Is Verizon Communications (VZ) the Best Counter Cyclical Stock to Buy According to Analysts?
We recently published a list of . In this article, we are going to take a look at where Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE:VZ) stands against other best counter cyclical stocks to buy according to analysts.
Counter cyclical stocks stand out because they tend to perform well during economic downturns, providing relative stability when markets become volatile. These resilient companies typically operate in more defensive sectors like utilities, consumer staples, and healthcare, offering products and services that consumers need, no matter how tight their wallets become. Furthermore, the truly counter cyclical stocks are the ones that experience accelerations in growth during recessions, due to consumers actively searching for ways to save money – think of discount stores or cheap clothes retailers. What makes the best counter cyclical stocks especially compelling is their stability during downturns: investors seek refuge in these stocks because they tend to maintain (or even increase) their value while other market segments struggle.
Financial theory, as pioneered by Markowitz' modern portfolio theory (1952), suggests that including counter cyclical stocks in a portfolio can improve the overall risk-adjusted returns by significantly reducing volatility while at the same time not impairing the return profile. Modern literature emphasizes that effective diversification can be achieved by combining financial assets whose returns are inversely correlated to one another; counter-cyclical stocks align well with this principle due to their low or even negative correlation with the broad markets. Empirical studies confirm that portfolios containing counter cyclical stocks tend to exhibit lower volatility and more stable returns during recessionary periods – this is a highly sought after trait by investors. The legendary fund manager Peter Lynch also emphasized the strength of stable companies in recessions; here's what he said:
'In economic downturns, invest in companies that make essential products; people will still buy toothpaste and food regardless of the economy.'
READ ALSO: 10 Best Low Risk Stocks To Buy in 2025.
We believe that the current market conditions are potentially suitable for investors to start considering adding the best counter cyclical stocks to their portfolios. The biggest problem we see with the current US stock market is that the Trump 2.0 Tariff Turmoil and a plethora of other aggressive shifts in the policy stance of the new administration are undermining consumer confidence in the future. Consumers, while still strong and healthy, exhibit a rapid deterioration in confidence – the Consumer Confidence Index dropped sharply in March to the lowest reading since January 2021. Even the Trump administration itself admits that its trade and DOGE policies might cause some slowdown in the short term but says they should lead to 'The Golden Age of America' in the long term.
Furthermore, business surveys show that increasingly more people are expecting fewer jobs in the upcoming months. A sharp deterioration in both metrics has historically coincided with the onsets of several recessions, such as the dot-com bubble burst, the 2008 crisis, and the 2022 bear market. It is of no surprise that many reputable research boutiques, including Yardeni Research and Goldman Sachs, have recently significantly raised their odds that the US economy will enter a recession in 2025 (although the estimated probability remains below 50% on average).
The drivers of a recession could be a potential one-time inflation shock from the tariffs expected for next week, a widespread slowdown in business Capex expectations that may trigger layoffs, as well as a more frugal consumer due to the overall uncertainty and deterioration in purchasing power. Under such conditions, counter-cyclical stocks could witness a significant acceleration in their business, which in turn may translate into superior returns compared to the broad market. We believe that the best counter-cyclical stocks are the ones that have significant potential upside according to analysts, as well as a proven track record of exceptional performance during previous economic cycles.
We consulted business literature on the characteristics of the best counter cyclical stocks and manually selected 20-30 stocks with a history of performing well during economic downturns, such as the 2008 and 2022 bear markets. Then, we select the top 11 stocks with the largest average upside potential as estimated by analysts and rank them in ascending order. For each stock, we also include the number of hedge funds that own the stock as of Q4 2024.
Why are we interested in the stocks that hedge funds pile into? The reason is simple: our research has shown that we can outperform the market by imitating the top stock picks of the best hedge funds. Our quarterly newsletter's strategy selects 14 small-cap and large-cap stocks every quarter and has returned 373.4% since May 2014, beating its benchmark by 218 percentage points ().
A smiling customer receiving customer contact center solutions on their smartphone.
Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE:VZ) is the second largest global telecommunications company and the largest wireless carrier in the United States, serving approximately 146 million subscribers. The company operates through two segments: the Consumer Group, which offers wireless and wireline services to retail customers, and the Business Group, which provides communications solutions to enterprises and government clients. VZ is regarded as a counter cyclical stock because the world continues to rely on its essential communication services and connectivity solutions even during recessions.
Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE:VZ) delivered strong financial and operational results in 2024, with wireless service revenue growing 3.1% and adjusted EBITDA growing 2.1%, both exceeding the midpoint of guided ranges. The company added nearly 2.5 million postpaid mobility and broadband subscribers while expanding margins, with postpaid phone net adds reaching nearly 900,000 for the year. Broadband performance was particularly strong, with 1.6 million subscriber additions in 2024, including nearly 4.6 million fixed wireless access subscribers, generating over $2.1 billion in revenue.
Looking ahead to 2025, Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE:VZ) expects wireless service revenue growth between 2% and 2.8%, with the underlying growth nearly double when excluding promotional amortization impacts. The company launched its AI Connect strategy to leverage existing network assets and edge computing capabilities, with a current funnel of over $1 billion in opportunities. Management continues to focus on operational excellence and financial discipline, maintaining its capital allocation priorities of investing in the business, supporting dividend growth, paying down debt, and eventually considering share repurchases. We include VZ on our list of best counter cyclical stocks as it has a strong history of outperforming the US stock market during bear markets, including year-to-date as the US stocks are in correction mode.
Overall, VZ ranks 10th on our list of best counter cyclical stocks to buy according to analysts. While we acknowledge the potential of VZ as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and doing so within a shorter time frame. There is an AI stock that went up since the beginning of 2025, while popular AI stocks lost around 25%. If you are looking for an AI stock that is more promising than VZ but that trades at less than 5 times its earnings, check out our report about this cheapest AI stock.
READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires.
Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Public markets primed for US IPO revival despite tariff uncertainty, NYSE President Martin says
By Arasu Kannagi Basil (Reuters) -Intercontinental Exchange-owned NYSE's President Lynn Martin said on Thursday that public markets were ready for well-prepared companies despite tariff unease as easing volatility was setting the stage for a rebound in U.S. IPO activity. Optimism that 2025 would finally be the year for a strong rebound in U.S. IPO market activity has recently been tempered by tariff-driven uncertainty, but the window seems to be opening up again after volatility eased and equities bounced back. "There's been this narrative in the market, particularly for the last two years. It's a bit false that companies can't go public," Martin said at the Piper Sandler Global Exchange & Trading Conference. The companies debuting at this time were public-market ready, she said, highlighting the successful listings of cybersecurity firm Rubrik and social media platform Reddit last year. "They were ready to go. They went, and they've done extraordinarily well," Martin said. Analysts say the IPO market could be in the early stages of a broader pickup, but that sustained stability was needed before the window opens fully. "We expect approximately one or two deals per week in June, ramping up a bit in July after Independence Day, and if all goes well, a full rebound in September, October after the summer lull," said Matt Kennedy, senior strategist at Renaissance Capital, a provider of IPO-focused research and ETFs. NYSE TEXAS The impending launch of the Texas Stock Exchange, backed by Wall Street giants BlackRock and Citadel Securities, is set to heat up the competition in listings markets. The NYSE was following its playbook, talking to its customers about why more of them were moving to Texas, Martin said. NYSE Texas officially opened for business in March and has secured a handful of companies over the past few weeks - including Trump Media & Technology Group - as its "founding" members. "The conversations we're having are incredibly positive," Martin said, adding that NYSE Texas had another double-digit dual listing lined up. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Is this S&P 500 stock a once-in-a-decade passive income opportunity?
