
Iran-Israel conflict, trade wars: What will Trump do at the G7 summit?
Trump railed against former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau after that Group of Seven summit and said he would yank the United States from a joint statement. The leaders fought at the time over retaliatory tariffs on critical steel and aluminum.
The G7 summit changes hands annually, and it just so happens to be Canada's turn to host again this week. Canadian leaders have signaled that they're keen to avoid the disarray that defined the gathering in 2018 and have worked to minimize any outward appearance of divisions.
Trump has often been a disruptor at global gatherings, badgering U.S. allies and competitors alike to adopt policies more favorable to the United States. But a conflict that erupted last week between Israel and Iran over Tehran's illicit nuclear program could change the dynamic in 2025, as the U.S. president flies to the foothills of the Rockies for the G7 summit.
The president could use his time in Kananaskis to unite his international colleagues behind solutions in the Middle East.
"Trump wants some kind of deescalation," said Josh Lipsky, a G7 organizer for former President Barack Obama who chairs the international economics program at the Atlantic Council. "That's what all the leaders around the table want. So there's an avenue here where Trump plays a more traditional role."
What will happen at the G7 summit?
Israel and Iran will be front-and-center at the summit, after the countries launched additional missile attacks on the eve of the event.
The volley comes after nuclear talks between American and Iranian negotiators that had been scheduled to take place on June 15 were canceled, despite a focused effort from Trump to keep them on track.
He told Tehran in social media posts and interviews with American journalists that a reinvigorated agreement was the only diplomatic offramp.
Overnight, he offered to play a mediating role in the conflict that could engulf a region already on edge by fighting between Israel and Hamas.
"We can easily get a deal done between Iran and Israel, and end this bloody conflict!!!" Trump said on Truth Social early Sunday morning.
Instead of focusing on global financial issues or security concerns about China and Russia, the missile exchanges in the Middle East will naturally take up a larger portion of the discussion, said Kelly Ann Shaw, who was Trump's representative to the economic club in the latter part of his first term.
"There's going to be a tremendous amount of concern about this exploding into a much broader regional conflict and what that means for every country participating in the G7," she said.
Trump has been laying the groundwork to play peacemaker: Ahead of the summit, Trump spoke to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen about the conflict and Russian President Vladimir Putin, whose country was kicked out of the informal gathering after it annexed Crimea in 2014.
Canada as the 51st state? Trump says 'highly unlikely' US uses military force to annex country
"He feels, as do I, this war in Israel-Iran should end, to which I explained, his war should also end," Trump said of his hour-long conversation with Putin June 14.
Russia helped facilitate a previous deal to curtail Iran's uranium program, which Trump pulled the United States out of in his first term.
In a nod to how much the fighting between Israel and Iran is upending the regular international order, Trump said he and Putin spent "much less time" on the phone talking about the Russian leader's assault on Ukraine.
"That will be for next week," Trump said, referring to a NATO Summit that will bring America and its military allies together in late June in the Netherlands.
But G7 leaders won't only talk about Iran and Israel. After all, tariffs are one of the main issues agitating Trump and his counterparts during his second-chance presidency.
Since 2018, Trump has expanded his tariff regime, and they've become a centerpiece of his second term. Trade dealing could be on the table with Canada, the European Union and more.
The president has advocated for the United States to absorb its northern neighbor - the host of the summit. And leaders still plan to discuss topics such as artificial intelligence and wildfire management.
How will talks on tariffs, peacemaking play out?
Of the group that attended the last G7 Summit in Canada, only Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron remain in power. The leaders of the United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, Canada and Italy have all turned over since Trump was last in office.
Gone is a typically long winded and hard-fought communique that every country has to agree to. Canada worked with G7 nations to come up with short, action-oriented leader statements on areas of common interest, a senior U.S. official said.
"I think it's a more pragmatic approach, frankly," Shaw, the former Trump aide, assessed. "And it really does get the G7 refocused on what it's supposed to be doing - which is talking about the most pressing issues of the day and trying to find a common ground and coordinated approach among some of the world's largest economies."
