Post Office Horizon scandal: Why hundreds were wrongly prosecuted
What happened and how many people were affected?
More than 900 sub-postmasters were prosecuted because of incorrect information from the Horizon computer system.Many sub-postmasters went to prison for false accounting and theft, and others were financially ruined.The Post Office itself took many cases to court, prosecuting 700 people between 1999 and 2015. Another 283 cases were brought by other bodies, including the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).In 2017, a group of 555 sub-postmasters - led by campaigner Alan Bates, who has since been knighted - took legal action in a landmark court case against the Post Office. In 2019, the Post Office agreed to pay the group £58m in compensation, but much of the money went on legal fees.The episode came to wider public attention last year after it was depicted in an ITV drama, Mr Bates vs The Post Office.The outcry triggered by the drama led to legislation being rushed through Parliament to bring in a law quashing convictions from the Horizon scandal.There are now a number of compensation schemes under way, and as of 2 June 2025, more than £1bn has been awarded to thousands of sub-postmasters across all schemes.
What was the effect on Post Office staff?
Many former sub-postmasters and sub-postmistresses say the scandal ruined their lives.Some used their own money to cover non-existent shortfalls because their contracts said they were responsible for unexplained losses. Many faced bankruptcy or lost their livelihoods.Marriages broke down, and some families believe the stress led to serious health conditions, addiction and even premature death.
'I'm terrified' - Post Office victim still fears seeing old customers'I thought mum left me, she'd been sent to prison'
What compensation schemes are in place?
There isn't a single compensation scheme for sub-postmasters to apply to, and individual eligibility depends on the particular circumstances of each case.The four main schemes are aimed at groups of victims who had different experiences of the scandal. As of 2 June 2025, about £1.039bn has been awarded to just over 7,300 sub-postmasters across all four redress schemes. That total breaks down as:Horizon Shortfall Scheme - £559mGroup Litigation Order Scheme - £167mOverturned Convictions Scheme -£68mHorizon Convictions Redress Scheme - £245mProf Chris Hodges, chair of the the independent Horizon Compensation Advisory Board, told the BBC that some individual compensation claims were "well over £1m".How do the Post Office compensation schemes work?
What is Fujitsu's Horizon system?
Horizon was developed by the Japanese company Fujitsu, for tasks such as accounting and stocktaking.It was introduced by the Post Office in 1999.Sub-postmasters quickly complained about bugs in the system after it falsely reported shortfalls, often for many thousands of pounds, but their concerns were dismissed.The Horizon system is still used by the Post Office. It says it has continued to make improvements to the system while it plans "to move to a new system that is being developed".
What is the Post Office Horizon public inquiry?
A public inquiry began in 2022 and heard evidence from Post Office and Fujitsu employees.Last year, Sir Alan Bates appeared at the inquiry, telling it that the Post Office had spent 23 years trying to "discredit and silence" him.Paula Vennells, who was Post Office chief executive between 2012 and 2019, gave evidence in May 2024. She was quizzed for three days and at times broke down in tears. She apologised to the sub-postmasters and their families "who have suffered as a result of all that the inquiry has been looking into for so long".The first part of the inquiry's report is due to be published on Tuesday.The inquiry became almost box office viewing - racking up more than 20 million views on YouTube.People with no connection to the Post Office told the BBC how they became engrossed watching.Who is Paula Vennells?Alan Bates says Post Office run by 'thugs in suits'
Who has been criticised for the Horizon scandal?
