logo
Accused mushroom killer says she lied to police: Australian court

Accused mushroom killer says she lied to police: Australian court

Straits Times3 days ago

Erin Patterson maintains the lunch was poisoned by accident and has pleaded not guilty to all charges. PHOTO: REUTERS
Accused mushroom killer says she lied to police: Australian court
SYDNEY - An Australian woman accused of murdering three people with poisonous mushrooms told a court on June 5 she lied to police because she feared being held 'responsible'.
Erin Patterson is charged with murdering her estranged husband's parents and aunt in 2023 by spiking their beef Wellington lunch with lethal death cap mushrooms.
She is also accused of attempting to murder a fourth guest – her husband's uncle – who survived after a long stay in hospital.
Patterson maintains the lunch was poisoned by accident and has pleaded not guilty to all charges.
An Australian court was told on June 5 how Patterson used a food dehydrator to prepare mushrooms that she had collected while foraging.
Patterson later told police she did not own a food dehydrator, the prosecution said.
'You lied about dehydrating food and mushrooms because you knew that if you told police the truth, then that would implicate you in the poisoned lunch,' prosecution lawyer Nanette Rogers said on June 5. 'Agree or disagree?'
Patterson responded: 'I agree that I lied because I was afraid I would be held responsible.'
The court previously heard that Patterson used a food dehydrator to preserve store-bought and foraged mushrooms, which she then kept in her pantry.
Days after the deadly lunch, security cameras allegedly captured Patterson discarding the dehydrator at a local rubbish dump.
Detectives said they found traces of death cap mushrooms in the dehydrator, the court previously heard.
'I didn't deliberately put death cap mushrooms in the meal,' Patterson told the court on June 5.
The prosecution alleges Patterson intentionally poisoned her lunch guests and took care that she did not consume the deadly mushrooms herself.
Her defence says Patterson ate the same meal as the others but did not fall as sick.
Beef Wellington
Patterson asked her estranged husband Mr Simon Patterson to the family lunch at her secluded rural Victoria home in July 2023.
Mr Patterson turned down the invitation because he felt too uncomfortable, the court heard previously.
The pair were long estranged but still legally married.
Mr Patterson's parents Don and Gail were happy to attend, dying days after eating the home-cooked meal.
Mr Patterson's aunt Heather Wilkinson also died, while her husband Ian fell seriously ill but later recovered.
Patterson told the court on June 5 if her husband had attended the lunch, she would have 'given him a beef Wellington too'.
'But not one with death cap mushrooms in it intentionally,' she said.
Patterson's defence lawyer Colin Mandy on June 5 asked if she intended to kill or cause serious injury to her lunch guests that day.
Patterson replied she did not.
The trial continues. AFP
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Colombian Senator Miguel Uribe shot in Bogota; condition unclear
Colombian Senator Miguel Uribe shot in Bogota; condition unclear

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Colombian Senator Miguel Uribe shot in Bogota; condition unclear

BOGOTA - Colombian Senator Miguel Uribe Turbay was shot in Bogota on Saturday, according to the government and his party, with no immediate confirmation from the authorities on the status of his condition. The 39-year-old senator is a member of the opposition conservative Democratic Center party, founded by former Colombian President Alvaro Uribe. The two men are not related. According to a party statement condemning the attack, the senator was hosting a campaign event in a public park in the Fontibon neighborhood in the capital on Saturday when "armed subjects shot him in the back." The party described the attack as serious, but did not disclose further details on his health. Colombia's presidency issued a statement saying the government "categorically and forcefully" rejected the violent attack, and called for a thorough investigation into the events that took place. Uribe's mother, the journalist Diana Turbay, was killed in 1991 during a rescue operation after she was kidnapped by Pablo Escobar's Medellin cartel. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

‘I want women to know that this kind of thing really happens': Wife-rape survivor on telling her story
‘I want women to know that this kind of thing really happens': Wife-rape survivor on telling her story

Straits Times

time5 hours ago

  • Straits Times

‘I want women to know that this kind of thing really happens': Wife-rape survivor on telling her story

