Thailand deports dozens of Uyghurs to China despite torture fears
Dozens of Uyghurs have been deported from Thailand to China in the face of warnings from human rights experts that they will face a high risk of torture, enforced disappearance and imprisonment.
Local media reported that several trucks with their windows covered were seen in the early hours of Thursday leaving the Bangkok immigration centre where 48 Uyghurs had been held during their more than 10 years in Thai detention.
A few hours later, at 4.48am, an unscheduled China Southern Airlines flight took off from Bangkok's Don Mueang airport, and it landed in Kashgar, in China's Xinjiang region, about six hours later, according to Flightradar24.
A video posted online showed a number of handcuffed men being escorted off a China Southern Airlines plane.
The Thai deputy premier Phumtham Wechayachai confirmed the deportation, telling Reuters that China had assured Thailand the 40 Chinese Uyghurs it returned on Thursday would be looked after.
'It was done in accordance with Thai law and international principles. There are no problems. They will be looked after well because they are their people,' Phumtham said. 'There are undergoing health checks. After that, they will be sent home. Their relatives have received them.'
China's government had earlier announced that a group of 40 'illegal immigrants' had been repatriated from Thailand. China's public security ministry said it attached 'great importance' to their return and the 'repatriation' was 'in line with the laws' of China and Thailand and international practice.
The security official did not mention that the group were Uyghurs, and many commenters on social media appeared to presume they were linked to scam farms.
At a separate press conference, the Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Lin Jian rejected criticisms from 'so-called human rights advocates' and said all ethnic groups in China enjoyed rights and freedoms as Chinese citizens.
'Certain political forces have been spreading lies concerning Xinjiang in order to disrupt the order in Xinjiang. We are firmly opposed to such interference,' he said.
The Thai prime minister, Paetongtarn Shinawatra, said only that 'the law, international process and human rights' must be followed.
The 48 detainees were among hundreds of Uyghurs who fled China in late 2013 and early 2014, travelling to south-east Asia with the help of people smugglers. Many had been told that if they could make it as far as Malaysia they could be resettled to Turkey.
The groups were arrested in Thailand in 2014 and the following year 109 were sent back to China, prompting global outcry. Photographs at the time showed some of them hooded, handcuffed and guarded by Chinese police. Others were sent to Turkey.
The rest have remained in Thai custody for a decade. Five detainees died during that period, including a newborn and a three-year-old.
The detained were part of an exodus of Uyghurs fleeing Xinjiang, where China is accused of committing human rights abuses, including the incarceration of about 1 million Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities.
Some governments have labelled the crackdown as a genocide and the UN found it to have possibly amounted to crimes against humanity. China denies the accusations.
Elaine Pearson, the Asia director at Human Rights Watch said she feared the returned group now faced 'a high risk of torture, enforced disappearance, and long-term imprisonment in China', having already enduring a decade in immigration detention in Thailand.
'Thailand's actions constitute a blatant violation of Thailand's obligations under domestic and international laws,' Pearson said. She said that until Wednesday, senior Thai officials had made multiple public assurances that these men would not be transferred, including to allies and UN official.
Last month UN human rights experts urged Thailand to halt the deportation, warning the detainees were at risk of 'irreparable harm' if returned.
Officials from the Chinese public security ministry claimed relatives of the group had asked for their return. 'They and their families have suffered great harm. Their relatives have repeatedly requested the Chinese government to provide assistance so that they can return to the embrace of the motherland as soon as possible and reunite with their loved ones. Promoting repatriation is a reflection of the Chinese police's effective protection of the legitimate rights and interests of its citizens,' an official said.
Many relatives of the Uyghurs had pleaded with authorities not to return them to China. 'The Chinese government doesn't want the world to hear their stories,' the brother of one detainee told the Guardian in January.
'The Chinese government is always paranoid about Uyghurs going to a safe country in large numbers and living together,' said the man, who left China in 2016. 'They always believe that's a threat … that is the reason why the Chinese government wants them back.'
Earlier this month Paetongtarn made an official visit to China and met Xi Jinping in Beijing. The two countries are marking 50 years of diplomatic relations.
Peter Irwin, and associate director for research and advocacy at the Uyghur Human Rights Project, said past experience suggested the 40 would be jailed.
