
The real-world impacts of the Dalai Lama's remarks on his succession
Thousands of admirers and followers of the Nobel peace laureate attended the event, including Indian ministers and even Hollywood actor Richard Gere, who called the Dalai Lama, "the most extraordinary man to have ever walked on this planet", in an emotional speech that was met with thunderous applause. Dancers celebrated the 90-year-old in traditional Tibetan garb dyed in the emblematic blue, yellow, red, and white colours of the Tibetan flag, against a backdrop of deodar cedars native to the Indian-governed Himalayan region.
But an undercurrent of political tension ran through the week-long celebrations. The spiritual leader announced earlier in the week that his successor, the 15 th Dalai Lama, would be his reincarnation, following centuries old Tibetan tradition. He stated that his office in India, The Ganden Phodrang Trust, will have "sole authority" to select his successor. The lengthy and secretive process would likely mean tracking down a child reincarnation over the span of many years.
The seemingly arcane and esoteric question of the Dalai Lama's spiritual succession does in fact carry serious real-world consequences. While the Dalai Lama said this past week that he would like to live for 30-40 more years, it's likely that the global Tibetan community will at some point in the not-so-distant future have to bid their beloved leader farewell.
The selection of the next Dalai Lama isn't just a matter of enormous importance to millions of Tibetan Buddhists scattered across the globe, it also plays an important strategic role in Indo-Chinese relations, which hold long-term significance for the future of Asian and global affairs.
A thorn in Indo-China relations
Tibet came under Chinese control after a seven-and-a-half-month-long annexation that ended in 1951. Ideologically, for the CCP, Tibet belonged to China since the Qing dynasty seized its land in the 18 th century. China believed the people within Tibet's theocracy needed to be "liberated" and reintegrated into the mainland.
There were also economic and strategic gains involved. The high-altitude cold desert holds geopolitical importance, and Beijing's seizure of Tibet and its vast pool of resources – from rare earths and minerals to untapped water and energy sources – helped drive China's economic growth.
The Tibetan diaspora first made their way to India en masse eight years after the annexation, during the 1959 Lhasa uprising, which was spurred by the fear that the Mao Zedong -led Chinese government wanted to arrest the Dalai Lama.
About 100,000 Tibetan Buddhists followed the Dalai Lama to India in the first exodus, with thousands more joining him there as the years went on. India's Prime Minister at the time, Jawaharlal Nehru, met the spiritual leader and agreed to provide him and his followers with asylum.
But according to Claude Arpi, a historian specialising in Tibet, India didn't provide much else. "India will never support Tibet openly and politically, unless there are some truly exceptional circumstances," he says. "But, they have provided some support, allowing the Dalai Lama to educate his people and keep the culture alive."
Beijing consistently labelled the Dalai Lama a separatist rebel for his continued campaign for an autonomous Tibet. But he amassed significant global support in exile, particularly after being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1989.
Political analysts say the Dalai Lama's presence in India gives New Delhi a measure of leverage with rival Beijing. Many call it India's "Tibet card": the threat that India would formally support the Tibetan desire for autonomy.
But Aadil Brar, a defence and geopolitical analyst based in Taipei, says that that card is getting weaker: "It's true that India's rise has made the issue more important, but India is sending conflicting signals. On the one hand, there is soft support, but the government is questioning the 'return on investment' it has made for the Tibetan community."
Indeed, India formally recognised Tibet as a part of China in 2003 to allow China-India bilateral relations to move forward. The agreement recognised that the Xizang Autonomous Region (the official Chinese name for Tibet) is part of the territory of the People's Republic of China and India would not allow Tibetans to engage in political activities against China in India.
The region's two superpowers already have a strained relationship and volatile, fragile border with regular skirmishes occurring along the almost 4,000 km long Line of Actual Control. Some have called for India to play the "Tibet card" in recent years, but it would undeniably only escalate tensions between the world's two most populous countries, together accounting for almost 40 per cent of the global population.
But Arpi says that while India's stance has remained cool, the Tibetan community under the leadership of the Dalai Lama has managed to keep its culture alive: "You can hear the language, you can see stupas, prayer flags and monasteries all over India – in Ladakh, Himachal and Sikkim – but no more in the Tibetan homeland."
