📸 Criticism at season start, Schalke choreography causes confusion
License worries, sporting downturns, a thousand coaches dismissed, against a black background. Criticism right at the start of the season?
The concerned faces of the rest of the spectators in the Veltins-Arena quickly turned into bright eyes. Because then the second part of the impressive tifo was presented. "Many a bad day has passed, but we always stand hand in hand!" THAT is Schalke!
This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇩🇪 here.
📸 Pau Barrena - 2025 Getty Images
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Roughriders soar past Alouettes 34-6 in CFL power clash
MONTREAL — A dominant defensive performance and explosive plays allowed the Saskatchewan Roughriders to walk away from Montreal with a 34-6 win on Saturday. It was billed as a clash between the CFL's top two teams, but the Roughriders proved a class above the Alouettes, improving to 7-1 and moving four points up on the 5-3 Calgary Stampeders in the West Division. The Saskatchewan defence held the Alouettes (5-3) to 169 yards and did not allow them to pass their 46 yard-line. They also forced three turnovers, although it could have been even more. 'Through and through that was our best game as a defence,' said Saskatchewan head coach and defensive coordinator Corey Mace. 'I told them, that being said, we dropped so many potential interceptions and turnovers. Really, really proud of those guys.' 'It makes it pretty easy to win football games,' quarterback Trevor Harris said about his defence's performance. 'If they don't get into the red zone and they only kick two field goals, it's tough to lose games. "It's on us as an offence to make sure we extend our leads and they don't get close. We did that, but obviously still wish we would have done a little more offensively.' 'They're a good team,' said Montreal quarterback McLeod Bethel-Thompson. 'We have to give them credit, but we came out absolutely terrible tonight, myself included. You come out against a good team and play badly, it looks like that.' Harris threw for 289 yards and two touchdowns against one of his former teams and Dohnte Meyers had 182 all-purpose yards in the win as well but the common refrain from the Riders coaches and players was that they were capable of even more. 'We're just going to continue to keep climbing and getting better. Just because you're 7-1 after eight games, it doesn't mean anything,' Harris said. A crowd of 21,654 at Percival Molson Stadium in Montreal witnessed the Riders improve to 4-0 on the road. It was the Roughriders first win in Montreal since Oct. 30, 2021, snapping a two-game losing streak in Quebec and three games against the Alouettes overall. 'The environment was everything that we thought it was going to be,' said Mace. 'Their crowd showed up, the energy was crazy, but as a football team we were able to keep them quiet.' 'Anytime you get a win on the road in the CFL, it's nothing to sneeze at, especially against a team like this,' Harris said. Montreal was playing its fourth game of the season without starting quarterback Davis Alexander. They are 1-3 in those games. Bethel-Thompson, Alexander's replacement, went 15 for 26 for 126 yards and an interception and was briefly replaced in the third quarter by Caleb Evans. Maas said he tried to find a spark by going to Evans but when it wasn't there, he returned to Bethel-Thompson. The loss drops Montreal two points behind the East-leading Hamilton Tiger-Cats. Saskatchewan opened the scoring with short-yardage quarterback Tommy Stevens' one-yard touchdown run on an opening drive aided by a 46-yard return on the opening kickoff by Meyers and an unnecessary roughness penalty on the Alouettes. It was the only scoring in the first quarter. The Roughriders doubled their lead on their first drive of the second quarter, a nine-play, 69-yard drive ending with a Harris touchdown pass to Tommy Nield with 8:35 remaining. Montreal finally got on the board with 5:15 remaining in the first half when Jose Maltos connected for a 56-yard field goal. Saskatchewan answered right back with a field goal of their own, set up after a long 58-yard pass and catch from Harris to Meyers. Meyers is in his second season with the Roughriders and came into the game among the league leaders with five explosive plays, which is categorized as receptions over 30 yards and kickoff returns over 40 yards. On Saturday, he added three more. 'He's a big-play guy and he's able to help us stretch the field,' said Harris. 'The reputation is that we only throw the ball short, but we've been throwing the ball deep over people's heads quite a bit this year with Dohnte and KeeSean (Johnson).' 'He's an explosive receiver,' Mace said. 