logo
‘People's commission' to examine future of water industry in England and Wales

‘People's commission' to examine future of water industry in England and Wales

The Guardian27-02-2025

A 'people's commission' on the future of the water industry will travel across England and Wales taking evidence from the public and environmental campaign groups at the centre of the sewage pollution scandal.
The inquiry has been set up by leading academics and environmental campaigners who were central to exposing the routine dumping of raw sewage into rivers by water companies to rival the government-established independent commission.
Members include the former Undertones frontman and campaigner, Feargal Sharkey, Becky Malby, who was responsible for a stretch of the River Wharfe in Ilkley becoming the first to be given bathing water status, Kate Bayliss, an academic who has investigated how private equity has taken over large parts of English water firms, and Ewan McGaughey, a professor of law at Kings College, London.
The people's commission will start taking evidence on 27 March. Malby said it was set up because the independent commission, chaired by Sir Jon Cunliffe, a former deputy governor of the Bank of England, was too limited in its scope and not willing to consider alternative forms of ownership from the privatised model.
Malby said: 'The people's commission fills the gap because we are going to address the problems that really matter to the public: the level of pollution in our rivers and seas, the shocking level of debt that water companies have racked up that we are having to pay excruciating interest on, the massive increase in bills with no guarantees that we are going to have clean water.'
Malby said participation in the Cunliffe commission was limited to stakeholders in the water sector and there was little scope for involvement from the public.
Cunliffe called on Thursday for evidence from investors, and environmental organisations, but made clear he would not be looking at renationalisation of the industry during his investigation, which will report this summer.
'My job is to make the current system work better, the government has made clear they have ruled out nationalisation,' he said.
In a speech in Manchester he said he did not think the privatised ownership of the industry was the problem. His remit will focus mostly on regulatory reform and ensuring financial resilience.
'The problems we see today have not emerged overnight. Nor, I believe, are they the inevitable consequence of a privatise regulated company model,' said Cunliffe.
'Rather, they have developed over time and due to factors including poor decisions and poor performance by companies, regulatory gaps, policy instability and a history of ad-hoc changes that have left an increasingly complex system that is no longer working well for anyone.'
Some water companies have said they will raise dividends to shareholders as they increase customer bills to pay for record £100bn investment in the sector over the next five years. Bills rise by an average of £123 this year alone.
The industry was responsible for record sewage pollution last year. This month a £3bn bailout for Thames Water, which has £17bn of debt, was approved by the high court to stave off the company's collapse. But customers will be forced to pay for the emergency loan – which comes with a 9.75% interest rate – in further bill increases, the high court heard.
Bayliss, from the department of economics at Soas, has worked extensively on privatisation and contributed to Guardian research which revealed that in 2022 more than 70% of English water companies were owned by foreign investment firms, private equity, pension funds and businesses lodged in tax havens.
'Our water system is not working. Our biggest utility is in financial crisis while raw sewage spilling into our rivers and seas has become the new normal,' she said. 'We need to fully understand what exactly is driving these failings, and why. From here we can devise pragmatic solutions, learning from experience in the UK and abroad, to build a water system in the interests of society and the environment.'
The people's commission will look at international examples, alternative models of ownership, innovation in water services and securing value for the public while protecting our rivers, lakes and seas.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Farming unions raise concerns over Wales' bluetongue stance
Farming unions raise concerns over Wales' bluetongue stance

