logo
World's first portable mosquito ‘air defence' blasts biters with lasers to neutralise them on its own, inventor claims

World's first portable mosquito ‘air defence' blasts biters with lasers to neutralise them on its own, inventor claims

The Irish Sun08-07-2025
A MOSQUITO-busting laser that can supposedly kill up to 30 mozzies a second has been proposed by a Chinese firm.
The gadget, called Photon Matrix, is claimed to be able to detect the mosquito, as well as its angle and size, within just three milliseconds.
Advertisement
4
A mosquito from the side on a white surface
Credit: Getty
As soon as the mosquito is detected, a second laser beam is fired to kill it.
The laser will allegedly scan its surroundings to avoid firing at larger objects such as people and pets.
However, it is still a prototype - so it is unclear if it can really do the job just yet.
The company expects to make its first deliveries of the product in October this year.
Advertisement
READ MORE ON TECH
Although major production is forecast to begin by March 2026.
According to its inventor, Jim Wong from Changzhou, China, it is a 'prototype of the first mosquito air defence system capable of identifying and neutralizing mosquitoes using high-specification LiDAR technology.'
Photon Matrix can detect objects that are flying at a top speed of 3.3 feet (one meter) per second.
That parameter is good news for house flies, which will only be fatally hit by it if they are flying really slowly.
Advertisement
Most read in Tech
4
bitten-worlds-first-portable-mosquito-1008450849
Credit: Photon Matrix
Mosquitoes, however, typically fly at a much slower pace than house flies.
So it weeds out the nasty critters, without taking out harmless house flies.
'I was quoted £10,000 for a garden renovation but did it MYSELF for £1,000 using ChatGPT to show my kids what single mums can do'
To this end, Wong says the mini laser weapon will not harm humans or pets, and is safe for use indoors.
Advertisement
Wong is raising money for the project on crowdfunding site Indiegogo, and the campaign has already met the its initial goal,
M
osquitoes are responsible for over 700,000 deaths annual due to the diseases they spread -
including Malaria
, Dengue,
Chikungunya
, and Encephalitis.
According to the Indiegogo page for the device, the basic edition of Photon Matrix has a waterproof design and can be installed easily.
This leaves it best placed to sit by water, which tends to attract mosquitoes - especially in summer.
Advertisement
It can also be powered by a simple power bank or through a portable power station, according to the listing.
The compact device on display is said to have a range of 9.84 feet (3 meters) for the basic version.
However, the pro version can detect mozzies up to 19.6 feet (6 meters) away, according to the inventor.
Both the basic and pro versions have a scan angle of 90 degrees.
Advertisement
While the basic version is on offer for $468 (£345), the pro version is available for $668 (£492) - though these are early bird prices.
4
Man while applying insect repellent on his hand. Prevention against mosquito bite in tropical destination.
Credit: Getty
4
Dengue fever vector, mosquito biting hand.
Credit: Getty
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fears of Amazon price hike and MORE ads as company boss teases worrying change for shoppers
Fears of Amazon price hike and MORE ads as company boss teases worrying change for shoppers

The Irish Sun

time17 hours ago

  • The Irish Sun

Fears of Amazon price hike and MORE ads as company boss teases worrying change for shoppers

AMAZON has sparked concern that more ads could pop up on Alexa devices as it introduces new AI features to the popular voice assistant. The company's new AI supercharged Alexa is still rolling out, which users can pay for if they don't have a Prime membership. Advertisement 2 Alexa is the world's most famous digital voice assistant Credit: Getty 2 Alexa+ is still rolling out in the US with no update on when it'll land in the UK Credit: Getty Alexa+ is optional and costs $19.99 (£15) per month without a Prime subscription. But there could be even more ads on the way as Amazon looks to make its devices profitable. Currently, users already see some limited ads, such as on Echo Show displays. There's also the "By the way" feature that makes subtle suggestions to you based off what you ask Alexa. Advertisement Amazon chief Andy Jassy has now hinted other ads are in the works. "There will be opportunities, as people are engaging in more multiturn conversations [with Alexa Plus], to have advertising play a role to help people find discovery, and also as a lever to drive revenue," he said during a recent investor call. TechCrunch has speculated that this could mean paying extra for an ad-free tier of Alexa. But users have raged over the idea and mocked possible scenarios. Advertisement "When you tell it to turn on your lights, it'll turn on the lights and then give a 15 second advertisement for other lights you could buy on one joked on Reddit. "All I want it to do is provide random facts when I ask about them, play the music I ask it to and adjust the household settings I tell it to," another person commented. "I don't want suggestions and I sure as s*** won't be listening to ads." A third added: "They are a glorified Bluetooth speaker. Advertisement "I will throw mine in the trash before I suffer through a single ad." And a fourth said: "I already stopped watching prime because of the ads. I'm fine dropping Alexa too." There's still no word on when Alexa+ will be rolled out to other countries including the UK.

