logo
Democrats are letting the far-left take them out of the running for 2028

Democrats are letting the far-left take them out of the running for 2028

The Hill17-05-2025

In the 2024 presidential election, President Trump swept all seven swing states, won the popular vote, defied the polls and shocked Vice President Kamala Harris and Democrats with his decisive victory. In the days that followed, I heard from several high-level Democratic operatives who shared essentially the same message: We are done being bullied into unpopular, losing positions by the far-left wing of our party, they said. We will get back to our roots of looking after the working class, the poor and the disenfranchised, they said.
Except they didn't. Exactly the opposite.
Seven months after Trump redefined how to win a presidential campaign, Democrats have been backed deeper into a corner by the far-left activists they still fear, whose creed contains only three fundamental dogmata: Trump-hatred, perpetual self-victimhood, and identity politics as the center and source of all decisions.
All three of those doctrines were strongly rejected by the majority of voters in 2024, including an increasing number of Black and Hispanic men, non-white voters in general, the disenfranchised, younger people and independent voters. The reason was obvious to everyone paying attention: Trump-hatred, forever victimhood, and identity politics are not policies. They are angry rants — and tired ones at that. Left-of-center HBO host Bill Maher has made this point time and again.
Those who switched to Trump in 2024 did so for one reason: He was addressing the 'bread and butter' issues that were upending voters' lives and threatening their futures.
There are a great many voters who have come to believe that the Democratic Party is not only leaderless, but completely lacking when it comes to real solutions to the problems affecting their lives and futures. Whether or not the Democrats or mainstream media admit it, these are people who took the time to listen to Trump in 2024, with a growing percentage believing his policies would address their needs.
The question for the Democrats now, come the midterms and looking to 2028, is: Will more from those communities once loyal to Democrats also educate themselves and move away from a party that has taken them for granted for decades? Current trends and Trump's piling up of 'bread and butter' victories indicate that this is a real possibility.
When voices from these communities and others disenchanted with Democrats turn their weary eyes to the new leadership of that party of today, what do they see? Sadly for them, only the doubling down of 'hate Trump,' identity politics and 'forever victimhood.'
Two of those pushing these hardest are Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas). Both seem laser-focused on winning the Democratic presidential nomination in 2028.
But as both preach this tripartite Democratic gospel, there is a very easy test by which potential voters can judge them: What have they actually done to improve the lives and safety of the constituents in their districts? You know, as in the people they were elected to serve.
Hating on Trump and creating as much self-serving publicity as possible are neither policies nor strategies. Rather, they are actions that could be viewed as narcissistic behavior.
Famed sportscaster and longshot 2028 Democratic candidate Stephen A. Smith recently addressed this issue on his podcast, He criticized both Ocasio-Cortez and Crockett, whom he believes will turn off a majority of voters.
'I think if you are a Democrat, if you are a leftist who rails against the system … if you believe that higher taxes is the way to go, that a focus shouldn't be on securing the borders, if you believe those kind of things, and that's where you stand ideologically, AOC is your candidate,' he said. 'Most people in the country are centrists, they're moderates. Whether they're Republican moderates or Democratic moderates or just flat-out centrists who are independents — that's most of the American population … she gives the impression, when you talk about universal healthcare and you talk about other things, if you equate it to taxing Americans 70 percent of their income she wouldn't be against it. That ain't going to win you elections.'
Smith also singled out Crockett for seemingly having just one position on anything: Being against any policy or opinion Trump champions. Bingo.
Like him or not, Smith has his finger on the pulse of tens of millions of disenchanted voters — working-class, poor and disenfranchised, wondering more and more why the current leadership of the Democratic Party has abandoned them and their needs in favor of more self-serving rants against Trump.
The Democrats ignore these millions of voices — who know the difference between useless bumper-sticker slogans and actual policy — at their own peril.
Douglas MacKinnon is a former White House and Pentagon official.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oil prices surge after Israel strikes Iran in major escalation of MidEast standoff
Oil prices surge after Israel strikes Iran in major escalation of MidEast standoff

