Pacific Palisades controlled burn planned as investigators search for wildfire cause
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives sent out notice that there will be a controlled burn along the Temescal Ridge Trail between Skull Rock and Green Peak from April 29 through May 1.
Investigators have their sights on this area, a popular hiking trail, where another fire had burned six days before the Palisades Fire broke out.
"If you see flames on the hillside in that area, there is no cause for concern, there is no need to contact 911," Los Angeles Fire Department Captain Erik Scott said regarding the planned burn. ATF is charged with investigating the wildfire's cause and origin.
A CBS News analysis of satellite imagery and photos shared by local residents found the Palisades Fire likely started close to the Jan. 1 Lachman Fire around the Temescal Ridge Trail. Palisades residents told CBS News they saw the fire break out the morning of Jan. 7 close to the Skull Rock Trailhead along the Temescal Ridge Trail in Topanga State Park.
The Lachman Fire grew to eight acres before fire crews extinguished the flames before they reached homes.
Officials still have not determined a cause for the Palisades Fire which broke out among strong Santa Ana winds. The massive wildfire burned more than 23,000 acres and killed at least eight people.
"Los Angeles Fire Department personnel will be present before, during, and after all testing to ensure public safety and environmental protection," ATF wrote in a statement. The public is advised to avoid the area.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
HelloFresh to pay $7.5M in California subscription case—how to claim settlement
Meal kit delivery company HelloFresh has agreed to pay $7.5 million to settle allegations of what prosecutors called "deceptive subscription practices" in California. The settlement was announced Monday by district attorneys in both Los Angeles and Santa Clara counties, which jointly filed the lawsuit that led to the settlement. The plaintiff argues that HelloFresh's policies violated the state's Automatic Renewal Law by "deceptively enrolling consumers into auto-renewing subscription plans without proper disclosure or consent," according to a statement from Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman's office. "No company, no matter how big or well-known, is exempt from California's consumer protection laws," Hochman said. "We will aggressively pursue enforcement when businesses take advantage of consumers by failing to clearly disclose subscription terms, obtain proper consent, or provide a fair way to cancel. Consumers have a right to know what they're signing up for, and they deserve better. Digital deception is still deception under the law." HelloFresh admitted no liability in the settlement. What were the allegations leveled against HelloFresh in California? Prosecutors alleged HelloFresh placed customers into ongoing subscriptions without proper notice or authorization. The Santa Clara District Attorney's Office also accused the company of making it difficult for customers to cancel subscriptions. "The meal kit delivery company, the largest in the U.S., also failed to disclose the material terms and conditions of advertised free meals, surprise gifts, and free shipping offers, among other false and misleading advertising allegations," Santa Clara D.A.'s officials said in a written statement. "These actions are violations of California's Automatic Renewal Law and False Advertising Law." The civil complaint alleged that HelloFresh failed to clearly disclose subscription terms prior to collecting payment; was unable to obtain customers' affirmative consent before charging their credit or debit cards; failed to provide post-transaction acknowledgments of subscriptions; and failed to offer an easy mechanism to cancel subscriptions. 'Misleading automatic renewal subscriptions and false advertising practices don't sell products – they sell deception,' according to Santa Clara County D.A. Jeff Rosen. 'Stop means stop.' HelloFresh denies wrongdoing HelloFresh representatives told CBS News that the company's policies were fair. "We take our commitment to customer transparency very seriously, and our subscription model and cancellation policies have been consistently clear to customers throughout the whole customer journey," according to a statement from the company. "While we deny any wrongdoing, we have cooperated fully with the coalition of California District Attorneys and have entered into a settlement agreement with them to resolve the matter amicably." Where will the settlement money go? Of the $7.5 million settlement, $6.38 million will be divided between the prosecuting agencies in the form of civil penalties, according to the L.A. County D.A.'s Office. $1 million of the settlement will be paid as restitution to eligible California consumers, officials added. $120,000 will be used to cover investigative costs. HelloFresh makes up roughly 75% of the meal kit delivery market in the U.S., officials said. The case was investigated by the California Automatic Renewal Task Force, or CART, Hochman said. The program was started in 2015 to address consumer complaints about improper subscription practices and comprises prosecutors from Los Angeles, Santa Clara, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz, and San Diego counties, as well as the city of Santa Monica. Who is eligible for restitution from Hello Fresh? According to the settlement, eligible consumers are those who: Were enrolled in automatic renewal product subscriptions between Jan. 1, 2019, and Aug. 18, 2025. Were charged for the first shipment without their knowledge or consent. Canceled their automatic renewal subscription after the first shipment. Never received a refund from HelloFresh. These individuals will receive notices from the third-party administrator detailing how to submit a claim. This article originally appeared on Palm Springs Desert Sun: HelloFresh to pay $7.5M in California subscription settlement Solve the daily Crossword