Many Indians also revere the Dalai Lama. Kiren Rijiju, India's minister of minority affairs and a practising Buddhist, sat right next to him at his birthday celebrations and explicitly expressed support for the announcement of his succession, saying that the spiritual leader alone had the right to make the decision. He clarified later that this was a personal opinion, not an official government stance, but it sparked fury from Beijing. Even Prime Minister Narendra Modi tweeted his wishes for the Dalai Lama, prompting China to warn India not to interfere in matters concerning Tibet.
Two Dalai Lamas
China has been censoring all posts and images in support of the Dalai Lama in China. Brar says that they likely came prepared with a state-approved plan of action and response to the inevitable controversy stirred up during the Dalai Lama's landmark birthday.
'China has invested a lot in Tibet to maintain stability and create new economies, and it has certainly developed the region. Controlling the land – which is vast, rural, and very difficult to control – has been an expensive challenge for China, so it's equally important now for the state to control the narrative," he says.
The Chinese state has realised that in order to manage dissent and separatism, it's essential to gain narrative control of a culture that is so linguistically, ethnically and culturally distinct from the mainland. To achieve that, it will likely select its own Dalai Lama after the death of the incumbent Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th spiritual leader in Tibetan Buddhist succession.
12:48
The Chinese ambassador to India, Xu Feihong, in response to the support from Indian government officials supporting the Dalai Lama, said on X, "The reincarnation and succession of the Dalai Lama is inherently an internal affair of China. The Chinese government upholds the principle of independence and self-governance in religious affairs and administers the reincarnation of Living Buddhas, including that of the Dalai Lama, in accordance with the law. No interference by any external forces will be allowed."
Brar points to a recent "signed" (state-approved) paper by Chinese state media outlet the Global Times, which provides a pointwise explanation of how a Beijing-approved Dalai Lama will be selected. The paper states that 'the management of Tibetan Buddhism affairs is a key responsibility of the central government', adding details of the selection system laid out by the 1793 Qing government, which states that reincarnation of Living Buddhas had to follow the procedure of "drawing lots from the golden urn". The Chinese foreign ministry reiterated that Beijing's top brass must approve the reincarnation.
The People's Republic of China officially identifies as an atheist state, which makes this decision to give Tibetans a state-approved spiritual leader even more curious.
Arpi says that in this case, geopolitics is a game of culture as much as it is of politics, and that Beijing hopes that providing a new spiritual leader will lessen dissent and protest among the Tibetan community.
"China did manage to control and develop Tibet, but they never managed to win over the community. Tibetans cannot freely practise their religion, which is a very central part of the identity. So that's why China believes that if they can control the Dalai Lama, they can control the hearts of Tibetans," says Arpi.
However, China's Dalai Lama will undoubtedly represent a Sinicized Buddhism, one that Tibetans in exile (and even within the country) will not easily accept. The current Dalai Lama has a following that extends well beyond Tibet, and even beyond Buddhism, meaning that the likelihood of a second spiritual leader being accepted outside China is low.
In his book "Voice for the Voiceless", released in March 2025, the Dalai Lama said his successor would be born in the "free world", outside China. That statement, along with his recent declaration that the centuries-old tradition of succession through reincarnation would continue in the hands of his Gaden Phodrang Trust, based in India, has assured that China's Dalai Lama will not be left unchallenged.
'It's not a region that China can just let be. There's a generation still alive that remembers the Dalai Lama before his exile, and tradition and oral history continues to exist. Their memory cannot be wiped out,' says Brar.
But Arpi says that even if the trust finds the next Dalai Lama soon, it could take a decade or longer to train him in a way that would enable him to have any real influence over the community. "This is a significant amount of time for China to assert its influence," he says, adding that there's also a danger that support from India will decline after the death of the incumbent, depending on where the Dalai Lama is born. On the other hand, if the successor is found inside India, it could aggravate neighbouring China even further and force the state to take a stand.
