What to know about Julio César Chávez's arrest by U.S. immigration officials
Chávez was detained in front of his home on Wednesday and will be deported to Mexico, where he faces organized crime charges, authorities said.
Here's what to know about this arrest:
Who is Chávez?
The 39-year-old boxer is a former middleweight champion hails from Mexico. His father, Julio César Chávez, is one of the most beloved athletes in Mexican history and a member of the International Boxing Hall of Fame.
The son has battled drug addiction for much of his lengthy boxing career, failing drug tests, serving suspensions and egregiously missing weight while being widely criticized for his intermittent dedication to the sport.
The younger Chavez still rose to the heights, winning the WBC middleweight title in 2011 and defending it three times. Chávez shared the ring with generational greats Canelo Álvarez and Sergio Martinez, losing to both.
In 2012, he was convicted of drunken driving in Los Angeles and sentenced to 13 days in jail. Then in January 2024, he was arrested on gun charges. Police said he possessed two AR-style ghost rifles. He was later freed on a $50,000 bond and on condition he went to a residential drug treatment facility. The case is still pending, with Chávez reporting his progress regularly.
Chávez was away from the ring for three years before his return late last year, but Paul's invitation brought him back again.
Where was he arrested?
According to his attorney, Michael Goldstein, Chávez was picked up Wednesday by a large number of federal agents while he was riding a scooter in front of a home where he resides in the upscale Los Angeles neighborhood of Studio City, near Hollywood.
Goldstein said officials blocked off the street and took Chávez into custody without informing his family. TV stations staked out his home Thursday afternoon and did not see anyone leave his home.
Just days before, Chávez had faced off against influencer-turned-boxer Paul and lost in a highly anticipated fight in Anaheim, California. The Department of Homeland Security said officials had determined Chávez should be arrested June 27, a day before the fight. It was unclear why they waited to act for days after the high-profile event.
What is he accused of?
Federal officials said in a news release that Chávez overstayed a tourist visa that he entered the U.S. with in August 2023. The visa expired in February 2024, they said.
Homeland Security said Chávez submitted multiple fraudulent statements when he applied for permanent residency on April 2, 2024, based on his marriage to a U.S. citizen, Frida Muñoz.
She is the mother of a granddaughter of imprisoned Sinaloa cartel kingpin Joaquin 'El Chapo' Guzman. U.S. officials said he is believed to be affiliated with the powerful Sinaloa Cartel that is blamed for a significant portion of Mexico's drug violence.
Mexico's Attorney General's Office said that an arrest warrant against 'Julio 'C was issued in March 2023 in an investigation of organized crime and arms trafficking allegations, and that Mexico initiated extradition proceedings on Thursday.
A federal agent who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly on the matter confirmed to The Associated Press that 'Julio C' is Chávez.
What happens next?
Goldstein, Chávez's attorney, said he did not know where Chávez was being detained as of Thursday morning.
DHS said Thursday that he was being processed for 'expedited removal' from the country.
Chávez's family issued a statement Thursday afternoon in support of him, the Los Angeles Times reported.