'He runs routes as smooth as ever, he's got great hands, and he's got some top-level speed to be able to break away. The kid's just a ballplayer, man, and I think everybody in the country's starting to figure that out.' The game's second half was delayed close to 30 minutes due to a thunderstorm in the area, and the rain continued to start the third quarter. Both teams were dealing with key players missing. Saskatchewan was missing receiver Samuel Emilus. In addition to Alexander, Montreal was without receivers Austin Mack and Tyler Philpot, while defensive back Kabion Ento was a late scratch and safety Marc-Antoine Dequoy left the game with an injury. Montreal head coach Jason Maas did not give an update on Dequoy's status, saying he will be re-evaluated this week. 'Injuries are part of the game,' said Maas. 'At times they're harder to overcome than others. Obviously, you don't ever want to start a game losing a guy and then lose a couple extra guys at those positions.' 'What I give more credit to than anything is them,' he said about his opponents. 'They played very well tonight, whether we were injured or not.' UP NEXT Roughriders: Host the Hamilton Tiger-Cats on Saturday, Aug. 16. Alouettes: Host the Edmonton Elks on Friday. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 2, 2025. Jared Book, The Canadian Press
New York Times
44 minutes ago
- New York Times
Why the Premier League's traditional ‘Big Six' are buying more from the rest of the league
If you thought there has been an increase in Premier League-to-Premier League transfers, you could be forgiven. This summer, there have been numerous Premier League players who have moved clubs within England's top flight, but the sense that intra-Premier League transfers are increasing is only a fallacy. Advertisement At the time of writing, these moves have only accounted for 25 per cent of Premier League arrivals (excluding loans) in the current transfer window, which is equal to the lowest rate in the last five summers. However, that feeling is probably related to the magnitude of those signings. Noni Madueke swapped Chelsea for Arsenal, Bryan Mbeumo and Matheus Cunha joined Manchester United from Brentford and Wolverhampton Wanderers, and Newcastle United signed Anthony Elanga from Nottingham Forest. Meanwhile, Tottenham Hotspur snapped up Mohammed Kudus from West Ham United, and Chelsea added Brighton & Hove Albion's Joao Pedro and Ipswich Town's Liam Delap to their squad. Moves towards the Premier League's historic 'Big Six' will generate the biggest noise, and in addition to the above, Milos Kerkez, Rayan Ait-Nouri and Christian Norgaard's transfers to Liverpool, Manchester City and Arsenal respectively empowers another theory: wealthier Premier League teams are harvesting talent from up and down the table. Despite moves between Premier League teams being just below the average of the usual rate, a big portion of these transfers have been 'Big Six' signings from the rest of the league. By the 'Big Six' in this context, we mean the richest clubs since 2010: Arsenal, Liverpool, Manchester United and Chelsea, who were joined by Manchester City after Abu Dhabi United Group took over the club in 2008, and Tottenham who benefited from Champions League money for the first time in 2010. This summer transfer window, 39 per cent of Premier League-to-Premier League moves have been the 'Big Six' acquiring players from the rest of the league — the highest share since 2010. The above isn't simply because 'Big Six' clubs are buying more players in general. Between 2015 and 2019, Arsenal, Manchester United, Liverpool, Tottenham, Chelsea and Manchester City focused on buying talent from abroad, with the percentage of their summer signings (excluding loans) from the rest of the Premier League never exceeding 15 per cent. Advertisement Purchases such as Kevin De Bruyne, Mohamed Salah, Son Heung-min, William Saliba and Jorginho proved to be worth their money. During that period, the upcoming talent in European teams were more lucrative than those at non-'Big Six' clubs. However, that has been changing in recent years, with 'Big Six' teams focusing more on signings from the rest of the Premier League. This summer, 27 per cent of the 'Big Six's signings have been from the rest of the league — the highest share since 2010. The Premier League's 'Big Six' are buying more from the rest of the league, and there are a couple of reasons behind this trend. The launch of the elite player performance plan (EPPP) by the Premier League in 2012 has helped English academies produce better talents. 'We needed to see a step change,' Neil Saunders, the Premier League's director of football, who was an academy programme manager when the EPPP was introduced, told The Athletic in June. 