Powys County Times

time4 hours ago

  • Powys County Times

Farming unions raise concerns over Wales' bluetongue stance

FARMING unions have expressed 'disappointment' and 'concern' at the Welsh Government's decision not to impose restrictions on livestock movement amid the spread of the bluetongue virus. Multiple outbreaks in England saw the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) announce last month that the restricted zone for bluetongue will be extended to cover all of England from July 1. Farmers will be able to move animals within England without a bluetongue licence or test but with Wales not imposing restrictions having not seen a confirmed case, limits are to be placed on moving livestock from England. Cattle, sheep and goats will need to test negative for the potentially fatal disease before they can be transported across the border. This led to the Royal Welsh Agricultural Society (RWAS) announcing this week that English and Scottish livestock exhibitors will not be allowed to compete at this year's Royal Welsh Show in July. Farming organisations in Wales had urged Deputy First Minister Huw Irranca-Davies to align with England to prevent restrictions on livestock movements. However, the cabinet secretary for rural affairs, said his decision was made in an 'attempt to hold back the disease for as long as we can', adding he could not 'in all conscience invite bluetongue into Wales' by aligning with England. A specific movement licence will be administered by the Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA), while England's focus will shift to encouraging uptake of new vaccines which alleviate the symptoms. 'The current RZ approach in England has helped keep bluetongue away from the Welsh border," Mr Irranca-Davies said. "I regret the current RZ cannot be maintained but understand the reasons behind its expansion to the whole of England. 'In practical terms, it means we will lose the security of having a two-county buffer between potentially infected livestock in England and the Welsh border. This change increases the risk of disease incursion into Wales.' NFU Cymru has expressed concern at the cost and practicality of these controls. 'There are many unknowns about how BTV-3 could impact our herds and flocks across Wales and Welsh farmers are extremely worried about the threat of the spread of the disease,' said NFU Cymru president Aled Jones. 'However, we have significant concerns about the lack of resources and capacity within the laboratories and APHA to deliver against the potential demand for each and every animal to be tested and licensed, given the significant amount of stock that move across the border from England to Wales for management, welfare and trading purposes. 'We understand that going forward the costs of testing will be borne by the farmer, which will cause a huge increase to the cost of trading.' FUW president Ian Rickman called the non-alignment a 'disappointment to the industry'. 'As farmers our first instinct is to keep any disease out, but in order to maintain economic stability within the industry, the FUW has repeatedly lobbied the Welsh Government to simultaneously align with the changes proposed in England, as the sheer number of cross-border holdings and trading activity will be vastly disrupted with this policy decision. 'Meanwhile, midges that carry and spread the virus would not respect any such boundaries. 'DEFRA's decision will inevitably bring disease to the Welsh-English border and places both the Welsh Government and the wider industry in an impossible situation. 'However, given this 'when' not 'if' circumstance of bluetongue encroachment into Wales, the FUW believes enforcing a border between Wales and England is both a futile endeavour and wholly impractical.'

UK's 2nd longest pier to finally reopen in £600bn cash injection boosting Victorian seaside town's economy
UK's 2nd longest pier to finally reopen in £600bn cash injection boosting Victorian seaside town's economy

Scottish Sun

time5 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

UK's 2nd longest pier to finally reopen in £600bn cash injection boosting Victorian seaside town's economy

The project could boost the town's tourism industry with new jobs and business opportunties PIER IN UK's 2nd longest pier to finally reopen in £600bn cash injection boosting Victorian seaside town's economy Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) AN HISTORIC pier at a popular seaside town is set to reopen following a £600 billion cash injection. After closing in 2022, Southport Pier could be revived after the government promised to prioritise local developments projects in its Spending Review. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 4 Southport Pier is set to reopen following a recent government announcement Credit: Getty 4 4 The pier has been closed since 2022 after adverse weather caused damage Credit: Getty 4 It's part of a £600 billion country-wide development project Credit: Getty Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced the review on June 11, which included a £600 billion cash injection to support the country's infrastructure. This cash injection aims to expedite a range of locally-significant development projects, including Southport Pier. It clarifies how day-to-day expenditure will be used in the country, as well as capital spending on transport, schools, community assets and hospitals. In a speech at the Houses of Parliament, Chancellor Reeves said: "I know the pride that people feel in their communities. I see it everywhere I go, but I also know that for too many people, there is a sense that something has been lost." She cited the death of the high street as one of the problems facing British towns, alongside a decline in community spaces, jobs and opportunities. The Spending Review aims to solve some of these problems as Reeves added: "Job creation and community assets are vital to our growth mission, but too often, regeneration projects are held back, gathering dust in bureaucratic limbo. We are changing that." During the speech, she named Southport Pier as just one of the projects that could benefit. The government hopes that reopening the pier, which has been shut since 2022, could create jobs and new business opportunities in the local area. Sefton Council closed the historic pier - which is the second longest in the country - after a period of extreme weather that left structural engineers concerned. Trendy English seaside town has rooftop bar that 'feels like the Med' Southport locals were excited at the prospect of a revival of such a culturally significant site for the town. Local MP Patrick Hurley said: "We've got a commitment from the Chancellor at the dispatch box to support the project. What that support means, in concrete and practical terms, is that there's going to be funding made available to make sure that the pier can be reopened." Hurley announced that by the end of summer they would have a better understanding of the exact funding, as well as the concrete proposals and timescales that would enable the pier to reopen. Mayor of Liverpool City Region, Steve Rotheram, expressed his support for the project. During a meeting at Lancaster House, Mr Rotheram said that Prime Minister Keir Starmer had given his word that Southport would be included in the development plans. Mayor Rotheram said: "This hasn't happened by chance. It's the result of tireless work by people who've never stopped fighting for the town's future." He credited Councillor Marion Atkinson and MP Hurley as being integral to the project's success, as well as the enthusiasm of Southport locals. In addition to being Britain's second longest pier, Southport Pier also has an important history. First opened in 1860, it has hosted famous performers like Charlie Chaplin. A restoration project between 2000 and 2002 helped to revive the pier and boost the local tourism industry before it closed in 2022.

