South African activists detained in Egypt before Gaza march
The PAGAD delegation to Egypt was detained for 11 hours in Cairo, Egypt.
Image: File
The PAGAD (People Against Gangsterism and Drugs) delegate was detained for 11 hours and were at risk of deportation as they were on the journey to the Global March to Gaza.
They are part of the thousands of activists who travelled to Egypt's Rafah Border Crossing to the strip on Friday to demand the entry of humanitarian aid.
Among those detained was National Coordinator Haroon Orrie and six others.
PAGAD's spokesperson, Cassiem Parker, said: 'The seven went through normal immigration procedure and then were told that they were being detained and might be deported.
'Their luggage was taken from them and was kept in a holding area from 3am to 2pm Egypt time.
'They were kept with several hundred other people from other countries coming into Cairo. At 2pm, they were told that they could continue but were not given any reason for their detention.
'They have subsequently said there are reports of raids on hotels, etc.'
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The African National Congress (ANC) regional spokesperson, Muhammad Khalid Sayed, said they note the information around the PAGAD delegation.
'First, we want to commend them for embarking on this global march to Gaza. It is in line with the South African stance of solidarity with the people of Palestine.
"But we are extremely concerned with the news that has come to us, and we hope that our authorities in Egypt make every effort to assist in having this particular matter resolved.'
GOOD Secretary-General Brett Herron said: 'The GOOD Party condemns the detention of members of the South African-based organisation People Against Gangsterism and Drugs (PAGAD) by Egyptian authorities, reportedly ahead of their planned participation in the Global March to Gaza.
'The delegation, whose mission was one of solidarity and peace, is now being threatened with deportation. This action is a grave violation of their rights and part of a disturbing pattern of silencing international civil society voices standing up for the people of Gaza.
'At the same time, observers and political figures are being welcomed with open arms on highly curated, one-sided visits to Israel, including MPs from South Africa. These delegations meet freely with Israeli officials while ignoring the urgent calls of Palestinians for justice, an end to the occupation, and the lifting of the brutal siege.
'We cannot ignore the hypocrisy that those attempting to bear witness to suffering and express solidarity with a besieged population are blocked, detained, or deported, while those cosying up to the occupying power face no such barriers.
'This dangerous double standard speaks volumes. It reveals how the principles of free movement, human rights, and international solidarity are selectively applied depending on who you support.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
SA is regressing on the advancements in female leadership and localisation
The year 2015 marked a seismic shift in the story of South African enterprise. The then appointed Lottery Operator, was the first to be owned and led by a woman. That was a big moment. As a Black female entrepreneur committed to telling Africa's story through its people, its victories, and its integrity, I saw this as more than a business win — it was a symbol of what transformation should look like in South Africa. This leadership didn't just check boxes on a scorecard; it embodied the spirit of empowerment. The visionary headship of the black-woman-led operator steered the National Lottery into a new era defined by innovation, local technological excellence, and profound social impact. Today, that legacy is under threat. The recent appointment of Sizekhaya Holdings as the fourth National Lottery operator is not just disappointing, it is deeply troubling. It challenges the integrity of our procurement processes, undermines genuine gender empowerment, and raises pressing questions about foreign influence and compromised leadership. As Africans, we have long fought to reclaim our narrative. But reclaiming is not enough. We must now protect and own it — and that means ensuring that Africa's progress is authored by its own people. That means calling out tokenism when it disguises itself as transformation. It was disheartening to observe Sizekhaya Holdings' leadership structure seems to be a step backwards. While four women are listed in leadership positions, only two hold executive roles. The others are non-executive directors – titles that sound impressive but wield limited operational power. This performative inclusion dilutes the very progress women like Charmaine Mabuza made. Even more concerning are the glaring red flags surrounding the bidding process itself. How can we discuss a 'clean' tender when key members of the evaluation committee have direct ties to Sizekhaya's major shareholder, Goldrush? One committee member has financial interests linked to the same bidder. These are not mere oversights; they are breaches of trust that demand our immediate attention. Trust is the bedrock of any public institution. Instead of silence from the Ministry, we need transparency. We need accountability. The technology behind the new operator raises serious concerns. Why are we outsourcing such a critical national system to Genlot, a Chinese firm, when it has been proven that we have local capacity to deliver world-class innovation? This isn't just about software – it's about sovereignty. Almost half the National Lottery's revenue could now flow offshore. Is that the cost of ignoring local excellence that we are willing to pay as a nation? As a woman who has built from the ground up, I understand the power of being given a chance — but also the responsibility to honour that opportunity with service, not self-interest. The National Lottery is more than a contract. It is a vehicle for transformation, one that impacts millions of lives. We cannot afford to politicise it or hand it over to interests that do not serve the public good. This moment demands more than frustration. It demands action. The question South Africa must ask is this: Whose interests are we serving now? Because if we do not champion local excellence, we are handing our power away on a silver platter, and history has shown us how that ends. The National Lottery should remain a symbol of our ability to uplift ourselves, not a cautionary tale of how easily progress can be reversed. South Africa is not for sale. And neither is our story. Jabulile Buthelezi - Kalonji is a strategic communications and stakeholder relations management professional, public speaker, author and publisher.
