Fascinating
When Obi-Wan Kenobi cut Darth Maul in half over 25 years ago, most of us thought that was it. Maul was clearly one of the coolest and most interesting Star Wars characters ever, but George Lucas chose to kill him. However, as fate would have it, the character has now come back time and time again, in large part due to Lucas's protégé Dave Filoni, and soon, we're gonna get way more of him than we ever thought possible.
Maul: Shadow Lord, a new animated series, was announced at Star Wars Celebration Japan last month and it'll bring the former Sith Lord back to the forefront in a big, big way. Speaking with fellow Star Wars star Katee Sackhoff, voice of Maul Sam Witwer revealed a few broad clues about what we can expect from the show, including how Maul perceives the plan formulated by his former master, Darth Sidious.
'This is a guy who knew that the Empire was coming, and he was part of that,' Witwer said on The Sackhoff Show. 'He was supposed to be part of the Clone Wars. He was supposed to work with his master, and they were going to bring about the destruction of the Republic and the destruction of his hated enemy, the Jedi Order. He was raised to hate them. He trained his whole life to destroy them. Well, now we have a show where, OK, all of that was done, but Maul, yeah, you killed a bunch of Jedi during the Clone Wars, but you did not work with Sidious. You didn't know the whole plan. And in fact, you got so scared about his plan that you tried to stop it at the last second.'
'Now the Empire's here, which Maul would have known that that was his master's intent,' he continues. 'But now that he's seeing it, he's like, 'Is this what he had in mind? Because this isn't what I thought it would be…' Maul comes from a time of swords and sorcery and magic and knights and now all of that color is being sucked out of the universe by this mechanized empire. And Maul's like, 'Is this right? Is this the universe that we were trying to build?''
That's fascinating, is it not? Seeing the grand plans of Emperor Palpatine through the eyes of someone who worked with him before Darth Vader. Before Count Dooku. Before Grand Moff Tarkin or Grand Admiral Thrawn. Someone who was there at the beginning and is now confused about what he thought the plan was, and what it ended up being.
But, as Witwer explains, that's kind of the aim of Maul: Shadow Lord.
'It truly is a show about bad guys versus worse guys,' he said. 'And our bad guys are still bad guys. This isn't going to be a show where you go, oh, you find out Maul is just a real teddy bear, man. He's just misunderstood… But the idea is, in fact, that even though he's a bad guy, is he as bad as Sidious or Vader? And the answer is actually no. From the Sith perspective, this guy has flaws. And these flaws are… the humanity that seeps in at various points. And some of this is humanity he did not have maybe early in Clone Wars. But because of things that happened to him, he's rethought a lot of things.'
Rethinking things is part of what is making Maul: Shadow Lord work too. Witwer explained that, as he was working with Filoni on Clone Wars and Rebels, they'd come up with ideas for Maul that they loved, but couldn't fit in the show. Now, all those ideas are coming back.
'There were ideas that I had back in Clone Wars that I would present to Dave, or even in Rebels,' Witwer said. 'And I also know things that Dave wanted to do. And Dave would go, 'We're going to cut this part out of the script that I have that I like so much because this isn't Maul's show.' Or I'd say, 'Dave, what if this happens?' And he goes, 'It's not Maul's show. You can't go into that little level of detail. We're seeing this from Ezra's perspective or Ahsoka's perspective.' And every time he said, 'This isn't Maul's show,' it never occurred to me that Maul could have a show. So I just took those ideas and I'm like, well, I guess we'll never see that. And now he's like, well, it's Maul's show.''
You can watch the full clip below and keep an eye out for Maul: Shadow Lord in 2026.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
50% Upside For MRVL Stock?
