No formal garda complaints from protestors removed during Gaza rally at Leinster House
Up to 40 people – including members of the Mothers Against Genocide group – were involved in the overnight staged encampment that began on Mother's Day at the gates of Leinster House in Dublin.
The group blocked the entrance to the Dáil and were given a direction and a period of time by gardaí to move under the Public Order Act the following morning.
However, when they failed to do so, gardaí removed the protesters, causing outrage among some members of the public and TDs.
In the Dáil, People Before Profit TD Richard Boyd Barrett described it as a 'peaceful sit-down protest' and said the women were arrested 'violently, in some cases.'
He said one woman told him: 'I was stripped completely naked and was asked to remove my underwear. When I questioned the necessity of this, I was told I would be forced violently if I didn't comply,' the account read.
'After removing my underwear, they looked inside my private areas and touched all my sensitive parts.' Deputy Boyd Barrett described the alleged behaviour as 'absolutely disgusting' and said the women 'were a threat to nobody.'
While Solidarity–People Before Profit TD Ruth Coppinger said, 'Some of those women were strip-searched and one was subjected to a cavity search.'
Mothers Against Genocide protesting outside Leinster House, Mother's Day 2025
The Irish Examiner has since learned that none of the protesters who were removed from the gates of Leinster House have submitted a formal complaint to the new garda Ombudsman.
A spokesperson for Fiosrú, the Office of the Police Ombudsman, said it has received '61 contacts from concerned members of the public about the media reports of the protest.'
The statement continued: 'It is open to anyone directly affected by or who has witnessed an act or omission by An Garda Síochána members to make a complaint to Fiosrú.
'Fiosrú does not share information relating to complaints made by or against individuals. This is to protect the investigative process, and the rights of both complainants and those complained against.
'Fiosrú is not in a position to comment any further.'
The 61 complaints from members of the public include those who viewed videos of the incident on social media or read about it on the internet.
It does not include anyone who was directly affected by the incident that unfolded during the encampment.
Complaints can be submitted to Fiosrú up to a year after an alleged incident occurs involving gardaí.
Megan Ní Ghabhláin of Mothers Against Genocide said at the time there had been a complete escalation by the gardaí against women involved in a peaceful protest at a time when few people were going in and out of the Dáil.
'Unfortunately, this morning, the gardaí decided they were going to remove these precious faces of these children in the most disrespectful manner,' she said.
Garda presence as Mothers Against Genocide protest outside Leinster House, 31 March 2025
Labour Leader Ivana Bacik later said she was 'shocked' that anyone from Mothers Against Genocide would be arrested.
Meanwhile, Social Democrats TD Gary Gannon said it was a 'heavy-handed approach' by gardaí.
A garda spokesperson said at the time: 'The direction given by gardaí was not complied with and a number of individuals were subsequently arrested for offences contrary to the Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act 1994 and conveyed to garda stations in Dublin.
'10 females (20s, 30s, 40s and 50s) and one male (20s) were arrested under Section 8 of the Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act, 1994.
'All 11 people have received adult cautions.
'An additional three men (20s and 30s) were also arrested for alleged offences under sections 6, 9, and 19 of the Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act 1994.
'The three individuals have been charged and are now before the courts.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
4 hours ago
- The Journal
High Court quashes public order conviction against Jemima Burke, sister of teacher Enoch
JEMIMA BURKE, A sister of teacher Enoch Burke, has had a District Court conviction for a public order offence quashed by the High Court. Burke (30), a management consultant in professional services and a UCG graduate in journalism, was convicted of the offence by Judge Vincent Deane at Ballina District Court, Co Mayo on 20 June 2024. It came after Burke attended an inquest in Swinford, Co Mayo that same day, which she told a previous court hearing concerned the death of a sepsis patient at Mayo University Hospital (MUH). She said the man spent 42 hours on a trolley, then went missing while in hospital care, and was later found dead in a river in Castlebar. She said during the inquest lunch break, while outside on the public street, she used her phone to film the coroner and several MUH staff. A Garda arrested her, confiscated her phone and brought her to Ballina Garda Station, where she was detained in a cell for more than two hours. She was then charged with two public order offences relating to a breach of the peace. When she appeared before Judge Deane that evening, she refused to sign a bail bond. The case was heard immediately. Judge Deane convicted her of one of the public order offences, under Section 6 of the Public Order Act, with the other taken into consideration, and fined her €350. Burke sought a review of her case last November after she alleged that her Constitutional rights were breached when she was arrested, charged, and convicted of a public order offence within a matter of hours. She argued that she had been the victim of a 'serious' miscarriage of justice in that there was 'excessive haste' in hearing the original case, and that she received no disclosure and had no legal representation at her trial. Advertisement She said she had been detained in a cell for two hours and that 55 minutes after leaving the cell, she was on trial in the court. In May, the High Court heard that the State would not oppose quashing the conviction against Burke, but it argued that the matter should still be sent back to the District Court for a new hearing. In a written judgement today, Ms Justice Sara Phelan said that Burke was entitled to choose not to enter into a bail bond 'In preferring to not remand her in custody, and thereby conducting the trial on the same day on which the offence allegedly occurred, it is clear that the District Court Judge fell into error,' she said. 