Lack of consultation means Ontario's Bill 5 oversteps treaty obligations, Oneida chief says
Oneida Nation of the Thames Chief Todd Cornelius had hoped that the days of Canadian governments passing laws that affect Indigenous communities without consulting them were in the past.
Then Ontario's Bill 5 happened.
Cornelius said the sweeping bill — which became law Thursday — violates signed treaty provisions that requires consultations with Indigenous groups, he wrote in a statement released Wednesday.
"This is not only a political failure, it is a betrayal of the relationship between the Crown and our Nation," said Cornelius.
Passing the bill without sufficient consultation amounts to the Ontario government breaking the series of agreements the Haudenosaunee (also known as the Six Nations and Iroquois League) signed with the Crown prior to Confederation, known as the Silver Covenant Chain, he said.
"At this moment, the chain has been deeply tarnished," he said.
Bill 5, also known as the Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act, includes major changes to the province's endangered species and environmental protection laws. The bill creates "special economic zones" which override provincial and municipal laws for certain projects.
Premier Doug Ford has said the Ring of Fire mineral deposit in northern Ontario and his proposed tunnel under Highway 401 would be given that special status under the proposed law.
Cornelius, however, said he's concerned that in an attempt to clear the way for economic development, Bill 5 negates environmental protections that are important to people in Oneida.
"Oneida will not participate in a processes that diminish its sovereignty," he said. "Oneida is a nation, not a municipality or a stakeholder under Ontario law."
Cornelius said he's ready to meet with representatives of the Crown — in this case the Governor General.
CBC News contacted the office of Governor General Mary Simon for comment Friday, but did not receive a response.
Oneida is not the first Indigenous community in Ontario to speak out against Bill 5. Among the outcry were protests at Queen's Park over the past week. Facing pressure, the government did add "duty to consult" provisions to the bill.
At Queen's Park Wednesday, Indigenous Affairs Minister Greg Rickford said the duty to consult provision is being put forward to provide "greater certainty" despite it referring to existing Constitution rights for First Nations.
Rosalind Antone, a member of Oneida's elected council, was one of more than 30 members from Oneida who travelled to Queen's Park this week to protest the bill. About 20 of those who came were youth members.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
7 minutes ago
- CTV News
Manitoba Indigenous groups agree to work together on major infrastructure projects
Southern Chiefs' Organization Grand Chief Jerry Daniels (left) and Manitoba Métis Federation President David Chartrand signed a memorandum of understanding at the Forks on Aug. 13, 2025. (Glenn Pismenny/CTV News Winnipeg) WINNIPEG — Two Indigenous groups in Manitoba have agreed to work together on major infrastructure and development projects. It comes as the federal government looks to fast-track projects across the country. The Southern Chiefs' Organization, which represents 32 Anishinaabe and Dakota First Nations in the province, and the Manitoba Métis Federation have signed a five-year agreement. It outlines their shared commitment to ensure First Nations and Red River Métis voices are included in the approval of any project proposed by the Manitoba government and supported by federal legislation. A new federal law gives Ottawa sweeping powers to speed up permits for what it calls 'nation-building projects.' The controversial legislation has faced pushback from Indigenous groups that argue elements of it could be used to undermine their rights. The Southern Chiefs' Organization and the Manitoba Métis Federation say they'll work together to pursue Indigenous-led developments in areas including forestry, harvesting and traditional economies. The Manitoba government is also exploring how it would create and operate a proposed Crown-Indigenous corporation. 'This agreement sends a message to all governments, partners and industry that First Nations and the Red River Métis are working together to shape a future that is led by Indigenous nations,' Grand Chief Jerry Daniels of the Southern Chiefs' Organization said Wednesday. 'We are forging a path towards economic independence and sustainability, ensuring the voices of First Nations and Red River Métis are integral to the design, approval and implementation of nation-building projects across this province.' Prime Minister Mark Carney has said the legislation is needed to shore up Canada's economy during the trade war with the United States. Ottawa has also promised to build up northern infrastructure, in part, to meet a NATO military alliance spending target for critical infrastructure. It's unknown which projects could be fast-tracked, but the government has pointed to ports, railways and pipelines. Carney recently met with First Nations, Inuit and Métis groups to discuss how best to build projects in partnership with Indigenous Peoples. The Manitoba Métis Federation turned down Carney's invitation to discuss the legislation, after Ottawa invited another Métis group the federation claims has no reason to exist. Other Métis groups and First Nations say communities represented by the Métis Nation of Ontario have no claim to Métis heritage and that Ottawa and Ontario have no right to recognize them. Manitoba Métis Federation president David Chartrand said the legislation must move forward, as Canada deals with ongoing threats from U.S. President Donald Trump. 'There's not a doubt it must arrive, because the danger that Trump imposes on all of us is very scary ... this is an economic war, and people should not take it lightly,' he said Wednesday. He added any nation-building projects approved in Manitoba must be done in collaboration with Indigenous Peoples in the province. --- Brittany Hobson, The Canadian Press This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 13, 2025.
