DA lodges human rights complaint over Merafong water crisis
This follows continued service failures that have left many residents — particularly in high-lying areas of Carletonville, Fochville, and surrounding suburbs — without a stable water supply for weeks and, in some cases, even months.
By this week, areas such as Carletonville Extension 8 were again without water. 'Paul Kruger Street also does not have water. This situation is making me really angry as it has been going on for five weeks,' a resident known only as Lea expressed on social media on July 11.
According to the DA's Merafong constituency head, Ina Cilliers, the formal SAHRC submission includes 560 affidavits from affected residents, detailed survey data, and other documentation showing the sustained violation of residents' constitutional rights.
'For months, the high-lying areas have been without a stable water supply, with some taps being dry for over three months. This is a clear violation of our residents' human rights,' said Cilliers.
The DA cites Section 27 of the Constitution, which guarantees access to sufficient water as a basic human right. Alarmingly, some of the most severely affected areas are also those with the highest payment compliance — often exceeding 90%.
The party attributes the ongoing crisis to a combination of infrastructure failure by the Merafong City Local Municipality and deliberate water throttling by Rand Water. As a result, while some wards have relatively stable supply, others are subjected to long-term dry taps.
Adding to residents' frustration is the complete lack of transparency. Neither Rand Water nor the municipality has provided clarity on water flow data or the decision-making process behind water distribution. 'Residents are left in the dark, both literally and figuratively,' Cilliers noted.
In response, the DA is escalating the issue at multiple levels:
In Parliament, DA MPs are putting direct pressure on Rand Water for answers.
In the Gauteng Provincial Legislature, the party continues to hold the Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (COGTA) accountable.
A resident-led survey is ongoing to map outage patterns across affected areas.
A petition has also been submitted to National Treasury, urging urgent intervention into Merafong's debt, which may be contributing to the throttled supply.
'The DA Gauteng has made it clear that this is not a partisan issue but one about dignity, life, and basic human rights,' Cilliers concluded.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Ramaphosa seeks apartheid damages case delay, but victims' families argue perpetrators are dying
The court was told that the government's interest lies in uncovering the truth. President Cyril Ramaphosa has asked the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria to stay a damages case brought by families of victims of apartheid-era crimes. However, lawyers for the applicants have warned that the alleged perpetrators are old and dying. The legal action, initiated by 25 families and survivors of apartheid victims – including relatives of the Cradock Four – seeks R167 million in constitutional damages. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa launches commission of inquiry into apartheid-era justice delays The applicants accuse the government of blocking the investigation and prosecution of murder cases referred by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). Ramaphosa has since established a commission of inquiry chaired by retired judge Sisi Khampepe to investigate the lack of prosecutions. Ramaphosa urges court to delay apartheid damages case On Wednesday, Advocate Timothy Bruinders, representing Ramaphosa and government, argued in court that the commission should be allowed to complete its work before the damages case proceeds. 'There was notice put out by judge Khampepe in which she set out what the progress will be over the next month. 'I think she has just started work on it so it's settled that there is a commission,' he told the court. Bruinders pointed out that both the TRC and the families had previously called for the establishment of such a commission to investigate the apartheid-era crimes. 'The reason for the commission of inquiry is because the facts are as yet unknown,' he said. ALSO READ: Mbeki accused of trying to save his reputation by intervening in apartheid lawsuit Judge Nicolene Janse van Nieuwenhuizen, however, raised a concern about whether it was not the applicants' prerogative to go ahead or withdraw their case. Bruinders responded that the case relied on the commission's findings in order for the court to make a ruling on damages. He argued that former National Director of Public Prosecutions Vusi Pikoli did not provide enough detail to conclude that interference occurred in one of the TRC cases. 'One could conclude from that there was an attempted interference.' Watch the case below: Bruinders added that the government and president sympathise with the families. 'They don't have closure. As they say, the prosecutions haven't happened. 'This is of concern to any government who cares about its citizens and those who died in fighting for what he ultimately sees now in the Constitution.' He emphasised that the government's interest lies in uncovering the truth. 'It is not to fight the families on procedural matters. One can imagine how that would go down politically. I do not think it would go down very well.' Victims' families demand justice Later, Advocate Matthew Chaskalson – representing the families – criticised the government's request to the court to delay the damages case, particularly as it had years to establish the commission. 'The applicants are seeking justice for crimes that were committed 30 and 35 years ago. That's the period we are dealing with. 'The perpetrators of these crimes have either already died or are dying at a rapid rate,' he said, pointing out that most suspects are now likely in their 70s. Chaskalson told the court that the applicants themselves are aging and that some have already died. 'They do not have time to wait indefinitely for the commission of inquiry to report and for relief to be recommended,' the lawyer said, adding that the applicants are entitled to their day in court while they are still alive. He further argued that commissions of inquiry have a tendency to 'drag on and on'. 'It is an extraordinarily optimistic proposition to put forward the idea that this commission will be able to do a thorough job on its investigation and report in four months' time, which is all it has left of the originally six months.' The court has reserved the judgment. NOW READ: Khampepe Commission is the right platform for Mbeki, Mabandla to tell their story, court rules
The Citizen
5 hours ago
- The Citizen
‘It's racism' – Gayton McKenzie plans legal action against Open Chats podcast