The S&P 500 has recovered from its volatile start to the year and is within touching distance of its record highs. At the same time, some quality shares are trading at exceptionally low prices. One example is Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ). As a rule, I stay away from pharmaceutical stocks, but I'm considering making a rare exception for this one. Johnson & Johnson has recently divested its consumer products business. The company now generates around 66% of its revenues from pharmaceuticals and 33% from medical devices. The main reason I generally stay away from stocks like this is I don't feel like I can evaluate them accurately. I'm not a medical professional and that means I can't confidently evaluate drug pipelines. That makes it hard to work out which businesses have the best prospects. And in fairness to me, it's not always straightforward even for people who do have specialist expertise in this sector. Johnson & Johnson does have some competitive strengths in this area – most notably its scale and its exceptional balance sheet. But there's something else that stands out to me about the company. A key part of what makes Johnson & Johnson unique is its culture. And this is set out in the 'Credo' – a document, which states that the company's priorities are, in order: Doctors, patients, nurses, and users of its products Employees Communities Shareholders In other words, focus on putting customers first and doing the right thing and the returns will follow. This ethical outlook is a key part of what has allowed the business to survive and thrive over decades. A lot of businesses have codes of conduct or ethical frameworks. But there's evidence that Johnson & Johnson's Credo means its culture is more entrenched than it is at other companies. The firm's reaction to the 1982 Tylenol crisis is now a well-known case study in ethical leadership. And it doesn't take specialist medical knowledge to appreciate the significance of this. Right now, shares in Johnson & Johnson come with a dividend yield of around 3.25%. That doesn't exactly jump out as a passive income opportunity, but it's the highest it has been in the last 10 years. This is a sign investors are unusually pessimistic about a stock they normally hold in high regard. And a key reason for this is the situation in the US at the moment. The situation is still developing, but potential risks include slower drug approval processes and price controls. Neither of these would be good for companies like Johnson & Johnson. The risk is real, but this might be the kind of opportunity that comes around once in a decade. Given the company's long-term strengths, I think it's worth taking seriously. I think Johnson & Johnson's biggest unique strength is its culture. Even if I'm wrong, there's clearly a lot to like about a company that has more than 50 years of consecutive dividend increases. Most of the time, the stock market appreciates the quality of the business. But it's unusually cheap at the moment and on that basis, it's certainly one to consider right now. The post Is this S&P 500 stock a once-in-a-decade passive income opportunity? appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Stephen Wright has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Elon Musk is gone, but DOGE's actions are hard to reverse. The US Institute of Peace is a case study
WASHINGTON — The staff was already jittery. The raiders from Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency had disposed of the U.S. Institute of Peace board, its acting president and its longtime outside counsel. But until 9:30 p.m. on Friday, March 28, there was hope the damage might somehow be limited. Then termination notices started popping up in personal emails. That was only the start. After ending his sojourn in Washington , Musk left behind a wounded federal government. DOGE's playbook was consistent: Show up physically, take over the facility and information technology systems, fire the leadership and replace it with DOGE associates. Dismiss the staff. Move so quickly that the targets and the courts have little time to react, let alone reverse whatever damage has already occurred. Thousands of workers across the federal government saw the playbook in action over the last four months. But the Institute of Peace, a small, 300-employee organization, is unique: The blitz during its takeover has been, for the moment, reversed in court . The headquarters taken away in a weekend of lightning moves is back in the hands of its original board and acting president. The question they must answer now is a point that U.S. District Judge Beryl A. Howell made during one hearing: Even a win 'makes no promises' about how difficult or possible it will be to put the Institute of Peace back together. 'A bull in a China shop breaks a lot of things,' the judge said. Nearly three weeks since the judge delivered a win, the institute is slowly trying to reboot. But there are barriers, and winning might not mean full restoration. For other agencies and departments fighting their own DOGE battles, it is a cautionary tale. The Institute of Peace was created by Congress in the 1980s. President Ronald Reagan signed the bill into law in 1985. Described as an independent, nonprofit think tank funded by Congress, its mission has been to work to promote peace and prevent and end conflicts while working outside normal channels such as the State Department. When DOGE came knocking, it was operating in 26 conflict zones, including Pakistan, Afghanistan, Mali and Burkina Faso. The institute was one of four organizations targeted by President Donald Trump's Feb. 19 Executive Order 14217. The order said it was being enacted to 'dramatically reduce the size of the federal government.' The institute's acting president, career diplomat and former Ambassador George Moose, and longtime outside counsel George Foote tried to explain to DOGE representatives that the institute was an independent nonprofit outside the executive branch. That attempt was for naught. At 4 p.m. on March 14, most of the institute's board was fired by email. The lone holdovers were ex officio — Cabinet members Pete Hegseth and Marco Rubio and the National Defense University's president, Vice Adm. Peter Garvin. Within minutes of the emails, DOGE staff showed up and tried to get into the building but failed over the next several hours during a standoff. That, according to court documents, kicked off a weekend of pressure by the FBI on institute security personnel. DOGE returned the following Monday and got into the headquarters with help from the FBI and Washington police officers. Foote thought the local officers were there to expel the DOGE contingent but learned quickly they were not. He, security chief Colin O'Brien and others were escorted out by local authorities. 