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney will encourage nations to "stand together," the country's ambassador to the United States, Kirsten Hillman, said, in addition to working through issues in a mutually supportive way.
"That's going to be his main message to all of the leaders: build a coalition of like-minded countries that share values, that believe in international cooperation, believe in free and open exchange of ideas, of goods, of services, of the technologies that keep us all strong together and safe and secure," she said.
Still, the American president's tariffs are a challenge for G7 nations. A partial reprieve he offered most countries and the EU expires next month. He's in the midst of negotiating deals with several participating countries, including Japan and Canada. He said he reached an agreement with the UK in May.
A senior U.S. official said Trump was eager to pursue his trade goals and take part in working sessions at the G7 on migrants and drug smuggling, in addition to other topics.
Hillman said there's no denying that countries are feeling the impact of Trump's tariffs. "Those are issues I'm sure that the president will want to talk to leaders about, and leaders will want to exchange their views, as well," she said.
Yet, Trump will be hard-pressed to play the role of peacemaker, after boasting, repeatedly, that existing conflicts would not have started had he won a second consecutive term.
And while tariffs are likely to come up in individual sit-downs, world leaders were already aiming to avoid a public clash with Trump like the one that unfolded in the infamous 2018 photo, Lipsky said.
They have a very clear objective this time, he added, which has not always been the case.
"You have the leaders of the world's largest advanced democracies in one room," Lipsky said. "And if they can't coordinate on some signal to both the Israelis and the Iranians, then they'll never be able to do it."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
29 minutes ago
- Spectator
The delusion of western Palestine activists in Egypt
As the news cycle shifts its gaze to Iran and the escalating war to prevent the psychotic Islamic theocracy from going nuclear, spare a thought for the few hundred virtue-signalling westerners who thought it would be clever to traipse through Egypt and attempt to approach the Gaza border, armed not with aid or expertise, but with slogans, smartphones, and a boundless belief in their own moral radiance. They came, allegedly, to show solidarity with Gaza. What they revealed, instead, was the sheer delusion of performative activism gone rogue. Egypt, they quickly discovered, is not Glastonbury These self-styled heroes of humanity had absorbed the wildest claims from Hamas propagandists: tales of genocide, disproportionality, and babies being starved by 'Zionists' for sport. That this information may have come from a terrorist organisation that systematically lies, stages suffering for cameras, and steals aid from its own people did not seem to give them pause. Nor did the macabre irony that Hamas triggered this war by butchering Israeli civilians on 7 October, in an Iranian-backed rampage. For the marchers, it seems context and truth are distractions. Israel is evil, Gaza is pure, and anything that complicates this infantile morality play must be ignored. And so they flew to Cairo, preening like missionaries, oblivious to the region they were entering. Egypt, they quickly discovered, is not Glastonbury. Its security services do not offer vegan meal options or safe spaces. Within days, hundreds were detained, deported, or dumped back in the capital. One might almost feel sorry for them, if it weren't all so laughable. Their misfortune wasn't just predictable, it was the logical outcome of their fantasy-driven politics colliding with a brutal, indifferent reality. One particular scene went viral, mostly because of its tragicomic absurdity. A heavily tattooed man from Wales, claiming to be a nurse and pacifist, stood theatrically in front of Egyptian officers, pleading for passage. His Welsh lilt only sharpened the absurdity: 'You do have a choice. You're humans. We're here for humanity… You are my brother. In Islam, you are my brother!' A woman beside him asked, 'Are you a Muslim?' He ignored her. The performance rolled on. 'Please, I saw them shooting pregnant women, Muslim women.' Behind him, the crowd chanted 'Free, free Palestine,' and our Florence Nightingale of farce continued: 'These people aren't Muslims doing this, they're Zionists. They're not Jewish… I stand for Islam, I stand for the people of Falesteen.' It would have been risible if it weren't so revealing. Far from being political or humanitarian action, this was mere street theatre, but it soon wore thin: even the over-enthusiastic Arabic interpreter who had manically waved his arms and relayed this poor chap's desperate message eventually wandered off, apparently bored. The Welshman carried on alone, invoking starving babies, empty breasts, and the 'white hearts' of the Arab world. This, presumably, was meant to dignify his sobbing saviour complex, but it came across as patronising. The whole thing felt like a pitiful, live-streamed hallucination or a previously unseen moment from Little Britain. But it's not just idiocy on display. There is a deeper, darker pattern at work. Though they're encouraged by the activist news angles