'I would imagine they will be in prison for the rest of their lives,' he said. 'We know this because this has been the case for people who have been deported previously – you just don't hear from them. The Chinese government treats people who try to flee the country as criminals … There is absolutely no way, from my perspective, that these people will be treated fairly.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
38 minutes ago
- The National
Donald Trump is reshaping democracy for authoritarians
It depicts US president Donald Trump as a firefighter arriving at an emergency scene somewhere – most likely Los Angeles – declaring: 'I'm here to put out the fire.' Facing off against him is a lone US citizen who duly points out to the firefighter that what, in fact, he's carrying is not a water hose but a flamethrower. To say that it encapsulates what is happening in Los Angeles right now would be an understatement, for the United States is changing in ways rarely seen before. READ MORE: SNP minister responds to 'secret meeting to discuss John Swinney leadership' reports Some, rightly, will argue it was ever going to be thus after the last US presidential election, and Trump was unleashed by the American people on themselves. In retrospect, doubtless some Americans regret electing Trump now that they see him set about the nation, brandishing every available tool or weapon capable of causing division or harm. 'Chainsaw' or 'flamethrower,' these have become Trump's weapons of choice in reshaping his country's democracy in tandem with imposing a blueprint of authoritarian rule. Yes, Trump has insisted that sending in federal troops is aimed at restoring calm or 'putting out the fire' of radical 'left-wing' agitators. He's even suggested invoking the Insurrection Act to quell the protesters in Los Angeles. But the real insurrection here – as back in January 2021 – is one ignited by Trump himself. There is a familiar even deeper historical pattern emerging here too, one that I was reminded of while watching a repeat on BBC4 recently of the landmark series, Rise Of The Nazis. As one newspaper review of the original series aired back in 1999 rightly noted, it served as a lesson in 'how easily – and petrifyingly quickly – a democratic country can move to a totalitarian dictatorship'. (Image: Evelyn Hockstein, REUTERS) Those who say such an observation is nothing but hyperbole in relation to America right now, need to think again. For watching the Rise Of The Nazis is to recall the ease with which propaganda, economic exploitation, and political manipulation came together and were harnessed for authoritarian rule. Trump like Hitler – and all those with authoritarian tendencies – know the political value in triggering those same tendencies among supporters by presenting them with a perceived threat to their shared way of life. Just as the Nazis manufactured crises to work to their advantage, so too does the Trump administration. Right now, the federal intervention in the US – again like 1930s Germany – is aimed at creating a showdown by painting a picture of a threat of disorder to the country at large. In Los Angeles, the template being deployed was outlined succinctly this week in The Economist magazine and goes as follows. First, 'announce an immigration crackdown on a city whose leadership does not want it, wait for protests, then call in the troops to put down the protesters. Cracking heads serves as a warning to other cities that might resist. It is also a signal to MAGA loyalists that Trump is doing what they elected him for'. (Image: MARK FELIX, AFP /AFP via Getty Images) Trump then is increasingly keen on using the military to quell protests against his policies. Sound familiar? 'We're gonna have troops everywhere,' he said, when asked about the situation in Los Angeles. And that's just the start, for Americans will see lots more US military personnel and weaponry on the streets of Washington this weekend as parades marking the US Army's 250th anniversary get underway. That there are echoes here of the Nuremberg rallies of 30s Nazi Germany has not been lost on many. The deployment of federal troops and US Marines in Los Angeles aside, we've also seen paratroopers drop from the sky with Trump giving a partisan encore speech to troops at Fort Bragg. This weekend it will culminate in a 'big beautiful' parade to coincide with the 'great leader's' birthday that will make last month's Victory Day parade in Moscow look quaint by comparison. Only the most blinkered could fail to see what Trump is doing here. This, after all, is a president with whom the US military has by and large had little truck until now. Trump's timely diagnosis of bone spurs in his heels that led to his medical exemption from the military during Vietnam never did him any favours in the eyes of many veterans. His unwillingness to recognise their sacrifice in fighting fascism in the Second World War led also to that infamous remark that Europe's military cemeteries 'were filled with losers'. But now, for Trump, it's time to think again, for that's what despots and dictators do when they need the military onside. All this wooing of America's armed forces with false praise allows Trump to make a point of showing executive force he always coveted but could only dream of during his first term. Admittedly, not everyone is convinced by Trump's newfound 