Annie (not her real name) hopes her story can encourage other couples to discuss issues openly with each other. ST PHOTO: GIN TAY 'I want women to know that this kind of thing really happens': Wife-rape survivor on telling her story SINGAPORE – Annie (not her real name) was one of the four victims in a disturbing case where husbands plotted with others to drug their own wives. The unconscious women were then sexual ly violated. The man Annie married in 2008 – and has since divorced – was among the seven men who have been convicted and sentenced for their involvement in the ring. Annie's former husband, who was referred to as J in media reports, had facilitated the most number of rapes. J got the heaviest sentence of all the men: 29 years in prison and 24 strokes of the cane. Annie, who is in her 40s and has four children, first contacted The Straits Times through her brother-in-law in 2024, after J appealed for a lighter sentence. Accompanied by her sister and brother-in-law, Annie wanted her story told. ST met her a second time in May 2025. By then, all the criminal cases had concluded and her divorce was finalised. Facing an all-female team of print and visual journalists in ST's newsroom studio, Annie was determined to tell her story. 'I was initially a bit worried about speaking up, because I am not sure if I can face the embarrassment... (but) I want women to know that this kind of thing really happens,' she said. She was steadfast, while aware she may be judged, adding: 'I know that in the media, everybody is wondering what actually happened, so I hope I can clear the air.' Annie was also inspired by Ms Gisele Pelicot, a 72-year-old grandmother in France who was raped over a decade by 51 men. Her estranged husband had orchestrated the whole thing. Ms Pelicot waived her right to anonymity during what she called 'a trial of cowardice'. The similarities are striking. Both of them learnt of their husbands' betrayal in 2020. Both were drugged and exploited. And both were manipulated to believe that all was well. 'I felt, 'Why is this thing happening around (the world)? Why are there wives suffering like that?' '(Ms Pelicot) suffered much worse than me, and I really pity her... She is very, very brave,' Annie said. Unlike the Frenchwoman, Annie cannot see herself unveiling her identity any time soon. 'Maybe when I am 80,' she said. Shame changing sides Four words Ms Pelicot said during the trial became a rallying cry for women: 'Shame must change sides.' It echoes with Annie. While the online chatter was largely directed at the perpetrators, the occasional comment shamed her as it emerged in court that she had had an affair with one of the rapists, identified as O. Annie said she slept with him to get back at her ex-husband for affairs he had. She did not have feelings for O; he propositioned her when her relationship with J was at the 'lowest'. 'I felt guilty for doing that. But I felt like I'd been forced to do it,' she said. The victim-shaming she had to endure was not just from strangers or J. J's mother submitted letters to the court pleading for leniency. She portrayed her son as a good family man and made mention of Annie's temper. Annie acknowledged that J did take care of her during their marriage and was not abusive. 'Every time we fought, I was the one who turned abusive. I was the one who wanted to punch him or slap him because I didn't know how to vent my frustration,' she said. But nothing could justify the cruelty of getting five men to rape her. 'Even if you hate your wife so much, you can just divorce her, let her go,' said Annie. J's mother also told Annie's children that it was 'her fault' that their father was in jail. Recalling her former mother-in-law's words, Annie's anger was palpable. 'I hope she can enlighten me. Tell me what kind of fault it is, so that I can avoid it in future.' Prosecutors called the husbands' betrayal 'gut-wrenching'. They said: 'When a woman enters into marriage, she entrusts herself to her husband. 'She trusts that the man she sleeps beside will not harm her as she sleeps, she trusts that in sickness, her husband will not poison her with drugs passed off as medicine, she trusts that her husband will keep private their most intimate sexual moments together.' Instead, the men breached their wives' trust on every front, said the prosecutors. Helplines Mental well-being Institute of Mental Health's Mental Health Helpline: 6389-2222 (24 hours) Samaritans of Singapore: 1-767 (24 hours) / 9151-1767 (24 hours CareText via WhatsApp) Singapore Association for Mental Health: 1800-283-7019 Silver Ribbon Singapore: 6386-1928 Chat, Centre of Excellence for Youth Mental Health: 6493-6500/1 Women's Helpline (Aware): 1800-777-5555 (weekdays, 10am to 6pm) Counselling Touchline (Counselling): 1800-377-2252 Touch Care Line (for caregivers): 6804-6555 Counselling and Care Centre: 6536-6366 We Care Community Services: 3165-8017 Clarity Singapore: 6757-7990 Online resources (for those aged 13 to 25) (for those aged 12 to 25) J appealed against his sentence. The man, who was self-represented, told the Court of Appeal that he was appealing out of his love for his wife, children and ageing parents, and that he could not leave his loved ones to 'fend for themselves'. He said he was not denying that he had done wrong, but was asking for leniency. He lost his appeal in January 2024 , with Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon describing his sentence as 'lenient'. Annie has not reached out to the other victims involved as she wants to put the past behind her. But she hopes her story can encourage other couples to discuss issues openly between husband and wife. Annie said: 'My advice to all the women out there is to speak up. Don't suffer in silence... don't be like me.' Selina Lum is senior law correspondent at The Straits Times. Christine Tan is a journalist at The Straits Times reporting on crime, justice and social issues in Singapore. Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.

Trump says US justice department, not him, made decision to bring back Abrego Garcia
Trump says US justice department, not him, made decision to bring back Abrego Garcia

Straits Times

time6 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Trump says US justice department, not him, made decision to bring back Abrego Garcia

Kilmar Abrego Garcia is a 29-year-old Salvadoran whose wife, Ms Jennifer Vasquez Sura (above), and young child are US citizens. PHOTO: REUTERS Trump says US justice department, not him, made decision to bring back Abrego Garcia WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump said on June 7 it was the Department of Justice, not him, that made the decision to bring back to the US a man mistakenly deported from Maryland to El Salvador. Kilmar Abrego Garcia was flown back to face criminal charges of transporting illegal immigrants within the US, Attorney-General Pam Bondi said on June 6. His return marked an inflection point in a case seized on by critics of Mr Trump's immigration crackdown as a sign that his administration was disregarding civil liberties in its push to step up deportations of migrants. 'Well, that wasn't my decision. The Department of Justice decided to do it that way, and that's fine,' Mr Trump told NBC News in an interview, when asked about Abrego Garcia's return. Mr Trump added that he had not spoken to El Salvador President Nayib Bukele about the move. Abrego Garcia, a 29-year-old Salvadoran whose wife and young child in Maryland are US citizens, appeared in federal court in Nashville on the evening of June 6. His arraignment was set for June 13, when he will enter a plea, according to local media reports. Until then, he will remain in federal custody. If convicted, he would be deported to El Salvador after serving his sentence, Ms Bondi said. The Trump administration has said Abrego Garcia was a member of the MS-13 gang, an accusation that his lawyers deny. Abrego Garcia was deported on March 15, more than two months before the charges were filed. He was briefly held in a mega-prison known as the Terrorism Confinement Centre in El Salvador, despite a US immigration judge's 2019 order barring him from being sent to the Central American nation because he would likely be persecuted by gangs. Mr Trump said he thought it would be 'a very easy case' against Abrego Garcia, who he accused of having a 'horrible record of abuse' of women. Abrego Garcia's lawyer, Mr Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, has called the criminal charges "fantastical." REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store