which seek to paint the conflict in simplistic, black and white terms, like a Ladybird book version of reality, these activists do not simply fall into their beliefs. They seek them out. They aren't 'radicalised' like someone catches a cold. Instead, they walk themselves into it, one credulous, self-congratulatory step at a time. As philosopher Quassim Cassam argues, extremism isn't just about ideology or tactics, it's a mindset: rigid, conspiratorial, and self-righteous. It thrives on grievance, absolutism and moral vanity. And crucially, it is chosen. People adopt it to interpret the world in a way that flatters their self-image and justifies their hostility. In this sense, the activists' worldview isn't imposed upon them, it is cultivated, reinforced, and rehearsed, with each act of public 'solidarity' functioning as both ritual and performance. They don't appear to ask why Hamas steals aid, embeds rockets in hospitals, or uses civilians as shields. They ignore why Gaza remains under blockade: because demilitarisation and deradicalisation were never accepted. Instead, they fixate on Israel, the Jewish state, as a unique and monstrous evil. This obscene inversion is not empathy. It is hatred, moralised. And the media helps. The BBC and other outlets regurgitate Hamas casualty claims as gospel, air scripted stories by Hamas leaders' children, broadcast false claims of 'flattened' hospitals, and treat every activist as a prophet or a saint. The BBC Arabic service even insisted that Jews spit on Christians as part of a holy festival ritual (we don't). The result is a feedback loop of propaganda and performance. The media amplifies the activists. The activists believe the media. And all of them seem to reinforce each other's prejudices under the performative illusion of humanitarianism. If they cared for Palestinians, they would campaign for Hamas to disarm, for children to be educated in peace, and for aid to be routed through secure, accountable channels. They would support Israel's right to exist and defend itself, and they would call out the Islamic fanatics who hold Gaza hostage and murder and rape Jews. But that would require moral clarity, political knowledge, and a spine. Far easier to film yourself sobbing outside Rafah and post it on Instagram for instant likes and shares. In the modern world, victimhood is currency. And being manhandled by Egyptian police, or weeping theatrically for the cameras, only boosts your activist credentials. They aren't real martyrs, but they certainly play them online. This is a grotesque masquerade. It feeds anti-Semitism, empowers terrorists, and distracts from real solutions. And all for what? So a few westerners can feel righteous for an afternoon. Spare a thought indeed, but not a tear.


Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Macron's blunt message to Trump from Greenland pre-G7
French President Emmanuel Macron delivered a blunt message to Donald Trump by stopping in Greenland Sunday en route to the G7 – a massive territory the U.S. president says the nation 'needs.' Macron stopped in Nuuk, the same city visited by Donald Trump, Jr. and Vice President JD Vance in separate stops that alarmed some locals who favor moves toward independence or continued association with Denmark. And the French president, eager to flex his own as a European leader as Trump pulls back rhetorically from European allies and pivots away from Ukraine, did not hold back in his public comments. 'I don't think that´s something to be done between allies,' Macron said on a brief visit where he met Danish PM Mette Frederiksen and Greenland's PM Jens-Frederik Nielsen. 'It´s important to show that Denmark and Europe are committed to this territory, which has very high strategic stakes and whose territorial integrity must be respected,' Marcon added. Macron's visit comes as Trump prepares to land in a country where locals are equally adamant against his call to make Canada the 51st U.S. state. 'I don't think he's playing around. I think he has intent around it. I think I think he's smart enough to know that we need them more than they need us, and he's willing to do whatever it takes,' local electrical contractor Curtis Reynard told the Daily Mail. With great powers scrambling for influence in the Arctic, Macron has also said the deep seas are not 'up for grabs.' Trump has been blunt in his claims about the need to obtain Greenland, which has stores of rare earth minerals under its permafrost and a strategic location between North America and Europe. 'We need Greenland for national security and international security,' Trump said in late March as the situation escalated. 'So we'll, I think, we'll go as far as we have to go,' Trump added. 'We need Greenland. And the world needs us to have Greenland, including Denmark. Denmark has to have us have Greenland. And, you know, we'll see what happens. But if we don't have Greenland, we can't have great international security. I view it from a security standpoint, we have to be there,' said Trump. Last week Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told lawmakers the U.S. had plans to invade Greenland or Panama if necessary. 'Our job at the Defense Department is to have plans for any particular contingency,' Hegseth said under questioning at a hearing. 'I think the American people would want the Pentagon to have plans for any particular contingency,' Hegseth added.