'It seems to this Court that the actions of the District Court Judge were such as to deprive the applicant of her constitutional right to a fair trial and, that being so, the District Court ought not to have embarked on the hearing on 20 June 2024.' The judge said while the District Court had jurisdiction to hear the case, it did not have jurisdiction 'to embark on a peremptory hearing' and therefore, the court acted 'in excess of jurisdiction from the outset'. Ms Justice Phelan said she was not prepared to return the matter to the District Court for a new hearing 'in circumstances where the applicant has endured enough and the prosecution cannot be acquitted of all the blame for some, at least, of what went wrong at the trial.' She also ruled that Burke was not entitled to an award of compensatory damages. She quashed Burke's conviction and made an order prohibiting any further prosecution of Burke in the District Court. With reporting from Paul Neilan Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
RTÉ News
5 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Presidential hopeful Gareth Sheridan says he has backing of two councils
Presidential hopeful Gareth Sheridan has said he has support in Tipperary and Laois county councils. The businessman, who officially launched his campaign in Dubin this morning, says he is confident he can be proposed and seconded by six local authorities, but would not be drawn on the other four. Anyone hoping to get their name on the ballot requires the support of four councils or 20 members of the Oireachtas. A sitting president can also nominate themselves. Mr Sheridan said his campaign is focused on housing, and that he wants to 'make Ireland home again'. He points to article 45.2.1 of the Constitution which requires the State to direct its policy towards securing that citizens may "through their occupations, find the means of making reasonable provision for their domestic needs". Mr Sheridan said this means working people should be able to afford to buy a home in Ireland. He added that he would hold the Dáil to account over housing failures.
Irish Examiner
7 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Enoch Burke's sister wins legal challenge as High Court quashes district court conviction
Enoch Burke's sister Jemima has had a district court conviction for a public order offence quashed by the High Court. And the management consultant will not have to face a re-hearing of the case, a High Court judge also ruled. However, Ms Justice Sara Phelan said she did not consider an award of compensatory damages over the matter appropriate or necessary. The High Court had heard last May that the State would not oppose the quashing of the public order conviction involving alleged mobile phone videoing by Ms. Burke. The State, however, argued the matter should still be sent back to the original court for a new hearing. Jemima Burke, 30, had been granted permission to seek judicial review of her case after she alleged her constitutional rights were breached when she was arrested, charged, and convicted of a public order offence within a matter of hours. She also sought that her case should not be remitted due to her constitutional rights. Ms Burke was convicted of a public order offence on June 20 last year by Judge Vincent Deane in Ballina District Court in Co Mayo. Ms Burke, a management consultant in professional services, said she attended an inquest in Swinford, Co Mayo, on June 20, concerning the death of a sepsis patient at Mayo University Hospital. She was later arrested and her phone confiscated. She was brought to Ballina Garda Station where she was detained in a cell, she claimed, for more than two hours. She was then charged with two public order offences relating to a breach of the peace. She said when she appeared before Judge Deane she refused to sign a bail bond. Judge Deane, she claimed, told her it would be unjust to adjourn the matter if she was not going to sign the bond, that there was little chance of her going to prison and that he had "to protect your interests at some level, too". Ms Burke was convicted of one of the public order offences, under Section 6 of the Public Order Act, with the other taken into consideration, and fined €350. In her High Court proceedings, she argued she had been the victim of a "serious" miscarriage of justice in that there was "excessive haste" in hearing the original case. Ms Justice Phelan in the High Court on Thursday said it could not be gainsaid that the manner in which the district court judge approached the hearing was peremptory 'notwithstanding the well-intentioned rationale behind such approach.' She said the district court judge had approached the matter with a view to protecting Ms Burke's interests, such that he did not want her to be remanded in custody. However, Ms Justice Phelan said Ms Burke was entitled to choose not to enter into a bail bond, and her right to a fair trial in due course of law was an absolute right. 'In preferring not to remand her in custody and thereby conducting the trial on the same day on which the offence allegedly occurred, it is clear the district court judge fell into error.' Ms Justice Phelan said. The actions of the district court judge, Ms Justice Phelan said, were such 'as to deprive Ms Burke of her constitutional right to a fair trial and the district court ought not to have embarked on the hearing on June 20, 2024', she said, ruling the district court had acted in excess of jurisdiction from the outset. Ms Justice Phelan said she was not prepared to remit the matter for further hearing and she also ruled Ms Burke was not entitled to an award of compensatory damages. The judge said she was inclined to award Ms Burke as a litigant in person her expenses and outlay in respect of the application, but the parties could mention the matter when it comes back before the court in October.
