
What is the cost to the economy of Israel's attack on Iran?
Market reaction to Israeli 200 fighter jets hitting more than 100 targets was swift – and predictable. The oil price shot up, the gold price shot up and share prices tumbled across the world.
The FTSE escaped the worst of the damage, largely because of its substantial contingent of natural resource stocks, including the presence of two heavily weighted oil majors in its upper reaches. But it still gave up ground following its record close.
Economic institute DIW has warned that higher oil prices resulting from the hostilities will hurt the German economy, Europe's economic engine – and the impact will not be confined there. Britain is in the midst of a moderate inflationary spike, with rates jumping to 3.4 per cent in April (3.5 per cent officially, but the Office for National Statistics got its sums wrong and has decided not to course correct).
The jump in prices, created by an oil slick of bill, fare and tax increases in that month, is at least expected to be temporary. But higher fuel prices have the potential to change that by powering up prices, potentially leading to a higher and longer-lasting spike than had been expected.
The Bank of England has no control over the international price of oil. However, history tells us it will act to damp down what it describes as the 'second order effects' from pricier oil fuelling inflation.
That is a problem for the UK economy – and chancellor Rachel Reeves, while we're at it – because they could really use the helping hand of lower interest rates. Donald Trump's tariffs are hurting exporters and even though there have recently been signs that the trade deal secured by Keir Starmer will take effect soon, the base 'liberation day' 10 per cent levy will still largely apply to British exports.
While this still leaves the UK in a relatively favourable position, the impact of the much higher tariffs on those without the (relative) benefits of a Starmer-style deal will still hurt. The US remains the world's biggest economy. Trump's economic vandalism will obviously damage the wider global economy, constricting trade, reducing growth, adding to the crippling uncertainty that many investors are apt to react to by hiding under their beds with pots filled with as much gold as they can afford.
Companies can be expected to respond similarly if the hostilities continue: when CEOs hear war drums beating, they are apt to switch their focus from risk taking and investment to cost cutting and cash conservation until the turmoil has passed.
In recent days, hopes of more UK interest rate cuts have been rising. The economy's struggles in April, which recorded the sharpest contraction in two years, the fact that inflation is actually lower than the ONS said it was and the marked weakening of the labour market, with unemployment rising, job openings vanishing and wage settlements falling, are food for those calling for looser monetary policy, including your correspondent.
Traders had been betting on two more cuts, with the first coming in September. Israel's action, however, could shift the calculus again, certainly if it the immediate rise in oil prices is sustained.
The Bank's rate setting Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) is not expected to move when it meets next week but, as ever, the comments in the minutes and the way the vote goes will merit close attention.
Swati Dhingra will, as she typically does, take a dovish line. I would expect her to vote for an immediate cut. The big question is whether any of her colleagues on the nine-member MPC will join her.
The uncertainty created by the outbreak of yet more hostilities is probably all the reason the majority will need for sitting tight and waiting to see how this plays out, before assessing the impact on inflation and the economy .
For the rest of us, by which I mean those of us lucky enough to have savings and investments, the message is, well, sorry to descend into cliche, but keep calm and carry on.
That meme, modern cliche and merch marketing tool – even though the faux wartime nostalgia of said merch is completely fake – represents sound advice.
The markets are apt to panic when things like this happen. Traders who play an important role in price formation, exhibit herd like behaviour, even though this about the worst possible response. It was ever thus. But that doesn't mean we have to follow suit. Much better to sit tight and hope (pray?) that it blows over soon.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Geeky Gadgets
2 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
The BRABUS ROCKET GTC Deep Red Is Absolutely INSANE!