'celebration' of America's military might, with reports that US veterans are split over their president's true motives. While some see it as a thing to be proud of, others remain wary of Trump's manipulation of it for his own political ends. Which takes me back to events unfolding in Los Angeles, for here the devil lies in the detail. That detail is how Trump's administration has cited a provision in the armed forces code allowing the president to put National Guard members under federal control when there is a 'rebellion or danger of a rebellion' against the authority of the US government. It's almost as if Trump and his cabal know what's coming with regard to America's future as they cynically seek to expand the powers of his presidency by riding roughshod over America's political system of checks and balances between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. Some might say so what? Trump, they argue, was elected democratically by a sweeping majority. But so too have other leaders who went on to consolidate authoritarian regimes. Back in 1930, while appearing before a constitutional court, Adolf Hitler brazenly informed the court that once he had achieved power through legal means, he intended to shape the government as he saw fit. 'So, only through constitutional means?' a judge asked, to which Hitler's now infamous sharp reply was, 'Jawohl'. Yes indeed. Just as Germany transformed politically in the 1930s before the world's eyes, likewise the momentum in America's shift toward authoritarian rule is accelerating by the day. It's high time we sat up and took notice of just what that could mean for us all.
Spectator
5 hours ago
- Spectator
Is Xi Jinping's time up?
Stories about Xi Jinping's father, Xi Zhongxun, are blowing up on social media. He died in 2002, so why the interest in him now? The weird fact is that Xi Zhongxun is being talked about in the West because he is not being talked about in China. Omission is the perverse way that one learns about what is really going on in the opaque world of Chinese Communist party (CCP) politics. China-watchers live on scraps. Xi Zhongxun was a big cheese in his own right. Born in the north-west's Shaanxi province, he was an early member of the youth league of the CCP. After meeting Mao Zedong at the conclusion of the Long March, which ended up in his home province, he quickly rose through the party ranks. After making a success of his governorship of Guangdong Province, where he set up one of the first of Deng Xiaoping's 'Special Economic Zones', Xi Zhongxun was promoted to the politburo in 1982. His official obituary describes him as 'an outstanding proletarian revolutionary', who was 'one of the main founders and leaders of the revolutionary base areas in the Shanxi-Gansu border region'. In short, Xi Zhongxun was an early hero and 'big beast' of the CCP. He passed his 'red genes' on to Xi Jinping, the primus inter pares of the 'princelings' who have come to dominate China's politics over the past decade. As such, it was no surprise that at the recent inauguration of the Revolutionary Memorial Hall in Shaanxi, it was planned to name it after Xi Zhongxun. But it didn't happen. At the last minute, in a low-key ceremony, his name was not only expunged from the title but omitted entirely from the memorial. A similarly strange story attaches to the 40-episode drama series Time in the Northwest, which followed Xi Zhongxun's life story. This unashamed glorification of President Xi's family, slated to be shown in primetime on CCTV, China's main state broadcaster, was dropped after two episodes. Is it a coincidence that the expunging of Xi Zhongxun has come to light while Xi himself seemingly disappeared from public view in the last two weeks of May? Chinese institutions are always alert to changes in the political wind – no more so than the state media. Recently China-watchers have detected subtle changes. Xi, usually on every front page of the People's Liberation Army Daily, has been much less prominent. Shen Ming-Shih, a director of the Institute for National Defence and Security Research in Taiwan, has observed 'a noticeable decline in the official references to Xi'. In the past, Xi has been described as the 'eternal core of the party'. As recently as December, the People's Liberation Army Daily wrote that decisions should 'rely on a single voice of authority'. Now it praises the virtues of 'collective leadership'. In addition, Shen has pointed out that academics at Peking University and South China University of Technology have not been punished for writing essays critical of Xi's policies. Remarkably, Hu Jintao, Xi's predecessor and faction opponent, who, in front of the world's press, was humiliatingly manhandled out of the CCP's 20th National Congress in October 2022 by Xi's bodyguards, seems to be making a comeback. On 19 May, the People's Daily and Xinhua News both published articles using Hu catchphrases that reference 'scientific, democratic and law-based decision-making'. Wen Jiabao, the supposedly billionaire former Chinese premier, is another elder who is reportedly on manoeuvres. In May, the usual monthly politburo meeting did not take place. Furthermore, Xi has not been present at high-level meetings of the Central Military Commission (CMC) of which he is chairman. His place has been taken by General Zhang, who is not a Xi faction member. CMC