Sarawak Day: Wan Junaidi calls on Sarawakians to work with govt for a better future
He said progress could not happen without close cooperation between the government, the people and the private sector.
"The government provides policies and infrastructure, the private sector is the driver of investment and the people are the supporters of development aspirations," he said in his message for Sarawak Day tomorrow.
He praised the leadership of Premier Tan Sri Abang Johari Openg, who is leading Sarawak towards progress through the Post-Covid-19 Development Strategy, which focuses on digital economic growth, renewable energy development, including green hydrogen, digital economy, as well as investment in education and innovation.
He said Sarawak's economy has shown strong resilience post-pandemic and is poised to soar on the global stage in green energy and the digital economy.
On Sarawak Day, he described July 22, 1963 as an important symbol of the identity of the people of Sarawak.
He said on that day, the British colonial administration granted self-government to Sarawak and appointed Tan Sri Stephen Kalong Ningkan as the first chief minister, allowing him to form a cabinet.
"This event was an important initial step in Sarawak's preparation to form the Federation of Malaysia with Sabah, Singapore and Malaya."
He said the British colonial administration handed over power to Sarawak before the Federation of Malaysia was formed on Sept 16, 1963.
"This event was the starting point for the formation of Sarawak's identity as a sovereign state within the Federation of Malaysia."
Wan Junaidi urged Sarawakians to remember the services of past leaders who paved the way, such as Stephen and Datuk Sri Tawi Sli, who played important roles in forming their own administrations.
He thanked former chief ministers the late Tun Abdul Rahman Ya'kub, the late Tun Abdul Taib Mahmud and the late Tan Sri Pehin Sri Adenan Satem for their great contributions to the development of Sarawak.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
29 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
We didn't meet to back your protest, NGOs tell Hamzah
Opposition leader Hamzah Zainudin had claimed that several NGOs, including Bersih, had approached him expressing unhappiness with the current government. PETALING JAYA : Six NGOS have rejected the basis of the anti-Anwar Ibrahim rally set for tomorrow, after opposition leader Hamzah Zainudin used their names yesterday to justify the protest. Bersih, C4 Center, Ideas, Projek Sama, Pusat Komas, and Transparency International Malaysia said further political instability will kill off the institutional reforms they are calling for. 'Because no party wins forever, institutional reform benefits all parties in the long run and should be supported by all,' they said in a joint statement. 'On this basis, we reject any mid-term change of government through the back door, like the Sheraton Move that threw the country's politics into disarray in the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic. 'Even if there is a change of government, the new administration may lack the clarity or commitment to implement institutional reform, or may be too fragile to undertake any meaningful change. 'We want to see the implementation of institutional reforms that will provide a level playing field for all parties in the 16th general election.' Yesterday, Malaysiakini reported Hamzah as claiming at a press conference that several NGOs had approached him expressing unhappiness with the current government. 'They are unhappy, and when they are not happy, then there is a motivation to 'turun' (join) the rally this Saturday. 'Many will be joining the rally, so do not be mad at us. The rakyat want to protest because many problems have been accumulating,' the Perikatan Nasional deputy chairman said. However, the NGOs said their meeting with Hamzah on July 1 had nothing to do with any political rally, and that they only sought to present their proposals on institutional reform and not to endorse any political campaign. They urged the opposition to play its role as 'effective competition' with the government to push for more institutional reforms. '(Reforms) require not only the determination of the Madani government, but also effective competition from the opposition, including the four states under PN, in terms of ideas and commitment, to the fullest extent of their power. 'It is only when all parties are racing to offer reforms can reform be driven and steered effectively,' they said.
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Amid Epstein furor, Ghislaine Maxwell seeks relief from US Supreme Court
(Reuters) -Even as an uproar over files relating to Jeffrey Epstein engulfs President Donald Trump and Congress, the U.S. Supreme Court is due to wade into the controversy and decide whether to hear a bid by an associate of the late financier and convicted sex offender to overturn her criminal conviction. The justices, now on their summer recess, are expected in late September to consider whether to take up an appeal by British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, currently serving a 20-year prison sentence after being found guilty in 2021 by a jury in New York of helping Epstein sexually abuse teenage girls. Maxwell's lawyers have told the Supreme Court that her conviction was invalid because a non-prosecution and plea agreement that federal prosecutors had made with Epstein in Florida in 2007 also shielded his associates and should have barred her criminal prosecution in New lawyers have a Monday deadline for filing their final written brief in their appeal to the court. Some legal experts see merit in Maxwell's claim, noting that it touches on an unsettled matter of U.S. law that has divided some of the nation's regional federal appeals courts, known as circuit courts. Mitchell Epner, a former federal prosecutor now in private practice, said there is a chance that the Supreme Court takes up the case, and noted the disagreement among appeals courts. Such a split among circuit courts can be a factor when the nation's top judicial body considers whether or not to hear a case. "The question of whether a plea agreement from one U.S. Attorney's Office binds other federal prosecution as a whole is a serious issue that has split the circuits," Epner said. While uncommon, "there have been several cases presenting the issue over the years," Epner added. Trump's Justice Department appeared to acknowledge the circuit split in a brief filed to the justices this month, but urged them to reject the appeal. Any disparity among lower court rulings "is of limited importance," Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote in the brief, "because the scope of a plea or similar agreement is under the control of the parties to the agreement." If the Supreme Court opts to grant Maxwell's appeal, it would hear arguments during its new term that begins in