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
What locals in Balloch think of Flamingo Land
A 10-year battle has raged over what this idyllic spot on one of the world's most storied waterways should come to look like in the future. An English leisure company called Flamingo Land specialising in leisure resorts has fought hard to build a hotel and log cabins and, ahem … a monorail here. The very notion of a leisure complex annexing one of the few remaining accessible spots on what the legendary Scottish naturalist, Tom Weir had called 'a lung for Glasgow' immediately seemed an anathema to the Scottish public and to those across the world who had experienced Loch Lomond's wild beauty. More than 155,000 signatures were collected expressing opposition to what they regarded as an environmental sacrilege. No other grassroots campaign had ever come anywhere near gathering so many responses. Read More Fake liberals wage war on Scotland's poorest and most vulnerable folk How new Pope and Catholic Church have mesmerised our Godless societies Pope Leo is the first American pontiff, but Trump should not celebrate It forced the developers and their partners, Scottish Enterprise and the Loch Lomond & The Trossachs National Park authority to retreat and re-consider an arrangement they'd all thought could be steered through with a minimum of public engagement and scrutiny. Along the way, a pattern of civic and private relationships has been exposed in which an exclusivity agreement with the developers was uncovered as well as a nexus of interlocking relationships in which undeclared interests and quiet land transfers have occurred. Featuring heavily throughout the saga has been the SNP's favoured weapon of mass obstruction: the redacted official document. The latest twists in a decade-long series of convulsions have occurred in the last few weeks. In May, the Scottish Government's Planning and Environmental Appeals Division intimated that the Reporter assigned to the case was minded to allow the appeal for the Flamingo Land development after it had been unanimously rejected by the Loch Lomond and the Trossachs Planning Authority last September Seasoned campaigners though, who had observed the behaviour of Scottish Enterprise and the tactics of the developers up close were wary of breaking open the champagne just yet. Scotland's planning laws allow developers unlimited scope for appeal while denying the same to community groups. It was inevitable that Flamingo Land bosses would return. Yet, there would be one more turn of the cards. It came when Jackie Baillie, the formidable Labour MSP for the area, succeeded in having the issue debated last Wednesday. The Scottish Government, fearing a vote it would lose, moved suddenly to re-call the plans. One local campaigner told me: 'When Jackie gets going on an issue she becomes a force of nature. It's clear she'd stacked enough votes among all opposition parties to cause the Government problems.' Loch Lomond plans (Image: Loch Lomond planning portal) In the Balloch House Inn, local people were keen to dismantle some of the mythology of this struggle for what they regard as the soul of their community. 'It now looks like the plans won't be going forward any time soon,' said Peter Broughan, long-time resident of this neighbourhood. 'And let's be honest: it would be insanity to do this before the 2026 election. It's not a vote winner. The problem of course is parity of planning. The developers can come back any time they want. Objectors can't.' Last week, Scotland's MSPs all received a clumsy letter from a lobbying firm acting on behalf of the developers. It attempted to dispel what it described as myths in the objectors' narrative. Within hours the decision to recall the plans was made: surely one of the fastest times on record a lobbyist's claims were dumped. The firm described as 'myth' that more than 155,000 people had objected to the Lomond Banks development. Here's what they claimed was the truth: 'While an online petition claimed to gather more than 155,000 signatures, these figures are not independently verifiable. In contrast, the official planning process received just 760 formal objections, a small number given the scale and reach of the project.' Local campaigner, Alannah Maurer is familiar with this type of claim and dismantles it. 'This is desperate stuff,' she said. 