
Greece: Woman dies after bomb she was carrying explodes in Thessaloniki
A woman was killed early Saturday in the northern Greek city of Thessaloniki when a bomb she was carrying exploded in her hands, police said.
The 38-year-old woman apparently was carrying the bomb to place outside a nearby bank around 5 a.m., police said.
Several storefronts and vehicles were damaged by the explosion.
Police said the woman, whom they did not publicly identify, had a criminal record related to drugs and prostitution and had been involved in at least one robbery and thefts in the past. The Greek police's division for organized crime was investigating the incident, while authorities were also investigating whether the woman might have had ties to extreme leftist groups.
Greece has seen occasional bombings, as well as targeted killings, attributed to various organized crime groups. The country also has a long history of politically motivated violence dating back to the 1970s, with domestic extremist groups carrying out small-scale bombings that usually cause some damage but rarely lead to injuries.
While the groups most active in the 1980s and 1990s, whose preferred targets tended to be politicians, foreign businesses and diplomats, have been dismantled, new small groups have emerged.
Last year, a man believed to have been trying to assemble a bomb was killed when the device he was making exploded in a central Athens apartment. A woman inside the apartment was severely injured. It was unclear what their intended target might have been.
The blast had prompted Minister of Citizen Protection Michalis Chrisochoidis to warn of an emerging new generation of domestic extremists.
In April, a new group calling itself Revolutionary Class Struggle claimed responsibility for a bomb that exploded in central Athens near the offices of Hellenic Train, Greece's main railway services operator, and the planting of another bomb near the Labor Ministry in early February.
The explosion near the train offices resulted in limited damage to the building and no injuries. It had been preceded by an anonymous call to local media 40 minutes before the blast warning about the device, leading police to evacuate and cordon off the area.
The group that claimed responsibility said the bombing was part of an armed struggle against the state.
The bombing at the train offices came shortly after the second anniversary of Greece's worst railway disaster, in which 57 people were killed and dozens more injured when a freight train and a passenger train heading in opposite directions were accidentally put on the same track.
The deadly accident sparked widespread anger and exposed severe deficiencies in Greece's railway system, including in safety systems. Some of the relatives of the victims led mass protests against the country's conservative government on the occasion of the accident's second anniversary.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
2 days ago
- Hans India
Why Ethics in Education Must Evolve Beyond Exam Conduct
Co-authored by- Mr. Zuno George Verghese, Assistant Professor, School of Legal Studies and Governance. Pursuing Ph.D., Tilburg Law School, Tilburg University, Netherlands. in Regulatory Governance from Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai and Dr. Vikas N. Prabhu, Assistant Professor, School of Business Studies. Former Project Manager, Infosys Ltd. Ph.D., IIM Bangalore, M.A. in Philosophy, Christ University, Bangalore. Ethics and education are two faces of the same coin. Socrates, the ancient Greek philosopher, believed that a person who knows what is right, will unfailingly do what is right. Therefore, as Socrates would see it, ignorance is the reason why human beings indulge in unethical activities or conduct. In that sense, ethics and education go hand-in-hand. However, while education becomes the bedrock for ethical behaviour of individuals in society, the flip question has long begged consideration and has, unfortunately, received scant attention. Has the process of education – that importantly involves learning and assessing – been ethically evaluated in a comprehensive manner? While the National Education Policy 2020 has served to significantly reform the education system by focusing on foundational literacy, emphasizing teacher training and development, promoting a holistic and flexible curriculum structure for the students, and integrating better with vocational training, there is a need to look beyond the system towards the process where one looks at how the main constituents – the administrators, teachers, and students – engage with the system and realize the best possible outcomes. An ethical evaluation of the process of education would surface those loop holes that are subverting any improvement in effectiveness that reforming the system could deliver. However, while the overlooked interaction between system and process is one root cause of suboptimal educational outcomes, another aspect plagues at the very heart of ethical analysis. Often, discussions of ethics in education have taken a very narrow perspective. They have primarily been concerned with exam conduct – involving issues such as preventing cheating or academic dishonesty during (written) exams, and ways to detect plagiarism (and, now, AI-generated content) in student (assignment) submissions. News of leaked examination papers and novel modes of examination misconduct by students hits news headlines year after year, reinforcing the (narrow) ethical narrative of examination conduct. Both the nodal bodies University Grants Commission and All India Council for Technical Education have undertaken initiatives to reform their evaluation systems a few years back (around 2018-19), based on the belief that evaluation is closely linked to learning outcomes, and is the best indicator of the level of learner accomplishment. But ethics does not predominate ends over the means. There is a fundamental (ethical) flaw in the above (evaluation-focused) approach which emphasizes the ends of education (i.e., learning outcomes) over the means (i.e., the process of learning). Though educational institutes have begun emphasizing continuous learning journeys (through formative and summative assessments), it still ends up as a mere restructuring effort that instead