chairmanship is central to the power of a CCP General Secretary. CCP elders are disillusioned by a leader who has assumed dictatorial powers but is deemed to have failed Uncertainty about the direction of the People's Liberation Army has contributed to the rumours of change in China's leadership. Hei Weidong, vice-chairman of the CMC and a member of Xi's Fujian faction, was suddenly arrested in April. Xi was governor of Fujian Province in the late 1990s. In November last year, another of Xi's Fujian clique, Admiral Miao Hua, who was head of the CMC's Political Work Department, was put under investigation for 'serious violations of discipline' – the usual newspeak for corruption. On 30 April, he was dismissed. Other Xi generals have reportedly been removed from their posts. In the realm of economic management there are also signs of discontent. It is widely recognised that Xi's repressive handling of the Covid pandemic was catastrophic. In the end it was public protest that forced him to end lockdown. By Chinese standards, post-Covid recovery has been anaemic. A property crash has destroyed consumer confidence and has also landed provincial governments with unsustainable levels of debt. Graduate unemployment has risen sharply. Many are fleeing to the West to find employment. A sense of malaise has cast a pall over China's younger generations. As a recent émigré Chinese dissident, who, like her friends, disparagingly refers to Xi as 'the village headman', confided to me: 'I realise that I was fortunate to live in a golden age of freedom and prosperity. Now it is over.' A sign of Xi's diminishing power is the increasing redundancy of the economic posts he held. The Central Financial and Economic Affairs Commission, which he chairs, has been meeting only sporadically. Foreign direct investment (FDI), which was a main contributor to the explosive economic growth of China after Deng's liberalisation of the economy in the 1980s, has collapsed. Beijing's State Administration of Foreign Exchange reported that FDI in 2023 was the lowest for 30 years. Inevitably a high proportion of blame for capital flight is being put on Xi's 'wolf-warrior' approach to diplomacy, itself an abandonment of Deng's 'softly, softly' approach to the expansion of China's global power. Who has been moving against Xi? Apart from elements within the army, who are thought to oppose military action against Taiwan, the 'princelings', many of whose offspring now reside overseas with the billions that their families have squirrelled away, are thought to be conspiring against the President. Most importantly, the party elders are disillusioned by a leader who has assumed dictatorial powers but is deemed to have failed. In China the elders act like an informal Areopagus, which in extremis checks the power of the executive. Willy Wo-Lap Lam, a Hong Kong-based scholar, has concluded that Xi's 'ability to shape policy in the financial, foreign affairs and other arenas has been truncated'. Lam speculates that 'Xi might be driven out of office this year'. Similarly, Cai Shenkun, a long-standing China-watcher, has reported that CCP leaders have already decided that Xi must step down: 'It's almost certain that an arrangement will be made to allow Xi and his inner circle to withdraw gracefully from the political stage. Once new leadership takes over, a new approach to governance will follow.' In a similar vein, Yao Cheng, a former officer in the CCP navy who deserted and fled to America in 2016, has speculated that Xi will retain 'only the ceremonial title of China's Chairman, before fully retiring at the 21st National Congress [in 2027]'. Xi's two-week disappearance in May seemed to support the theory that he has already been frozen out. So, did his reappearance on 4 June when he met Belarus leader Alexander Lukashenko lay to rest the rumours of his political demise? Quite the opposite. The meeting, which was abnormally held in Xi's house, was strangely subfusc and devoid of normal protocols. Reporting was delayed and brief and did not feature any quotations from the President. The press photographs were lifted from Belarusian media as though Chinese reporters and photographers were not allowed to be present. If the rumours of Xi's defenestration are true, why the delay and subterfuge? The answer may lie in the fact that there is no obvious successor. No surprise here, seeing as, during his 12 years in power, Xi has put his clique in most senior positions. Zhang Lei, a well-connected, US-based YouTuber, has speculated that the CCP elders are casting around for a successor. Her sources suggest that Wang Yang, a liberal 'non-princeling' member of the Politburo Standing Committee of the CCP from 2017 to 2022, has been sounded out. The demise of Xi has been predicted before and there can be no certainty that the recent waves of rumours are accurate. Even if they are true, it remains possible that Xi could stage a comeback and put his enemies to flight. However, given the dire problems facing China and the indifferent performance of its leader, it seems quite plausible that forces within the CCP have had enough of the dictatorial Xi, who, just two years ago, had presumptuously declared his intention to rule until 2032. If Xi falls, or indeed has already fallen, the consequences for Taiwan and US-China relations could be dramatic – and possibly beneficial to both.