Ms Vennells resigned from her role at the Post Office in 2019. In January 2024, she said she would hand back her CBE.In August 2023, the then-Post Office chief executive Nick Read said he would return bonus money awarded for his work on the Horizon inquiry.Fujitsu Europe director Paul Patterson said the firm had a "moral obligation" to help fund compensation payments.Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey has been criticised for refusing to meet Sir Alan when he was postal affairs minister, in May 2010. He says he was "deeply misled by Post Office executives".The BBC discovered that former Prime Minister David Cameron's government knew the Post Office had dropped a secret investigation that might have helped postmasters prove their innocence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
26 minutes ago
- BBC News
Volunteers catch over 45,000 Sussex drivers speeding in 2024/25
More than 45,000 drivers in Sussex have been caught speeding by volunteers over the last year, new figures have Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) Katy Bourne shared the findings for 2024/25 during a meeting of the county's police and crime panel on the work of community speedwatch volunteers, the public reported more than 13,000 incidents of dangerous and antisocial driving via Operation Crackdown. Presenting her annual report, the PCC said the figures were "quite sobering". "It's no wonder we're seeing increases in collisions on our roads," she Bourne confirmed that another 772 reports were made via a separate road safety initiative, Operation a result, more than 30,000 people were given the chance to attend driver training courses as an alternative to prosecution, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service. At the end of March, Sussex Police left the Safer Roads Partnership and it was announced that a dedicated Fatal Five Roads Unit would be set up to deal with issues such as Fatal Five are driving offences which are the main contributors to serious and fatal accidents – excess speed, not wearing a seatbelt, being distracted by things such as a phone, drink and drug driving, and careless and inconsiderate Bourne confirmed that the business case for the unit is now complete. She said: "We're now in the process with the scoping team. That started this month and we're due that report in October. "So hopefully it will be established in the new year. But these things take a while."
BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
MV Matthew crew were 'valuable components' on behalf of crime group with 'apparently unlimited resources'
The six men caught on board the bulk carrier MV Matthew with 2.2 tonnes of cocaine and two others who attempted to take the illicit load on board a second vessel in the Irish Sea have been jailed for a combined 129 years. Passing sentence at the Special Criminal Court on Friday, Ms Justice Melanie Greally described the ship's experienced and highly expert crew as "valuable components of the engine that drives international drug smuggling". Advertisement The defendants, who hail from Iran, Ukraine, Philippines and the UK, were "committed to and invested in" the criminal enterprise on behalf of an organised crime group with "apparently unlimited resources", the judge said. Having set headline sentences ranging from 30 years to 22 years, the three-judge court reduced each sentence after considering mitigating factors. The longest sentence imposed was against Dutch national Cumali Ozgen (50), who received a 20-year sentence. Ms Justice Greally said Ozgen had the closest connection to the Dubai-based criminal organisation that planned and funded the operation and that stood to gain from its success. Advertisement Ozgen, along with Ukrainians Mykhailo Gavryk (32) and Vitaliy Vlasoi (33); Iranians Soheil Jelveh (52) and Saeid Hassani (39) and Filipino Harold Estoesta (31); previously pleaded guilty that between September 24th and 26th 2023, both dates inclusive, at locations outside the State, on board the vessel "MV Matthew" they possessed cocaine for sale or supply contravention of the Misuse of Drugs Regulations. The drugs have been valued at €157 million. Ukrainian national Vitaliy Lapa (62), with an address at Rudenka, Repina Str in Berdyansk, and Jamie Harbron (31) of South Avenue, Billingham in the UK pleaded guilty that on dates between September 21st and 25th 2023, at a location within the State, they attempted to possess cocaine for the purpose of selling or otherwise supplying to another. Ms Justice Greally on Friday sentenced Ozgen to 20 years in prison; Estoesta to 18 years; Jelveh to 17.5 years; Vlasoi to 16.5 years; Hassani to 15 years; Gavryk to 14 years; Lapa to 14.5 years and Harbron to 13.5 years. Advertisement The court previously heard that while the MV Matthew was sailing under the flag of Panama, it was owned by a Dubai-based company known as 'Symphony Marine'. It departed from Curacao, off the Venezuelan coast before being loaded with 2.2 tonnes of cocaine. The court also heard that an organised crime group in Dubai instructed the crew of the MV Matthew as it attempted to evade law enforcement and deliver the drugs to an Irish vessel. Despite repeated warnings from the Irish Navy, including warning shots fired from the LE William Butler Yeats, the person overseeing the operation told the crew to keep going and head for a safe port in Sierra Leone. The original plan was that the MV Matthew would deliver the drugs to a second ship, the Castlemore, but rough seas and technical difficulties caused the Irish vessel to miss the connection and later to run aground. Advertisement As the MV Matthew tried to evade capture, members of the Irish Army Rangers were lowered by rope ladder from a helicopter onto the ship's deck. The crew had tried to set the drugs on fire but the rangers acted quickly to quench the flames and save the drugs as evidence. One of the rangers, a former member of the Navy, steered the vessel to Cork Harbour. In sentencing, Ms Justice Greally said a significant aggravating factor was that the operation was