Eyewitness News
2 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
National Dialogue is a distraction from failure to achieve meaningful transformation
Malaika Mahlatsi 13 June 2025 | 10:10 national dialogue Cyril Ramaphosa African National Congress (ANC) President Cyril Ramaphosa announces a National Dialogue for 2025. Image: @CyrilRamaphosa On 10 June 2025, President Cyril Ramaphosa announced developments on the National Dialogue that he proposed just over a year ago. These developments include the establishment of a team of 'eminent persons' whose role will be to 'guide and champion' the dialogue. These 'eminent persons' are influential individuals in government (current and former), the private sector, academia and broader civil society (to some extent). According to the president, the dialogue aims to discuss the challenges facing South Africa and to 'forge a path into the future in dialogue with one another'. Ramaphosa likened this National Dialogue to the discussions that occurred during apartheid. He stated: 'Through dialogue, we were able to deal with the challenges that the apartheid system caused in our country and achieved peace and overcame violence. We established a democracy and ended apartheid. Following the negotiations process, we used dialogue to start building a united nation where once there had only been conflict and division. We achieved all this because we came together in dialogue to discuss our difficulties, our concerns, our hopes and our aspirations as a people'. On the surface, a National Dialogue seems like a good idea. South Africa is increasingly becoming polarised, with divisions occurring along racial, class, ideological, ethnic and gender lines. There is no question that ours is a deeply divided society, and that dialogue has a place in healing a divided people. I understood this a few years ago when I attended a march against the ZANU-PF's authoritarian reign in Zimbabwe, held in Pretoria by the Zimbabwean diaspora. What was supposed to be a protest against the brutality of the regime exposed deeply concerning divisions that made it clear that the issues in Zimbabwe are deeper than the reality that the ZANU-PF government enjoys a monopoly of violence and governs with a margin of terror. Scores of protestors held posters calling for cessation, arguing that Matabeleland should break away from the Republic of Zimbabwe, using regressive arguments rooted in ethnic chauvinism. But at the heart of this thinking is the unacknowledged trauma of Gukurahundi, a genocide that ripped through Matabeleland between 1983 and 1987, where tens of thousands of Ndebele people were slaughtered by the Fifth Brigade under the instruction of Robert Mugabe's government. The lack of dialogue about Gukurahundi in Zimbabwe has not only made victims of the genocide invisible but has cemented unimaginable generational trauma. There is a necessity for dialogue in Zimbabwe, just as there is in many parts of the continent where traumas have gone unacknowledged. So, as a principle, I do support national dialogues. I value their significance. But scratch beneath the surface of the proposed National Dialogue in South Africa, and you realise that here, it is nothing more than a distraction from the failure of the democratic government to achieve meaningful transformation. Unlike in Zimbabwe, where injustice has not even been acknowledged, in our country, the issue is not about a lack of dialogue but rather, lack of action. Furthermore, the president's likening of the dialogue to negotiations that 'ended' apartheid is manipulative and a distortion of history. The Convention for a Democratic South Africa (CODESA), the negotiating forum established in 1991 after the National Peace Accord, which aimed at transitioning South Africa from apartheid to a democratic government, may have provided a platform for dialogue, but it did not 'end' apartheid. The power of mass action, both domestically and internationally, coupled with the economic and political unsustainability of apartheid, led to its end. By the time the negotiations happened, the apartheid regime was so isolated globally that the economic logic and incentive for apartheid was no longer sustainable. It was the people of South Africa and our allies across the world who made apartheid unworkable and made negotiations a logical conclusion. Insisting that CODESA 'ended' apartheid is a form of erasure of the role that South Africans played in their liberation, and historical revisionism that has come to define the narrative of struggle in the democratic dispensation. The issues that the president wants to see addressed by the National Dialogue are not unknown. The government is fully aware what the issues in our country are. Its own research institutions such as the Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC), the Gauteng City Region Observatory (GCRO), government departments, think