What is the cost to the economy of Israel's attack on Iran?
What is the cost to the economy of Israel's attack on Iran?

The Independent

time8 hours ago

  • The Independent

What is the cost to the economy of Israel's attack on Iran?

If we needed another lesson about the difficulties of managing an economy in a period of nerve-wracking uncertainty, Israel's attacks on Iran have provided it. Market reaction to Israeli 200 fighter jets hitting more than 100 targets was swift – and predictable. The oil price shot up, the gold price shot up and share prices tumbled across the world. The FTSE escaped the worst of the damage, largely because of its substantial contingent of natural resource stocks, including the presence of two heavily weighted oil majors in its upper reaches. But it still gave up ground following its record close. Economic institute DIW has warned that higher oil prices resulting from the hostilities will hurt the German economy, Europe's economic engine – and the impact will not be confined there. Britain is in the midst of a moderate inflationary spike, with rates jumping to 3.4 per cent in April (3.5 per cent officially, but the Office for National Statistics got its sums wrong and has decided not to course correct). The jump in prices, created by an oil slick of bill, fare and tax increases in that month, is at least expected to be temporary. But higher fuel prices have the potential to change that by powering up prices, potentially leading to a higher and longer-lasting spike than had been expected. The Bank of England has no control over the international price of oil. However, history tells us it will act to damp down what it describes as the 'second order effects' from pricier oil fuelling inflation. That is a problem for the UK economy – and chancellor Rachel Reeves, while we're at it – because they could really use the helping hand of lower interest rates. Donald Trump's tariffs are hurting exporters and even though there have recently been signs that the trade deal secured by Keir Starmer will take effect soon, the base 'liberation day' 10 per cent levy will still largely apply to British exports. While this still leaves the UK in a relatively favourable position, the impact of the much higher tariffs on those without the (relative) benefits of a Starmer-style deal will still hurt. The US remains the world's biggest economy. Trump's economic vandalism will obviously damage the wider global economy, constricting trade, reducing growth, adding to the crippling uncertainty that many investors are apt to react to by hiding under their beds with pots filled with as much gold as they can afford. Companies can be expected to respond similarly if the hostilities continue: when CEOs hear war drums beating, they are apt to switch their focus from risk taking and investment to cost cutting and cash conservation until the turmoil has passed. In recent days, hopes of more UK interest rate cuts have been rising. The economy's struggles in April, which recorded the sharpest contraction in two years, the fact that inflation is actually lower than the ONS said it was and the marked weakening of the labour market, with unemployment rising, job openings vanishing and wage settlements falling, are food for those calling for looser monetary policy, including your correspondent. Traders had been betting on two more cuts, with the first coming in September. Israel's action, however, could shift the calculus again, certainly if it the immediate rise in oil prices is sustained. The Bank's rate setting Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) is not expected to move when it meets next week but, as ever, the comments in the minutes and the way the vote goes will merit close attention. Swati Dhingra will, as she typically does, take a dovish line. I would expect her to vote for an immediate cut. The big question is whether any of her colleagues on the nine-member MPC will join her. The uncertainty created by the outbreak of yet more hostilities is probably all the reason the majority will need for sitting tight and waiting to see how this plays out, before assessing the impact on inflation and the economy . For the rest of us, by which I mean those of us lucky enough to have savings and investments, the message is, well, sorry to descend into cliche, but keep calm and carry on. That meme, modern cliche and merch marketing tool – even though the faux wartime nostalgia of said merch is completely fake – represents sound advice. The markets are apt to panic when things like this happen. Traders who play an important role in price formation, exhibit herd like behaviour, even though this about the worst possible response. It was ever thus. But that doesn't mean we have to follow suit. Much better to sit tight and hope (pray?) that it blows over soon.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store