Axios
7 hours ago
- Axios
Citizenship reviews now ask immigrants to show "positive contributions" to U.S.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services officers under the Trump administration must consider the "positive attributes" of immigrants seeking U.S. citizenship — rather than just the absence of misconduct — according to a recent policy memo. The big picture: The Friday USCIS memo calls for a more "holistic" approach to assessing the "good moral character" of an immigrant seeking naturalization under an administration that has cracked down on immigration and pathways to citizenship in unprecedented ways. Driving the news: Good moral character is not a new requirement for naturalization. But under the USCIS memo, officers are instructed to put "greater emphasis" on an applicants' "positive attributes and contributions." Those can include factors like community involvement, family caregiving and educational attainment. "Going forward, USCIS officers must account for an alien's positive attributes and not simply the absence of misconduct," the memo states. Zoom out: It also calls for heightened scrutiny of disqualifying behaviors. Those include permanent bars to good moral character — like murder, aggravated felonies and genocide — and other offenses, like gambling and drug-related violations. But the memo also stipulates that other disqualifying actions could include behavior that is technically lawful but is "inconsistent with civic responsibility within the community," like habitual traffic infractions or solicitation. The policy also instructs officers to consider factors that show an applicant could have demonstrated "genuine rehabilitation," through actions like rectifying overdue child support or past-due taxes. Context: The test of "good moral character" has in the past largely been satisfied if applicants don't have any of the disqualifying or criminal offenses detailed in U.S. immigration law, per CBS News. But the memo says "[e]valuating GMC involves more than a cursory mechanical review focused on the absence of wrongdoing." It continues, "It entails a holistic assessment of an alien's behavior, adherence to societal norms, and positive contributions that affirmatively demonstrate good moral character." What they're saying: USCIS Spokesman Matthew J. Tragesser said in a statement provided to Axios that the agency is restoring "integrity" in the immigration system. "Today, USCIS is adding a new element to the naturalization process that ensures America's newest citizens not only embrace America's culture, history, and language but who also demonstrate Good Moral Character," he said. Catch up quick: The Trump administration has launched a sweeping spectacle cracking down on illegal immigration, but it's also significantly curtailed avenues to being in the country legally by terminating past legal protections and targeting refugee admissions.
CBS News
a day ago
- CBS News
Aurora police, ATF seize dozens of firearms and drugs, arrest TdA gang members in undercover operation
Police in Aurora, along with the ATF, DEA and several other law enforcement organizations, showed off the firearms and drugs seized in an undercover operation that resulted in the arrests of dozens of suspects. Some of those suspects have been confirmed to be TdA gang members. On Monday, the ATF displayed 69 firearms and some of the drugs seized in that operation that started 10 months ago. The undercover operation began when Arapahoe County Sheriff Tyler Brown reached out to federal agents about a spike in crime at the Ivy Crossing Apartments in Aurora. That's where, according to undercover agents, they purchased some of the drugs and guns and agents said they even discussed a possible murder-for-hire with suspects. A total of 30 people were arrested. Law enforcement said they are connected to the TdA gang in Venezuela. "We have seen an impact of what true collaboration can bring. Not only through law enforcement but through the building of trust and assurance to the residents that their safety matters," said Brown. The suspects are facing charges including federal drug trafficking, firearms offenses, and murder-for-hire. The agencies involved include the Arapahoe County Sheriff's Office, Aurora Police Department, and the City of Aurora along with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, the Drug Enforcement Administration, Homeland Security Investigations, ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations, and Joint Task Force Vulcan.