CBC
8 minutes ago
- CBC
Bar association cautions N.S. premier on statement about court decision
Social Sharing The Canadian Bar Association is warning Nova Scotia's premier that recent comments from his office risk blurring the public's perception of "the important distinction" between the roles of elected politicians and the judiciary. In a letter to Tim Houston dated July 29 and posted online, the president of the association's Nova Scotia branch writes that the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal's decision to decline to answer a reference question related to the Chignecto Isthmus was "based on established legal principles, not an avoidance of difficult questions." "The courts have a fundamental responsibility to determine whether questions posed to them are appropriate for judicial determination," Abha Romkey writes. "In doing so, they safeguard not only the integrity of the judicial process but also the essential separation of powers between courts and the other branches of government." At the heart of the matter was a question of what level of government has legislative authority over the small strip of land that connects the province to New Brunswick. The Nova Scotia government put the question to the court several years ago amidst a dispute with Ottawa over the responsibility for the cost of upgrading the Isthmus, which requires work to ensure future storms do not cut off the vital trade and transportation corridor, which includes the Trans-Canada Highway and a rail link. The federal government offered to foot half of the $650-million bill, with the governments of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick splitting the other half, but the provinces maintained Ottawa should cover all costs of upgrading and strengthening dikes that protect the low-lying area. Ultimately, the provinces accepted the proposal but Nova Scotia pushed ahead with its court case. Although lawyers for the Nova Scotia government said they were not looking for the court to determine who has the financial responsibility for the upgrades, Houston had stated publicly that the court case could help determine that question. Concerns about political undertones That drew concerns from the court, which issued a decision that called Nova Scotia's reference question "vague," "imprecise" and with "political undertones." "The background leading up to the Question suggests it is an attempt to enlist the Court in a political dispute — that is — who is responsible to pay for the remediation of the Isthmus," the justices wrote in their decision. "We recognize our obligation to provide advice when a reference is made to this Court, however, the Governor in Council should not be using the reference process for a political purpose. The reference process is not a mechanism for achieving political ends." Houston's office responded with a statement that said the court should answer questions it's asked about interprovincial affairs. The statement went on to say that all constitutional questions of the court that cross federal and provincial jurisdictions have the potential for political overtones. "This is not a legitimate reason to avoid answering an important, reasonable question," the statement from Houston said. Public confidence in courts 'fundamental' to rule of law In her letter to the premier, Romkey writes that although constitutional questions often have political dimensions, "it is both legitimate and necessary for courts to decline to answer where the question lacks sufficient legal substance or would risk drawing the judiciary into a political dispute." "This ensures that rulings address genuine legal issues, not policy debates, preserving both judicial independence and public confidence in our courts." Romkey, who notes in her letter that she represents more than 1,500 lawyers, judges, academics, students and notaries in Nova Scotia, concludes her letter by encouraging the premier's office "to consider clarifying that your comments were not intended to call into question the Court's independence or the legitimacy of its decision to decline the reference, as public confidence in our courts is fundamental to the rule of law." In a statement, Houston's press secretary said the case deserved a clear resolution. "In the past, courts have made clear decisions on issues like the legality of the federal government imposing a carbon tax on provinces," Catherine Klimek said. "If Nova Scotians are to foot the bill for a national project, they should at least receive a clear court ruling assuring them that it is indeed their responsibility."
CBC
8 minutes ago
- CBC
Kingston city council votes to eliminate taxi commission
Social Sharing Kingston's city council will eliminate the regulator overseeing local taxis, a move that will see the municipality assume the responsibilities of the embattled organization. The decision comes after much discussion over the role of the Kingston Area Taxi Commission (KATC) and whether the organization had met its duties of financial accountability and transparency. "This is a systemic problem," Coun. Brandon Tozzo said Tuesday, during a council meeting which voted to eventually eliminate the KATC. "It's because the institution started in the late 1980s. And we keep coming back to this issue again and again. And I think it's the institutional design," he said by way of explaining what he saw as intractable problems with the KATC. Recently the councillor called for the KATC to be dissolved, announcing in a letter he'd stepped down from his role on the regulatory body. At the heart of the debate are missing audited financial reports, as well as perceived conflicts regarding its governance structure. Despite years of requests, the KATC has "continuously failed" to provide any financial information, according to a report by the city's chief administrative officer Lanie Hurdle. In the days preceding Tuesday's meeting, the commission had provided its 2022 numbers, with promises that other missing years would be complete by the first quarter of next year. It had hoped councillors would delay the vote, allowing for more discussions to take place. "We're not saying don't go down this path," Simon Chapelle, the KATC's secretary, told CBC News on Tuesday. "What we're saying is, give us an opportunity to address the inaccurate assessments and comments that have been made on social media and to the public" At the meeting some councillors raised concerns over how much work it'll be for Kingston to take over oversight duties. "I really don't want this to cost taxpayer money and I really think we need clearer details on that," said District 1 Coun. Gary Oosterhof. "I believe this is a lot more work than we're letting on." Oosterhof likened the KATC to an airplane on a runway, about to take off. "And then we abort the flight," the councillor said. "They have demonstrated considerable ability and readiness to do their work." Others cited concerns regarding whether the end of the KATC would risk a break in service, especially for the accessible taxi program, which offers those with mobility issues an affordable way to get around. City staff said work would be done to ensure a smooth transition. At Tuesday's meeting, Kingston Mayor Bryan Patterson aired his support for the recommendations. He said his decision was guided by conversations with the mayor of Loyalist Township, the other major stakeholder in the KATC. "This is not, in my view, a framing of, 'Oh, because there were problems, we just decided to close it down,'" Patterson said at the conclusion of council's back-and-forth. "I actually would frame it differently. I just think that there's an evolution that's taking place." The mayor had said his decision-making was not based on the mistakes of the past, but on what model he believes will be best for Kingston's future. Tozzo says he's happy a decision was reached, with a motion to defer the vote failing to secure enough support to pass. "It's just fairly clear that there were operational issues with the organization," he said over Zoom on Wednesday. "And that six months wouldn't really change that opinion for most of us." While the city will issue a notice of its intention to withdraw from the KATC, it won't be officially dissolved until September 2026.