The BRABUS ROCKET GTC DEEP RED is a groundbreaking open-top hybrid supercar that pushes the boundaries of luxury and performance in the automotive industry. This masterpiece of engineering and design seamlessly blends the raw power of a hypercar with the exhilarating freedom of a cabriolet. Meticulously crafted entirely from red exposed-structure carbon fiber, the ROCKET GTC DEEP RED is a testament to BRABUS' unwavering commitment to their '1-Second-Wow' philosophy, captivating onlookers with its striking visual presence and unparalleled performance capabilities. At the heart of this automotive marvel lies a hybrid drivetrain that generates an astonishing 1,000 horsepower, solidifying its position as one of the most powerful BRABUS vehicles ever conceived. The ROCKET GTC DEEP RED's performance figures are nothing short of extraordinary, with a blistering top speed of 317 km/h (197 mph) and the ability to accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h (62 mph) in a mere 2.6 seconds. This unrivaled combination of speed and agility transforms the act of driving into an immersive and unforgettable experience, redefining the very essence of what a supercar can achieve. The ROCKET GTC DEEP RED's hybrid powertrain not only delivers exceptional performance but also showcases BRABUS' commitment to embracing innovative technology and sustainable innovation. By harnessing the synergy between a potent internal combustion engine and an advanced electric motor, this hybrid system optimizes power delivery while reducing environmental impact. This forward-thinking approach positions the ROCKET GTC DEEP RED at the forefront of the automotive industry's shift towards eco-friendly performance vehicles. Bespoke Craftsmanship and Exclusivity Each BRABUS ROCKET GTC DEEP RED is a bespoke creation, carefully crafted to the exact specifications and preferences of its discerning owner. This level of customization ensures that no two ROCKET GTC DEEP RED models are alike, making each one a true reflection of its owner's unique style and personality. From the handcrafted red leather interior with BRABUS' signature 'Shell' quilting to the carbon fiber accents that adorn the cabin, every element of the ROCKET GTC DEEP RED is a testament to the brand's unwavering dedication to craftsmanship and attention to detail. The exclusivity of the ROCKET GTC DEEP RED is further emphasized by its limited availability. With only a select few models produced, owning this hyper GT is a privilege reserved for the most discerning collectors and automotive enthusiasts. The scarcity of this masterpiece not only adds to its allure but also ensures that it will remain a coveted and cherished possession for generations to come. Pricing and Availability As a bespoke creation, the BRABUS ROCKET GTC DEEP RED's pricing is available upon request, reflecting the uncompromising level of craftsmanship, engineering, and customization that goes into each vehicle. The exclusivity of this hyper GT is carefully maintained, with limited production ensuring that each model remains a rare and sought-after collector's item. Specifications Engine: 4.5-liter twin-turbo V8 hybrid system 4.5-liter twin-turbo V8 hybrid system Power Output: 1,000 hp (735 kW) 1,000 hp (735 kW) Torque: Electronically limited to 1,620 Nm (1,195 lb-ft) Electronically limited to 1,620 Nm (1,195 lb-ft) Transmission: Nine-speed sport transmission with paddle shifters Nine-speed sport transmission with paddle shifters Top Speed: 317 km/h (197 mph) 317 km/h (197 mph) Acceleration: 0-100 km/h (62 mph) in 2.6 seconds 0-100 km/h (62 mph) in 2.6 seconds Wheels: BRABUS Monoblock P 'PLATINUM EDITION' five-spoke wheels BRABUS Monoblock P 'PLATINUM EDITION' five-spoke wheels Tires: Continental SportContact 7 (275/35 ZR 21 front, 335/25 ZR 22 rear) Continental SportContact 7 (275/35 ZR 21 front, 335/25 ZR 22 rear) Body Material: Red exposed-structure carbon fiber Red exposed-structure carbon fiber Interior: Handcrafted red leather with BRABUS 'Shell' quilting and carbon accents Handcrafted red leather with BRABUS 'Shell' quilting and carbon accents Exhaust System: BRABUS stainless steel with active valve control Explore More Automotive Innovations For automotive enthusiasts captivated by the groundbreaking engineering and design of the BRABUS ROCKET GTC DEEP RED, there are numerous avenues for further exploration and discovery. The rapid advancements in hybrid technology, for example, offer fascinating insights into the future of high-performance vehicles, as manufacturers seek to balance power, efficiency, and environmental responsibility. Similarly, the evolution of carbon fiber in automotive design has transformed the way cars are constructed, offering unparalleled strength, lightweight properties, and aesthetic appeal. Another area of interest for those drawn to the ROCKET GTC DEEP RED is the growing trend of bespoke luxury vehicles. As discerning clients increasingly seek out unique and personalized automotive experiences, brands like BRABUS are pushing the boundaries of customization, creating one-of-a-kind masterpieces that reflect their owners' individual tastes and preferences. This focus on exclusivity and craftsmanship has elevated the art of automotive design to new heights, ensuring that the world of high-performance cars remains a constant source of innovation and inspiration. Source Brabus Filed Under: Auto News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.