'The EPPP was born out of a backdrop of a perception that English players — and players coming through our system — weren't technically as advanced or tactically as astute as some of our European counterparts.' Delap's switch from Ipswich to Chelsea follows in the footsteps of Dominic Solanke's move from Bournemouth to Tottenham last summer and Declan Rice's transfer from West Ham to Arsenal in 2023 — well-developed homegrown talent is ending up at 'Big Six' clubs. The spending power of these teams allows them to do that, which brings us to the second point: the Premier League's crazy money. According to UEFA's latest annual European Club Finance and Investment Landscape report, which is based on the audited accounts for 2023 from 745 top-flight clubs in UEFA's 55 member associations, the Premier League's aggregate revenue (€7.1billion) is almost as much as the second and third highest earning leagues, La Liga and Bundesliga, combined. Advertisement It is why upcoming players at non-'Big Six' clubs usually stay in the Premier League, where the top-earning teams can offer larger transfer fees and higher salaries. The gap in TV revenue is part of the equation, with the Premier League's latest domestic four-year deal starting from the 2025-26 season collectively valued at £6.7bn. The jump in TV revenue since the 2016-2019 cycle — £5.1bn from domestic rights compared with £3bn in the previous three-year cycle — empowered the league's spending power and allowed non-'Big Six' teams to venture into Europe and sign players such as Youri Tielemans (Monaco to Leicester City in 2019) and Amadou Onana (Lille to Everton in 2022). In the three-summer cycle (2016, 2017 and 2018) corresponding to the improved TV deal, the rate of signings from outside United Kingdom and Ireland for non-'Big Six' teams increased to 51 per cent, before dropping to 46 per cent between 2019 and 2022, and going back to 51 per cent during the 2022-2025 TV cycle. Since 2016, non-'Big Six' teams have been signing players from Europe's biggest leagues with France leading the way with 72 arrivals in the Premier League, followed by Spain (60), Germany (59) and Italy (43). Unearthing talent from the second divisions of these leagues may reap rewards, but the Premier League's non-'Big Six' teams are signing straight from the top with Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga and Ligue 1 comprising 51 per cent of their summer signings since 2016. Wolves signed Cunha from Atletico Madrid on loan with an obligation to buy the forward in the summer of 2023, before selling him to Manchester United in June 2025. Another example is Marc Cucurella, who joined Brighton from Getafe in the summer of 2021 and was bought by Chelsea the following year. Additionally, the Premier League clubs with the lowest transfer-weighted average age of signings since 2016 have been Brighton and Brentford, who are looking to find young potential talents from different markets before selling them higher up the ladder in the league. Advertisement Brighton's list is a long one, with Joao Pedro and Cucurella joined by Yves Bissouma, Moises Caicedo and Alexis Mac Allister — although the latter two were winter signings. Meanwhile, Brentford have David Raya and Mbeumo to boast their smart approach in the transfer market. Looking at which non-'Big Six' teams buy the most players from abroad, Brighton are only in third place with 74 per cent of their summer signings (excluding loans) since 2016 coming from outside the United Kingdom and Ireland. Sitting above them are Leeds United (75 per cent) who have signed six players from overseas markets this summer, and Wolves (81 per cent) who have focused on bringing in Portuguese players since their promotion to the Premier League in 2018. Players joining these clubs are increasingly having clauses in their contracts that allow 'Big Six' teams to sign them at a certain price, whether that's a release clause or a relegation one. Even if it's a hefty fee, the spending power of the 'Big Six' clubs means that they are capable of matching the required amount. Instead of searching for an equivalent and cheaper prospect in an untapped market, 'Big Six' clubs have the luxury of paying a 'Premier League premium' to get a player who has proved himself in the league and adapted to the lifestyle in England. 'You watch Matheus (Cunha) every weekend doing things against the players that you are going to face,' said Manchester United's head coach, Ruben Amorim, last month. 'That can help you to have more certainty when you choose players.' Developing better players through the English academies alongside the non-'Big Six' clubs' ability to attract talent from abroad has made the Premier League the perfect market for the wealthier 'Big Six'. Summer 2025 is the reaping season in the Premier League.