CHONGQING, CHINA - MARCH 3: In this photo illustration, the Marvell Technology Inc. logo is ... More displayed on a smartphone screen on March 3, 2025, in Chongqing, China. (Photo by) Marvell Technology (NASDAQ:MRVL), a firm focused on manufacturing semiconductor integrated circuits for data centers, has recently revealed its Q1 fiscal 2026 results. The company slightly surpassed analyst predictions, disclosing earnings of $0.62 per share on revenues of $1.9 billion, compared to consensus estimates of $0.61 and $1.88 billion, respectively. In spite of this positive outcome, Marvell's stock fell by 3% in after-hours trading and has declined by 43% since the start of the year. A considerable part of this downturn took place in March, following a disappointing outlook. Investors looking for steady returns may want to consider investigating diversified investment options such as the Trefis High Quality portfolio, which has shown remarkable performance, achieving over 91% returns since its inception. Additionally, see – Nvidia Stock's 1 Big Risk Considering the stock's fluctuations and the recent decline, you might be questioning whether Marvell is currently a good buy. From a valuation perspective, MRVL stock seems appealing. At approximately $62 per share, it is trading at 8.3 times trailing revenues and 32 times trailing adjusted earnings. This is significantly lower than its three-year average price-to-sales (P/S) ratio of 10.4 times and price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 42 times. While a decrease in valuation multiples may appear justified given the company's average revenue growth of only 10% over the last three years and a shrinkage in its adjusted net income margin from 30.5% in fiscal 2023 to 26.3% currently, this does not convey the complete picture. Marvell's Q1 results demonstrated impressive growth, with overall revenues soaring by 63% year-over-year. This was fueled by a strong 76% rise in core data center sales, reaching $1.44 billion. This increase is largely due to the rising demand for custom AI chips. Although the adjusted gross margin decreased by 240 basis points year-over-year to 59.8%, the company's bottom line witnessed a substantial enhancement, reporting earnings of $0.62 per share, marking a 158% increase from $0.24 in the same quarter last year. In the future, Marvell expects Q2 sales to be around $2.0 billion, which aligns with market expectations. Building upon the valuation discussion, Marvell is currently experiencing growth at a much quicker rate than it has over the past three years. Analysts estimate that sales are projected to grow by 42% this year and an additional 20% next year. This accelerated growth trajectory is anticipated to have an even greater influence on earnings, which are expected to rise by 2.3 times during this period. This swift growth trend calls for an upward adjustment in valuation multiples. Notably, the average analyst price target of $96 for MRVL indicates a considerable upside potential of more than 50%. Marvell's strategic foray into the AI sector began with its interconnect solutions for data centers. However, the greater opportunity lies in the creation of application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), which function as custom AI chips. These tailored chips for hyperscaler data centers offer numerous benefits over general-purpose GPUs, such as those provided by Nvidia and AMD. Specialized chips can lower costs, enhance energy efficiency, and optimize performance for specific functionalities, unlike general-purpose GPUs intended for a wider range of applications. Marvell has been strengthening its alliances with significant AI stakeholders, including Amazon Web Services, which has expanded its agreements for data center semiconductors, including bespoke AI products. While the valuation of MRVL stock seems enticing, it is essential to take potential risks into account. Historically, Marvell's stock has underperformed in comparison to the broader market during economic downturns. For example, during the inflation shock of 2022, it fell by 62% from its peak, in contrast to a 25.4% decline for the S&P 500. Similarly, amid the COVID-19 pandemic correction in 2020, it dropped by 40% versus a 33.9% decrease for the S&P 500. This trend indicates that MRVL stock is more vulnerable to negative macroeconomic conditions. In addition, there are ongoing concerns regarding the slow rollout of Amazon's Trainium chips amid weak external demand, which could potentially hinder future revenue growth. Therefore, while Marvell stock might seem attractive from a valuation angle, investors should carefully assess these risks. You may want to purchase MRVL during this current dip, but investing in a single stock, regardless of its potential, carries risks. If you aim to mitigate that risk while still positioning yourself for strong upside, consider the High Quality portfolio, which has surpassed the S&P 500 and achieved returns exceeding 91% since its launch. Why is that? As a collective, HQ Portfolio stocks have offered superior returns with lower risk compared to the benchmark index; presenting a smoother ride, as evidenced in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.
Android Authority
2 hours ago
- Android Authority
Sony's new XM6 headphones are surprisingly easy to repair, even for battery replacements
TL;DR iFixit's teardown of Sony's latest flagship headphones reveals some welcome repairability improvements. The WH-1000XM6's battery is secured with screws instead of adhesive, allowing for easier replacements. The headphone's drivers, USB-C port, audio jack, and button board are also much easier to access. Sony recently unveiled the WH-1000XM6, the highly anticipated successor to one of the best flagship headphones on the market. The new model brings several improvements over its predecessor, including a significantly faster QN3 processor, better ANC, enhanced voice call quality, longer battery life, and more. The XM6 also brings some welcome design changes. Sony has reintroduced the folding mechanism on the new model, which was omitted on the XM5. The company has also added detachable earpads for easier replacement and designed a completely new travel case. But that's not all. Sony has reportedly also redesigned the XM6's insides, which could improve repairability. iFixit has spotted several upgrades that should make the flagship headphones easier to repair. Its teardown reveals that the lithium polymer battery powering the XM6 is secured in a plastic housing with two screws instead of double-sided adhesive, making replacements easy. The modular plate housing the XM6's drivers is also held down by Phillips-head screws and a rubber plug, allowing for straightforward disassembly. Sony has also made the modular USB-C port, audio jack, and button board much easier to access than they were on the XM5. You can check out how easy it is to pull the headphones apart in iFixit's teardown below. Although the company has yet to share a repair manual for the headphones, you can expect it to arrive soon. Sony has published one for the older model, and we don't see why it won't do the same for its latest flagship headphones. As for replacement parts, Sony currently doesn't offer any for the WH-1000XM6 or its predecessor. However, given that the company is actively making changes to improve the repairability of its headphones, there's a chance it could start selling replacement parts soon. What do you think of Sony's decision to make its headphones easier to repair? Would these changes convince you to buy the WH-1000XM6 instead of a flagship headphone from a different brand? Let us know in the comments. Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at Email our staff at news@ . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.
