logo
BIG news: SA naturalised citizens to FINALLY get smart ID

BIG news: SA naturalised citizens to FINALLY get smart ID

Minister of Home Affairs Leon Schreiber has announced the 'big news' that South African naturalised citizens will finally be able to apply for their smart ID cards.
Previously, those who called SA their second home were required to use the green barcoded ID, casually known as the 'green mamba.'
In an X post, Minister of Home Affairs Leon Schreiber posted: 'For the first time ever, over 1.4 million naturalised citizens and lawful permanent residents are now eligible to obtain Smart IDs and use eHomeAffairs! We're starting with applicants from visa-exempt countries and then expanding to all others.
Schreiber added that the development was a 'major milestone on the digital transformation.'
He continued: ' It is a victory for social inclusion. As these citizens and lawful residents were previously excluded from the Smart ID and restricted to the vulnerable green ID book. And it is a victory for national security. As it makes our country less reliant on the insecure green ID book'.
While naturalised citizens will be enjoying the benefits of smart ID cards – particularly enhanced safety – many South Africans expressed their concerns.
@Nelisiwe94: 'So many people being naturalised? I wonder what process they followed to qualify. I hope we are not giving citizenship to undeserving people who are coming to SA with ulterior motives'.
@AwaitedOne1: 'It's an invasion, a hostile takeover. Are they going to get voting rights as well?'
@LimpopoLadyy: 'That's a whole lot of foreigners . If we add the wives/husbands, children, and other relatives they brought, that's over 15 million foreigners'
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 .
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gayton McKenzie: 'If I were President, I would scrap BEE and start an empowerment bank'
Gayton McKenzie: 'If I were President, I would scrap BEE and start an empowerment bank'

IOL News

time3 hours ago

  • IOL News

Gayton McKenzie: 'If I were President, I would scrap BEE and start an empowerment bank'

Minister of Sports, Arts and Culture Gayton McKenzie proposes bold reforms, criticizes Black millionaires for lacking community investment, and blames illegal immigration for unemployment, urging South Africans to embrace 'unpopular decisions' for collective growth. Image: File Patriotic Alliance (PA) leader and Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture, Gayton McKenzie, says if he were made president, he would completely scrap the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (BBBEE) policy. He was speaking at the Black Business Council Summit on Friday. Instead, he proposes replacing it with a single empowerment bank, funded by a mandatory contribution of 1% of turnover from all white-owned businesses and previously empowered individuals. 'You can't build wealth without collateral,' McKenzie said. He believes the new bank would provide loans where 'your blackness will be your collateral. Your black skin.' According to him, this model avoids the counterproductive practice of forced partnerships, such as the 26% equity expectations under current BEE frameworks. 'Instead of telling white people, come make me a 26% partner, I will not do that. That's not business. That's counterproductive.' McKenzie highlighted that the new bank would enforce accountability, mentorship, and evidence of impact before extending further loans. On the current implementation of BEE, he is critical of how it's benefited a small elite rather than addressing broad economic disparities. 'BEE has not failed. We have failed BEE, and I'm including myself in all the Black millionaires today.' 'It is the same people doing deal after deal, and that is the truth. We can't run away from it.' He said black business leaders have become complicit, often choosing repeated partnerships over building independent ventures, even after attaining significant wealth. 'You do a deal, you're no longer poor; you are now a dollar millionaire, yet you still insist on becoming a partner in a business that a white man has built. That's a conversation we don't want to hear.' McKenzie drew a contrast with the Jewish community, suggesting that Black millionaires should show similar communal responsibility, especially in addressing the country's staggering Black unemployment. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading 'We have so many black millionaires, but we have the highest unemployment rate. We just get more, we get more, but you're not even giving back to where you stay.' On illegal immigration, he blames the national budget deficit and service delivery failures on unaccounted foreign nationals. ''The ANC is getting an F, but they don't deserve an F. The ANC should be getting a D. But the reason why they don't deserve, don't know why they're getting an F, because they budget for South Africans. ''Mabahambe, and you will see jobs will appear.' 'Two million of them have jobs, waiters, whatever. So when we chase them away, immediately we have two million jobs for locals.' He says South Africa is budgeting for people not counted in the census, which causes direct economic strain. Ultimately, McKenzie argued that real empowerment comes not from forced partnerships, but from building institutions and taking 'unpopular decisions' that directly benefit the broader Black population. 'Let us get rich, all of us, but let's take the unpopular decisions. Mabahambe.' Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel IOL Politics