tanks, learning institutions, the media, and all manner of institutions and platforms have repeatedly communicated what the issues in South Africa are and what they have been since the dawn of and the government know exactly what ails us and what solutions are needed to alleviate the struggles that we confront. There is nothing that a consultative process will bring to light that protesting communities, activists, scholars and people on the margins (including women, the LGBTQI+ community, migrants, persons with disabilities, Khoisan people, etc) have not already expressed. Even more, the root of the problem for which symptoms have been protested over, analysed and commented on by South Africans across all walks of life, is known. The government of our country knows that unless the nucleus of racial capitalism, from whence the chromatin network of landlessness, poverty, inequalities, and all forms of structural violence emerges, is addressed, meaningful transformation will not happen. No matter how much ignorance it feigns, the government knows. For this reason, I am in full agreement with Sinawo Tambo, the spokesperson of the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), who posits that Ramaphosa is attempting to make South Africans take collective responsibility for the failures of the party he leads and seeks to mask this scapegoating with the sentimentality of a National Dialogue. The dialogue gives an illusion of a government that listens when in reality, the South African government, and certainly, the African National Congress (ANC), has proven impervious to listening. Ramaphosa wants to keep South Africa in an endless cycle of dialogue to distract us from the fact that the government is failing to facilitate the radical reform that is needed to redress the injustices of the country's amoral past. He wants us to dialogue because he does not have the guts to make demands on those who remain resistant to change – the unrepentant White minority that has become emboldened by the inertia of his government and has opted out of participating in the process of nation-building without consequence. Instead, the oppressed are expected to beg for justice and to negotiate for humanisation. Instead of dedicating taxpayers' resources to a performative consultative process, the government should be channelling those resources towards programmes/initiatives aimed at addressing gender-based violence, structural reform, economic and spatial justice, and service delivery. These are some key issues that South Africans have already expressed as needing urgent intervention. These are issues the country has already communicated through dialogues in communities, through the media and on platforms. To want to have South Africans repeat them for the purpose of symbolism is callous. President Ramaphosa must reflect deeply on the sentiments expressed in Karl Marx's 11th thesis in the Theses on Feuerbach , who, in his critique of the traditional role of philosophy, which he saw as primarily theoretical, contends that: 'Philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point, however, is to change it'. In the context of South Africa, the people have dialogued in various ways; the point for the government is to muster the political will to act. Malaika, a bestselling and award-winning author, is a geographer and researcher at the Institute for Pan African Thought and Conversation. She is a PhD in Geography candidate at the University of Bayreuth in Germany.
Eyewitness News
3 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Over 250 SANDF troops deployed to DRC set to arrive back on home soil
JOHANNESBURG - More than 250 South African National Defence Force (SANDF) troops who were deployed to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) are set to arrive back on home soil on Friday afternoon. The troops are expected to land at Air Force Base Bloemspruit in Bloemfontein at midday. This marks the end of the SANDF's participation in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) mission in the DRC, which saw South African soldiers fight alongside Malawian and Tanzanian troops in an effort to restore peace in the eastern part of the country. In May, South Africa withdrew its troops from the DRC, having lost 14 soldiers in a battle with M23 rebels in January. The loss of lives sparked a national outcry, resulting in a public spat between President Cyril Ramaphosa and Rwandan President Paul Kagame on X. Ramaphosa's labelling of the Rwandan Defence Force as a "militia" didn't sit well with Kagame. Tensions between the countries have since subsided. In May, both leaders formed part of a presidential panel at the opening of the African CEO Forum in the Ivory Coast. Defence Minister Angie Motshekga is expected to welcome the troops upon their arrival. ALSO READ: SANDF refutes claims of troops returning from DRC surrendering weapons in Rwanda
