China, Pakistan behind anti-Rafale jets campaign? France flags 'disinformation' after India's Operation Sindoor
Defence attaches in Chinese foreign embassies led the campaign to undermine Rafale sales, seeking to persuade countries not to buy more of the French fighter and instead choose Chinese-made jets, The Associated Press reported, citing findings from a French intelligence service.
Sales of the Rafale jets and other heavy weaponry bring big business for France's defence industry, helping efforts by the government to strengthen ties with India and other nations in Asia, where China is trying to establish itself as the dominant power.
French officials reportedly have said other countries began to raise questions over Rafale's performance after Pakistan claimed to have downed five Indian planes, including three Rafales, during the fighting in May.
Pakistan's claim about Rafale has not been confirmed by India. Air Marshal AK Bharti, during a press briefing on Operation Sindoor, had responded to reports of Rafale jets being downed, stating that "losses are a part of any combat scenario" without confirming or denying the claims.
ALSO READ | Did India lose Rafale fighter jet in Operation Sindoor action? Indian military says this
Captain Shiv Kumar, an Indian Navy officer, said last month that India did lose some fighter jets on the opening day of its military operation against Pakistan due to initial restrictions. He, however, did "not agree" with the claims that the nation lost as many as five fighter planes.
Eric Trappier, CEO of Dassault Aviation, which makes the Rafale jets, recently dismissed Pakistan's claim and called it "inaccurate". Speaking to Challenges, a French magazine, he refuted Islamabad's claims that three Rafale jets were shot down during the four-day conflict between India and Pakistan in May.
'Rafale not targeted randomly': French ministry
French officials have said they are pushing back against the alleged concerted campaign of Rafale-bashing and disinformation online at the hands of Pakistan and China.
France said the campaign reportedly included manipulated visuals of supposed Rafale debris, AI-generated content, and more than 1,000 newly created social media accounts to spread a narrative of Chinese technology being superior.
ALSO READ | Rafale maker Dassault Aviation stock nears record high after India-Pak military conflict
However, French military officials have not been able to directly link the online bashing to the Chinese government.
The French intelligence service said that Chinese embassy defense attaches echoed similar narratives in meetings they held with other countries' counterparts and security officials.
Chinese officials reportedly focused their lobbying on countries that have ordered Rafales and nations that are potential customers of the French fighter planes, the intelligence finding said.
The French defence ministry said Rafale was being targeted by "a vast campaign of disinformation" that "sought to promote the superiority of alternative equipment, notably of Chinese design."
"The Rafale was not randomly targeted. It is a highly capable fighter jet, exported abroad and deployed in a high-visibility theater," the ministry said on its website.
'The Rafale was also targeted because it represents a strategic French offering. By attacking the aircraft, certain actors sought to undermine the credibility of France and its defense industrial and technological base. The disinformation campaign therefore did not merely target an aircraft, but more broadly a national image of strategic autonomy, industrial reliability, and solid partnerships," it added.
Meanwhile, China's ministry of national defense told AP that France's claims "are pure groundless rumours and slander".
"China has consistently maintained a prudent and responsible approach to military exports, playing a constructive role in regional and global peace and stability," it added.