'We have full confidence in his innocence,' the statement said. 'We firmly believe that the proper course is to allow the competent authorities to carry out their work without external pressure or speculation.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mexico temporarily hands CIBanco, Intercam trust businesses to development banks
MEXICO CITY (Reuters) -Mexico will temporarily transfer the trust-handling businesses of two financial institutions sanctioned by the U.S. for alleged involvement in money laundering, the finance ministry said on Friday. Mexican development banks will temporarily take over the trust units of CIBanco and Intercam Banco, while the ministry looks for a permanent solution to transfer them over to private institutions, it said in a statement. The transfer will allow "the trusts to continue operating uninterrupted, for the benefit of their settlors, beneficiaries, and third parties involved," the ministry said. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Protests against surging mass tourism in Mexico City end in vandalism, harassment of tourists
MEXICO CITY (AP) — A protest by hundreds against gentrification and mass tourism that began peacefully Friday in Mexico City neighborhoods popular with tourists turned violent when a small number of people began smashing storefronts and harassing foreigners. Masked protesters smashed through the windows and looted high-end businesses in the touristic areas of Condesa and Roma, and screamed at tourists in the area. Graffiti on glass shattered glass being smashed through with rocks read: 'get out of Mexico.' Protesters held signs reading 'gringos, stop stealing our home' and demanding local legislation to better regulate tourism levels and stricter housing laws. Marchers then continued on to protest outside the U.S. Embassy and chanted inside the city's metro system. Police reinforcements gathered outside the Embassy building as police sirens rung out in the city center Friday evening. It marked a violent end to a more peaceful march throughout the day calling out against masses of mostly American tourists who have flooded into Mexico's capital in recent years. Tension had been mounting in the city since U.S. 'digital nomads' flocked to Mexico City in 2020, many to escape coronavirus lockdowns in the U.S. or to take advantage of cheaper rent prices in the Latin American city. Since then, rents have soared and locals have increasingly gotten pushed out of their neighborhoods, particularly areas like Condesa and Roma, lush areas packed with coffee shops and restaurants. Michelle Castro, a 19-year-old college student, was among the flocks of people protesting. She said that she's from the city's working class city center, and that she's watched slowly as apartment buildings have been turned into housing for tourists. 'Mexico City is going through a transformation," she said. "There are a lot of foreigners, namely Americans, coming to live here. Many say it's xenophobia, but it's not. It's just that so many foreigners come here, rents are skyrocketing because of Airbnb. Rents are so high that some people can't even pay anymore.' The Mexico City protest follows others in European cities like Barcelona, Madrid, Paris and Rome against mass tourism.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Lululemon Sues Costco Over ‘Dupes' of Pants and Jackets
Lululemon is taking Costco to task for allegedly knocking off its pants, hoodies and jackets and selling the dupes at a fraction of the price. Filed Friday in a United States District Court for the Central District of California, the Canadian athleticwear brand's lawsuit alleges that Costco perpetuated trade dress infringement and unfair competition by creating its own cheaper versions of popular Lululemon products like Scuba hoodies and sweatshirts, Define jackets and ABC pants, which range in price from $98 to $128. Some of Costco's nearly-identical versions of these products retail for less than $20. More from Sourcing Journal Shein Faces Copyright Infringement Complaint from Brandy Melville QVC and Cornerstone File FMC Complaint Against ONE for Alleged Failure to Fulfill Contract Material World: MycoWorks Melds Reishi and Danish Design in Nordic Light According to Lululemon, the brand's success has given way to the rise of knockoffs of its designs, a phenomenon that's become so widespread that there is a 'LululemonDupes' hashtag on TikTok wherein users share and promote copycat products. The infringing products create an improper association with the brand, with some shoppers believing they are authentic and others specifically purchasing them because they're tough to distinguish from authentic Lululemon merchandise. Lululemon asserted that Costco has been willful and complicit in perpetuating deceptive sales practices, writing in its complaint that it had already served Costco with a cease-and-desist letter to no avail. The similarities in the products have been well-documented in the media; the Washington Post published an article titled 'Is That Hoodie a Lululemon or a Costco Dupe? No One Has to Know But You, while the New York Times ran a piece featuring the headline, 'Are These $20 Costco Pants a Lululemon Dupe? We Investigated.' The athleisure label also asserted that Costco is known to use manufacturers of popular brands' products for its own Kirkland private label. The line, which has developed its own cult following, now accounts for over one-third of Costco's sales. Neither Costco nor its manufacturers disclose the connection between Kirkland products and the original branded products—a source of ambiguity that Lululemon said 'preconditions at least some consumers into believing that private label, KIRKLAND-branded dupes are in fact manufactured by the authentic supplier of the 'original' products.' In other words, Costco consumers may believe they are getting the same product they might buy at Lululemon, just unbranded. 'Defendant does not dispel this ambiguity'—and in fact, it benefits from it, the complaint said. Now, Lululemon is seeking an award of damages in the form of lost profits, or other damages adequate to compensate for the patent infringement. It is also seeking an order permanently preventing Costco and any of its associated businesses or vendors from manufacturing, importing, advertising, marketing or selling products that infringe upon its trade dresses. The company is demanding a trial by jury.
