Texas push to ban minors under 18 from social media fades with time running out
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A push in Texas to ban social media accounts for children under 18 faded Thursday after lawmakers did not take a key vote on creating one of the nation's toughest restrictions aimed at keeping minors off platforms such as TikTok, Snapchat and Instagram.
The bill, which already passed the GOP-controlled state House, aims to go further than a Florida social media ban for minors under 14. Australia banned social media accounts for anyone under 16.
But earlier momentum behind the Texas measure slowed at the eleventh hour in the state Senate as lawmakers face a weekend deadline to send bills to Republican Gov. Greg Abbott. Abbott has not said publicly whether he supported the proposed ban, which was opposed by tech trade groups and critics who called it it an unconstitutional limit on free speech.
'This bill was the best way to protect children in this state,' state Rep. Jared Patterson, a Republican carrying the measure, said Wednesday.
The legislative session ends Monday. That leaves a narrowing path for the proposal that, if passed, would set up another test of state efforts to set boundaries on how and when children can access social media.
Many tech companies have established a presence in Texas, including X, which is owned by Elon Musk.
Earlier this week, Abbott signed into law a separate measure requiring Apple and Google to verify the age of online app store users, as well as parental consent to download apps and make in-app purchases for users under 18. Utah passed a similar bill earlier this year.
The proposed Texas ban aimed at minors is the latest move in a growing bipartisan push nationwide to address the impacts of social media on the well-being of children. Critics accuse platforms of using addictive functions to lure children onto their site and keep them there, and of not doing enough to curb violent or age-inappropriate content, or online abuse.
Nearly half of American teenagers say they are online 'constantly' despite concerns about the effects of social media and smartphones on their mental health, according to a December 2024 report published by the Pew Research Center.
The American Psychological Association has called on tech companies and lawmakers to protect children's mental health, arguing that social media platforms are 'particularly risky' to young people who cannot disengage from sites and struggle with impulse control.
States and countries have passed various measures to address the problem, and some have run into legal challenges.
A federal judge in 2024 temporarily blocked Utah's first-in-the-nation law requiring social media companies to check the ages of all users and place restrictions on accounts belonging to minors.
California, which is home to some of the largest tech companies in the world, will make it illegal for social media platforms to knowingly provide addictive feeds to children without parental consent starting in 2027. And New York state allows parents to block their kids from getting social media posts suggested by a platform's algorithm.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
an hour ago
- Toronto Star
Cyber charter schools in Pennsylvania would see funding cut under bill passed by the state House
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A Democratic-sponsored proposal to limit per-student payments to Pennsylvania's cyber charter schools and make other changes to how they operate narrowly passed the state House on Wednesday over Republican objections that it would imperil the online learning programs. The 104-98 vote, with only two Republicans in favor, sets down a marker on the perennially contentious issue of school funding as state lawmakers work to complete the coming year's state budget for the fiscal year that starts in July.
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Cyber charter schools in Pennsylvania would see funding cut under bill passed by the state House
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A Democratic-sponsored proposal to limit per-student payments to Pennsylvania's cyber charter schools and make other changes to how they operate narrowly passed the state House on Wednesday over Republican objections that it would imperil the online learning programs. The 104-98 vote, with only two Republicans in favor, sets down a marker on the perennially contentious issue of school funding as state lawmakers work to complete the coming year's state budget for the fiscal year that starts in July. The bill's $8,000 limit on how much public school districts would have to reimburse the cyber charters was the central piece of the sprawling legislation and would be a boost to the districts and the property tax payers who bear much of the cost of public education in Pennsylvania. There currently is no cap for the districts' payments to cyber charters, an amount now linked to how much districts spent on their own students in the prior year. Supporters said changes to the cyber charter rules are widely backed among the state's 500 school boards and that cyber school spending has been the subject of critical reviews, including recently by Republican Auditor General Tim DeFoor. But opponents defended the existing system as a critical lifeline to the students and families that for various reasons have sought alternatives to traditional schools. The bill's main provisions The bill would set annual tuition payments from school districts to cyber charters at $8,000 per student, with potential yearly increases. Special education funding would also see changes. Cyber charters would not be able to maintain cash balances above 12% of their spending and would not be able to provide payments or gifts to parents as incentives to enroll their children. The bill would bolster disclosure requirements regarding cyber charters' policies, instructional materials and budgets. It would bar the state Education Department from approving any additional cyber charter schools through the 2029-30 school year. A new Cyber Charter School Funding and Policy Council would be set up to make recommendations concerning enrollment, governance and funding. What did lawmakers say about it? During floor debate Wednesday, Rep. Martina White, a Philadelphia Republican, said the measure will 'close real schools, displace real students, strip families of the very choices that they depend on to give their children a chance at success.' The moratorium would be highly damaging to cyber charters, said Rep. Craig Williams, a Delaware County Republican. 'You limit the number of cyber charters now in existence, you choke off its funding, and eventually you can kill cyber charter. Sixty-plus thousand students in our school system, finding another way to learn, and we're going to choke it off with this bill,' Williams said. The chair of the House Education Committee, Lehigh County Democratic Rep. Peter Schweyer, enumerated cyber charter spending issues raised in the auditor general's report, including staff bonuses, gift cards, vehicle payments and fuel stipends. 'Gift cards?' Schweyer asked his colleagues. 'We would all get in trouble if we were taking gift cards as part of our compensation.' The money at stake Leaders of existing public cyber charter schools say the measure would cut their funding by about $450 million or more across the state, with a third of the total reductions targeting special education student reimbursements. A Democratic analysis put the figure at more than $600 million. What are public cyber charter schools? About 65,000 Pennsylvania students currently attend the state's 14 public cyber charter schools, which are public, nonprofit corporations. They do not have to follow all of the requirements mandated of public schools under state law. Cyber charter school are considered independent public schools, approved to operate with a 'charter' issued by the Education Department. They use technology to provide much of the teaching. Students usually do not need to attend a physical location beyond certain events, such as standardized testing. What happens now? The proposal was sent over to the Republican majority state Senate for its consideration. The bill becomes part of a wider negotiations to determine the budget before lawmakers recess for the summer.