Rafale maker Dassault Aviation has sold 533 jets, including 323 for export to Egypt, India, Qatar, Greece, Croatia, the United Arab Emirates, Serbia, and Indonesia. So far, Indonesia has ordered 42 planes and is considering purchasing more Rafales.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
21 minutes ago
- Mint
India's mega shipbuilding plan unfolds; 5 greenfield and 3 brownfield facilities taking shape on both sides of coastline
India is working to dramatically expand its domestic shipbuilding capabilities, with plans to establish eight such clusters along its expansive coastline. While five of these facilities will be built from the ground up, the rest three will involve expansion of existing facilities. The government has finalized the locations with pre-secured land parcels and necessary clearances, Union shipping secretary T.K. Ramachandran said. The mega-initiative, a cornerstone of the nation's Atmanirbhar Bharat drive, aims to transform India into a global shipbuilding powerhouse. States have made rapid progress in developing maritime clusters, Ramachandran said in an interview. "All state governments have formed special purpose vehicles to implement the project with approved and identified land parcels and access network connecting the clusters with roads and railway infrastructure. Seaside infrastructure is being developed along with breakwater facilities," he said. Nations are increasingly looking at shipping as a strategic sector, given Chinese dominance of the sector. US president Donald Trump has called for revitalizing shipbuilding, viewing it as crucial for both national security and economic prosperity. He has signed an executive order to create a Maritime Action Plan, established a new Office of Maritime and Industrial Capacity within the National Security Council, and proposed measures like imposing fees on Chinese-built vessels entering US. The five greenfield clusters that will come up in Andhra Pradesh, Odisha, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, and Maharashtra will host the entire spectrum of ship manufacturing to equipment production, vendors, bunkering stations, insurance and ship leasing, said Ramachandran. These sites will house everything from ship manufacturing and equipment production to vendors, bunkering stations, insurance, and ship leasing entities. India's push is driven by a desire to significantly increase India's miniscule share of global shipbuilding, currently below 1%. The Maritime India Vision 2030 and Vision 2047 plans aim to elevate India into the top 10 and then top five shipbuilding and ship-owning countries worldwide, respectively. The target is to raise the share of Indian-built ships in India's fleet from the current 5% to 7% by 2030 and a substantial 69% by 2047. Odisha, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu have commissioned techno economic feasibility reports, and the government is exploring tie-ups with global shipbuilders for these clusters. While the secretary did not comment on the required investment for these projects, it is estimated that about ₹2 trillion would be required to develop the infrastructure over five to six years. The investment is part of the broader Maritime India Vision 2030, which anticipates a total investment of ₹3-3.5 trillion across ports, shipping, and inland waterways. In addition, three brownfield facilities will be developed: two in Gujarat (a ship repair facility in Vadinar and a shipbuilding facility in Kandla) and one shipbuilding facility near Cochin Port in Kerala. Shipping ministry officials have visited shipbuilding hubs in South Korea, Japan, and Scandinavian countries to explore partnerships and joint venture agreements. Ramachandran indicated that some tie-ups between global shipbuilders and Indian private and state-owned companies could materialize soon. "While we're seeing progress, the global market is still dominated by China, South Korea, and Japan," commented Pushpank Kaushik, CEO & head of business development (subcontinent, middle east and South East Asia) at Jassper Shipping. "To bridge that gap, what's really needed now is a clear push for foreign investment and technology transfer. If policy can make space for that, it'll not only attract global players but also strengthen our position in the international market." Mint had earlier reported about the government's plan to identify locations on both east and west coast of India as part of its ambitious global ship hub plans. The Union budget for FY26 outlined several measures to bolster domestic shipbuilding, including a ₹25,000 crore government-industry partnership Maritime Development Fund; revamping the existing Shipbuilding Financial Assistance to address cost disadvantages; and providing credit notes for shipbreaking to help purchase made-in-India ships. The budget also included large ships in the infrastructure harmonized master list, allowing their purchase on easier terms, while providing basic customs duty exemption on raw materials, components, consumables or parts for 10 more years. India's shipbuilding initiative would also address a concern of the trade about the uncertainty and variability of shipping costs impacting their competitiveness. With better availability of domestic shipping lines at affordable prices, the freight rate volatility due to shock events like covid-19, the Russia-Ukraine war, Red Sea crisis and the Iran-Israel conflict could also be checked.