New York Times
44 minutes ago
- New York Times
How England won the 1966 World Cup: A proper manager, no wingers, and Bobby Charlton in his pomp
This is the eighth in a series by The Athletic looking back at the winners of each men's World Cup. The previous articles have looked at Uruguay in 1930, Italy in 1934 and again in 1938, Uruguay in 1950, West Germany in 1954, before a Brazilian double in 1958 and 1962. This time, it's the turn of England in 1966. The codifiers of association football had a mediocre record at the World Cup until hosting it. England hadn't entered the first three tournaments because the FA were still refusing to be a part of FIFA. In their four attempts since deciding to take part, England had twice reached the quarter-finals, but had twice been eliminated at the group stage. Advertisement Yet England still enjoyed great reverence across the footballing world. In 1963, the FA celebrated its centenary by hosting a game between England and a Rest of the World XI, a genuine collection of the best footballers from every other nation. England won 2-1. Even accounting for home advantage and the unfamiliarity of the opposition players with one another, it's clear England had outstanding individuals. The spine of Gordon Banks, Bobby Moore and Bobby Charlton were all arguably the best in the world in their position. But they needed home advantage to become the world champions. And while hosting the tournament has always increased the chances of success, particularly in the early days of the World Cup, this was the first time since the opening two editions — Uruguay and Italy — that the hosts actually won it. Upon taking charge of England in October 1962, Alf Ramsey declared that England would win the World Cup. It was a bold claim. But this was a manager who had recently completed something even more unlikely than winning the World Cup with the host nation. In 1955, aged 35, he'd taken charge of Ipswich Town, in the third tier of English football. Two years later, he won promotion to the second tier. Four years after that, he won promotion to the First Division. And then he promptly won the title at his first attempt. Even when considering that the gap between the divisions was less substantial than in the modern age, this was an unprecedented transformation of a club. Sensing things couldn't get much better, he left Suffolk for the England job. Ramsey had been a no-nonsense England full-back in his playing days, including at World Cup 1950. He also scored the final goal in England's most famous defeat, the 6-3 loss to Hungary at Wembley in 1953. He was never overwhelmingly popular with the press or supporters, but he never tried to be. Advertisement He remained in charge of England for another eight years after this World Cup success, before being sacked when he failed to qualify for World Cup 1974. He was barely seen afterwards, aside from a brief stint in charge of Birmingham City, when he'd originally joined to serve on the board. But Ramsey really only had two major jobs in his coaching career, and he won the First Division and then won the World Cup. Ramsey was, in a sense, the first proper England manager. Until the Second World War, there had been no official position of head coach, and the squad was selected by a selection committee. This seems bizarre today, but in a world before matches were widely televised, and when all weekend matches kicked off at the same time, it was thought that keeping across the entire First Division (and beyond) was impossible. England merely had a 'trainer' in charge of tactics. Walter Winterbottom is generally considered England's first official head coach, but he was also the FA's first director of coaching, and used to joke — maybe half-joke — that 'the job had a sideline to it: manager of the England teams'. The plural reflects that he was in charge of both the main England team and the amateur equivalent, and genuinely seemed to consider this of less overall importance than his other role. Besides, he also had his squad picked by an eight-man selection committee. Ramsey, almost routinely described as 'not an establishment figure', wasn't going to stand for any of that and was given full control of picking the England squad and starting XI. 'It's a new position,' he said upon his appointment. 