
What the shocking NYC mayoral race means for two of California's biggest politicians
A Democratic Socialist winning New York's Democratic mayoral primary doesn't mean the Big Apple is more progressive than San Francisco. But the victory by 33-year-old Zohran Mamdani over former New York Gov. and political scion Andrew Cuomo, 67, sends a loud message that is reverberating to the West Coast: Democratic voters want candidates with a fresh voice and a more populist economic message.
That could portend bad news for former Vice President Kamala Harris, the epitome of an establishment candidate who is pondering running for California governor next year. She has said she will announce her decision before the end of the summer.
Lorena Gonzalez, president of the 2.1 million-member California Labor Federation, said Mamdani's win taps into the same sentiments she has been hearing from focus groups the federation has been conducting with working-class voters for the past six months across California.
'It's clear that there is a hunger for an economic message that is just not being satisfied by either party,' Gonzalez said Wednesday. 'It's time for the party to step up on economic issues.'
Ludovic Blain, executive director of the California Donor Table, an organization that has invested over $50 million in progressive candidates and ballot measures over the past two decades, said, 'What we saw in New York is an echo of what's been happening around the country, concentrated here in California.' He pointed to progressive mayors being elected in Los Angeles, Chicago and Oakland over the past two years.
While the winner of Democratic primary in deep blue New York City starts with a huge advantage, Mamdani's road will be tougher than many previous primary winners. In the general election, he will face the incumbent, Mayor Eric Adams, running as an independent after federal corruption charges against him were dismissed at the behest of President Donald Trump's Department of Justice. Cuomo also may run as an independent, potentially splintering the Democratic vote.
Warning signs for Harris: 'The NYC mayoral election results are a bad sign for an establishment politician trying to make a comeback like Kamala Harris,' said San Francisco Democratic pollster Ben Tulchin, who has helped to elect California governors (Gray Davis and Gavin Newsom) and a New York mayor (Adams in 2021). Mamdani's win is a 'an encouraging sign for candidates focusing on pocketbook issues, such as (former Los Angeles Mayor) Antonio Villaraigosa, who has been emphasizing the high cost of groceries and gas prices.'
Harris, much like Cuomo, would enter the governor's race with near universal name recognition, deep pockets and likely the backing of the party's establishment. But Cuomo didn't grow his base during the campaign while Mamdani surged.
Mamdani's win was a rebuke of the Democratic establishment: Cuomo was backed by a record-breaking $25 million super PAC, privilege (his father, Mario Cuomo, served two terms as New York's governor) and endorsements from the party's elders like former President Bill Clinton. His super PAC was funded with $8.3 million from billionaire former Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, $1 million from DoorDash and $500,000 from investor Bill Ackman, a Trump supporter. The message: Billionaires, Trump supporters and yesterday's leaders are not the path to victory in a blue city in the Trump 2.0 era.
Meanwhile, candidates supported by Run for Something, which backs progressive younger candidates, have won 50 races nationwide this year.
'The next generation of leaders isn't coming — it's already here,' said Run for Something President Amanda Litman. 'Young people have lived the consequences of the gerontocracy's failures and are doing something about it. They've won elections, yes, but they've also won real concessions for the people they represent. Voters are hungry for change. If their leaders don't give it to them, they'll happily find someone else who will.'
Former Barack Obama adviser and San Francisco-based 'Pod Save America' co-host Dan Pfeiffer wrote Wednesday on X: 'What's happening in NYC is a blaringly loud message to those in the Dem establishment who cling to the old politics, recite focus-grouped talking points and are too afraid to say what needs to be said. We have a lot to learn from (Mamdani's) campaign.'
One San Franciscan bolstered by Mamdani's win was Saikat Chakrabarti, 39, who is challenging Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi, 84, for Congress in 2026. Chakrabarti, who was a founding software engineer at the tech firm Stripe, led the Justice Democrats progressive group and was chief of staff to New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y.Pelosi has not announced if she is running for re-election.
'The next (Mamdani) could be (Chakrabarti) running against Nancy Pelosi,' wrote Cenk Uygur, CEO of 'The Young Turks,' progressive online news show. 'If he beats Pelosi, the old guard of the party will be devastated. Time for a new Democratic Party.'
Gonzalez said being a Democratic Socialist didn't hurt Mandami, just like it hasn't impeded Vermont independent Sen. Bernie Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez, who both endorsed Mandami, from drawing huge crowds across the country this year for their 'Fighting Oligarchy' tour.
'Young people especially don't care (about the socialist label). 'They're not buying into that in the same way that older voters have historically,' Gonzalez said.
It's about the economy — and joy: In a fundraising email to supporters Wednesday, the progressive Justice Democrats group praised Mamdani for campaigning 'on lowering costs for New Yorkers through free buses, a rent freeze, no-cost childcare, city-owned grocery stores, taxing corporations and the 1 percent, raising the minimum wage to $30 by 2030, and more. Surprise! That's what working people want from their leader.'
Adams previewed his general election campaign strategy Wednesday when he slammed Mamdani's agenda Wednesday as the unrealistic promises of a 'snake oil salesman' during a Fox News interview.