But while the question of succession within the Tibetan community holds immense importance, Arpi says that the current Dalai Lama has created a resistance movement that remains strong. "It's what he represents that is more difficult to erase."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sustainability Times
2 days ago
- Sustainability Times
'China's Giant Dam Just Rose On The Roof Of The World': Record-Breaking Project Sparks Terrifying Water War Fears Across Asia
IN A NUTSHELL 🌍 On July 19, 2025, China initiated the world's largest hydroelectric project, sparking geopolitical concerns. project, sparking geopolitical concerns. 🔋 The project on the Tibetan Plateau aims to produce 300 billion kilowatt-hours annually, three times the Three Gorges Dam . . 💧 Concerns rise as the project impacts the Yarlung Tsangpo River, affecting downstream India and Bangladesh. River, affecting downstream India and Bangladesh. 🛠️ The venture highlights China's ambition in renewable energy, but faces challenges in regional cooperation. On July 19, 2025, a significant shift in water geopolitics occurred in Asia. China announced the construction of the world's largest hydroelectric project, sending ripples far beyond its energy implications. The venture, nestled on the Tibetan Plateau, symbolizes China's ambition to dominate renewable energy. However, this colossal project raises concerns among China's neighbors, particularly India and Bangladesh, due to its potential impact on regional water resources. As China embarks on this ambitious endeavor, the geopolitical landscape of Asia stands on the brink of transformation, posing questions about the balance of power and cooperation among nations. China's Ambitious Hydroelectric Project on the Tibetan Plateau In the heart of the Tibetan Plateau, where the Yarlung Tsangpo River originates, China is poised to construct an unprecedented hydroelectric complex. This massive undertaking includes the construction of five cascading power stations, projected to generate an astounding 300 billion kilowatt-hours annually. To put this into perspective, this output is triple that of the renowned Three Gorges Dam, the previous record-holder for the world's largest hydroelectric output. The technical marvel of this project demands an enormous investment of $167 billion, overseen by the newly formed China Yajiang Group. This state-owned enterprise was established specifically to manage this monumental project. Beyond the staggering figures, this endeavor reflects China's determination to solidify its leadership in the renewable energy sector, showcasing its capability to orchestrate projects of unparalleled scale and ambition. The Geopolitical Implications of the Yarlung Tsangpo River The implications of this project extend far beyond China's borders. The Yarlung Tsangpo River flows into India, where it becomes the Brahmaputra River, a crucial waterway supporting the regions of Arunachal Pradesh and Assam. The river's course continues into Bangladesh, underpinning its significance as a transnational resource. This geographical context elevates the project from an energy initiative to a geopolitical flashpoint. Controlling a transboundary river's source grants significant leverage over downstream countries, especially in regions where agriculture is heavily dependent on natural water cycles. The geopolitical stakes are high, with China possessing the potential to influence the water supply of its neighbors, a power that could be wielded strategically in diplomatic conflicts. India and Bangladesh Express Concerns Over Water Control The announcement of the project was met with swift reactions from neighboring countries. India and Bangladesh have expressed legitimate concerns regarding the potential disruptions to their water supply. The potential impacts are far-reaching, affecting agriculture, ecosystems, and communities reliant on the river's flow. Particularly alarming is the prospect of China leveraging its control over the river for political purposes. In times of diplomatic tension, the temptation to manipulate water flow—either by retaining water to induce droughts or releasing it to cause floods—could serve as a means of exerting indirect pressure on these nations. This possibility adds a layer of complexity to regional relations, heightening concerns over water security. Territorial Disputes Add to the Complexity The underlying tensions are exacerbated by ongoing territorial disputes. India claims Arunachal Pradesh as part of its territory, while China views it as part of southern Tibet. In this contentious context, the construction of the Chinese dam takes on added symbolic significance, representing an assertion of sovereignty over the entire watershed. In response to this perceived threat, India is accelerating its own hydroelectric projects in the contested region. This race to develop water resources transforms the Himalayas into a theater of unprecedented infrastructural competition, as both nations strive to secure their hydrological interests. The situation underscores the intricate interplay between resource management and territorial claims in the region. China's Assurances and Regional Skepticism In an effort to address regional apprehensions, Chinese authorities have issued numerous assurances. Beijing claims to have conducted comprehensive environmental studies to ensure that the project will not harm downstream ecosystems. Furthermore, the initiative is portrayed as a means to prevent natural disasters and enhance regional climate adaptation. The Chinese Foreign Ministry has also pledged that the dam will never be used for political leverage. However, these assurances are met with skepticism in a region where mutual trust is fragile. The challenge lies in reconciling China's energy ambitions with the concerns of its neighbors, fostering a cooperative rather than adversarial approach to shared water resources. As China advances with its ambitious hydroelectric project, the world watches closely. This initiative encapsulates the challenges and opportunities inherent in the transition to renewable energy. While the project promises significant contributions to clean energy, it must navigate the complexities of international relations and regional cooperation. The key question remains: can China balance its energy aspirations with the legitimate concerns of its neighbors, transforming potential conflict into an opportunity for collaborative progress? This article is based on verified sources and supported by editorial technologies. Did you like it? 4.5/5 (24)