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Oil prices surge after Israel strikes Iran in major escalation of MidEast standoff

Oil prices surged around 7% on Friday morning after Israel launched airstrikes on Iran, marking a significant escalation in the Middle East conflict. International benchmark Brent crude futures (BZ=F) rose to just below $74 a barrel, while West Texas Intermediate futures (CL=F) changed hands at almost $73. Both were paring earlier sharper gains that saw Brent spike by more than 13%. Prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel is prepared to keep attacking Iran "for as many days as it takes" after his country carried out strikes on its nuclear and military facilities overnight. "Over the past few months intelligence has shown that Iran is closer than ever to obtaining a nuclear weapon," IDF spokesperson BG Effie Defrin said in a video statement. "This morning the IDF began preemptive and precise strikes, targeting the Iranian nuclear program." On Friday morning, President Trump urged Iran to "make a deal" over its nuclear program to avert further conflict. "JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE," he wrote in a post to social media. Iran has threatened to hit US assets in the region as part of its retaliation, even as Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned the country against such a move. Rubio said Israel took "unilateral action" and the US was not involved in the strikes. Iran is the third-largest oil producer within the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), trailing only Saudi Arabia and Iraq, with output exceeding 3 million barrels per day. 'The most immediate risk is to Iranian exports, which could drop sharply from the current 1.6 to 1.8 million barrels per day if maximum pressure tactics escalate or broader disruptions occur,' Rebecca Babin, U.S. senior energy trader at CIBC Private Wealth, told Yahoo Finance Thursday night. 'There's also the possibility — though still uncertain — of direct supply losses if Israel targets Iranian oil infrastructure,' she added. Iran has launched 100 low-flying drones toward Israeli territory in retaliation, an Israeli military spokesman told Reuters. While the swarm is likely to take several hours to reach its target, it could just be paving the way for a missile bombardment later. It remains unclear whether the conflict could spill over into the broader region. 'We can probably expect a temporary slowdown in oil tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz,' said Ed Hirs, senior fellow at the University of Houston, in an interview with Yahoo Finance. Tehran has repeatedly threatened to block the strait, a vital chokepoint through which as many as 20 million barrels of oil pass each day. On Wednesday afternoon, crude futures surged more than 4% after the U.S. ordered the evacuation of non-essential embassy personnel from Iraq, amid rising regional threats. Supply concerns also mounted this week after President Trump indicated during a podcast that he's increasingly doubtful Washington will reach a nuclear deal with Iran, as recent talks have stalled. "I don't know. I did think so, and I'm getting ... less confident about it," Trump said on the program 'Pod Force One' which aired on Wednesday. Ines Ferre is a Senior Business Reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on X at @ines_ferre. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

See photos: The last large-scale military parade in Washington DC in 1991
See photos: The last large-scale military parade in Washington DC in 1991

USA Today

time31 minutes ago

  • USA Today

See photos: The last large-scale military parade in Washington DC in 1991

See photos: The last large-scale military parade in Washington DC in 1991 Show Caption Hide Caption Armored tanks arrive in DC for Trump's military birthday parade As Washington, D.C. prepares for the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, armored tanks have begun to arrive ahead of Saturday's celebration. Thousands of soldiers, military equipment, musical performances and more are set for this weekend in Washington D.C. for the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary celebration. Happening along the National Mall on Saturday, June 14, the event is also falling on the same day as President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, but the administration has insisted that the Army's anniversary and Trump's birthday are a coincidence and that the parade is justified to honor soldiers' sacrifice. Army parachutists jumping from aircraft are set to land and give Trump an American flag for his birthday, Pentagon officials said, according to Axios. A rare sight in Washington D.C., the last major military parade was held in 1991 to celebrate the end of the first Gulf War. Before 1991, large-scale military parades were held following the American victory in World War I and World War II. According to the National Park Service, "debates over military policy" that occurred during the Korean and Vietnam wars forced parades to be more "subdued." Photos: The last large military parade in Washington DC Contributing: Kathryn Palmer and staff, USA TODAY Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Reach him at and follow him on X @fern_cerv_.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store