'It's a verifiable fact that 155,000 objected, whether by email or through an online portal platformed by the Scottish Green MSP Ross Greer. It shows the strength of feeling – and to an unprecedented extent – that the Scottish are opposed to the planning application. If the developer claims these figures are not independently verifiable, is he suggesting that our MSPs are misrepresenting figures in statements they have made in Parliament? 'Are they suggesting that 155,000 objections, including campaign groups representing 6,000 members are not to be considered? How arrogant and insidious.' Willie Hutchison, an engineer who has worked all over the world, said: 'Loch Lomond is an area of outstanding natural beauty and it is recognised both at home and internationally as such. Commercial real estate developments like the Flamingo Land proposal are utterly at odds with the objects of retaining an area of natural beauty. Their proposal comprising two hotels, restaurants, bars, shops, a brewery, over a hundred chalets, and a monorail tells you that. 'Las Vegas on the Loch may be a quip but in truth it reflects how such commercial developments are the antithesis of the natural environment. In my opinion, this is a Trojan Horse with more development to come. 'And why has this deal proceeded with such secrecy? What justifies a near ten-year 'exclusivity agreement'? Why can't people know what public land is being sold for? And how much is the running bill, including working hours spent by highly-paid public officials? Are we expected to believe that 10 years and huge public and private expense is all merely for this development?' Local resident, Elaine Telfer said: 'You wonder why Flamingo Land is so determined to keep fighting, and at what cost? Could it be a Land Grab, of a world famous prime location: the gateway to Loch Lomond? Looking at their financial position, from Companies House, they are asset-rich only, so who are their backers? From the first sod being cut to the opening of the resort will take something like seven years. The disruption caused is beyond comprehension.' Enter Peter Haining, the world-renowned Scottish rower who won three world Sculling titles. He is founding Director of the Scottish Institute of Sport and remains a globally-respected rowing coach. He was born in nearby Dumbarton and first honed his skills on this stretch of water as a member of the Loch Lomond Rowing Club. Mr Haining has been in quiet discussions with some local campaigners and politicians about a much more ambitious and sustainable project which would unlock the full cultural and economic potential of this historic region. 'The scope of what can be achieved here, without disturbing the natural beauty and the natural order of this place is vast,' he said. 'I'd propose a Loch Lomond watersports centre. And from that you could develop ideas around on what this area really needs. I'd like to expand it to the University of Loch Lomond which would provide a natural link in an educational chain which has Stirling at one end and Glasgow at the other. 'This place is a natural environment for providing degrees in a broad spectrum of environment specialisms, including energy conservation and the study of algae and solar energy. Loch Lomond and the surrounding lands are intrinsic to a true appreciation of both ancient and modern Scotland, stretching back to the Neolithic age. The heartbeat of Scotland can be felt here. 'Spain has benefitted greatly from the tens of thousands who visit to walk the ancient pilgrimage routes that lead to the tomb of St James in Santiago de Compostela. We have our own sacred highways around here which tell the story of how the first Christian monks came here and where St Columba walked and which helped give birth to western Christianity. The geographical and historical timelines around this part of Scotland are vast end endless. 'You could have a Gaelic-speaking centre and foster trades and skills in kilt-making, acrylics, fabric-dying. In commercial terms, you could attract investment from global partners owing to the opportunities in world-class fishing, fine dining and whisky. It would be a four-phase plan, fully costed and researched, starting with a watersports centre, the university and training camps for international rowers. 'America's Ivy League universities have vast alumni wealth under management and these places absolutely adore the Scottish Highlands and the west coast.' Peter Haining's vision is significantly more valid and purposeful than anything that the government agencies and their favoured business partners have produced in a decade of wasted endeavour.