October, with a ruling then expected by the end of next June. MOUNTING PRESSURE Trump and his administration have been facing mounting pressure from his supporters to release additional information about the Justice Department's investigation into Epstein, who hanged himself in 2019 in a Manhattan jail cell, an autopsy concluded, while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. Deputy U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche, a former personal lawyer to Trump, met with Maxwell in Florida on Thursday in what her lawyer called "a very productive day." The administration reversed course this month on its pledge to release more documents about Epstein, prompting fury among some of Trump's most loyal followers. The Epstein case has long been the subject of conspiracy theories, considering his rich and powerful friends and the circumstances of his death. The Supreme Court's 6-3 conservative majority includes three justices appointed by Trump during his first term in office. Whether the court would want to take on such a case that represents a political landmine is an open question. The justices hear relatively few cases - about 70 out of more than 4,000 appeals filed at the court each year - and have broad discretion to choose which ones will be on their docket. At least four of the justices must agree in order for the court to take up a case. EPSTEIN'S DEAL Maxwell's appeal focuses on a deal Epstein struck in 2007 to avoid federal prosecution in part by pleading guilty to state criminal offenses in Florida of soliciting prostitution and soliciting minors to engage in prostitution. Epstein then served 13 months in a minimum-security state facility. In 2019, during Trump's first term as president, the U.S. Justice Department charged Epstein in Manhattan with sex trafficking of minors. Epstein pleaded not guilty, but committed suicide before the trial at age 66. Maxwell was arrested in 2020 and convicted the following year after being accused by federal prosecutors of recruiting and grooming girls to have sexual encounters with Epstein between 1994 and 2004. Maxwell failed to convince a trial judge and the New York-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to throw out her conviction based on the 2007 non-prosecution agreement, which stated that "the United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein." In the appeal to the Supreme Court, Maxwell's lawyer David Markus said that in its reference to co-conspirators, the Epstein agreement had no geographic limit on where the non-prosecution agreement could be enforced. "If the government can promise one thing and deliver another - and courts let it happen - that erodes the integrity of the justice system," Markus told Reuters. "This isn't just about Ghislaine Maxwell. It's about whether the government is held to its word," Markus said. The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers has urged the Supreme Court to hear Maxwell's appeal given the prevalence of plea agreements in the U.S. criminal justice system and to ensure that the government keeps its promises. The group represents thousands of private lawyers, public defenders, law professors and judges nationwide. It said in a filing to the justices that the lack of a geographic limitation means "no part of the Department of Justice may institute criminal charges against any co-conspirator in any district." Columbia Law School professor Daniel Richman, an expert in criminal law, said it was unusual for the U.S. attorney in Florida to include protection for co-conspirators in the agreement to not prosecute Epstein. That peculiarity might be reason enough for the Supreme Court to avoid the matter, Richman said, as it renders the case a poor vehicle for resolving whether pleas in one court district bind actions in all other court districts. "There were many strange things about this deal," Richman said, which will cut against the Supreme Court's interest in taking up Maxwell's appeal. Richman said he hoped the political fallout would not play into the Supreme Court's decision on whether to hear Maxwell's appeal. If it does, Richman said, taking up the case could allow Maxwell to avoid cooperating with the government and dodge responsibility. "A decision that would allow Maxwell to protect herself probably would not be something they would be interested in," Richman said of the Supreme Court justices. (Reporting by Andrew Chung; Editing by Amy Stevens and Will Dunham)
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Hong Kong issues arrest warrants for 19 overseas activists with bounties
HONG KONG: Hong Kong's national security police announced arrest warrants for 19 activists based overseas, accusing them of subversion under a stringent national security law, marking the largest such tally yet. They are accused of organizing or participating in the 'Hong Kong Parliament', a group authorities in the Asian financial hub say aimed to subvert state power, under the law Beijing imposed in 2020 following months of pro-democracy protests in 2019. The activists are accused of having launched a referendum or run as candidates in the unofficial 'Hong Kong Parliament' group, which authorities say aims at achieving self-determination and drafting a 'Hong Kong constitution'. Police, who said the organisation sought to overthrow the governments of China and Hong Kong by unlawful means, said they are still investigating and further arrests may follow. Among those named are businessman Elmer Yuen, commentator Victor Ho, and activists Johnny Fok and Tony Choi. Four of them are subject to previous arrest warrants, each carrying a bounty of HK$1 million ($127,000). Among the remaining 15, for each of whom police are offering a bounty of HK$200,000 ($25,480), are those said to have organised or run in the election and sworn in as its councillors. None of the accused could be reached for comment. The former British colony returned to Chinese rule in 1997 with the guarantee of a high degree of autonomy, including freedom of speech, under a 'one country, two systems' formula. Critics of the national security law say authorities are using it to stifle dissent. Chinese and Hong Kong officials have repeatedly said the law was vital to restore stability after the city was rocked for months by sometimes violent anti-government and anti-China protests in 2019. Police reiterated that national security offenses were serious crimes with extraterritorial reach and urged the wanted individuals to return to Hong Kong and surrender. 'If offenders voluntarily give up continuing to violate the crime, turn themselves in, truthfully confess their crimes, or provide key information that helps solve other cases, they may be eligible for reduced punishment,' they said in a statement. Police also warned that aiding, abetting, or funding others to participate in the 'Hong Kong Parliament' could be a criminal offense. ($1=7.8488 Hong Kong dollars) - Reuters