The Guardian
4 minutes ago
- The Guardian
How would potential new property tax differ from stamp duty and council tax system?
The government is considering a new national property tax as the first step towards a radical shake-up of stamp duty and council tax. The discussions taking place at the Treasury – revealed by the Guardian on Monday – have already prompted much debate and, perhaps inevitably, led to an outcry in some quarters. Here we consider how the current system works and how it could change. Two things, essentially. First, sources said Treasury officials were initially examining a potential new tax that would replace stamp duty on owner-occupied homes. It would be paid by homeowners on properties worth more than £500,000 when they sold them. The amount paid would be determined by a property's value. Such a change would be a big deal because under the current system, stamp duty is paid by buyers, not sellers. It could be a bigger concern for some people living in London, the south-east and other areas where property prices are particularly high. Second, officials are also said to be studying whether, after a national tax was brought in, a local property tax could then replace council tax in the medium term. While a new national property tax could in theory be implemented during this parliament, overhauling council tax would take longer and would almost certainly require Labour to win a second term in 2029. You must pay stamp duty land tax (SDLT) – to give it its full name – if you buy a property over a certain price in England and Northern Ireland. There are different approaches to some land taxes in Wales and Scotland. Stamp duty rates vary depending on whether someone is a first-time buyer, and are banded in steps upward depending on the value of the property. They can also vary as a result of stamp duty 'holidays' benefiting some buyers that are brought in from time to time. The rates changed in April this year, and (first-time buyers excepted) where this is the only residential property someone will own, the tax is now zero up to £125,000, then 2% on the portion from £125,001 to £250,000, and 5% on the portion from £250,001 to £925,000. There are then two more bands so that it tops out at 12% on the portion above £1.5m. However, economists and others have long criticised stamp duty as outdated – SDLT is based on a tax first introduced in England in 1694 – and arguably the biggest barrier to moving house. Paul Johnson, until recently the director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, has said that of all the taxes levied at present, stamp duty on homes 'has a pretty good claim to be the most damaging and pernicious of the lot'. He added: 'The more often you move, the more tax you pay. It gums up the housing market and, by extension, the labour market.' The average stamp duty bill has risen to £9,935, according to research issued earlier this year by Coventry building society. It was £6,235 in 2014, according to its data. But of course, individual amounts vary hugely. It is estimated that the majority of property transactions – about 60%-plus – are affected by stamp duty. It has been suggested it would be paid by owner-occupiers on houses worth more than £500,000 when they sell up. The rate would be set by central government. This tax would not replace stamp duty on second homes. On the face of it, and based on current property prices, a £500,000 threshold would mean that the majority of people selling their home would escape the new tax. The average price of a home in the UK is £272,664 or £298,237, depending on whether you believe Nationwide's or Halifax's latest data. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion But tough luck if you are in London: according to the Halifax's latest data, the average house price in the capital is £539,000. The Guardian reported that the new tax (if it happens) would only affect about a fifth of property sales. Stephen Perkins, the managing director at the home loans broker Yellow Brick Mortgages, said: 'Financially, unless the property tax is ridiculously high, this will raise less money than stamp duty, as fewer homes will be affected.' He claimed: 'Initially, sellers will just build this into asking prices, sending [property] prices up.' Sources said Treasury officials were, in part, drawing on the findings of a 48-page report from the centre-right thinktank Onward, which was published in August last year. This put forward the idea of a 0.54% tax, with a 0.278% supplement on the portion of any value that exceeded £1m, which it said 'would raise the same amount as stamp duty'. The tax would be levied only on properties valued at £500,000-plus, and only on the portion of value above £500,000. The thinktank proposed that someone who had only recently bought their house and paid a substantial sum in stamp duty would not be asked to pay