Archaeologists uncover 800-year-old bones with strange details & they offer a surprising insight into Aztec life
Archaeologists uncover 800-year-old bones with strange details & they offer a surprising insight into Aztec life

The Irish Sun

time18 hours ago

  • The Irish Sun

Archaeologists uncover 800-year-old bones with strange details & they offer a surprising insight into Aztec life

The discovery points at a potential link to the Aztec empire ANCIENT SECRETS Archaeologists uncover 800-year-old bones with strange details & they offer a surprising insight into Aztec life ARCHAEOLOGISTS have uncovered ancient bones that offer a surprising insight into the Aztec era. Historians noticed details on the remains, suggesting they may have served an unusual purpose. Advertisement 3 Details on ancient human remains found in South Texas suggest a potential link to Aztec life (stock image) Credit: Getty 3 Carvings on the bones suggest they were used as musical instruments Credit: Wikimedia Commons/Gary Todd Archaeologists carried out an in-depth analysis of 29 prehistoric human bones discovered along the southern Texas coast. Unusual markings on the skeletal remains suggest they may have carried out a purpose beyond death. Unusual details Historians suggested that the group of hunter-gatherers who once inhabited the area likely created music by transforming the human bones into instruments. Dr. Matthew Taylor, who works as a biological anthropologist at Georgia's Augusta University, identified a musical rasp fashioned from a human humerus while studying the artefacts. Advertisement IFLScience reported that the item, which was part of a museum collection, resembled an omichicahuaztli, which is an instrument that was used by pre-Hispanic Mexican cultures, including the Aztecs. The remains date back to the Late Prehistoric era (AD 700-1500) in North America, according to an in-depth analayis published in the International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. "Late Prehistoric South Texas (1300-1528 AD) was characterised by hunter-gatherer habitation," Dr. Taylor wrote. "Forager peoples lived in the region from Paleoindian times up to and beyond European contact and never adopted agriculture." Advertisement He added that inhabitants of southern Texas and the associated Gulf Coast "have been historically documented since AD 1528". The analysis of the 29 bones found that 27 were made from either the arm or the leg. 'Once in a century' Pompeii discovery as ancient luxury SPA is saved from ashes with thermal baths & stunning mosaic Meanwhile, the remaining two objects were constructed from rib bones. According to archaeologists, the instruments were typically crafted using what's known as the "groove-and-snap" method. Advertisement This involves sawing a groove around a bone's circumference before breaking it in half. "This process is labour intensive and represents hours of work," Dr. Taylor wrote. He emphasised the meticulous manual effort behind crafting these skeletal artifacts. Potential links Historical objects fashioned from human bone are often thought to signify practices like honouring ancestors or displaying war trophies. Advertisement However, Dr. Taylor pointed out that such interpretations don't align with other archaeological findings from the region. The musical rasp made from an upper arm bone featured 29 carefully carved notches and decorative geometric patterns. One of the most intriguing discoveries, this instrument appeared to have been played by scraping another object along the grooves. While unique to South Texas, similar instruments are well-documented in central Mexican histories. Advertisement Typically carved from human thigh bones, these objects are decorated with comparable designs. Dr. Taylor speculated the Texan rasp "may represent an emulation of Mexican religious practices." He pointed to a possible contact or influence between Indigenous tribes occupying the South Texas coast and the Aztec empire. "Whatever their original provenance, it is quite apparent that the Late Prehistoric inhabitants did not regard the handling of human remains as taboo," he concluded. Advertisement "Although some may wish to equate the presence of these artefacts with the existence of cannibalism, this report does not support or refute that hypothesis." More on archaeology The remains of a lost Roman city have been uncovered on a popular holiday island. And the lost tomb of a 1,700-year-old king was uncovered in Mayan temple. Plus, the eerie "hybrid" skull that belonged to a "half human, half neanderthal girl". Advertisement An ancient lost city from 3,500-years-ago that played home to the oldest civilization in the Americas' was uncovered in Peru. And AI has deciphered a hymn on a 4,000-year-old clay tablet, which is said unlock the mystery of the ancient city of Babylon.

Is AI making our brains lazy?
Is AI making our brains lazy?

RTÉ News​

timea day ago

  • RTÉ News​

Is AI making our brains lazy?