In an fundraising email to supporters Wednesday, Justice Democrats contrasted Mamdani with other Democrats, saying he 'notably did not throw marginalized communities like trans youth, immigrants, or Palestinians under the bus like so many in the Democratic Party are so quick to do in an attempt to win elections.' Earlier this year, California Gov. Gavin Newsom said on his podcast that it was 'deeply unfair' for transgender athletes to participate in girls' sports during a podcast with conservative activist Charlie Kirk — an attempt by Newsom to try to broaden the party's appeal by talking with conservatives, but which offended many core Democratic supporters.
Mamdani appeared as a guest on many podcasts from across the political spectrum without betraying his base.
'Enthusiasm and energy carried the day in New York,' said Graeme Joeck, director of organizing and advocacy for Abundance San Francisco, a centrist group. 'What Zohran offered New Yorkers was positivity, authenticity and energy. And we Democrats are operating with quite the deficit of those characteristics at present.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Trump officials to give first classified briefing to Congress on Iran strikes
WASHINGTON (AP) — Senators are set to meet with top national security officials Thursday as many question President Donald Trump's decision to bomb three Iranian nuclear sites — and whether those strikes were ultimately successful. The classified briefing, which was originally scheduled for Tuesday and was delayed, also comes as the Senate is expected to vote this week on a resolution that would require congressional approval if Trump decides to strike Iran again . Democrats, and some Republicans, have said that the White House overstepped its authority when it failed to seek the advice of Congress and they want to know more about the intelligence that Trump relied on when he authorized the attacks. 'Senators deserve full transparency, and the administration has a legal obligation to inform Congress precisely about what is happening,' said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, who said Tuesday that it was 'outrageous' that the Senate and House briefings were postponed. A similar briefing for House members was pushed to Friday. CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth are expected to brief the senators on Thursday. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was scheduled to be at the Tuesday briefing, but will not be attending, according to a person familiar with the schedule. The briefing could be contentious as questions have swirled around Trump's decision to strike Iran and whether the attacks were successful. A preliminary U.S. intelligence report found this week that Iran's nuclear program had been set back only a few months, contradicting statements from Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about the status of Iran's nuclear facilities, according to two people familiar with the report. The people were not authorized to address the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. On Wednesday, Gabbard and Ratcliffe sent out statements backing Trump's claims that the facilities were 'completely and fully obliterated.' Gabbard posted on social media that 'new intelligence confirms what @POTUS has stated numerous times: Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed.' She said that if the Iranians choose to rebuild the three facilities, it would 'likely take years to do.' Ratcliffe said in a statement from the CIA that Iran's nuclear program has been 'severely damaged' and cited new intelligence 'from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.' Most Republicans have staunchly defended Trump and hailed the tentative ceasefire he brokered in the Israel-Iran war. House Speaker Mike Johnson even went as far as to question the constitutionality of the War Powers Act , which is intended to give Congress a say in military action. 'The bottom line is the commander in chief is the president, the military reports to the president, and the person empowered to act on the nation's behalf is the president,' Johnson told reporters. But some Republicans — including some of Trump's staunchest supporters — are uncomfortable with the strikes and the potential for U.S. involvement in an extended Middle East conflict. 'I think the speaker needs to review the Constitution,' said Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. 'And I think there's a lot of evidence that our Founding Fathers did not want presidents to unilaterally go to war.' Paul would not say if he is voting for the resolution by Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., that would require congressional approval for specific military action in Iran. The resolution is likely to fail as 60 votes would be needed to pass it and Republicans have a 53-47 majority. But Kaine says it's important to put the Senate on the record. 'You have a debate like this so that the entire American public, whose sons and daughters are in the military and whose lives will be at risk in war, get to see the debate and reach their own conclusion together with the elected officials about whether the mission is worth it or not,' Kaine said. While he did not seek approval, Trump sent congressional leaders a short letter Monday serving as his official notice of the strikes, two days after the bombs fell. The letter said that the strike was taken 'to advance vital United States national interests, and in collective self-defense of our ally, Israel, by eliminating Iran's nuclear program.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
James Carville calls Zohran Mamdani's NYC mayoral primary victory a ‘potentially damaging event' for Democratic Party