'This sort of thing has never been done before and I think we'll have to find out what we can do. It's something that has to be established and something that one has to find out about.' Ramsey was considered unusual for picking a full 22-man squad for every international break; in the days before substitutes, it was previously considered enough to pick a much smaller group. Advertisement England's success didn't convince everyone that the position of England manager was necessary. In the early 1980s, Brian Glanville, the most revered 20th-century English football writer in English football, wrote a World Soccer column claiming that England had generally coped fine without one, although this was partly a dig at the poor performance of Ramsey's successors, Don Revie and Ron Greenwood. Surprisingly, for a country not renowned for being overly interested in tactics, England are unique in that their World Cup-winning side had a nickname describing their tactical approach: these were 'Ramsey's wingless wonders'. A telling sign of this approach is that England's centre-forwards can be seen taking throw-ins in the final. The idea of playing without wingers was almost unthinkable before World Cup 1966. English football's most adored players were wingers — in the previous decade, they'd fielded Stanley Matthews and Tom Finney in the same side. And in Ramsey's early days in charge, he put great emphasis upon the importance of wingers. But his sides became increasingly narrow. He started the tournament with Manchester United's outside forward John Connelly, something of a forgotten figure, in the side. But by the end of the tournament, England barely had any width at all. The eventual starting XI was difficult to describe in terms of system, but players had very clear characteristics. Moore was the refined ball-playing defender, while Jack Charlton was more old-school. Both full-backs pushed forward. Nobby Stiles was a combative defensive midfielder who came under fire for his tackling during this tournament, and his presence allowed Martin Peters to roam. On the right, Alan Ball was something between a box-to-box player and a wide man, and notable for his sheer energy in the final, while Charlton very vaguely played from the left but was more of a No 10. Up front was the biggest talking point. Jimmy Greaves, the greatest goalscorer in English top-flight history, dropped out of the starting XI through injury midway through the tournament and never regained his place. Hurst, who had only made his debut earlier in the year but had headed the quarter-final winner against an infamously physical Argentina side, remained in the team. Ramsey also stuck with Roger Hunt, who lacked Greaves' natural talent but had a reputation as a hard worker. That, for many, symbolised Ramsey — an admirer of disciplined workers rather than talented individualists. You can make a case for various players. Hurst scored a hat-trick in the final. Moore was the captain and became the symbol of England's victory. Banks was a truly legendary goalkeeper. Ball was the best performer in the final. But ultimately England's true star was Bobby Charlton, a player who won that year's Ballon d'Or and finished second in the subsequent two years. A rampaging attacking midfielder who was the all-time top goalscorer for both Manchester United and England until Wayne Rooney surpassed him in both respects (Harry Kane since surpassed Charlton and Rooney for England goals), he produced the best individual moment of England's campaign with a brilliant goal in the group stage win over Mexico, running from the halfway line, feinting to go on his left foot, before chopping onto his right and firing into the top corner from 30 yards. Advertisement 'He was one of the greatest players I have ever seen,' Ramsey later said. 'He was very much the linchpin of the 1966 team. Early in my management, I knew I had to find a role suitable to Bobby's unique talents.' That was a particular compliment from a manager who hadn't appreciated the talents of other big-name attackers. Charlton, unusually considering he was England's third-most advanced player, wore No 9 in the tournament, partly a reflection of the fact that Ramsey had previously used him as a centre-forward. Charlton's best display for England came in the semi-final win over Portugal, where he lit up the game with his passing — sometimes considered a relative weakness compared to other greats in his role — and also scored both goals in a 2-1 win. The quality of that display led to him being quieter in the final, however. West Germany manager Helmut Schon was so scared of Charlton's goalscoring threat that he instructed Franz Beckenbauer, at this point renowned as an exciting