Smacking ban is needed to protect children, health experts say
According to the Children Act 2004, it is unlawful to hit your child, except where it is 'reasonable punishment', and this is judged on a case-by-case basis.
But experts said these laws are 'vague and dangerous'.
Now 13 health organisations are calling on the Government to back an amendment to the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill which would remove the 'reasonable punishment' defence from law in England.
They said that the Bill reaching committee stage in the House of Lords is a 'pivotal moment' in the smacking ban campaign.
Baroness Finlay has proposed an amendment to eliminate the 'reasonable punishment' defence.
In an open letter, the organisations said this defence is 'archaic' and 'allows for the physical punishment of children'.
'This leaves them with less protection from assault than adults, an unacceptable disparity in our modern society,' they wrote.
'The evidence is clear: physical punishment is harmful, ineffective, and has no place in a society that values the well-being of its children.'
The organisations called on the Government to 'stand on the side of our children and ensure their fundamental right to safety and protection', adding: 'By removing this archaic defence, we can send a clear message that violence against children is never acceptable.'
Professor Andrew Rowland, child protection officer at the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health and a consultant paediatrician, said: 'There is now strong agreement from health and social care professionals that the current laws around physical punishment of children, including smacking, are unjust, vague and ultimately dangerous.
'It is time to bring protection from physical assault for children in line with the protection afforded to adults.
'Every child deserves the best possible start to life, and eradicating physical punishment of children is a key part of that aim.'
Dr Elaine Lockhart, head of the Child and Adolescent Faculty at the Royal College of Psychiatrists, added: 'The physical punishment of children is not just cruel, it is dangerous: the practice has been shown to be detrimental to children's mental health and leads to poor developmental outcomes.'
Dr Tamasin Knight, from the British Medical Association's public health medicine committee, added: 'We believe that children should have full legal protection from all forms of physical punishment.'
The full list of signatories on the letter are: Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health; Faculty of Public Health; Royal Society of Medicine; School and Public Health Nurses Association; Institute of Health Promotion and Education; Institute of Health Visitors; Royal Society for Public Health; British Association for Child and Adolescent Public Health; British Medical Association; Royal College of Psychiatrists; Aldey Hey Hospital Charity; Alliance 4 Children and Barnardo's.
The Government has been approached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Report: White House meltdown over return of RFK Jr. aide
A staffer for HHS Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr - who drew the ire of President Donald Trump's MAGA base and was fired - returned to his job last week after Chief of Staff Susie Wiles stepped in. Dr Vinay Prasad's unexpected return to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) marks one of the more dramatic personnel reversals of the Trump administration. And some of Trump's MAGA allies, both in Washington and across the country, still have concerns about him and doubts about his loyalty. 'It seems to be amateur hour at the FDA, and Prasad is an unnecessary distraction,' a Trump official told the Daily Mail. A hematologist-oncologist and outspoken critic of FDA bureaucracy, Prasad has long argued that the agency is too slow to adapt to scientific innovation. In July, Makary told Politico that Prasad doesn't have a 'political bone to his body.' According to senior administration officials who spoke with Politico, Wiles worked closely with Kennedy and Makary to convince the president that Prasad was not anti-Trump and should be reinstated. 'I think it really is something good about the president that he's willing to change his mind when persuaded,' one of the senior administration officials told Politico. Still, Prasad's rehiring not only signals Trump's willingness to overlook past criticisms but also represents a quiet victory for Kennedy, who now has one of his most trusted allies back inside the agency. It also underscores the limits of Loomer's influence in shaping personnel decisions despite her past successes. She has reportedly been behind nearly a dozen ousts of so-called 'deep state' officials she says have been harmful to the administration. Trump reportedly fired multiple officials on the White House National Security Council after an April meeting with Loomer. But after Prasad's rehiring was announced, Loomer called the move 'demoralizing' and an 'open disrespect of the MAGA base.' Prasad's reinstatement places him at the center of one of the administration's most ambitious policy fights: reshaping how the US regulates vaccines and biotechnology. But in a column for Newsmax, Texas-based conservative strategist Charlie Kolean warned that Prasad's regulatory approach could slow the pace of medical innovation and delay life-saving treatments. He argued that Prasad's emphasis on excessive caution would create bottlenecks for biotech development, giving foreign competitors an advantage. And he told the Daily Mail that the FDA's direction on drug approvals and biotech regulation could shift under Prasad's leadership. During his initial stint at the FDA, Prasad blocked the approval of a gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, citing concerns over the strength of the clinical evidence. The move sparked backlash from patient advocacy groups and families affected by the disease, who argued that the therapy represented a rare and urgent lifeline.