Veteran strategist James Carville warned on Wednesday how democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani winning the New York City mayoral primary may be a burden for the Democratic Party. Mamdani, a Ugandan-born New York State Assemblyman from Queens, caused a major upset by defeating former Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the race to become the Democratic Party's nominee for New York City mayor. Republicans and some Democrats have blasted Mamdani, warning he is a grim sign of America's political future. Carville, one of the most famous strategists in American politics, has been speaking about the Democratic Party's need to ditch far-left politics since well before the 2024 election. He spoke about Mamdani's surprising victory on his podcast with co-host Al Hunt, warning it may be yet another hurdle for struggling Democrats. The strategist noted that Mamdani 'has not walked back' calls for 'global infitada' [sic]. Carville was referencing how Mamdani refused to disavow the phrase 'Globalize the intifada,' which pro-Israeli supporters argue is a call for violence, and Israel opponents tout as a mere call to struggle against oppression. 4 Carville warned that Mamdani's victory may be yet another hurdle for struggling Democrats. Youtube / Politicon 'Maybe he'll turn out to be a very skilled candidate that can skillfully navigate some of what I refer to as 'esoteric' positions,' Carville said, appearing to refer to Mamdani's policy of government-run grocery stores, which bewildered the seasoned strategist. 'There's a lot of baseball left here,' Carville said of the mayoral election. 'We've got a lot of baseball left to play.' Hunt argued that New York City is not a reliable indicator for America at-large, citing how many of its most iconic mayors did not represent a larger political shift outside of their city. 4 Republicans and some Democrats have blasted Mamdani, warning he is a grim sign of America's political future. 'However, I do believe that Republicans will jump on this,' he said. He then appeared to refer to Rep. Elise Stefanik's, R-N.Y., comment where she warned about Mamdani being a 'radical, Defund-the-Police, Communist, raging Antisemite.' Hunt denied that Mamdani is a communist, but argued, 'he does have some issues that the Republicans will love to talk about.' 'I can't imagine that any Democratic candidate anywhere in the country is going to be able to escape answering this question. I think the microphone's going to follow him around. I think that they're going to pound this home as hard as they possibly can,' Carville agreed. 4 Hunt argued that New York City is not a reliable political indicator for America at-large. Youtube / Politicon A big part of the answer, Carville replied, is encouraging people to 'look at our nominees in Virginia and New Jersey.' However, he said, 'Depending on who comes in a general election, there's a lot of Democrats that are going to have a hard go at this. I think it's a potentially damaging event.' Both of the hosts drew parallels between former President Joe Biden and Cuomo being rejected as symbols of the Democratic Party's past in favor of something entirely new. 4 Supporters celebrate as Zohran Mamdani leads in the Democratic Primary for New York Mayor at the 'Zohran For NYC Election Night Party' in New York City on June 24, 2025. Derek French/Shutterstock 'Sometimes the Democratic Party's attitude is 'take this and eat it, because you gotta eat it,' and people don't like that,' Carville said, arguing that mentality was enforced on Democrats with Biden and then with Cuomo. The rejection of this, he said, goes beyond ideology and is a generational shift, one could either be positive or negative for the Democrats' future. 'I think this guy creates probably more problems than opportunities for the Democrats,' Hunt later argued after criticizing his grocery store proposal as 'not realistic at all.' Carville warned that opposition to Mamdani is going to 'keep unearthing stuff' from his past. 'I mean he's gotta give an umbrella answer for all of this,' he said. 'You know, Harris had the same problem.'


UPI
2 hours ago
- UPI
Trump administration challenges Minnesota Dream Act in court
June 25 (UPI) -- The Trump administration on Wednesday filed a lawsuit challenging Minnesota laws that provide some undocumented immigrants with higher-education tuition benefits not offered to U.S. citizens. The lawsuit is the third time the Justice Department has challenged states' laws this month amid the Trump administration's crackdown on immigration. The filing challenges the Minnesota Dream Act, which was signed into state law in May 2013 to make illegible some undocumented immigrants in the state for in-state tuition rates, privately funded financial aid and state financial aid. Federal prosecutors allege the Dream Act discriminates against U.S. citizens from other states who must pay higher out-of-state tuition rates while violating federal law that states "an alien who is not lawfully present in the United States shall not be eligible on the basis of residence within a state ... for any postsecondary education benefit unless a citizen or national of the United States is eligible for such a benefit." "No state can be allowed to treat Americans like second-class citizens in their own country by offering financial benefits to illegal aliens," Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement. "The Department of Justice just won on this exact issue in Texas, and we look forward to taking this fight to Minnesota in order to protect the rights of American citizens first." Earlier this month, federal prosecutors filed lawsuit challenging a similar law in Texas. Instead of a legal fight as is anticipated in Minnesota, Texas' Republican-led government joined the Trump administration seeking the enjoin the Texas Dream Act of 2001. And the court sided with them, handing the Trump administration a win in its fight against immigration. "Ending this discriminatory and unAmerican provision is a major victory for Texas," the state's attorney general, Ken Paxton, said in a June 4 statement. On Tuesday, however, the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas and several civil rights and pro-democracy organizations filed a motion to intervene in the Texas case on behalf of students and related groups, arguing the order "creates sweeping uncertainty for impacted students and colleges and universities." "The Texas Legislature passed the Texas Dream Act with overwhelming bipartisan support because Dreamers represent the best of us in our classrooms, board rooms and communities," David Donatti, senior staff attorney at the ACLU of Texas, said in a statement. "While the attorney general normally would defend state laws, the decision not to means that somebody must. We are proud to advocate for our Dreamers alongside Texas schools and students." The Justice Department last week also filed a lawsuit against a similar law in Kentucky. The lawsuits follow President Donald Trump signing several immigration-related executive orders including "Protecting American Communities from Criminal Aliens," which directed the attorney general to identify laws "favoring aliens over any groups of American citizens," including "State laws that provide in-State higher education tuition to alines but not to out-of-State American citizens." Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia provide in-state tuition to their undocumented students, according to the Higher Ed Immigration Portal. Eighteen states and D.C. also provide access to state financial aid.