attacking midfielder, to man-mark Charlton out of the game. Broadly speaking, Beckenbauer managed that, but possibly at the expense of West Germany's own attacking threat. Overall, a really good game between two sides — Beckenbauer's role aside — focused on pushing forward and attacking. Helmut Haller put West Germany ahead after a rare mistake from Ray Wilson, before Hurst headed home unmarked from Moore's flighted free kick. Goalkeeper Hans Tilkowski was often criticised for not coming to claim this cross — and the way he stood behind his line and simply pointed at Hurst did look rather odd — but he'd previously taken a bad knock when coming for another cross and was therefore hesitant to leave his line again. Peters seemed to have won the game with a simple volley at a corner, after Hurst's effort had been blocked and looped up into the air, but then defender Wolfgang Weber scored an even scrappier goal to equalise in the penultimate minute. That meant extra time. Ramsey famously told his players that they'd won the game once, and now they had to do so again. There are two options from extra time. You can argue that England's goal to go 3-2 ahead is the most famous moment — on the turn, Hurst smashed the ball against the bar. It bounced down onto the line and then out. The goal was given by linesman Tofiq Bahramov, who became referred to as 'the Russian linesman' in England, although he hailed from present-day Azerbaijan. In fact, he's such a hero in the otherwise unremarkable footballing nation of Azerbaijan that the country's former national stadium was named after him. Advertisement Without wanting to go over the nuances of a 59-year debate and the various modern technological attempts to prove it one way or another, it seems unlikely the ball actually crossed the line. The common argument from Hurst is that it must have been over because England striker Hunt turned away to appeal for the goal rather than heading in the rebound. This is somewhat disingenuous; Hunt wasn't at the right angle to tell, and the ball was bouncing slightly past him anyway. England at least scored a fourth, although there was further confusion here. Referee Gottfried Dienst had put his whistle to his lips, seemingly about to blow for full time, before waving on the play. This meant some England supporters had started their pitch invasion with the play still going on, with Hurst sent in behind by a long ball. This prompted the most famous commentary line in British sporting history, courtesy of the BBC's Kenneth Wolstenholme. 'Some people are on the pitch! They think it's all over,' and then, as Hurst slammed home another goal, 'It is now.' It was Moore's second assist of the final, and more significantly, Hurst's third goal — his hat-trick is analysed in more detail here. He remained the only hat-trick scorer in a World Cup final until Kylian Mbappe's for France in 2022. Hurst now proudly declares that he's the only hat-trick scorer in a World Cup final to finish on the winning side. England were hardly hailed as spectacular winners across the world, especially in an era when Brazil were regularly winning the tournament with wonderful football, but this was a tournament of few genuine contenders. Caution and discipline in their first four matches, when they were underwhelming but kept four clean sheets, gave way to more impressive displays in their last two matches. They were the better side in open, entertaining games against both Portugal and West Germany. It's difficult to identify who else should have won it. Hungary started promisingly before fading. The most praise was generally reserved for two first-time qualifiers: North Korea, who famously defeated Italy and then went 3-0 up against Portugal before losing 5-3. Portugal, the other key debutants, had the most revered player at the tournament, Eusebio. But they lost to England fair and square in the semi. The majority of matches were considered somewhat drab and overly aggressive at a time when a more defensive approach to football seemed to be on the rise. The 1966 success is sometimes retrospectively framed as 'the worst thing that could have happened to English football', as it convinced them to knuckle down and focus on hard running over talent. That always seems overly contrary, and besides, that wasn't Ramsey's fault — unlike Winterbottom, he wasn't the FA's director of coaching, too. His task was to win the World Cup, and he did. (Top photos: Daily Mirror/Mirrorpix/Mirrorpix via Getty Images; design: Eamonn Dalton)