on behalf of a criminal organisation with international reach and "apparently unlimited resources to invest in transnational drug-trafficking". She said each defendant's culpability was based on the "vast quantity" and value of the drugs, the meticulous planning of the operation and the group's technical sophistication. Advertisement Cocaine is a "highly addictive drug which is causing widespread societal harm and dysfunction," she said. While none of the convicted men belong to the "upper echelons" of the criminal organisation and they did not own the drugs or stand to profit from their sale, Ms Justice Greally said they played an important role in the operation. Apart from Ozgen and Harbron, they possessed a "high level of seafaring and navigational expertise," which is vital to such operations, she said. "Seafarers are not cogs but valuable components of the engine that drives international drug smuggling," she said. Each had proven competence at sea and obtained a high level of trust in the organisation. They were "committed to and invested in the success of the venture," she said. Ms Justice Greally noted that Ozgen and the officers on board the MV Matthew had given varying accounts of when and how they came to know of the illicit nature of the ship's cargo. However, Ms Justice Greally said a failure to understand the purpose of the voyage would require a level of "wilful ignorance" that is "tantamount to knowledge". She pointed out that the MV Matthew is a large bulk carrier which left Venezuela for Gdansk in Poland with no cargo. While at sea, the ordinary seamen were plied with alcohol before armed men on board a second vessel lifted the drugs onto the MV Matthew by crane. She said there was also evidence from a group chat being used by the officers that each of them knew that the MV Matthew was using "spoofing" software to misrepresent its location as it crossed the Atlantic. Ozgen, the judge said, was the crew member most closely connected to the criminal organisation in Dubai and was to be paid a significant sum for his role. He had specific knowledge of the drugs and was on board to ensure the job was successful, the judge said. He provided progress reports to Dubai every couple of days and occupied the captain's cabin so he could supervise and monitor what the other officers were doing. "The evidence supports that he was a malign and intimidatory presence on the ship," she said. Hassani and Lapa, she said, were in debt and were motivated by the financial pressure they were under and their family circumstances. Harbron, a drug addict, was primarily looking to reduce his drug debt, the judge said. Jelveh, who was the captain of the vessel, contacted the Irish Coast Guard after two failed rendezvous with the Castlemore and asked to be airlifted away for medical reasons. He therefore left the MV Matthew before the operation's failure was certain, Judge Greally said, and had no role in later attempts by the crew to defy the orders of the Irish Navy and customs officers or to prevent the Irish Army Rangers from making their landing. Estoesta, the judge said, demonstrated a level of commitment to the criminal organisation that was "unmatched by any other officer". When presented with a choice between obeying the Irish authorities or the criminal organisation, he chose to try to evade justice and escape Irish waters, hoping to get to Sierra Leone in west Africa. When a helicopter attempted to lower the rangers to the ship by rope ladder, Vlasoi was steering the ship. Ms Justice Greally said Vlasoi manoeuvred the ship to frustrate their landing, exposing them to danger and creating a further aggravating factor. Ms Justice Greally set headline sentences for each accused, ranging from 30 years for Ozgen, the most culpable, to 22 years for Harbron who was deemed least culpable. Before finalising the sentence, Ms Justice Greally said the court took into account that each defendant pleaded guilty and that all, except Harbron, have no previous convictions. She further considered their family situations and the difficulties they will face in a foreign prison, far away from home. Within the prison system, each defendant has enhanced status for good behaviour. Ms Justice Greally backdated each sentence to when they went into custody following their arrests in September 2023. Ms Justice Greally concluded by saying that she had observed the "professionalism and competence" of the joint task force involving gardai, customs and revenue officers, the navy and the Irish army. They had succeeded in preventing the ship from escaping Irish waters and from evading justice. The skill of the army rangers, she said, was critical to the operation's success. She further commended the investigation team and lawyers for the clarity of the evidence presented in court which, she said, "without doubt led to the guilty pleas being entered". Outside court, Detective Superintendent Joe O'Reilly said this remains the largest seizure of controlled drugs in the history of the State. Ireland Woman (42) jailed for acting as get-away driver fo... Read More He added: "The sentences imposed today provide a clear message to persons involved in international drug trafficking that Ireland is not a soft target for transnational organised criminal networks. "This and other drugs interdictions over recent years clearly demonstrate that all agencies of the State, supported by our international partners, will work together to successfully disrupt and dismantle criminal networks engaged in drug trafficking, thereby reducing harm to our communities. "To those involved in drug trafficking, the message is clear: The full force of the Irish State, supported by our international partners, is against you. The reality facing you is security interdictions, special investigations, the Special Criminal Court, lengthy sentences and asset seizure. "Transnational organised crime gangs cause misery to communities not only in Ireland but throughout the world. Tackling these gangs not only makes Ireland safer but all the other countries that they operate in."
BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Judge wants explanation from solicitors over 'no knowledge' letter in spy case
A High Court judge has said he wants an explanation over a letter from the solicitors for HR firm Deel Inc, saying their client had "no knowledge" of the following by private investigators of a payroll manager at the centre of a rival business's "spy" affair. Mr Justice Brian Cregan said he was not going to join Deel as either a defendant or notice party in proceedings being brought by Keith O'Brien, the man who was allegedly paid €5,500 a month to pass on trade secrets of his former employer, HR software firm Rippling, to rival Deel. Rippling is now suing Deel and others, including Mr O'Brien, over the matter. Advertisement The judge said he would not join Deel in Mr O'Brien's separate case alleging harassment and surveillance because doing so, of the court's own motion, was an exceptional jurisdiction. It was also unfair to the O'Brien side, who did not want Deel added anyway, and because of the separate Rippling case against Deel. Mr O'Brien's case is against two private investigators which he claims have been involved in harassment of him and his family, including one who allegedly followed him by car to various locations and photographed his children playing in their garden. The investigators, Mark Murran, also known as Rock Investigations, and Cliona Woods of Gotham Services, strongly deny any overt surveillance or claims of harassment and intimidation. Advertisement That case was back before Mr Justice Cregan on Friday, when the judge ruled out joining Deel but said his main outstanding concern was a pre-litigation letter written by Deel's solicitors, Hayes LLP, in reply to a call from Mr O'Brien's solicitor to desist from the alleged surveillance/harassment. In that letter, Hayes stated their client had no knowledge of the cars allegedly following Mr O'Brien. On Tuesday, the judge described the Hayes letter as either a "blatant lie or a misrepresentation" because it was later admitted as being incorrect, because Deel said it had organised "discreet" but not overt surveillance on Mr O'Brien. On Friday, he said: "The question from my point of view is that this is a letter from reputable solicitors who are officers of the court and it is blatantly wrong". Advertisement He said Deel's barrister, Paul Gardiner SC, instructed by Hayes, indicated he (the judge) should not have said it was a lie or misrepresentation, but it seemed to the judge that it is still an issue for the court and should be properly addressed. He said because of that letter, earlier this week in another case in which Hayes were representatives, he had a question as to whether he could rely on it, although he did do so in that case. He believed the next step was for Hayes to swear an affidavit as to how that replying letter to the O'Brien side was written. Mr Gardiner said the letter was true at the time, and while it turned out to be incorrect because discreet surveillance was commissioned by Deel, when written, it was believed to be correct. He felt that what the court might be doing is "putting a wedge" between Deel and its representation. Mr Gardiner also believed the judge was being unfair to both Hayes and Deel in circumstances where fair procedures and due process have yet to take place and where the judge's words were being widely reported. Advertisement If the court is to have a separate inquiry into this letter, it should at least not take place until the O'Brien harassment proceedings have concluded which may well find there was no harassment, he said. Mr Justice Cregan said he would give two weeks for Mr Gardiner to take instructions and consider the matter more fully, and he said his concerns may be assuaged if it is explained in an affidavit. The judge also granted consent orders, sought by Mr Murran and Ms Woods, that Mr O'Brien preserve any information, including on CCTV, dashcam and phone, relating to the allegations against them. He also continued the injunctions restraining further surveillance.