Education or Entrapment? How Student Debt Sustains Systemic Youth Oppression in a Democratic South Africa
Education or Entrapment? How Student Debt Sustains Systemic Youth Oppression in a Democratic South Africa

IOL News

time5 hours ago

  • IOL News

Education or Entrapment? How Student Debt Sustains Systemic Youth Oppression in a Democratic South Africa

Awam Mavimbela is a registered social worker, former Walter Sisulu University Lecturer, PhD candidate with University of the Free State, and a published author Image: Supplied Apartheid-era education policies, rooted in oppression and segregation, have necessitated post-apartheid efforts to redress historical injustices by broadening access to the university system. Education remains a critical instrument for addressing inequality and alleviating poverty. However, despite gains in access, post-apartheid South African youth are now confronted by a new barrier, student debt. Even within this debt crisis, the enduring deliberate inequalities of apartheid are evident. Institutions historically serving white students tend to have significantly lower levels of student debt compared to universities predominantly attended by African, Coloured, and Indian students. For instance, as of 2021, student debt at Tshwane University of Technology amounted to R4.4 billion; Cape Peninsula University of Technology stood at R1.13 billion; Central University of Technology at R1.78 billion; and the University of KwaZulu-Natal and the University of the Witwatersrand at R1.7 billion and R1.062 billion, respectively. In stark contrast, Stellenbosch University's student debt was only R16.3 million; Rhodes University, R15.3 million; and the University of Cape Town (UCT), the lowest, at R14.1 million. The consequences of student debt are severe. They include withholding of academic certificates, exclusion from further studies, and blocked registration for subsequent academic years. These frustrations contributed to the #FeesMustFall protests of 2015/2016, when students, particularly from marginalised communities, reached a breaking point. While student demographics are not always disaggregated by race within institutions, without doubt African, Coloured, and Indian students bear the brunt of student debt an inference supported by national socio-economic disparities released by StatsSA yearly. Thus, student debt emerges as a modern mechanism of continued systemic oppression in South Africa, reinforcing historical patterns of exclusion and undermining constitutional promises. Section 29(1)(b) of the South African Constitution obliges the state to make higher education "progressively available and accessible." This means there should be funding (NSFAS) reform as the current leads to student debts. The existing debt crisis contradicts this mandate, challenging the myth that access to education is purely merit-based. Instead, structural inequalities ensure that student debt perpetuates intergenerational poverty as per apartheid policies. During apartheid, racial exclusion from education was legally enforced through instruments such as the Bantu Education Act of 1953, the Indian Education Act, and the Coloured Persons Education Act. Today, universities—ostensibly democratic institutions—function as more subtle vehicles of exclusion through financial mechanisms, particularly student debt. The discourse around student experiences is increasingly colour-blind, overlooking the racialised nature of economic and educational policy legacies. Within a neoliberal framework, student debt is framed as a personal burden rather than a manifestation of systemic socio-economic oppression. This neo-liberal individualistic perspective erases the structural dimensions of debt, which enforces racial and class stratification. As such, debt is not merely a technical or financial issue, it is youth symbolic violence (continuation of oppression). For Black graduates, many of whom are financially responsible for extended families, student debt is a source of mental illnesses like, trauma, stress, and delayed economic participation. Historic debts contribute to the intergenerational mental health burdens—depression, anxiety, social isolation, and trauma—among previously oppressed populations. Furthermore, the student debt crisis reveals how universities have become corporatised entities, dependent on student fees for financial viability. Students are no longer just recipients of education; they are financiers sustaining the neoliberal university model. This article contends that student debt is a consequence of apartheid-era oppression and calls for solutions beyond the current frameworks, such as debt cancellation, free education, or universal basic income. Without reimagining education funding, existing approaches risk entrenching the status quo of racial inequality, thereby serving elite interests. Student debt also undermines initiatives like the 1997 White Paper for Social Welfare, which identified education as a vehicle for redressing historical imbalances (poverty). The fragmented social welfare systems experienced by Africans, Coloureds, and Indians cannot be remedied without addressing the racialised nature of educational debt.

