South African activists detained in Egypt before Gaza march
Image: File
The PAGAD (People Against Gangsterism and Drugs) delegate was detained for 11 hours and were at risk of deportation as they were on the journey to the Global March to Gaza.
They are part of the thousands of activists who travelled to Egypt's Rafah Border Crossing to the strip on Friday to demand the entry of humanitarian aid.
Among those detained was National Coordinator Haroon Orrie and six others.
PAGAD's spokesperson, Cassiem Parker, said: 'The seven went through normal immigration procedure and then were told that they were being detained and might be deported.
'Their luggage was taken from them and was kept in a holding area from 3am to 2pm Egypt time.
'They were kept with several hundred other people from other countries coming into Cairo. At 2pm, they were told that they could continue but were not given any reason for their detention.
'They have subsequently said there are reports of raids on hotels, etc.'
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The African National Congress (ANC) regional spokesperson, Muhammad Khalid Sayed, said they note the information around the PAGAD delegation.
'First, we want to commend them for embarking on this global march to Gaza. It is in line with the South African stance of solidarity with the people of Palestine.
"But we are extremely concerned with the news that has come to us, and we hope that our authorities in Egypt make every effort to assist in having this particular matter resolved.'
GOOD Secretary-General Brett Herron said: 'The GOOD Party condemns the detention of members of the South African-based organisation People Against Gangsterism and Drugs (PAGAD) by Egyptian authorities, reportedly ahead of their planned participation in the Global March to Gaza.
'The delegation, whose mission was one of solidarity and peace, is now being threatened with deportation. This action is a grave violation of their rights and part of a disturbing pattern of silencing international civil society voices standing up for the people of Gaza.
'At the same time, observers and political figures are being welcomed with open arms on highly curated, one-sided visits to Israel, including MPs from South Africa. These delegations meet freely with Israeli officials while ignoring the urgent calls of Palestinians for justice, an end to the occupation, and the lifting of the brutal siege.
'We cannot ignore the hypocrisy that those attempting to bear witness to suffering and express solidarity with a besieged population are blocked, detained, or deported, while those cosying up to the occupying power face no such barriers.
'This dangerous double standard speaks volumes. It reveals how the principles of free movement, human rights, and international solidarity are selectively applied depending on who you support.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Cyril Ramaphosa's Ignorance: A Symptom of South Africa's Governance Challenges
SANDF Chief General Rudzani Maphwanya with President Cyril Ramaphosa at the Pretoria Military Sports Club. Image: Jacques Naude/African News Agency (ANA) Clyde N.S. Ramalaine South Africa's foreign policy is under siege, not from foreign powers, but from the fragmentation of its own State centre. The controversy over SANDF Chief General Rudzani Maphwanya's visit to Iran is more than a military misstep; it exposes fractures in governance, civil–military discipline, and institutional coherence. That a senior military officer could conduct politically charged diplomacy without the President's knowledge signals a State adrift, where factionalism, ideological signalling, and individual prerogatives dictate the nation's global posture. Maphwanya's visit lies at the intersection of foreign policy confusion, eroding civil–military discipline, and structural governance weaknesses. By bypassing diplomatic channels and publicly articulating solidarity with a sanctioned state, he blurred the line between military command and political advocacy. The episode raises fundamental questions: Who truly directs South Africa's foreign engagements? Does the President still control the levers of statecraft entrusted to him? In my assessment, General Rudzani Maphwanya's statements in Iran exceeded the bounds of military neutrality. And straddled overreach. By declaring that 'South Africa and Iran have common goals,' condemning Israel's actions in Gaza and the West Bank, criticising U.S. sanctions, and framing his visit as delivering a 'political message' at 'the best possible time,' he stepped directly into the political and ideological arena. These were not neutral observations or ceremonial remarks; they aligned with Iran's foreign policy positions and implicitly endorsed its strategic narratives. While some may argue he was 'merely articulating South African policy,' the timing, specificity, and ideological tenor suggest otherwise: this was a deliberate straddling of political space. In doing so, Maphwanya undermined the constitutional role of the Presidency and DIRCO, blurring the line between defence leadership and foreign policy-making, and raising urgent questions about civil-military discipline and the ability of the state centre to assert control over high-ranking officials acting on the international stage. Civil–Military Boundaries Shattered By convention, defence chiefs remain neutral, executing policy rather than shaping it. Maphwanya's public alignment with Iran undermined this principle, encroaching on the exclusive domain of the Presidency and DIRCO. Military neutrality safeguards against politicisation of the armed forces and ensures civilian oversight. The contradiction between Maphwanya's emphasis on neutrality in SA Soldier, Volume 32, No. 4 (2025), and his actions in Iran may suggest deliberate signalling. Domestically, it reassured the ANC's pro-Palestinian and nationalist base that senior military leadership aligns with ideological positions championed within party structures. Internationally, it signalled to Tehran that South Africa's military is willing to engage beyond formal diplomatic channels, potentially bypassing the Presidency and DIRCO. The general's confidence may reflect awareness of Minister Motshekga's backing, particularly her dismissive stance toward perceived American deference. By straddling the political space with ministerial support, Maphwanya tests the boundaries of presidential authority, raising questions about civilian control over the armed forces. This is not merely a lapse in protocol but a visible assertion of institutional autonomy, where senior officials act in alignment with factional or ideological allies rather than under the unified command of the Commander-in-Chief. When considered alongside Lt. General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, the KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner's July 6 statement, a pattern emerges: senior security officials asserting independent positions. Individually, each may seem isolated, but collectively, they indicate persistent strain on institutional discipline and oversight. This dynamic suggests the State centre—the Presidency and Cabinet—is increasingly challenged by high-ranking officials operating with their strategic calculus. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Mixed Messaging and Diplomatic Risks Mixed messaging amplified the damage. Ramaphosa urged caution, Motshekga defended the visit, and the military chief effectively freelanced policy in Tehran. These contradictory signals create openings for external actors to exploit South Africa's internal dissonance. Iran is under sweeping US sanctions. Any appearance of military endorsement risks being interpreted as a strategic pivot, with billions in AGOA trade benefits hanging in the balance. Beyond economic stakes, the timing compounded the risk: the Israel–Hamas war sharpened global ideological divides, and Iran's accession to BRICS added symbolic weight to the visit. While some Global South states may applaud Pretoria's independent posture, symbolic gains come at the cost of trade, investment flows, and currency stability vital to South Africa's fragile economy. The Centre Not Holding At the heart of the crisis is the divergence between the Presidency and Defence Minister Angie Motshekga. Presidential spokesperson Vincent Magwenya described the visit as 'ill-advised,' emphasising Ramaphosa neither knew of nor sanctioned it, and reiterating that foreign policy is the sole domain of the Presidency and DIRCO. By contrast, Motshekga insisted 'all protocols were duly observed' and defended Maphwanya, dismissing concerns as undue deference to America. When Minister Motshekga asserts that 'all protocols were observed,' this implies that the President, DIRCO, and all relevant structures within the state's diplomatic apparatus were duly informed and that established procedures governing high-level international engagements were followed. This contradiction reveals more than bureaucratic tension. DIRCO's absence, the sidelining of South Africa's ambassador in Tehran, and the conflicting narratives suggest parallel centres of power within the state. Authority is fragmented, ministerial prerogatives clash with the Presidency, and accountability is obscured. There is, however, an alternative reading. Perhaps Ramaphosa and Motshekga are performing a calculated balancing act. The Presidency's rhetoric of caution appeals to Western partners concerned about sanctions and AGOA eligibility, while Motshekga's defiance speaks to the ANC's domestic base, where suspicion of Western pressure runs deep. Even if intentional, this 'good cop/bad cop' choreography carries real risks: the absence of coherent coordination allows foreign influence to seep in, institutions are undermined, and the Presidency appears weak at home and abroad. Institutional Tensions and Governance Failures Ramaphosa's claimed ignorance is a constitutional red flag. Either the reporting lines failed, or the trip was deliberately concealed. Both scenarios weaken civilian supremacy over the military, a cornerstone of democratic governance. Maphwanya's rhetoric, echoing partisan ANC positions on Israel and Palestine, threatens to drag the SANDF into factional politics. Unchecked, this sets a precedent for 'parallel diplomacy,' where provincial governments, municipalities, SOEs, and the military pursue independent foreign agendas. For a middle-power state, multiple competing voices erode credibility, trust, and negotiating leverage. South Africa risks becoming a cacophony of internal agendas broadcast to the world, with each actor signalling its alignment. Domestic Political Dilemmas The Democratic Alliance's call for a court-martial underscores a constitutional imperative: the military must remain neutral. Ramaphosa faces a dilemma. Disciplining Maphwanya would reaffirm civilian supremacy but risk alienating ANC hardliners and pro-Palestinian constituencies. Inaction normalises military autonomy and chips away at presidential authority, sending a signal that the chain of command can be disregarded without consequence. Strategic Incoherence and Policy Vacuums Beyond the immediate controversy, the episode exposes a broader malaise: South African foreign policy is a patchwork of ideological impulses, factional agendas, and reactive positioning, managed from a State centre increasingly unable to assert coherent authority. Policy vacuums invite unauthorised actors to step in. Maphwanya's initiative broadcast positions never sanctioned by the Presidency or DIRCO, creating inconsistent diplomatic signalling. Symbolic alignment with sanctioned states may appeal to ideological allies but risks alienating Western governments critical to trade, investment, and economic stability.
The South African
2 hours ago
- The South African
20 August 2025: 'IDF gearing up for Gaza operation amid talks' and other world headlines
Here are the stories that made headlines on the front pages of newspapers worldwide on Wednesday, 20 August 2025. The New York Times' front page reports: 'Trust Trump for peace? A dilemma for Ukraine.' The Jerusalem Post's front page reported that the IDF is gearing up for a Gaza operation amid ongoing talks. China Daily's front page reported that Xizang is moving towards modernisation. The Daily Mail's front page reported that Labour's migrant hotel policy is in disarray. The Guardian's front page reported that the High Court has ruled that asylum seekers must be moved from the protest hotel. If you wish to stay up-to-date – for FREE – on the latest international and South African news, then bookmark The South African website for all that plus the latest in the world of finance, sport, lifestyle – and more. Did we mention it was 100% free to read …? The IDF prepares for a Gaza operation as talks continue. Share your thoughts below. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
JUST IN: DJ Sumbody murder: Katiso ‘KT' Molefe remains behind bars as bail denied
The state argued that Molefe is a dangerous individual with another pending murder case and alleged deep criminal connections. Controversial businessman Katiso 'KT' Molefe will remain behind bars after his bid for bail failed on Wednesday. Molefe appeared in the Alexandra Magistrate's Court, accused of being the mastermind behind the murder of South African artist Oupa John 'DJ Sumbody' Sefoka. He had previously argued that being charged with murder should not automatically disqualify him from being granted bail. The judge disagreed and sided with the state's argument that Molefe is a dangerous individual with alleged deep criminal connections. At the time of his arrest for Sefoka's killing, Molefe was out on R100 000 bail in another murder case. The court had heard how Molefe is allegedly involved in the illicit drug trade, while he has also been implicated in several alleged dodgy tenders and corrupt business dealings. This is a developing story.
