Redress policies aren't reverse discrimination
Image: File
THE Democratic Alliance opposing the Employment Equity Act to a point of wanting it scrapped by the courts is a clear sign of who it truly represents despite identifying itself as a non-racial party.
This is part of the necessary legislation that is aimed at addressing the historical and systemic inequalities faced by certain groups in the workplace. Without employment equity, fair representation on of under-represented groups such as black people, women, and people living with disabilities wouldn't be guaranteed.
Looking at the racial makeup of people in management in most companies and businesses in the private sector, you would swear that white males are the majority in this country. Employment Equity isn't discrimination against a specific race, but given South Africa's history, it's meant to promote diversity and to break down barriers and eliminate obstacles that hinder certain groups from succeeding.
It's quite strange that anyone can oppose diversity because in the workplace it offers different perspectives, ideas and experiences. While the issue of opposing incompetence is valid, not all employment equity beneficiaries are the same. We can't view redress policies as reverse discrimination, but quota targeting carries the risk of hiring less qualified individuals and promoting people who don't have enough leadership or management skills.
The DA and all those who support its court application need to ask themselves why they are against transformation policies. It is disappointing and a regression to see the DA so emboldened in its fight against race-based policies.
The population breakdown is 80% black, 9% coloured, 8% white and 2.5% Indian. Per Employment Equity Report 2023/24 the top management breakdown is: 68% white, 16% black, 10% coloured and 4% Indian. Senior management positions: white (55%), black (23%), coloured (13%) and Indian (7%).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Angie Motshekga deserves to be fired for defending SANDF misconduct
Chris Hattingh | Published 4 hours ago The Democratic Alliance (DA) believes Defence Minister Angie Motshekga's conduct in shielding General Rudzani Maphwanya from accountability is so serious that it deserves for her to be fired. Her latest defence of Maphwanya's misconduct in Tehran shows she is unfit for office and is causing irreparable harm to South Africa's image. Instead of holding General Maphwanya accountable for overstepping his constitutional mandate, Motshekga endorsed his version of events and declared herself 'satisfied' with his report. By doing so, she has chosen to side with an unelected general who engaged in unsanctioned political diplomacy in Iran. This is a blatant violation of the SANDF Code of Conduct. According to Iranian state media, Maphwanya pledged 'common goals' with Tehran, endorsed its stance on Gaza, and promised deeper strategic ties. These are political pronouncements no soldier has the authority to make. Motshekga's decision to shield him undermines one of the cornerstones of our democracy: civilian oversight of the military. Instead of safeguarding South Africa's constitutional and diplomatic interests, she has rubber-stamped conduct that weakens our standing among democratic allies and strengthens ties with authoritarian regimes. Her failure is not just an error of judgment and a failure of leadership. By placing political expedience above accountability, she has sent the message that generals may act as they please without consequence, while ministers will look the other way. This cannot be tolerated in a constitutional democracy. South Africa is already struggling with strained international relations. Now, under Motshekga's watch, our global credibility and national security are being further eroded. Every day she remains in office deepens the damage. President Ramaphosa has a duty as Commander-in-Chief of the SANDF to act decisively. He must hold Motshekga and General Maphwanya accountable, and send a clear signal that South Africa remains committed to constitutional order, civilian control of the military, and respect for democratic values. The DA will not allow our nation's hard-earned democratic principles to be trampled by a Minister who has failed in her most basic duty: to put South Africa first. Chris Hattingh MP - DA Spokesperson on Defence and Military Veterans
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Land in hand but no money to build: Gauteng housing project vacant due to lack of foresight
A housing scheme aimed at giving 100 000 beneficiaries fully serviced plots of land has seen ambitions unrealised A land ownership scheme to empower the building of assets has not realised its intended goals. The Rapid Land Release Programme (RLRP) envisioned the handing over of fully serviced plots of land across Gauteng for recipients to develop homes to their own specifications. However, roughly seven years after its launch, the vast majority of stands remain empty, despite having been allocated to beneficiaries. 99% of plots still vacant The RLRP was launched in 2018 by then premier David Makhura and was continued during Premier Panyaza Lesufi's administration. The programme featured roughly 100 000 fully serviced stands and moved away from providing the turnkey apartments common in other social housing projects. The provincial government stated four years ago that the stands were ready for allocation, but to date, only a fraction of stands have seen development. At a recent oversight visit to Palm Ridge Ext 14 by the DA, officials explained that of the 2 200 stands allocated to recipients in the area, only 13 had seen any construction. Speaking to community members, DA representatives were told how constant delays, broken promises and a lack of support had left the stands bare. 