of reducing emphasis on evaluations, increases it. Learners, who were hitherto bogged down by exam pressures towards the end of their terms would now, perhaps, be troubled through the entire term. The alarming rate at which student suicides are occurring in institutions across the country (notably, in the so-called premier institutes) renders the need to question the ethicality of the process of education not just important but also extremely urgent. Therefore, the question that we deem necessary to ask is whether the process of education that is prevalent in our country today can stand its (ethical) ground when it comes to aspects such as inclusivity, fairness, and overall student wellbeing – the factors we believe are pivotal to enhance learning outcomes. The National Achievement Survey (NAS) conducted in 2021 by the Ministry of Education, Government of India, found that levels of student learning had dipped significantly compared to their own 2017 survey. While research suggests that the dip observed in NAS 2021 was owing to the COVID-19 disruption, the disengagement experienced by learners in the post-pandemic-world is a strong indication that ethics in education must evolve beyond exam conduct. We, thus, posit that three categories of ethical questions need to be asked to ensure a comprehensive ethical evaluation of education. (See Exhibit 1 for the three categories of ethical questions) Exhibit 1 Broad-based research in education has shown that enhancing the process of learning will improve learning outcomes. For instance, a study by the University of Michigan (see link: underscored the importance of engagement, communication, and diversity in enhancing learning outcomes. Importantly, the study found that when students are encouraged to coordinate with a diverse bunch of peers their levels of 'active learning' are greatly enhanced. On another front, the increased use of technology in education also needs to be viewed with caution, and carefully implemented. For instance, Sweden has been gradually enacting regulations to restrict screen-time (and mobile phone usage) in schools so as to prevent learner addiction and prioritize their mental health. (See Exhibit 2 for our own experience in this matter while teaching a subject at Vidyashilp University) One of the cases that assumes importance in today's context is towards enabling students to be familiar with and skilled at utilizing AI-tools. A careful implementation of usage of AI-tools by the students has the potential to facilitate the learning of the students at their own pace and intensity, of introducing diversity in the forms of learning, and to engage with their peers on adopting best practices on 'active learning'. Universities should therefore invest in and maintain adequate computing infrastructure to ensure fairness in overcoming disparity in access that specific students might encounter owing to their economic status, gender or background. Such steps would also help with improving the overall well-being of students in equipping them to counter the muddling effect of finding themselves in an 'AI-cho chamber' where their peers are using AI tools, and social media abounds with enthusiastic 'influencers' extolling the benefits of such tools. Exhibit 2 Thus, we deem that a comprehensive shift in ethical evaluation of education system in India is largely due. Focusing merely on the ethics of exam conduct prioritizes ends over means and turns the teacher-student relationship into a cat and mouse game. By taking ethics beyond exam conduct, the education system can develop into an environment where students can shape their future and grow into capable, sensitive, and ethically grounded persons.


New Indian Express
2 days ago
- New Indian Express
MDMK leader Vaiko backs Haasan's view on Kannada origin
COIMBATORE: MDMK leader and Rajya Sabha member Vaiko on Thursday backed actor-politician Kamal Haasan's remarks that the Kannada language was born out of Tamil. Addressing the media, Vaiko said that Tamil is one of the oldest languages like Latin or Greek. "Not only Robert Caldwell (renowned 19th-century missionary and linguist), but other linguistic experts across the globe have acknowledged that Tamil is the oldest language in the world," the veteran politician said. "We are not lauding the Tamil language as we are from Tamil Nadu. There is nothing wrong in Kamal Hassan's statement since he stated the truth that Kannada was born out of Tamil," said Vaiko who demanded the fringe parties in Karnataka to stop protesting against Kamal and Tamils in Karnataka. Vaiko blamed the lack of timely police intelligence for the tragic Bengaluru stampede on Wednesday. "The police intelligence wing could have gathered a report about the visitors and taken prior steps to prevent it," he noted.


Time of India
3 days ago
- Time of India
Vaiko supports Kamal in language row
Coimbatore: Asserting that Tamil is the oldest language, MDMK general secretary Vaiko has defended actor and MNM leader Kamal Haasan over the Kannada–Tamil language row saying there was nothing wrong with Haasan's opinion. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Speaking to reporters at the Coimbatore International Airport in the city on Thursday, he said experts and linguists, including Robert Caldwell, had stated that Tamil is the most ancient language—older than the northern Indian languages, Greek, Latin, and even the language spoken by the ancient Egyptians. He cited Manonmaniam Sundaram Pillai's view that Malayalam, Telugu, and Kannada originated from Tamil. Pillai composed the Tamil prayer 'Neeradum Kadaludutha'. "So, there is nothing wrong with Kamal Haasan's opinion that Kannada was born out of Tamil," Vaiko said. He added that it would be best to end the protests in Karnataka over the issue. Criticising Union home minister Amit Shah, Vaiko said, "He claims that all languages originated from Sanskrit, yet only 24,000 people speak it today." He noted that just as Tamil sentiments are strong in Tamil Nadu, there is now a growing linguistic awareness in non-Hindi-speaking states such as Kerala, Karnataka, Maharashtra, West Bengal, and Punjab. He welcomed this as a positive development and said that the Dravidian movement and MDMK would continue working to spread this awareness. tnn