Spectator
5 hours ago
- Spectator
Portrait of the week: Spending review, LA protests and Greta Thunberg deported
Home Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, was the last minister to agree funding in the government spending review. Once the NHS and defence were settled there wasn't enough to go round. The police wanted more. Everyone over the state pension age in England and Wales with an income of £35,000 or less will receive the winter fuel payment after all, at a cost of £1.25 billion, Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, announced. Capital spending included £39 billion on social housing over the next ten years. The government also committed £14.2 billion for the new Sizewell C nuclear power station, but did not say where the money was coming from. Rolls-Royce was selected as the preferred bidder to build the country's first small modular reactors. Unemployment rose to 4.6 per cent, its highest level since 2021, up from 4.5 per cent. Any child in England whose parents receive Universal Credit will be eligible for free school meals from September 2026, adding 500,000 to the scheme. Teachers in England can use artificial intelligence to mark homework, under government guidance. The NHS said that a blood shortage required an increase of donors from 800,000 to a million. David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, announced sanctions against two Israeli ministers over comments which 'incited extremist violence', banning them from entering Britain. Zia Yusuf resigned as the chairman of Reform UK. He had criticised Sarah Pochin, the party's new MP, for urging Sir Keir Starmer to back a burqa ban, saying: 'I do think it's dumb for a party to ask the PM if they would do something the party itself wouldn't do.' Two days later he returned to the party in a role with the so-called Doge UK team, seeking savings in council spending. Labour won the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election for the Scottish parliament with 8,559 votes, ahead of the SNP's 7,957 and Reform's 7,088. There was rioting in Ballymena after an alleged sexual assault by two teenage Romanian-speaking boys. An audit commissioned by the secretary general of Unite found that there had been a 'pervasive fraud environment' in the union, which spent £112 million on building a hotel in Birmingham, losing £53.8 million. Last week Unite members voted to continue the dustmen's strike in Birmingham, which began on 11 March. Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, agreed with US warnings against a new Chinese embassy at the former Royal Mint site on Tower Hill, fearing espionage. Marks and Spencer began taking online orders for home delivery again, six weeks after a cyber attack. Peter Easterby, the only racehorse trainer to have sent out more than 1,000 winners both over jumps and on the flat, died aged 95. Novelist Frederick Forsyth died aged 86. Abroad About 2,000 National Guard troops were deployed in Los Angeles by the federal government, against the wishes of Governor Gavin Newsom of California, to confront violent protests against the migrant deportation policy of President Donald Trump. A curfew was imposed and 700 Marines and 2,000 more National Guard were sent in. Mr Trump said he was 'disappointed' that Elon Musk had called his 'big, beautiful' budget bill a 'disgusting abomination'; Mr Musk complained of the President's 'ingratitude', declaring: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election.' He then tweeted: 'Time to drop the really big bomb: Donald Trump is in the Epstein files.' He later deleted it. Mr Trump signed a proclamation banning entry for people from 12 countries: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen; a partial ban extended to Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. Russia launched an attack with cruise missiles and hundreds of drones on Kyiv and other places in Ukraine; the next night Karkhiv was the target; on another night Kyiv and Odessa. Russia and Ukraine exchanged sick and badly wounded prisoners of war, those aged under 25, and bodies of 12,000 soldiers. Russia's mercenary group Wagner announced it was withdrawing from Mali after four years. A 75ft statue of Lenin in Osh, Kyrgyzstan, was quietly taken down. Eleven were killed in a shooting at a secondary school in the city of Graz in Austria, including the suspect. A yacht carrying Greta Thunberg and 11 others trying to bring aid to Gaza was towed to the port of Ashdod, after being seized by Israel, and she was put on a plane to Paris. CSH