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Outrage grows after ICE agents with assault rifles use flash grenades during San Diego raids
Protests broke out in San Diego last week after U.S. immigration authorities raided two popular local Italian restaurants, which ended with the use of flash grenades to disperse angry crowds. The raids, executed Friday by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Homeland Security officers, at Buona Forchetta and Enoteca Buona Forchetta in South Park, a trendy San Diego neighbourhood lined with popular shops and places to eat, ended in four people being taken into custody, according to the The Los Angeles Times. Yasmeen Pitts O'Keefe, a spokesperson for Homeland Security Investigations, a department within ICE, told the publication that the warrants were related to alleged 'violations of hiring and harboring illegal aliens and false statements,' adding that an investigation was ongoing. The arrests come amid a crackdown on illegal immigration in California and the country in general, as U.S. President Donald Trump vows to erase the presence of people residing in the U.S. without legal authorization, though the legality of these measures has been repeatedly challenged by the Supreme Court, elected officials, federal judges and the general public. Story continues below advertisement In a statement shared on Instagram on May 31, Buona Forchetta said it was 'devastated and heartbroken' by the raids and that the way events unfolded was 'nothing short of traumatic.' Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'We are working closely with our attorneys to locate and support our detained employees and their families,' it continued, adding that it is providing support for staff members who witnessed the incident. Story continues below advertisement According to O'Keefe, during the incident, a large crowd gathered and began chanting 'Shame!' — its presence ultimately stifling agents' ability to execute the raid, she said. 'The demonstrators became unruly and as a result less lethal noise flash diversionary devices were deployed to allow law enforcement to exit the scene as safely as possible,' O'Keefe explained. 'When gatherings like these are formed, it not only places law enforcement in danger but also the demonstrators and onlookers attempting to impede law enforcement activity,' she concluded. Footage of the protests has since appeared online and shows residents and passersby demanding that officials vacate the premises. One witness told NBC News, 'This isn't freedom, this is fascism,' and, according to the Los Angeles Times people could be heard yelling 'Nazis' and 'fascists' at ICE agents as they attempted to block a government vehicle. City officials in San Diego condemned the use of non-lethal incendiary devices to control the crowds, saying it did nothing but disturb the peace. 'Federal actions like these are billed as a public safety measure, but it had the complete opposite effect, ' San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria wrote in a statement. What happened last night in #SouthPark undermined trust and made us less safe. My full statement: — San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria (@MayorToddGloria) May 31, 2025 Story continues below advertisement On Monday, California lawmakers gathered outside San Diego's federal courthouses to speak out against Friday's raids. 'We are outraged at what we saw on Friday,' Democratic Rep for San Diego, Juan Vargas, told reporters. 'The scenes that we saw play out on the streets were absolutely unacceptable. Why were ICE agents armed to the teeth as if they were entering a war zone?' He queried. 'This was to intimidate and to bring terror and fear,' he continued. Over the weekend, in Massachusetts, ICE concluded a month-long mission, coined Operation Patriot, to curb illegal immigration in the state that saw nearly 1,500 people deemed 'criminal aliens' detained. Student-led protests erupted in a Boston suburb on Sunday after 18-year-old Marcelo Gomes Da Silva was detained on his way to volleyball practice with friends. ICE agents were looking to arrest his father, who they say is living illegally in the U.S. His son, who was described by his coach as an 'exceptional citizen,' had been attending school in the Boston area since the age of six years old.
