Macron's blunt message to Trump from Greenland pre-G7
And the French president, eager to flex his own as a European leader as Trump pulls back rhetorically from European allies and pivots away from Ukraine, did not hold back in his public comments. 'I don't think that´s something to be done between allies,' Macron said on a brief visit where he met Danish PM Mette Frederiksen and Greenland's PM Jens-Frederik Nielsen. 'It´s important to show that Denmark and Europe are committed to this territory, which has very high strategic stakes and whose territorial integrity must be respected,' Marcon added.
Macron's visit comes as Trump prepares to land in a country where locals are equally adamant against his call to make Canada the 51st U.S. state. 'I don't think he's playing around. I think he has intent around it. I think I think he's smart enough to know that we need them more than they need us, and he's willing to do whatever it takes,' local electrical contractor Curtis Reynard told the Daily Mail. With great powers scrambling for influence in the Arctic, Macron has also said the deep seas are not 'up for grabs.'
Trump has been blunt in his claims about the need to obtain Greenland, which has stores of rare earth minerals under its permafrost and a strategic location between North America and Europe. 'We need Greenland for national security and international security,' Trump said in late March as the situation escalated. 'So we'll, I think, we'll go as far as we have to go,' Trump added. 'We need Greenland. And the world needs us to have Greenland, including Denmark. Denmark has to have us have Greenland. And, you know, we'll see what happens. But if we don't have Greenland, we can't have great international security. I view it from a security standpoint, we have to be there,' said Trump.
Last week Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told lawmakers the U.S. had plans to invade Greenland or Panama if necessary. 'Our job at the Defense Department is to have plans for any particular contingency,' Hegseth said under questioning at a hearing. 'I think the American people would want the Pentagon to have plans for any particular contingency,' Hegseth added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Abrego Garcia's lawyers want smuggling charges dismissed on grounds of vindictive prosecution
Lawyers for Kilmar Abrego Garcia asked a federal judge on Tuesday to dismiss a human smuggling case against him, saying the government was prosecuting the Maryland construction worker to punish him for challenging his removal to El Salvador. Their motion filed in court said attempts to dismiss indictments on the grounds of 'selective or vindictive prosecution' are infrequent and rarely succeed, 'but if there has ever been a case for dismissal on those grounds, this is that case.' The attorneys said senior cabinet members, Justice Department leaders and President Donald Trump mounted unprecedented public attacks on Abrego Garcia and that 'vindictiveness is clear from the record.' Acting U.S. Attorney Robert E. McGuire in Tennessee, where Abrego Garcia is in jail, said in an email prosecutors would have no other comment beyond what they file in response to the motion. No prosecutor motion was filed as of late Tuesday. Abrego Garcia became a prominent face in the debate over Trump's immigration policies following his wrongful expulsion to El Salvador in March. Trump's administration violated a U.S. immigration judge's order in 2019 that shields Abrego Garcia from deportation to El Salvador because he likely faces threats of gang violence there. The administration claimed Abrego Garcia was in the MS-13 gang, although he wasn't charged and has repeatedly denied the allegation. Facing mounting pressure and a U.S. Supreme Court order, the Trump administration returned Abrego Garcia to the U.S. in June to face the smuggling charges, which his attorneys have called 'preposterous.' Tuesday's motion alleged the government was trying to paint Abrego Garcia as a criminal to punish him for challenging his removal to El Salvador and to avoid 'the embarrassment of accepting responsibility for its unlawful conduct." The motion said the government also aimed to change public opinion about Abrego Garcia's deportation. Abrego Garcia's attorneys asked the court at least to order a hearing on the government's motives. The smuggling case stems from a 2022 traffic stop for speeding, during which Abrego Garcia was driving a vehicle with nine passengers. Police in Tennessee suspected human smuggling, but he was allowed to drive on. A federal judge in Maryland last month prohibited the Trump administration from taking Abrego Garcia into immediate immigration custody if he's released from jail. The judge ordered the government to provide three business days notice if Immigration and Customs Enforcement intends to initiate deportation proceedings against him.