this tax in addition. Council tax has been described as 'a deeply broken system', and in its report, Onward said the way it worked meant 'an average home in Blackpool contributes more to the public purse than a mansion in Kensington'. Council tax bands in England are still set using property values from 1 April 1991, ranging from band A, for homes worth up to £40,000, to band H, for those worth £320,001 and above. The system of funding local government is different across the UK. The average band D council tax set by local authorities in England for 2025-26 was £2,280 – an increase of £109, or 5%, on the 2024-25 figure of £2,171. The idea of a new local annual property levy to replace council tax was also proposed by Onward. That plan – for a 'local proportional property tax' – would result in the owners, rather than the residents, of a property worth up to £500,000 paying varying rates of tax dependent on the value of the home. They would pay a minimum of £800 a year. A rate of 0.44% 'would raise the same amount of revenue as council tax', said the report. The TaxPayers' Alliance was quoted as saying: 'If these reports are true, then taxpayers are facing a wealth tax in all but name.' Craig Fish, the director at the mortgage broker Lodestone, said he was concerned that such a shake-up would stop people selling or moving home, especially in high-value areas. 'The result is less income overall,' he said.


Telegraph
4 minutes ago
- Telegraph
More of us are growing old, but pensioners don't have to be an economic burden
As the country paid its respects to the last surviving veterans of the Second World War, you might have assumed that Britain venerates its pensioners. But the increase in life expectancy since that war means that the pensioners are a much bigger share of the population than in 1945 and there is now a danger that rather than valuing and celebrating seniority, younger generations are being encouraged to see the elderly as a liability and a drain on the public purse. The pension commission, launched recently by the Labour government, announced this week that within the next 50 years pensioners will make up a quarter of the adult population. This alarming headline has triggered speculation that the ground is being prepared for an increase in pension age or the discarding of the triple lock. The Government is keen to damp down speculation of any changes to the current system, fearing the electoral impact, not to mention the wrath of its own backbenchers, following the embarrassing retreat on the winter fuel allowance. But the changing balance of the population needs to be addressed, so that growing old is viewed as an opportunity rather than as a slide into dependency. The reality is that older people are enjoying much better health than their parents' generation and many are continuing to work beyond retirement age. Today's grandparents are also more likely to be providing childcare – or helping their adult children onto the housing ladder – than putting their feet up. George Osborne's highly political decision to introduce the triple lock, during the coalition government, may have looked like an easy win at the time, but by creating a massive financial liability has ended up by stoking intergenerational resentment. The state pension is now the second biggest item of government expenditure after health; by 2030 it is expected to cost around £15bn a year. Had the state pension simply kept pace with the cost of living, the cost would have been around a third lower. An inflation-protected pension should surely now be the way forward, breaking the link with earnings but providing a safety net to underlie private savings. A government with the courage to propose this would be in a much stronger position to offer incentives to savers and promote greater financial independence in old age. Coupled with this should be serious reform to the social care sector, to lift the burden on the NHS and assuage the misery of too many older pensioners languishing in hospital. Again, incentives need to be put in place to encourage self-insurance, with a cap on care costs to enable a thriving social insurance sector and more private care providers. The danger with the present Labour government is that it is ducking both these challenges and compounding the problematic legacy of previous administrations. It has postponed any decision on the reform of social care, despite the inevitable impact on the NHS budget in the meantime. As to pension saving, the Chancellor is actively reducing or removing pension tax reliefs as well as undermining private pensions providers by interfering in their investment decisions. Damaging private saving simply pushes the problem back on to the Government's books. This country has drifted into a mindset of state dependency and none of our politicians have the courage or foresight to break free.