Edgar Lungu's death sparks outcry, allegations of poisoning and political suppression
Edgar Lungu's death sparks outcry, allegations of poisoning and political suppression

The Star

time5 hours ago

  • The Star

Edgar Lungu's death sparks outcry, allegations of poisoning and political suppression

Former Zambian President Edgar Chagwa Lungu has died at the age of 68, with his final days clouded by political tension, medical struggles, and serious allegations of state-sponsored persecution. Lungu passed away on Thursday in a South African hospital, where he had been receiving treatment for an undisclosed illness. However, the official silence on the cause of death and mounting accusations from his political allies have sparked a storm of controversy, including claims that the former head of state may have been poisoned to prevent him from contesting the 2026 presidential elections. Lungu, who served as Zambia's sixth president from 2015 to 2021, had announced a political comeback in late 2023 after years of relative quiet following his electoral defeat to current President Hakainde Hichilema (popularly known as HH). But what began as a bid to return to the ballot box quickly turned into a contentious and, some claim, dangerous standoff with the ruling administration. A Contested Comeback Lungu's return to politics was met with immediate resistance from the Hichilema-led government. In December 2024, the Constitutional Court ruled that Lungu was ineligible to contest again, arguing that his first, partial term from 2015 to 2016 counted as a full term under Zambia's constitutional two-term limit. Lungu's legal team and supporters decried the judgment as politically motivated, pointing to his widespread popularity among grassroots voters and within opposition coalitions as a threat to the ruling United Party for National Development (UPND). But critics say the court ruling was just the beginning of a broader campaign to shut Lungu out of national politics. Stripped of Protection and Benefits Soon after his political re-entry, Lungu was stripped of all retirement benefits typically afforded to former heads of state. These included state-provided security, official transportation, medical support, and diplomatic privileges. The government justified the move by citing a legal provision that bars retired presidents from engaging in politics if they wish to retain those benefits. While technically legal, the action had far-reaching consequences for Lungu's safety and well-being. Without state protection, his movements were left exposed. More alarmingly, his access to healthcare, particularly urgent specialist treatment, was severely limited. Sources within the Patriotic Front (PF), Lungu's party, say repeated requests for travel permits to receive medical care abroad were delayed or denied. 'He was denied not only political freedom but medical care too,' said a senior PF official. 'When it became clear that he needed to leave for urgent treatment, the government stalled. That decision may have cost him his life.' Allegations of Poisoning With the cause of Lungu's death yet to be officially confirmed, speculation is growing that he may have been deliberately poisoned. Though no forensic evidence has been made public, the PF is calling for an independent international investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death. His daughter, Tasila Lungu-Mwansa, confirmed in a public statement that her father had been unwell for weeks and had travelled to South Africa under medical supervision. However, she also alluded to the family's belief that his condition may have been the result of "external interference" — a veiled reference to suspected foul play. PF leaders have taken a more direct stance. 'This was not a natural death,' said Brian Mundubile, a close ally of Lungu. 'We believe this was orchestrated to eliminate him politically and permanently.' Restricted Movement and Surveillance Beyond the courtroom and hospital bed, Lungu's daily life was increasingly policed. Police were reportedly stationed outside his home, monitoring his activities and restricting public engagements. Even routine morning jogs and Sunday church services were flagged as political activity and discouraged or blocked by law enforcement. 'It was humiliation, plain and simple,' said one family confidant. 'He was a former president being treated like a common criminal just for exercising and praying.' Human rights activists and opposition figures have condemned the government's treatment of Lungu as not only unconstitutional but dangerous for Zambia's democratic fabric. 'What happened to President Lungu sets a dangerous precedent,' said a representative of the Zambia Human Rights Commission. 'If a former president can be silenced this way, what protection exists for the ordinary citizen?'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store