Patriotic Alliance leader said he would be taking legal action after racial slurs spark nationwide outrage Gayton McKenzie, the Patriotic Alliance (PA) leader and current Minister of Sports, Arts and Culture, has vowed to take legal action against the Open Chats Podcast after a viral clip surfaced showing its hosts making derogatory and racist comments about the coloured community in South Africa. In the video, the podcasters claimed that coloured families engage in incest and described the community as 'crazy'. The remarks have sparked public outrage, prompting political leaders, civil society and ordinary citizens to demand accountability and legal barriers. McKenzie reacts: 'It's racism, we're going after them' Open chat podcast team. Image: Instagram In a video posted to social media, McKenzie condemned the podcast episode, calling it blatant racism and confirming that his party's legal team had been instructed to deal with the matter swiftly. 'I want a report today of how we are going to deal with those people who said coloureds are crazy,' said McKenzie. 'All steps are going to be taken; we're going after them in their capacity legally.' He further highlighted the double standard in how the media and society react to racial issues. 'If coloured people made those remarks about any other race group, it would be frontpage news. We must never allow people to become that comfortable with disrespecting us.' McKenzie emphasised the need for legal answers to offensive remarks about his community. ALSO READ: 8 things South Africans secretly miss from the '90s Public outrage and calls for accountability Gayton McKenzie. Picture: TikTok The clip has triggered a flood of criticism across social media platforms, with users calling for the episode to be taken down and for consequences to follow. Many were particularly incensed that the podcast production team allowed the episode to be aired, even after hearing the derogatory remarks during recording and editing. PA councillor Liam Jacobs also condemned the remarks, saying: 'This clip hurt. Action needs to be taken, and we must make a strong point. To the podcasters: go read and educate yourselves about coloured people. We are not your punchline.' DA files complaint with South African Human Rights Commission Meanwhile, the Democratic Alliance (DA) also entered the fray, reporting the incident to the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC). 'Hate speech, harmful racial stereotyping, and the public degradation of any group in our society cannot be tolerated. We note the podcasters have since apologised, an implicit admission of guilt. But an apology alone does not erase the harm caused,' the party said. The DA also emphasised the importance of upholding free speech responsibly. 'We will always defend the right to free speech, but that right ends where it infringes on the constitutional rights and dignity of others.' Podcast apologises amid growing backlash In response to the criticism, the Open Chats Podcast issued a public apology via its social media platforms, expressing regret for the episode. 'The intention was never to cause harm or disrespect the coloured community. Open Chats is a platform centred around open conversations that sometimes touch on sensitive topics. However, we recognise that we must conduct our conversations respectfully,' the statement read. The podcast has since issued a written apology and removed the controversial episode from all platforms. Civil society weighs in Civil rights organisation Cape Forum also condemned the podcast's remarks and called for a full investigation by the SAHRC. 'This type of rhetoric is damaging, degrading, and cannot be swept under the rug. We demand a full inquiry and appropriate sanctions,' the group said.
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
Ministers under fire for tardy replies to parliamentary questions
Justice and Constitutional Development Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi as well as her Social Development counterpart Sisisi Tolashe are the latest ministers to find themselves having to explain themselves to MPs why they fail to provide responses to written questions within stipulated timelines. Image: Photographer: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers Minister are blaming the long time it takes to compile responses to written parliamentary questions for their delayed responses. This happens as parliamentarians are taking some ministers to task for failing to respond to written questions within the stipulated 10 days and the 10-day additional time. Justice and Constitutional Development Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi as well as her Social Development counterpart Sisisi Tolashe are the latest to find themselves having to explain themselves to MPs, instead of being reprimanded in the sitting of parliamentary session when found to be on the wrong side of the rules. DA MP Janho Engelbrecht asked Kubayi to provide the reasons for not responding to his questions published on April 25 within the period stipulated by parliamentary rules. In her response, Kubayi said she took her responsibilities and accountability very seriously. 'I am aware of the Rule 145(5) which stipulates that Parliamentary Questions should be responded to within 10 working days. 'I would like to confirm that the reply was submitted to Parliament on 22 May 2025, however, due to the process of sourcing the required information as well ensuring the integrity and accuracy of the response, as a result, the tabling of the said reply was delayed,' she said. ActionSA MP Dereleen James enquired from Tolashe why she provided a reply to her written question only as late as 10 March, which was 12 working days from when the reply should have been provided. James asked whether Tolashe has found that her failure to respond within the stipulated time frame undermined parliamentary accountability and oversight as provided for in the rules of the National Assembly and the provisions of the Constitution. Tolashe said the delay with regards to the James' response was regretted and she apologised. She said the question required very extensive and detailed answers as it dealt with expenditures, to ensure that little or no mistake was committed. 'The nature of the question that the honourable member asked requires that we reconcile different records of all expenditures so that we can give an accurate account. The other issues were that (the) honourable member will realise that most of the officials are still new in the organisation; to recognise the need for asking for an extension while we compile her responses,' she said. This development comes as Parliament published a report of outstanding parliamentary questions for both and written reply on August 1. The report is prepared for submission to Leader of Government Business, Deputy President Paul Mashatile, to take up the non-compliance with affected ministers. It shows that a total of 3,282 written questions were asked as at May 30. At least 323 written questions were not responded to as at August 1.