'They have sidearms and tasers and are saying you can't go anywhere but out that door,' Foote said. 'I had no choice. 'You guys have the guns, and I don't.'' The board filed a lawsuit the following day and asked for a temporary restraining order. Howell expressed dissatisfaction with DOGE's tactics but declined to restore the fired board members or bar DOGE staff from the headquarters. By then a DOGE associate, Kenneth Jackson, had been named as acting president of the organization by the ex officio board members. Employees held out hope that the organization would not be disassembled because Jackson was asking questions as if he might do an assessment of the organization's work, said Scott Worden, director of the Afghanistan and Central Asia programs. The staff knew what he'd done as the head of the U.S. Agency for International Development. Now Jackson was at the Institute of Peace, but they were hopeful 'we would have a process of explanation or review of our work,' Worden said. Then came March 28. The notices came alphabetically. By the time it was finished, shortly before midnight, almost all the institute's 300 employees had been let go. The impact was 'profound and devastating on a few levels,' Worden said. First, employees at the institute are not government employees so they got no government benefits or civil service protections. Insurance also was gone — critical for employees fighting health problems. Partners abroad also suddenly lost their support and contacts. It left 'thousands of partners in a lurch,' he said. The lawyers representing board members in their lawsuit asked for a court hearing as soon as possible to head off rumors of more mayhem to come. But when they walked into courtroom 26A of the E. Barrett Prettyman Courthouse at 10 a.m. on April 1, the headquarters and other assets were gone, too. It was, Howell said at the hearing, 'a done deal.' Over the weekend, as workers reeled, DOGE was making personnel changes of its own. Jackson had given way to DOGE representative Nate Cavanaugh, whose name was on the documents that allowed DOGE to take control of Institute of Peace assets and transfer the headquarters — built in part with private donations — to the General Services Administration. Howell was incredulous that it had been accomplished in two days. In court, the Trump administration's attorney, Brian Hudak, laid out the timeline, making clear that the newly named president of the institute had not only been authorized to transfer the property but also the request had gone through proper channels. For the second time, Howell refused to stop the actions. Throughout hearings, Howell struggled with how to describe the institute — whether it was part of the executive branch and under the Republican president's authority. That was central to the case. The government argued that it had to fall under one of the three branches of government and it clearly wasn't legislative or judicial. Lawyers defending the government also said that because presidents appointed the board, presidents also had the authority to fire them. The White House also maintained that despite decades of operation and an annual budget of around $50 million, the institute had failed to bring peace and was rightfully targeted. Howell's May 19 opinion concluded that the institute 'ultimately exercises no Executive branch power under the Constitution but operates, through research, educational teaching, and scholarship, in the sensitive area of global peace.' 'In creating this organization,' the judge said, 'Congress struck a careful balance between political accountability, on the one hand, and partisan independence and stability, on the other.' She added that even if the organization was part of the executive branch, the law that created it set specific steps for firing the board members and none of those had been followed. Because the board was fired illegally, all subsequent actions — including replacing Moose, firing the staff and transferring the headquarters — were 'null and void,' she said in her ruling. The government filed a notice of appeal and asked Howell to stay her order. She said no. The government has requested a stay with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. Two weeks later, about 10% of the people who would normally be inside the headquarters, about 25 people, are there, doing maintenance, getting systems running and trying to get to the institute's funding. Any physical damage comes more from inattentiveness than malice — food that spoiled, leaks that went unfixed, popup security barriers needing maintenance. Desks are empty but with paperwork and files strewn across them, left by the speed of the takeover. O'Brien, the security officer, praised the General Services Administration and security managers who tried to keep the building going. But getting systems fully functioning will entail lots of work. 'We're the first ones to get behind the looking glass,' O'Brien said. Foote said those returning continue to try to locate and access the institute's funding. That includes funds appropriated for this fiscal year by Congress and the part of the endowment moved during the takeover. He said transferring funds within the federal government is 'complicated.' The result: Workers are furloughed, and overseas offices will remain closed. Nicoletta Barbera, acting director for the U.S. Institute of Peace's West Africa and Central Africa programs, is one of the furloughed workers. 'We had USIP representatives based in Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger that, overnight, were left with no support system from anyone here in HQ,' she said. The programs were focused on preventing terrorism by supporting women and young people, to 'identify signs of radicalization.' Barbera said a recent attack in Burkina Faso ended with 'hundreds of atrocities and deaths.' 'And I couldn't just stop but think, what if I could have continued our work there during this time?' she said. Moose has said the speed at which the organization gets back to work depends on numerous factors, including the appeals process. But, he said, there will likely be lasting damage — 'the traumatic effects this has had on the people who have been impacted by it.' 'And, obviously, that includes our own ... staff members,' Moose said, 'but it also extends to the people with whom we collaborate and work all around the world. That's going to be hard to repair.' ___ This story has been corrected to show the name of the DOGE representative is Nate Cavanaugh, not Nick Cavanaugh.