LeMonde
3 days ago
- LeMonde
Leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan shake hands and sign deal at White House peace summit
The leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan shook hands Friday, August 8, at a White House peace summit before signing an agreement aimed at ending decades of conflict. President Donald Trump was in the middle as Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan flanked him on either side. As the two extended their arms in front of Trump to shake hands, the US leader reached up and clasped his hands around theirs. The two countries in the South Caucasus signed agreements with each other and the US that will reopen key transportation routes while allowing the US to seize on Russia's declining influence in the region. The deal includes an agreement that will create a major transit corridor to be named the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity, the White House said. Trump said at the White House on Friday that naming the route after him was "a great honor for me" but "I didn't ask for this." A senior administration official, on a call before the event with reporters, said it was the Armenians who suggested the name. Both leaders said the breakthrough was made possible by Trump and his team. "We are laying a foundation to write a better story than the one we had in the past," Pashinyan said, calling the agreement a "significant milestone." "President Trump in six months did a miracle," Aliyev added. '35 years they fought' Trump remarked on how long the conflict went on between the two countries. "35 years they fought, and now they're friends and they're going to be friends a long time," he said. That route will connect Azerbaijan and its autonomous Nakhchivan exclave, which are separated by a 32-kilometer-wide (20-mile-wide) patch of Armenian territory. The demand from Azerbaijan had held up peace talks in the past. For Azerbaijan, a major producer of oil and gas, the route also provides a more direct link to Turkey and onward to Europe. Trump indicated he'd like to visit the route, saying, "We're going to have to get over there." Asked how he feels about lasting peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan, Trump said "very confident." Friday's signing adds to the handful of peace and economic agreements brokered this year by the US. The peace deal between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda helped end the decadeslong conflict in eastern Congo , and the US mediated a ceasefire between India and Pakistan, while Trump intervened in clashes between Cambodia and Thailand by threatening to withhold trade agreements with both countries if their fighting continued. Yet peace deals in Gaza and Ukraine have been elusive. Trump has made no secret of his wish to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his role in helping ease long-running conflicts across the globe. Aliyev and Pashinyan on Friday joined a growing list of foreign leaders and other officials who have said the US leader should receive the award.


Euronews
3 days ago
- Euronews
Belarus journalist sentenced to 10 years for treason in closes trial
A Belarusian journalist has been handed a 10-year prison sentence on charges of treason and disclosing state secrets, according to the Belarusian Association of Journalists (BAJ), which revealed the verdict on Friday. Danil Palianski, 53, who contributed to several independent news outlets, was convicted in a closed trial on 25 July, but details of the ruling only surfaced a day before the fifth anniversary of the controversial 2020 presidential election that entrenched Aliaksandr Lukashenka's grip on power and triggered mass protests. According to media reports, in September 2024, while visiting family in Russia, Palianski was stopped by Russian FSB officers in his car. He was charged with disobedience after allegedly refusing to show his documents. At first, his detention was believed to be an administrative offence. It has emerged that he is facing criminal charges under Article 356 of the Criminal Code. Article 356 of Russia's Criminal Code covers war crimes recognised as serious offences by the international community. In addition to his prison term, Palianski was fined roughly $7,000 (€6,000), BAJ said. "Belarus has already become the black hole of Europe, where people are judged for words and thoughts," said BAJ chairman Andrei Bastunets, condemning the ruling. Palianski, arrested last September, is among 37 journalists currently imprisoned in Belarus. His conviction is the latest in a broad and ongoing crackdown against dissent following Lukashenko's disputed re-election on 9 August 2020. Human rights organisations report that over 65,000 people have been detained in connection with anti-government demonstrations, while hundreds of thousands have fled the country fearing repression. The Belarusian human rights group Viasna estimates there are around 1,187 political prisoners in the country, including Ales Bialiatski, Nobel Peace Prize laureate and founder of the organisation.