'There seems to be no forethought given to how beneficiaries will build and maintain their homes or cover service costs,' stated DA Gauteng shadow Human Settlements MEC Mervyn Cirota. 'It is also unacceptable that the government proceeded with the programme despite knowing that most beneficiaries could not afford to build, secure loans or pay for services.' MEC disputes figures However, Gauteng Human Settlement MEC Tasneem Motara disputed the figures, saying the DA's claims of more than 2 000 undeveloped stands was 'factually incorrect'. 'The project comprises of 758 stands which were developed in 2021/2022 financial year, all of which have been allocated, with title deed registration currently underway,' Motara told The Citizen. The MEC said the 758 stands were part of the broader project called the Ikagelang RLRP and that beneficiaries were approved in line with the National Housing Needs Register and have their ownership linked with housing subsidy systems. Once obtaining the title deeds, beneficiaries receive full ownership; with the only proviso that developments meet municipal planning and building regulations. Motara clarified that under the RLRP, beneficiaries did not need to wait until receiving title deeds to begin construction as the stands had services pre-installed and were given certified letters of allocation. 'This document enables beneficiaries to apply for building plan approval from the municipality and to commence construction in line with municipal building regulations. 'In short, the allocation letter is the enabling instrument, beneficiaries are not left in limbo. 'Palm Ridge Ext 14 therefore remains a key element of our broader human settlements strategy, contributing to both land ownership and spatial transformation,' Motara said. 'Defeats the purpose' The DA claims that the project has cost at least R500 million so far and is calling for the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) to look into the whereabouts of the funds. 'Palm Ridge is just a small microcosm of the whole RLRP. There is no indication whether a transfer has taken place so there may be an allocation, but that is only the first step,' Cirota told The Citizen. Cirota noted the project suffered from insufficient funding, a hold up in deeds transfers and failure to assist beneficiaries with planning. 'It is a multi-pronged attack, and if one of those elements falls away, then the whole process comes tumbling down. 'What is the purpose of having the land if you cannot build a house on the land or maintain the property. It defeats the whole purpose of the whole project,' Cirota said. NOW READ: Gauteng's housing crisis: 150 years to clear the backlog
The South African
4 hours ago
- The South African
Buti Manamela under fire for latest SETA appointments
The Democratic Alliance (DA) has called on the Minister of Higher Education, Buti Manamela, to appoint independent and non-political people to deliver an effective turnaround of some of the embattled Sector Education and Training Authority (SETA)s that have been placed under administration. This week, Manamela appointed Oupa Nkoane, Lehlohonolo Masoga, and Zukile Mvalo as Construction SETA (CETA), Services SETA, and Local Government SETA (LGSETA) administrators. However, the individuals have been implicated in corruption, mismanagement, and fraud in previous government jobs. DA spokesperson and member of the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training, Karabo Khakhau, said the party has written an urgent letter to Manamela to demand his reconsideration of these appointments and withdrawal of his announcement. Khakhau said the appointees are unfit- implicated in corruption, mismanagement, fraud in previous government jobs – or have proved themselves useless in the SETA space already. Oupa Nkoane is a former municipal manager at the ANC-governed Emfuleni Local Municipality in Gauteng. He is implicated in a forensic report that details the mismanagement of R872 million in this municipality. Lehlohonolo Masoga is a former ANC Limpopo MEC & Deputy Speaker. Khakhau said he was implicated in a forensic report by forensic services company Morar for backdating a communications contract worth R4.4 million as the CEO of the Musina-Makhado Special Economic Zone – this was seen to justify unjustified payments made to communications company, Mahuma Group. Lastly, Zukile Mvalo is the current Deputy Director General responsible for skills development in the Department of Higher Education, and has been since 2017. All 21 SETAs have been reporting directly to him for the past 8 years. He has failed at stabilising SETAs for the past eight years, and has no prospect of fixing anything suddenly now. 'Minister Manamela announced these appointments saying they are to address serious and entrenched governance failures in these entities, including procurement irregularities, lapses in oversight, and board instability – how on earth can this be addressed by corruption, fraud, mismanagement and implicated ANC cadres? 'We demand that Manamela stop this, and appoint independent non-political persons free of corruption implications to deliver an effective turnaround of the system,' she added. Earlier this year Manamela's predecessor Nobuhle Nkabane also came under fire for controversial SETA board appointments which were later withdrawn. The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) and the DA raised concerns about the political proximity of individuals appointed as chairpersons of various SETA boards. These include former KwaZulu-Natal Premier Nomusa Dube-Ncube who is now Manamela's deputy, Gwede Mantashe's son Buyambo Mantashe, Head of Department in the KZN Department of Transport Siboniso Mbhele, and former KZN MEC of Economic Development and Tourism Mike Mabuyakhulu. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