Have you ever googled something but couldn't remember the answer a short time later? Well, you're probably not alone. Multiple studies have shown that "digital amnesia" or the "Google effect" is a consequence of having information readily available at our fingertips. It happens because we don't commit the information to memory in the knowledge that we can easily look it up again. According to The Decision Lab, this bias exists not only for things we look up on internet search engines but for most information that is easily accessible on our computers or phones. For example, most of us can't remember friends, family members or work colleagues' phone numbers by heart. So how can we help our brains to remember information? "Writing is thinking," said Professor Barry O'Sullivan from the School of Computer Science & IT at UCC. Professor O'Sullivan believes there are learning benefits associated with Large Language Models (LLMs), but his view is that we should be applying a precautionary principle to them as its such early days. "If you're not the one doing the writing then you're not the one doing the thinking, so if you're a student or you're the employee, the writing really does need to be yours," he said. LLMs with chatbots or virtual assistant chatbots such as Gemini or ChatGPT, have been trained on enormous amounts of text and data and their systems are capable of understanding and generating human language. With these rapid advances in AI certain tasks are now easier, and when used effectively can save time and money, in our personal and working lives. However, there are concerns about critical thinking, creativity and problem solving. Some AI companies claim their models are capable of genuine reasoning, but there's ongoing debate over whether their "chain of thought" or "reasoning" is trustworthy. According to Professor Barry O'Sullivan, these claims "just aren't true." "These large language models don't reason the same way as human beings," he said. "They have pretty weak abilities to reason mathematically, to reason logically, so it really is the big stepping stone, but it's always been the big stepping stone in AI." he added. He cautions people and workers to use these tools as an assistant, and as a sometimes "unreliable assistant". Professor O'Sullivan also warns AI generated answers could contain a biased view of the world, that is when human brain power is needed to apply sense, reasoning and logic to the data. The Google Search Engine was launched in 1998 and is considered a narrow form of AI. Since then, there have been many studies highlighting how the "Google Effect" is a real phenomenon and its impact on how we remember and learn. Launches such as Open AI's chatbot ChatGPT, and more recently Google's AI Overviews and AI Mode search are all relatively new, meaning there has been less time to study the effects. A new study by researchers at the media lab at Massachusetts institute of Technology (MIT) "Your Brain on ChatGPT", divided 54 people aged 18 to 39 into three groups to write essays. One group used Open AI's ChatGPT, one used Google's Search Engine, and the remaining group used no tools; they had to rely purely on brain power. While it was a very small study and in a very specific location (Boston), it found that of the three groups, ChatGPT users had the lowest brain engagement. While in the brain-only group, researchers found they were more engaged and curious, and claimed ownership and expressed higher satisfaction with their essays. The study suggests the use of LLMs, such as ChatGPT which is what they used but is similar to other LLMs, could actually harm learning, especially for younger users. "The MIT study is one source, but there isn't any definitive evidence of that, however the growing amount of evidence does seem to be tipping on that side of the argument that the more we rely on very sophisticated reasoning systems that can automate the process of writing, the less we are thinking," said Professor O'Sullivan. "People should remember that writing is thinking, so when you when you give up the writing to somebody else, you're not thinking anymore and that does have a consequence." Is digital dependence shaping our brains? Whether in education or in the workplace, the use of AI is becoming increasingly prevalent. In a nutshell it does appear to be shaping our brains, but the debate continues over whether it's happening in a negative or a positive way. As a professor in UCC, Mr O'Sullivan ponders over whether table quizzes are as popular as they used to be, and how young people view need-to-know information. "You often hear students saying, "Well I don't really need to know that because if I was out on the job I'd Google it, and wouldn't that be just fine?" "It is to some extent fine for some pieces of information, but it's also important to know why the information is that way, or what the origin is, or why things are that way," Professor O'Sullivan said. There is a skill shift happening with how we and our brains engage with new technology. This is why human judgement and decision making is more important than ever according to Claire Cogan, behavioural scientist and founder of Behaviour Wise. "There is an effect (from AI) on how the brain learns, so there's an impact on brain health. Some of that is relevant to employers, and its very relevant to individuals," said Ms Cogan. AI is useful in the workplace when it can automate mundane or time-consuming tasks such as generating content and extracting key points from large amounts of data. Ms Cogan noted the theory is when people talk about the pluses and minuses, AI should free up time to allow people to do other things. "So as long as that balance is there, it's a good thing. If that balance isn't there, then it's simply going to have a negative impact," she stated. Referring to the MIT study, she assessed it found evidence that using AI can slow attention and have an impact on the working memory. "The brain will go for shortcuts, if there's an easier way to get to something, that's the way the brain will choose," said Ms Cogan. "However, there are still areas where human intelligence far outweighs anything AI can do, particularly around judgment and decision making, and they're going to become more and more important," she stated. "That's the side driven by people, so there's a whole new skill where people are going to have to learn how to judge when to use AI, how to use it, how to direct it, and how to manage it," she said. Does reliance on AI impact on critical thinking in the workplace? Since the late 90s people have been using search engines to find facts. With the advances and sophistication of AI people are becoming more wary, with real concerns about misinformation, disinformation and deep fakes. So while we are relying on AI tools to help find information, it's more important than ever that we engage core human skills in terms of decision making. Ms Cogan believes in an ideal world teachers and lecturers would be almost preparing people for what is going to happen in five or more years. "It's a particular skill to know when and when not to use AI, just teaching the value in decision making because ultimately the overall goal or the aim is defined by the person. There is a skill to making a good decision, and in a work context to know how to arrive at the best decision, that in itself is a whole topic in behavioural science," she said. What's next for our brains? "For our own sake, we need to nurture our brains and we need to look after our brain health," said Ms Cogan. "The best way we can do that is by remaining actively involved in that whole learning process," she said. The authors of the MIT study urged media to avoid certain vocabulary when talking about the paper and impact of generative AI on the brain. These terms included "brain scans", "LLMs make you stop thinking", "impact negatively", "brain damage" and "terrifying findings". It is very early days when it comes to learning about how these technological advances will impact on us in the long term. Maybe in the near future, AI will be able to summarise and analyse data from upcoming studies to tell us if it is rewiring our brains or making them lazy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store