Reuters
20 minutes ago
- Reuters
Texas lawmaker prepares for second night of redistricting protest in state Capitol
Aug 19 (Reuters) - Democratic state Representative Nicole Collier hunkered down for a second night in the Texas Capitol building rather than accept a mandatory police escort in a redistricting battle as President Donald Trump seeks to keep Republican control of Congress. This time she expects to have a bit more company. Collier was one of more than 50 Democrats from the Texas House of Representatives who left the state in a two-week walkout to deny Republicans the legislative quorum needed to approve new congressional district maps drawn at Trump's behest. After the Democrats returned on Monday, they faced new rules by the Republican leadership, requiring each to stay put in the Capitol, unless they agreed to be placed in custody of a state police officer to monitor their movements. Republicans said the signed permission slips were designed to ensure the Democrats' presence when Republican leaders gavel in a second special session on Wednesday to pursue the unfinished business of redistricting. Democrats called the crackdown unjustified. Collier, in her seventh two-year term representing Fort Worth, refused to agree to a police monitor, remaining in the Capitol building in protest. "What matters to me is making sure that I resist and fight back against and push back," Collier told Reuters from the Capitol in an interview on Monday. CBS News reported that Collier's lawyers filed a court petition against the Republicans' crackdown, saying the threat of civil arrest for leaving the Capitol amounted to "illegal confinement." Collier posted a picture of herself on X on Tuesday sleeping on a chair with a blanket and the caption, "This was my night, bonnet and all, in the #txlege." CNN said Texas State Representatives Gene Wu and Vince Perez, also Democrats, joined her in solidarity overnight, bringing snacks of dried fruit, ramen and popcorn. On Tuesday, Collier said several more of her Democratic colleagues had torn up their permission slips and would join her for a second overnight protest in the Capitol. About two dozen supporters staged a boisterous but peaceful protest in the Capitol, chanting and carrying signs outside the House chamber where Collier remained sequestered. The proposed redrawing of Texas congressional districts aims to help Republicans pick up five seats from Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives in the November 2026 midterm elections. Republicans now hold a slim 219-212 majority in the U.S. House, with the balance between the two parties expected to be closely fought. The Texas Democrats said their walkout, while merely delaying the action they sought to thwart, gave their party time to organize a counter-measure, led by California Governor Gavin Newsom, to advance its own redistricting plan. Newsom has called California's effort, designed to pick up five new Democratic seats in the U.S. House, the 'Election Rigging Response Act.' Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows, a Republican, accused Collier and other Democrats of shirking their duty as lawmakers, delaying other important business besides redistricting. After Monday's session, Collier stood alone in the center of the chamber in Austin, the state capital, making telephone calls and doing interviews amid a sea of empty seats. Wu, the Democratic leader of the Texas House, has said the current congressional districts already dilute the voting power of the state's racial minorities, and the new redistricting plan represented "turbocharged racism." On Fox News, Abbott called Wu's accusation "bogus," saying redistricting would create more Hispanic-majority districts. He said it was also necessary to give Trump voters in Democrat-majority districts the ability to elect Republicans. In a statement on Monday, Collier, a former chair of the Texas Legislative Black Caucus, said, "My community is majority-minority, and they expect me to stand up for their representation."
The Guardian
20 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump's tariffs replace diplomacy as other US tools of statecraft are discarded
On the campaign trail, Donald Trump pledged to use tariffs to revitalise American industry, bringing jobs home and helping to make America great again. But more than six months into his administration, experts say the president's trade war is increasingly being wielded as a political cudgel, in lieu of more traditional forms of diplomacy. The president's current target, India, has been unable to reach a trade agreement and Trump appears ready to follow through with his threat to impose a further 25% tariff on Delhi – bringing the total to 50% – the joint highest levy on any country, along with Brazil. It is a whiplash-inducing turnaround from a few months ago, when the newly minted Trump administration seemed intent on continuing a years-long bipartisan effort to deepen ties with India as a geopolitical counterweight to China. It's part of a trend which highlights how tariffs are used as threats against countries perceived to be recalcitrant. Rather than a tool of economic coercion, Trump instead wields tariffs as a political weapon. Five rounds of trade talks between the two sides have brought India no closer to conceding to US demands that it open up its vast agriculture and dairy sectors. Negotiations planned for early next week have been abruptly called off, as India's prime minister, Narendra Modi, grapples with Trump's demand that India cease to buy oil from Russia; sales that the US says are helping to fuel Vladimir Putin's war against Ukraine. The demand – that India wean itself off the Russian oil, which accounts for about 35% of its total supply – sits at odds with the original stated purpose of Trump's tariff regime: to bring manufacturing back to the US and rebalance trade deficits. 'Tariffs have a very specific purpose of protecting domestic industry from competition,' says Dr Stuart Rollo from the Centre for International Security Studies at the University of Sydney. 'That's not really what this is about … It's kind of pivoted to a tool of geopolitical compulsion.' Trump himself has come to admit this. Along with the threatened additional 25% tariff on India in retaliation for continuing to purchase Russian oil, the president has tied Canada's 35% tariff to its recognition of Palestinian statehood. In the case of Brazil – which has a rare trade surplus with the US, meaning it buys more than it sells – Trump has stated that the huge 50% tariff is due to the trial of his political ally, Jair Bolsonaro, who is charged with plotting a military coup after he lost the 2022 presidential election. The president's top trade adviser, Peter Navarro, even has a new term for these explicitly political trade threats: 'national security tariffs'. The Democratic senator Chris Murphy put it more bluntly, writing in the Financial Times in April that the tariffs are not designed as economic policy but as a 'means to compel loyalty to the president'. Rollo says: 'It's a way of the United States to compel as much of the world as possible into realignment with its global leadership at a time when its actual weight and gravity is diminishing.' In some ways, this is not new; the Biden administration used trade restrictions to limit China's access to state of the art semiconductors at a time of heated geopolitical tensions. But Devashish Mitra, professor of economics at Syracuse university, says that for many in India, the threat faced over Russian oil purchases seems incoherent, ill thought out, and could push India closer to China. 'India did consider the US an ally,' says Mitra. 'It was a country that the US was relying on as a counter to China in that region. So it had a huge geopolitical importance, but it doesn't seem like Trump values any of that.' This week China's foreign minister has been in Delhi for talks, and Modi is expected in Shanghai at the end of the month; his first visit in seven years. It's a part of a recent pattern of tightening relations between the Brics countries – Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, which make up 40% of global GDP – that experts say is a response to Trump's aggressive trade policies. For future US administrations, winning back the trust of some of these countries could be difficult, as Trump's escalating trade war comes at the same time as his administration dismantles its instruments of global statecraft. From mass firings at the state department, to the slashing of foreign assistance programmes at USAID, America's diplomatic toolbox is vastly diminished. Tariffs have 'come to replace diplomacy', says Rollo. And so with his attention divided between crises at home and abroad, the president has left himself armed with only a hammer, with every global flashpoint looking to him like a nail.
