logo
Agricultural contaminants in drinking water linked to higher preterm birth rates: Study

Agricultural contaminants in drinking water linked to higher preterm birth rates: Study

The Hill25-06-2025
Exposure to a common agricultural contaminant in drinking water, even in small doses, may be linked to increased risks of preterm birth, a new study has found.
The pollutant, called nitrate, is also associated with low birth weight in infants whose mothers consumed affected water during pregnancy, according to the study, published on Wednesday in PLOS Water.
While nitrate is a naturally occurring compound that is necessary to plants and animals for survival, its widespread use in inorganic fertilizers has increased the compound's presence in the environment.
When excess nitrate is consumed by humans, usually via drinking water contaminated by agricultural runoff, the chemical can interfere with the blood's ability to carry oxygen, the study explained.
'There is no safe level of prenatal nitrate exposure,' author Jason Semprini, an assistant professor in public health economics at Des Moines University, said in a statement.
While the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set a maximum threshold for the compound's presence in drinking water in 1992, there has been no official recognition of adverse birth outcomes as an associated outcome.
As such, Semprini set out to evaluate possible risks — evaluating 357,741 birth records from Iowa from 1970 to 1988. Linking each birth to county-level nitrate measurements taken within 30 days of conception, he observed that concentrations rose about 8 percent per year.
After controlling for seasonal variables and other factors, Semprini found that early prenatal exposure above 0.1 milligrams per liter — just 1 percent of the current EPA limit — was linked to a rise in preterm birth incidence.
Meanwhile, early prenatal exposure to nitrate at levels greater than 5 milligrams per liter — half of the EPA limit — was associated with an increased likelihood of low birthweight, according to the study.
The research identified no additional risk on birth outcomes at elevated nitrate levels: those greater than the federal regulatory bar.
Although Semprini acknowledged that the scope of the study was limited, due to its focus on one state, he said that more recent data from other states and sources could help bolster the strength of the connection.
Going forward, he expressed hopes that the research could help inform the reevaluation of current federal standards, which remain unchanged since 1992 — despite a surge in nitrate levels in groundwater nationwide.
The current threshold, Semprini continued, could be 'insufficient for protecting the in-utero transmission of water-based nitrate during the first trimester of pregnancy.'
While cities nationwide have implemented pilot programs to reduce nitrate contamination in water, such solutions can be expensive and would benefit from 'rigorous cost-benefit analyses' that offer quantifiable support for these initiatives, according to the study.
Estimating that the impact from prenatal exposure to nitrate is equivalent to about 15 percent of the harm caused by cigarettes, he pointed out that these pollutants do not receive 15 percent of the attention granted to smoking.
'Ignoring the potential harm from lower levels of prenatal nitrate exposure, the current regulatory standards are not adequately protecting America's mothers or children,' Semprini added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Legionnaires' outbreak in New York grows to 90 cases, 3 deaths
Legionnaires' outbreak in New York grows to 90 cases, 3 deaths

UPI

time2 hours ago

  • UPI

Legionnaires' outbreak in New York grows to 90 cases, 3 deaths

Health officials in New York said a Legionnaires' disease outbreak in Central Harlem has now sickened 90 people and caused three deaths. File Photo by SHOU SHENG/EPA A Legionnaires' disease outbreak in Central Harlem has now sickened 90 people and caused three deaths, New York City health officials said Tuesday. The update comes just a few days after the city's health department proposed new rules for the testing of building cooling towers, suspected origin of the outbreak. Cooling towers are large rooftop devices that release mist into the air to help cool buildings. But if the water inside the tower becomes too warm or isn't disinfected properly, bacteria called Legionella can grow. People can get sick when they inhale this contaminated mist. A Department of Health spokesperson told CNN that the proposed rules "were in development well before the Legionnaires' cluster in Central Harlem." Under current city law, building owners must register and maintain their cooling towers, which are regularly inspected, CNN said. The new proposal would set strict timelines for testing, require analysis of samples by state-certified labs and impose fines for noncompliance. Financial penalties have not been specified. Right now, failing to follow maintenance rules can bring fines of $500 to $2,000. Still, enforcement could be difficult. Inspections have dropped sharply, city data shows, with fewer than half as many in 2024 compared to 2017, when the city began tracking numbers, according to Gothamist, a non-profit newsroom affiliated with WNYC public radio. The cluster was announced July 25. Health officials say all working cooling towers in the affected area have been tested, and those with Legionella have been cleaned. Legionnaires' disease is a type of pneumonia, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says. Symptoms can include: Cough, fever, headaches, muscles aches and shortness of breath. The infection can be treated with antibiotics. Left untreated, it may lead to serious complications like lung failure or death. Each year, around 6,000 cases are reported in the U.S., the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) says. Health officials suspect the true number is higher, however, because it can be hard to tell Legionnaires' apart from other types of pneumonia. More information The Mayo Clinic has more on symptoms and causes of Legionnaires' disease. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Study Reveals PTSD, Depression Spike After East Palestine Train Disaster
Study Reveals PTSD, Depression Spike After East Palestine Train Disaster

