Indian court frees 12 in 2006 Mumbai train bombings
An Indian court acquitted on Monday 12 men previously convicted for a series of bomb blasts that ripped through packed commuter trains in Mumbai in 2006 that killed 187 people.
The men were convicted in 2015 of murder, conspiracy, and waging war against the country over the attacks during the evening rush hour of July 11, 2006 that also injured more than 800 people.
Five were sentenced to death, while the other seven were given life imprisonment.
But, 10 years later, the Bombay High Court set aside a lower court's verdict and acquitted the 12 men.
Justices Anil Kilor and Shyam Chandak said in their judgment, the prosecution had 'utterly failed to establish the offense beyond the reasonable doubt against the accused on each count.'
The men were ordered to be released from jail 'if they are not required to be detained in any other case.'
The prosecution can appeal against the order in the Supreme Court.
Read: US hosts Pakistan military chief at White House, India responds by warming to China
A total of seven blasts ripped through the trains after the bombs, packed into pressure cookers, were placed in bags and hidden under newspapers and umbrellas.
Prosecutors said the devices were assembled in Mumbai and deliberately placed in first-class coaches to target the city's wealthy Gujarati community.
They said the bombings were intended as revenge for the riots in the western state of Gujarat in 2002, which left some 2,000 people dead, most of them Muslims.
Prosecutors accused Pakistan-based militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba of being behind the attacks, although a little-known outfit called the Lashkar-e-Qahhar later claimed responsibility.
Pakistan denied the allegations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Thailand, Cambodia agree truce after five days of fighting
PUTRAJAYA: Thailand and Cambodia's leaders agreed to an 'unconditional' ceasefire Monday, after five days of combat along their jungle-clad frontier that has killed at least 36 people. More than 200,000 people have fled as the two sides fired artillery, rockets and guns in a battle over the long-disputed area, which is home to a smattering of ancient temples. The flare-up was the deadliest since violence raged sporadically from 2008-2011 over the territory, claimed by both sides because of a vague demarcation made by Cambodia's French colonial administrators in 1907. Reading a joint statement from the leaders of both countries after peace talks, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said they had agreed 'an immediate and unconditional ceasefire' with effect from midnight Monday (1700 GMT). 'This is a vital first step towards de-escalation and the restoration of peace and security,' he said at a press conference in Malaysia's administrative capital Putrajaya, flanked by Thai acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai and Cambodia's Prime Minister Hun Manet. Anwar said a meeting of military commanders from both sides would take place on Tuesday morning, before the countries' cross-border committee would meet in Cambodia on August 4. Thai and Cambodian leaders head to Malaysia for peace talks As the deal was being announced, an AFP journalist in the Cambodian city of Samraong – 17 kilometres (10 miles) from the fraught frontier – reported hearing continuing artillery blasts. 'Very good results' US President Donald Trump – who both nations are courting for trade deals to avert the threat of eye-watering tariffs – intervened over the weekend, and said both sides had agreed to 'quickly work out' a truce. 'Today we had a very good meeting and very good results,' said Cambodia's Hun Manet, thanking Trump for his 'decisive' support and saying the truce would serve as 'a foundation for future de-escalation'. Ahead of the summit, Thailand and Cambodia had traded fresh fire and barbed accusations. Cambodia's defence ministry spokeswoman Maly Socheata said it was 'the fifth day that Thailand has invaded Cambodia's territory with heavy weapons and with the deployment of a lot of troops'. Thailand and Cambodia to hold peace talks after more border clashes And as he departed Bangkok airport, Phumtham told reporters he did not believe Cambodia was 'acting in good faith'. After the talks hosted by Anwar – chair of the ASEAN bloc of which both Thailand and Cambodia are members – Phumtham called for the truce to be 'carried out in good faith by both sides'. 'Thailand decides for peaceful resolution, while continuing to protect our sovereignty and the lives of our people,' he said. 'Highly tense' On the eve of the talks, Thailand's military said Cambodian snipers were camped in one of the contested temples, and accused Phnom Penh of surging troops along the border and hammering Thai territory with rockets. It said there was fighting at seven areas in the rural region, marked by a ridge of hills surrounded by wild jungle and fields where locals farm rubber and rice. 'The situation remains highly tense, and it is anticipated that Cambodia may be preparing for a major military operation prior to entering negotiations,' the Thai military statement read. Thai King Maha Vajiralongkorn marked his 73rd birthday on Monday, but a notice in the country's Royal Gazette said his public celebrations scheduled for Bangkok's Grand Palace had been cancelled amid the strife. Trump has threatened both countries with high levies in his global tariff blitz unless they agree to independent trade deals – but said he would 'look forward' to signing them once 'peace is at hand'. Each side had already agreed to a truce in principle, while accusing the other of undermining peace efforts and trading allegations about the use of cluster bombs and targeting of hospitals. Nationalist sentiment Thailand says nine of its soldiers and 14 civilians have been killed, while Cambodia has confirmed eight civilian and five military deaths. The Thai military said it had returned the bodies of 12 Cambodian soldiers killed in combat. More than 138,000 people have fled Thailand's border regions, while around 140,000 have been driven from their homes in Cambodia. With the skirmish enflaming nationalist sentiments, Thailand warned its citizens to 'refrain from any kind of violence, whether in speech or action' against Cambodian migrants living in the country.
