Installation at Kanakakunnu Palace sparks outrage among nature lovers
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: Green activists in the state capital on Saturday organised a peaceful protest walk demanding the protection of the heritage grounds of Kanakakunnu Palace. As many as 20 nature lovers took part in the walk held at Kanakakunnu Palace on Saturday morning. The massive installation of a container-laden ship replica at the Kanakakunnu Palace premises in Vizhinjam has sparked outrage among environmentalists.
Earlier, green activists had moved the High Court against implementing nightlife at Kanakakunnu Palace premises causing damage to the heritage grounds of the palace and the HC had issued a stay order halting the nightlife project. The existing High Court order restricts any kind of construction activities, hard landscaping, excavation, tree removal and demolition of structures within the compound and inside the historically significant palace.
'Kanakakunnu is an INTACH certified heritage property and nothing of this sort can be done inside it without the permission of the Arts and Heritage Commission. They have put up this huge installation close to the tree which I planted in 2022. Back to back events, and installations are causing damage to the trees and plants inside the premises,' said Asha Gopinathan, a green activist who took up the matter with the tourism department.
In response to the complaint, tourism director Shika Surendran said that the installation is connected with the inauguration of the Vizhinjam International Seaport project. She pointed out that the installations are temporary and are scheduled for removal immediately. She also made it clear that the installation was erected responsibly without causing any damage to the flora and fauna.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Slum dwellers on mangrove land not entitled to rehab, rules HC
MUMBAI: In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court on Friday held that slum dwellers who have settled on protected forests — including mangrove land and buffer zones — cannot seek rehabilitation under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971. A division bench of Justice Girish S Kulkarni and Justice Advait Sethna upheld the Maharashtra government's stance that Section 3Z-6 of the Slum Act explicitly excludes forest areas from its scope. As a result, encroachments on forest land are not entitled to the protections or benefits afforded to recognised slum dwellers. The court was hearing a petition filed by four residents of Laxminagar, a settlement located within mangrove forests and buffer zones in Charkop, Kandivali. The petitioners approached the High Court through advocate Ronita Bhattacharya Bector after revenue authorities demolished around 500 huts in the area — including theirs — in April 2021. The petitioners argued that the demolition was unlawful as they had been residing there since 1980 and were therefore eligible for rehabilitation under a government resolution (GR) dated June 16, 2015. That GR protects slum dwellers who settled before January 1, 2000, by entitling them to permanent alternate accommodation. They also cited a second GR dated May 16, 2018, which extends similar benefits to those settled between January 1, 2000, and January 1, 2011. However, additional government pleader Uma Palsuledesai, appearing for the state, countered that the petitioners were not entitled to any relief as they had encroached on protected mangrove land — classified as a reserved forest under Survey No. 39, spanning 57 hectares. She pointed out that Section 3Z-6 of the Slum Act expressly excludes such areas, including those falling under Coastal Regulation Zones (CRZ), from its purview. Agreeing with this submission, the bench observed, 'There is a clear exclusion for the applicability of the Slums Act set out under Section 3Z-6. The land in question falls within a protected forest. Therefore, the provisions of the Slums Act will not apply, and the petitioners cannot claim benefit as protected occupiers under the Act.' The court also noted that the area had never been formally declared a slum under the Act, and that the petitioners failed to meet the statutory definition of 'eligible slum dwellers' as laid out in Section 2(c-b) of the Act. 'This is a case where protection, relocation, and rehabilitation under Section 3Z of the Slums Act are not available to the petitioners, rendering their claim against the demolition legally untenable and unsustainable,' the court concluded, dismissing the petition.
The Hindu
4 days ago
- The Hindu
Madras High Court bids farewell to Justice RMT Teekaa Raman
CHENNAI The Madras High Court on Friday (June 6, 2025) bid adieu to Justice RMT. Teekaa Raman who is due to retire from service on June 8, 2025 on attaining the age of superannuation. With his retirement, the working strength of the High Court would get reduced to 58 as against the sanctioned strength of 75 judges. Delivering his farewell address, Advocate General P.S. Raman said, Justice Raman, hailing from Arcot in Vellore district, was a mathematician turned lawyer since he had obtained a bachelor's as well a master's degree in mathematics before pursuing law and getting enrolled with the Bar Council in 1988. He was selected as District Judge by direct recruiment in 2004 and joined Tamil Nadu State Judicial Service in 2005. After serving in various districts across Tamil Nadu and also in the High Court Registry, he got elevated as an additional judge of the High Court in November 2016 and became permanent in 2018. He had delivered many important verdicts including the 2023 judgement wherein he held that removal of uterus by a woman suffering from ovarian cancer would not amount to cruelty thereby entitling her husband to seek divorce on that ground. In another case, he held denying financial support to wife would amount to cruelty. In yet another case, he ruled that a marriage between an Indian professing Hinduism with a foreigner of different faith must necessarily be registered under the Special Marriage Act of 1954 and that such a marriage could not be considered as a valid marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act of 1955. During his stint as a High Court for more than eight years, he had disposed of 22,699 main cases and 20,851 miscellaneous petitions. While a majority of 6,908 main cases were disposed of by him individually, another 5,042 main cases were disposed of as a part of various Division Benches. In his acceptance to the farewell address, Justice Raman thanked his mentor J. Kanagaraj, a former judge of the Madras High Court, his parents, other family members and gurus for their contributions towards his growth. He also recalled a couple of interesting criminal cases heard by him as a district judge.
India.com
5 days ago
- India.com
World Environment Day
Videos World Environment Day | সাইকেলে সবুজের বার্তা! পরিবেশ দিবসে হাইকোর্টে অভিনব উদ্যোগ | Zee 24 Ghanta Message of greenery on a bicycle Unique initiative at High Court on Environment Day Message of greenery on a bicycle Unique initiative at High Court on Environment Day | Updated: Jun 05, 2025, 01:10 PM IST Advertisement Message of greenery on a bicycle Unique initiative at High Court on Environment Day