Motor Trend
2 hours ago
- Motor Trend
The Era of Cars Running a Single Computer and Operating System Is Here
Is China really 'there' already, producing cars with centralized computers and a hypervisor? Coming out of CES 2025 earlier this year, we covered a Snapdragon innovation Qualcomm was pitching to automakers, capable of running an entire car on a single chip. Now we just returned from China where we drove a similar system by Chinese EV maker Nio—which designed, developed, and manufactured its own chip in-house, along with the software that runs on it. 0:00 / 0:00 See All 5 Photos Chinese Smart-EV startup Nio's Shenji NX9031 Chip--the world's first Automotive 5nm chip. How are these newish Chinese car companies (Xpeng has designed its own chip, too) able to pull this off? By prioritizing digital development. Nio's engineering workforce of between 10 and 11,000 engineers is split about 70/30 between software versus other branches of engineering, so they do their own electrical architecture, for example, while leaving some hardware-based tasks such as suspension design and development to third parties. Tesla's engineering mix is similar in scope to Nio's, but most legacy automakers reverse those percentages. See All 5 Photos Nio SkyOS Operating System Schematic SkyOS The name may conjure frightening references to SkyNet from the Terminator movies, but this comprehensive vehicular operating system is designed to oversee all systems onboard Nio's entire range of cars—from its simple, compact Firefly EV to the all-singing, all-active-suspension-dancing Nio ET9. We asked whether there was a measurable difference in the number of lines of code or the computing power between a Firefly application and ET9 and were told that no, one SkyOS system fits all. There will simply be fewer features on some models, all connected via an ethernet backbone. A huge benefit touted for SkyOS is its extremely low latency (response time), which is said to be far less than a millisecond. That's considerably quicker than competing Linux systems, and drivers can appreciate such an improvement in latency through touchscreen responses and shorter ABS stopping distances. See All 5 Photos Nvidia's Orin chip has been one of the auto industry's top-performing chips. Nvidia Orin or Shenji NX9031? SkyOS is designed to run on various chipsets, so cars demanding fewer features can utilize less expensive existing chips, while full-featured cars like the ET9 get Nio's new Shenji NX9031—hailed as the automotive world's first production 5nm chip. (Note: 5nm is simply a chip-marketing term that refers to the next step in the evolution of transistor density—the gates are not physically 5 nm apart, but the chip houses more than 50 billion transistors.) Billed primarily as an autonomous driving enabler, the chip reportedly possesses at least double the processing power of two Nvidia Orin chips with a pixel processing capacity of 6.5GB/s and a response time of less than 5 ms, yet it draws considerably less power than an equivalent Nvidia array. Such processing power improves things like the vision systems' ability to recognize objects in low light and for AI personal assistants like Nio's NOMI to process large-language models. See All 5 Photos Schematic comparing and contrasting domain-based versus zonal electrical architecture. Isn't Rivian Basically Right There Too? Close. Rivian's electrical architecture is in the vanguard of American manufacturers, but its system still largely qualifies as zonal, in which various zones aggregate signals from nearby sensors and send them (via simpler communications) to the central computer. Rivian runs an OS from QNX Blackberry. Nio employs zones, as well, but generally fewer of them. Low-feature-set cars like the Firefly might employ one or two zones while a fancy ET9 needs four. What About Tesla? The other vanguard player in America's SDV universe is Tesla, which still employs considerably more than a handful of zones in its more centralized zonal architecture. It also runs open-source software (OSS) such as Linux, GNU toolchain, and other community-based projects such as Ubuntu. SkyOS is Also Open Source Perhaps a future Tesla may leverage Nio's SkyOS, which the company has announced it has made 'open source.' What does that mean? Mostly the software development community is free to look under the hood and develop products and apps to run on the SkyOS system. This is the main motivation for Nio making the software opens source: to improve the user experience with more potential over-the-air updatable features and Easter eggs developed out-of-house. (For reference, Android is open source, while Apple's iOS is not.) Might Americans Ever Experience SkyOS? Barring outright bans on Chinese software, there's every possibility that, say, a domestic or European automaker could leverage Nio's open-source software. Perhaps that possibility is highest with McLaren, which has a technology sharing agreement with Nio. It would certainly seem wise to leverage the development expense of those NX9031 chips by selling them to other automakers, but a lot of strategic calculus goes into making any such decision.