Daily Mail
11 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Albanese government set to overhaul the NDIS with significant changes
Anthony Albanese's government plans to remove children with mild autism or minor developmental delays from the NDIS, as the scheme's costs continue to spiral. Health and NDIS Minister Mark Butler (pictured) told the National Press Club in Canberra on Wednesday the National Disability Insurance Scheme had become too big since it debuted in 2013 - with one in six Australian six-year-old boys now an NDIS participant. 'The scheme is now entering its adolescence, a period that all parents know involves the maturing of our beautiful children but a period also that can be full of risks that things will run off the rails without a judicious dose of management and supervision,' he said. 'The NDIS has grown incredibly fast and created new markets which have at times impacted and distorted other parts of the health and social care ecosystem.' Butler said the government was aiming to pare back the NDIS to its original purpose to serve those with a permanent disability, following a review initiated by former NDIS minister Bill Shorten in 2022. 'First, returning the scheme to its original purpose, its North Star - the provision of support to people with significant and permanent disability and secondly, ensuring the scheme becomes sustainable from a Budget perspective.' The NDIS is forecast to cost taxpayers $52.3billion in 2025-26 which is more than Australia's $51.5billion defence budget, even during a time of global geopolitical uncertainty. The cost of the National Disability Insurance scheme is growing at a faster annual pace than aged care, even as more baby boomers retire, and Medicare. The NDIS costs blew out to $48.5billion in 2024-25 and the Treasury Budget papers revealed it was Australia's third most expensive program after revenue help for the states and territories and support for seniors. The scheme is becoming more expensive, as children with autism make up the bulk of new recipients instead of those with a permanent disability. 'Growth in new participant numbers remains high,' he said. 'Diverting this group of kids over time from the NDIS is an important element of making the scheme sustainable and returning it to its original intent.' A Nine Newspapers analysis of new NDIS recipients during the last financial year showed seven out of 10 of them were children with autism - or 56,000 out of the 78,000 participants who signed on between July 2024 and June 2025. 'Just under half the scheme's participants are now children under 15 - a share that rose again in this month's latest quarterly report and fully half of the new NDIS entrants are under the age of nine, most of whom have developmental delay or autism and are entering the scheme under the early intervention stream,' Butler said. 'Now I think most Australians would be alarmed to know that now, one out of every 10 six-year olds are now on the NDIS, including 16 per cent of six-year old boys. 'That's one in every six boys in the average, grade two classroom.' On the New South Wales mid-north coast, it's one in four six-year old boys. The NDIS's June quarter report for 2024-25 revealed that for most participants under 18, 'the most prevalent disability types are autism and developmental delay'. 'Both disability types have higher diagnosis rates in males,' it said. The NDIS now support 740,000 Australians, which Mr Butler said was projected to grow to 1million by 2034. The scheme was originally intended to support 410,000 people with a disability when it began in 2013, during former Labor prime minister Julia Gillard's final months in office. The government in 2023 announced it would also aim to restrict annual growth, in the NDIS, to eight per cent a year, with public spending under Labor already at the highest level since 1986 outside of the Covid pandemic. 'Getting growth down from 22 per cent to eight per cent will certainly be a substantial achievement,' Butler said.
BBC News
12 hours ago
- BBC News
Why men in Jersey struggle to ask their GP for help
More than a decade ago, a report from the government showed on average 120 men a year were dying from preventable causes, compared to 70 have things improved since then?Dr Guillaume Besson said he thought there was still a lot to do to help men reach out for help from doctors before it was too started the Men's Clinic at the Lido Medical Centre this year to provide specialist support for men and to help them with issues they might not feel comfortable speaking to others Besson said: "Men are really underrepresented when it comes to health... [many] find it difficult to come and see their doctor." 'Embarrassing to call' He said range of reasons saw GP appointments put off, leading to later serious health Besson added they had found "18% of men will not attend their GP because of privacy concerns" and "lots of men find it embarrassing to call up and say they need to book an appointment because of things like poor erections".That is why patients submit contact forms online to the clinic, where they detail the reason for their appointment and only call to confirm the also said: "About half of men will have some form of sexual dysfunction, and things like poor erections can be a sign of heart disease.""The main concern is that things fester, becoming harder to treat and high blood pressure and high cholesterol levels often don't have symptoms, and you only find out with a heart attack or stroke." Figures from Public Health show that men often lived until the age of 80, but spent 17-and-a-half years in poorer health on of Public Health Professor Peter Bradley said poorer health was caused by common conditions such as heart disease, cancer and diabetes and "they are largely preventable, so there really is a value in getting checked".He added: "It's especially important when you get into your 40s to consider going to your GP or health provider and get some basic tests done, start thinking about your lifestyle and do that early on."This has also been an issue raised in the States Assembly by the health minister this year when Deputy Tom Binet answered questions about inequalities in the health said "there are inequalities in mental health" and men are "twice as likely" to die from suicide than women in Jersey. Matt Falla started a mental health support group for men called Man Club, which has started a partnership with Island Padel to improve men's physical health as said mental and physical health were "intrinsically linked" and "Padel has a community aspect where you support each other which is a big help".Mr Falla added: "We are much better at being open about our problems, but men still struggle to talk about things that don't have an obvious solution like health."According to the ONS Health Insight Survey, external from February, commissioned by NHS England, 45.8% of women compared to just 33.5% of men had attempted to make contact with their GP practice for themselves or someone else in their household in the previous 28 days.
