Wife of retail baron Sir Philip Green in lucrative property deal
Monaco-based Tina Green, 75, owns 20 flats in a complex near Marble Arch via her Guernsey-based vehicle P17 Investments, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.
Lady Green owned Topshop's parent company Arcadia, which was run by her husband. She bought the leasehold apartments at Garrett Mansions, off Edgware Road, in August 2020, three months before Arcadia was put into administration.
Stores were closed during the second coronavirus lockdown in November 2020 with the loss of 13,000 jobs, and the brand names sold to online competitors.
Apartments at Garrett Mansions, which has a pool, spa and gym, sell for £1.4 million. It would make Lady Green's investment worth as much as £28 million.
Topshop returned to physical retail for the first time in four years with a one-day, pop-up event yesterday in Shoreditch, East London, ahead of a rumoured High Street comeback.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Gatwick braced for bank holiday chaos as baggage staff prepare for strike at the end of the month over pay
Holidaymakers could face severe delays at Gatwick Airport this month as baggage staff are preparing to go on strike over pay. The workers, who are employed by ICTS, are among some of the lowest paid at the airport and generally earn just above the minimum wage. They are set to walkout over a pay dispute with bosses on one of the busiest weekends of the year, according to Unite. The walkout is set to take place from August 22 to 26 and then again from August 29 to September 2. It is likely to cause huge disruption to all flights out of Gatwick and the union has warned they could intensify the action if the dispute is not resolved. The Unite union said that ICTS's turnover has grown by 110 per cent since 2020, reaching £170 million in 2024. They said it made a profit before tax of £6.1million in the same year, up by 47 per cent compared to 2023. Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said: 'ICTS has more than enough money to offer these workers a fair pay rise. Not doing so is just corporate greed. ICTS' Gatwick workers will receive Unite's complete backing for as long as it takes during their strikes for fair pay.' Unite regional officer Ben Davis said: 'ICTS is entirely responsible for the disruption that will be caused to Gatwick passengers during the strike action. It can well afford to put forward an acceptable pay offer and that is what needs to happen. 'Despite performing a critical role, these workers are amongst the lowest paid at the airport. Gatwick should be stepping in and pressuring ICTS to put an improved offer forward.' A London Gatwick spokesperson said: 'We are working with our suppliers to avoid any impacts and we expect to operate a normal summer holiday flight schedule for our airlines and passengers on these dates. 'Of course, we hope ICTS and their union can reach a resolution before then.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Treasury targeting inheritance tax reforms to help plug UK deficit
The Treasury is looking at ways to raise more money from inheritance tax amid growing pressure on the country's finances ahead of the autumn budget, sources have told the Guardian. Officials have been tasked with examining whether tightening rules on the gifting of money and assets could be one way of addressing a gap between revenue and spending that is estimated to reach more than £40bn. Although no decisions have been taken, the government has been careful not to rule out tax rises later this year amid slowing economic growth, higher-than-hoped inflation and unemployment at a four-year high. Labour MPs have been pushing the idea of a wealth tax, but changes to inheritance tax (IHT) thresholds could be similarly controversial. Rachel Reeves and Keir Starmer have already prepared the ground for tax rises in recent interviews, suggesting the pressure on public finances is too great to rule them out. However, the government's pledge not to raise taxes on 'working people' in its election manifesto has left the chancellor with limited options for how to tackle a yawning deficit cause by factors including Donald Trump's tariffs, higher debt interest payments and a series of U-turns on welfare cuts. Among the moves being considered are changes to how wealth or assets can be given away prior to death to reduce inheritance tax liablities. This includes examining the possibility of a cap on lifetime gifting. At present, gifts made seven years before someone dies are not subject to IHT, while those given three to seven years before death are taxed on a sliding scale known as 'taper relief', with the rate reducing each year from 32% to 8%. A lifetime cap could be introduced to limit the amount of money or value of assets an individual can donate as part of their IHT planning and the Treasury is also reviewing rules around the taper rate, people familiar with the matter said. A source with knowledge of the work told the Guardian: 'With so much wealth stored in assets like houses that have shot up in value, we have to find ways to better tap into the inheritances of those who can afford to contribute more. 'It's hard to make sure these taxes don't end up with loopholes that undermine their purpose. But we are trying to work out what revenue might be raised and how to ensure it's a fair approach.' The source added: 'IHT can raise more, and even if we do nothing, it will raise more money as the threshold for paying it stays frozen. But we have to look at the levers for taxing wealth if the aim of the government is to avoid hitting earnings from work as much as possible.' IHT changes have provoked a strong public response in the past, even though fewer than one in 20 estates paid it in recent years. In the late 2000s the Conservatives enjoyed a significant swing in opinion polls when they proposed raising the threshold at which IHT would kick in. Then party leader David Cameron made it a hot-button issue, putting pressure on the Labour prime minister, Gordon Brown, with headlines about the 'death tax'. More recently, Reeves has faced fierce criticism and protests over the past year in response to her decision in last autumn's budget to slash tax breaks for farmers passing on their businesses. She defended her decision in an interview in Northern Ireland on Tuesday, saying she believed those farmers with more than £3m to pass on 'should make a contribution' and would still continue to pay a lower rate of IHT than others. Only 4.6% of deaths resulted in IHT being paid in the tax year 2022-2023, according to the latest figures from HMRC. The average effective tax rate was 13%, after accounting for all the different reliefs and exemptions that might apply depending on the individual circumstances. That compares with the headline rate of 40%. The government is trying to work out how it can tap into the vast wave of wealth that will be transferred from baby boomers when they die, fuelled by large pension pots, as well as house prices that have risen sharply over their lifetimes. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion It already took steps to bring these pensions into the scope of IHT late last year. From April 2027, most unused pension pots and death benefits will be subject to the tax. This leaves large loopholes, however, if sums are withdrawn and gifted instead, and officials are increasingly concerned about large cash sums being extracted from these pots. Another possible revenue stream being looked at is whether to increase capital gains tax rates by a few percentage points. However, this would be accompanied by some kind of CGT allowance for investors who put money into British businesses, as the Treasury tries to strike a balance between tapping into wealth to fund public services without deterring investment into the UK. There is growing anecdotal evidence that some wealthy people and company directors may have already left the UK following recent tax changes, including the end of the 'non-dom' status, though there is no official data yet available. The Guardian was first to reveal that the government was considering major changes to business property relief and agricultural land tax in 2024, a step then brought in by Reeves. These changes may have a significant impact on how much money is raised by IHT going forward, but it is unclear how they might alter behaviour. Meanwhile CGT rates were not raised as high as many senior Labour party figures had hoped in 2024, with the government stepping back from bringing it closer to levels of income tax. Still, some senior government figures believe that there is a political deal to be done to create a path towards equalising its levels with income tax. They believe there is room for this a compromise after Reeves signalled that a flat rate wealth tax – of the kind proposed by backbenchers last month of 2% on assets over £10m – had more or less been ruled out. In a recent interview, Reeves pointed to IHT and CGT as the UK alternatives to a headline wealth tax such as that in countries like Switzerland. 'We have inheritance tax. We have capital gains. We've just got rid of the non-dom tax status that doesn't exist any more in our tax system. So we do have taxes that tax the wealthy. I'm not keen to do what Switzerland has done and replace those with a wealth tax because I think there's the risk of actually losing money by doing those things,' she told LBC's Iain Dale on 2 August. A Treasury spokesperson said: 'As set out in the Plan for Change, the best way to strengthen public finances is by growing the economy – which is our focus. Changes to tax and spend policy are not the only ways of doing this, as seen with our planning reforms, which are expected to grow the economy by £6.8bn and cut borrowing by £3.4bn. 'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible, which is why at last autumn's budget, we protected working people's payslips and kept our promise not to raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee national insurance or VAT.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Rumoured tax raid spooks another industry
A new tax has appeared on the horizon, its advocates claiming it could raise £3.2bn for the Treasury. On Wednesday, Gordon Brown took to the airwaves, championing a tax rise on the 'undertaxed' gambling industry. The former Prime Minister is backing calls from the think tank Institute for Public Policy Research, which is claiming raising various gambling taxes could earn the Treasury enough money to cover the cost of scrapping the two-child benefit cap. The policy – perhaps unsurprisingly – is relatively popular. A YouGov survey found 42 per cent of respondents polled to be strongly in support of higher taxes on online gambling, while 28 per cent would somewhat support the increase. Dr Christopher Snowdon of the Institute of Economic Affairs warns against the seduction of supporting a so-called sin tax to fund a noble cause, or the hypothecation of a particular tax stream. If the tax works and reduces consumption, it reduces the Treasury's tax intake, leaving less money for the cause it was meant to fund. 'HMRC have made it clear that hypothecation is the antithesis to everything they believe in', he tells me. But also, is the industry about to be decimated before Rachel Reeves manages to collect her golden eggs? Such is the jitter across businesses as the Chancellor hunts around for tax revenue to plug a black hole worth as much as £50bn in the economy that by Friday the country's biggest gambling companies had lost over £4bn in value, ' amid fears of a tax raid on the sector in the next Budget '. One of these companies, Flutter, which lost over £4.2bn in value, paid nearly £750m in taxes in 2024. Never mind raising more money, is the Treasury about to lose a chunk of its tax take as some of these companies fold or move their operations off-shore to escape a tax raid? Back in November, when the rumours of a so-called Gambling Tax had first surfaced, the Betting and Gaming Council had set out the case for its members: '[t]he proposed levy rate for independent bookmakers is a hammer blow to the 500 small independent betting shops and the 2,500 people who work in them, which risks job losses and venue closures, while contributing a small amount to the overall levy total.' Dr Snowdon shares these concerns. Rachel Reeves has a habit of pursuing policies 'without looking at third-order effects', he tells me. If the anticipated tax rise pushes up the cost of gambling online on UK websites, punters could very easily make use of a Virtual Private Network or VPN to access gambling sites in other countries. There may be public support for taxing the gambling industry into oblivion. But who does the Chancellor then turn to in order to fill the resulting hole in her tax intake? Rachel Reeves cannot afford a repeat of the non-dom debacle, nor can ordinary taxpayers.