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Petrobras weighs options for Polo Bahia onshore fields, including sale, says CEO
Brazil's state-run oil firm Petrobras is weighing options for its Polo Bahia onshore oil fields, including a potential sale, Chief Executive Magda Chambriard said on Saturday, adding that any decision will prioritize returns and shareholder interests. The Polo Bahia hub, consisting of some 28 onshore fields, was previously listed for sale under former President Jair Bolsonaro's divestment strategy. President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva pulled it off the market after he took office in 2023 and ended Bolsonaro's divestment strategy. Chambriard said the current operation at the Polo Bahia produces very little oil but requires significant effort. Extracting from those onshore fields was more viable when oil prices were higher, at $90-$100 per barrel, than it is at the current $65 per barrel, she added. "This is on our table and we haven't decided yet what we're going to do, whether to keep it with us, outsource the operation or transfer the asset. It's on the table, we're studying it and we're going to do what's best and most profitable for us and our shareholders," Chambriard said during the Strategic Forum for the Brazil-China Naval Industry in Rio de Janeiro. Asked if the company could replicate this analysis for its Urucu operation in Amazonas state, Chambriard declined to comment on potential divestment plans, and said Urucu produces "the best oil, the most valued." Also on Saturday, Brazilian and Chinese shipyards signed memorandums of understanding to foster technological and commercial collaborations, aligning with increased demand for Petrobras vessels.>
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
India's nuclear energy push needs a policy overhaul, not just a power plan
India's renewed quest for nuclear power is a political call, not just because of the legislative push it requires for amending relevant laws to enable the entry of private players and ease the onus of liability but also for the new ecosystem that will have to be created to drive this forward. This will require recasting a truly coveted set-up built around developing an indigenous credible nuclear deterrent, where producing electricity serves as an important front, to one where making power will have to become a strategic goal by itself. After all, the target is 1,800 GW power capacity by 2047, of which 250 GW is planned to be nuclear. At present, India is just producing a little over 8 GW, which means executing a massive leap that cannot be done under the existing systems where all functions, from regulating to producing and waste management, are with the Department of Atomic Energy , which tightly controls the entire ecosystem for strategic reasons. The Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd , which runs the civilian programme, is also a DAE entity. This approach stems from the fact that Indian scientists had to build the n-weapons programme in utter secrecy, outside the non-proliferation treaty and against all odds posed by an India-targeted technology denial regime. This achievement eventually forced the US to shift its policy and recognise India's weapons programme through the Indo-US nuclear deal. Now is the time to take advantage of the avenues of expansion in the power sector. Telecom, which is also a sensitive sector, was opened up under a regulatory system. A TRAI-like model may be a good starting point to set up an independent Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, which will oversee the entire sector that's going to span across departments of power and atomic energy. Suggestions like setting up a Nuclear Energy Mission under a Cabinet Secretary-led apex inter-ministerial committee, which can carry out this transition, may be a good starting point. Essentially, what's being attempted is to establish a mechanism for nuclear energy conversations with private and foreign players through the power ministry. Also, an independent radioactive waste management authority will be needed to build confidence in this ecosystem. The US Senate Foreign Relations Committee has recently passed a bill called the International Nuclear Energy Act of 2025 , which seeks to amend 2005 US Energy Policy Act to include provisions that will actively promote the "fullest utilization of the reactors, fuel, equipment, services and technology US nuclear energy companies in civil nuclear programmes outside the country". The bill has carved out a special category for "allies and partners" with whom the US will foster a special collaborative relationship, including financing for "research, development, licencing and deployment of advanced nuclear reactor technologies for civil nuclear energy". The term 'partner' has been included only for India as it's not an ally. In fact, it's the only country named in the bill as a partner nation alongside allies. China along with Russia and Iran are among the countries put in the list of countries specifically excluded from cooperation under this proposed Act. While this puts India on a strong footing, the bill has a section devoted to India that seeks to set up a joint consultative mechanism which will submit a report every six months on the implementation of the programme in India. It also requires that partner countries have acceptable legal frameworks for liability, radioactive waste management, licensing systems for advanced reactors, among other things. At a broader level, the revamp is necessary to take advantage of these shifts to revive this sector. But from an India standpoint, it also requires a mindset shift to develop an ecosystem that legally and institutionally promotes, not deters, the growth of nuclear power - a task envisaged but unfinished from the nuclear deal.