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
No evidence Pahalgam attackers came from Pakistan, says ex-Indian home minister
Demolishing propaganda of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government, former Home Minister of India P. Chidambaram has said that the Pahalgam attackers could be homegrown terrorists and there was no evidence that they came from Pakistan. Speaking to The Quint, Chidambaram also said the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government was unwilling to disclose what investigation the National Investigation Agency (NIA) has done all these weeks into the terrorist incident. 'Have they (NIA) identified the terrorists or where they came from? For all we know, they could be homegrown terrorists. Why do you assume they came from Pakistan? There is no evidence of that,' he added. Pahalgam attack: India's refusal to formation of global investigation body The Congress leader has come under attack by the ruling party leaders and supporters over his this statement, which has brought down the narrative on which's basis India waged a days-long war against Pakistan and attacked the latter's civilian population. It should be noted that in April 2025, an attack in the tourist area of Pahalgam in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK) resulted in the loss of 26 lives, after which India launched 'Operation Sindoor' against Pakistan. Senator Sherry Rehman said Chidambaram's statement on Pahalgam attack exposed the false narrative of the Indian government. 'India should reflect on its internal issues and security failures. No evidence has ever been presented proving Pakistan's involvement in the attack,' she said, reminding New Delhi of Pakistan's repeated demand to provide evidence about Islamabad's alleged involvement in the attack. Following Chidambaram's statement, the ruling party of India, the BJP has been continuously criticising the Congress. Several BJP leaders have interpreted Chidambaram's statement as giving a clean chit to Pakistan in the Pahalgam incident. Countering the BJP's attack over his statement, the former Indian home minister said the 'worst kind of troll' is one who suppresses a full interview and uses two sentences to paint the speaker black. 'Trolls are of different kinds and use different tools to spread misinformation. The worst kind is a troll who suppresses the full recorded interview, takes two sentences, mutes some words, and paints the speaker in a black colour,' he wrote on his X account.
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Azealia Banks defends Trump over teen relationship allegations, sparks outrage
Azealia Banks, who is African American, used epithets directed at Muslims against Zayn. PHOTO: thesource Rapper Azealia Banks has sparked widespread outrage after defending former President Donald Trump against allegations of past sexual involvement with underage girls. In a series of controversial tweets, Banks claimed such relationships were once socially acceptable, drawing sharp criticism across social media. Azealia Banks has taken a break from defending Israel's genocide to come out in staunch defense of pre-2000s pedophilia — Fifty Shades of Whey (@davenewworld_2) July 26, 2025 Banks argued that relationships between adult men and teenage girls were culturally normalized in earlier decades, writing, *"I'm honestly not surprised or mad at Trump for getting some 15-year-old p***y because those were the times."* She referenced her own experiences, stating she was "old enough to choose" to engage with older men at age 15. While clarifying she wasn't endorsing such behavior today, her comments were met with immediate backlash. Girl my dad was 47 and my mom was 14 when they got together …. Cry somewhere else loser — Azealia Banks (@azealiaslacewig) July 27, 2025 The controversy escalated when Banks dismissed the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, tweeting, "FORGET ABOUT THE EPSTEIN FILES WHO CARES." She also used offensive language toward young Latina girls and the LGBTQ+ community, accusing gay men of hypocrisy for criticizing her views. This is not the first time Banks has faced backlash for inflammatory remarks, but critics argue this incident is among her most troubling. Advocates and social media users have condemned her statements as dangerous, particularly given the sensitive nature of underage exploitation allegations. The backlash has reignited discussions about celebrity accountability and the influence of public figures in shaping discourse on abuse and consent. Banks' comments remain under heavy scrutiny as the debate continues.