Newsweek

time10 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Study Reveals PTSD, Depression Spike After East Palestine Train Disaster

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Researchers have found that cases of depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and lack of trust in public officials are rising roughly two-and-a-half years after a Norfolk Southern train derailed and spilled toxic chemicals in East Palestine, Ohio. Why It Matters On February 3, 2023, a freight train carrying toxic chemicals—including vinyl chloride, butyl acrylate, ethylhexyl acrylate and ethylene glycol monobutyl—derailed in East Palestine about a quarter mile west of the Ohio-Pennsylvania state line and spilled toxins in a waterway feeding into the Ohio River. National attention was paid to the incident due to nefarious effects on locals and the broader environment. Then-President Joe Biden and his administration were ridiculed for their response, accused of not publicly releasing concerning health information while not providing Americans with sufficient information. President Donald Trump, in the infancy of his third presidential campaign, traveled to East Palestine shortly after the derailment to show support for the community and touted the impact of his visit shortly thereafter on social media. What To Know Researchers who co-authored what they described as the most comprehensive study yet on the aftermath of the derailment spoke with Newsweek about their findings, published Tuesday in the Journal of Traumatic Stress. The study, titled "Prevalence of PTSD and Major Depression in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia 9 Months After the East Palestine Train Derailment," was funded in part by the National Institutes of Health. The study correlates upticks in mental disorders among potentially exposed residents of Ohio, Pennsylvania and West Virginia roughly nine months post-derailment. The cross-sectional study, consisting of a nonprobability sample of 1,000 adults living within 65 miles of the derailment site and who completed a self-administered clinical survey interview, assessed PTSD and major depression, physical health symptoms, negative derailment-related beliefs and experiences, and preexisting psychiatric risk factors. Ohio EPA and EPA contractors collect soil and air samples from the derailment site on March 9, 2023 in East Palestine, Ohio. Ohio EPA and EPA contractors collect soil and air samples from the derailment site on March 9, 2023 in East Palestine, peer-reviewed study's most notable findings show upticks, including: Approximately 15 percent of respondents met criteria for presumptive PTSD symptoms, more than twice the national average. Approximately 13 percent met criteria for major depression, about 60 percent greater than the national average. About half of respondents within proximity of the disaster have reported new or worsening physical symptoms including coughing, fatigue and eye irritation. Those living closer to the scene of the accident reported higher incidents. More than half of residents said they had little to no confidence in public officials during and after the incident, expressing a distrust of public officials and uncertainty about chemical exposure. Effects of Disasters On Mental Health "What we noticed was in that aftermath of the derailment, in addition to these concerns around exposure that were being reported by a lot of news sources at the time—there was a lot of initial data to suggest that these people were reporting physical and mental health problems as well," study co-author Dr. Cameron Pugach of the Medical University of South Carolina told Newsweek. "So, we were really motivated in this study to provide the first kind of comprehensive investigation and in a large-scale mental health survey to kind of quantify the extent to which people were reporting these mental health problems and these physical health problems, and the extent to which people were actually reporting these levels of concerns specifically associated with with toxic substance exposure," Pugach continued. Along with the mental health consequences, he noted how nearly three-quarters (73.9 percent) of respondents were concerned about potential toxic exposure, while another 92.1 percent were wary about associated health problems. Also, about half the respondents reported at least one physical health problem following the derailment—with respiratory and gastrointestinal problems being the most common. "When you look at like national level data, for example on PTSD, the rates that are being reported in the sample in and around East Palestine are over twice the prevalence of the national estimates of PTSD in the U.S., so they're quite elevated," Pugach said. "I think it's pretty comparable to what you'd see in other kinds of disasters like this." Aaron Reuben, study co-author and an assistant professor of neuropsychology at the University of Virginia, said these types of mental health surveys became more customary following major disasters and cultural events, like the September 11 attacks or Flint water crisis—the latter of which also resulted in long-lasting psychiatric problems, including increases in reported PTSD and depression. "There's an interesting phenomenon with this event, which is that it was very dramatic. It was highly publicized," Reuben told Newsweek via phone. "And if you lived in the area, because they burned so many tanks worth of chemicals, you know they were worried about explosion. The sky was filled with these extremely dramatic plumes, what we know to be toxic that you would absolutely not want to be exposed to." He said evacuation efforts made within a mile of the site, coupled with burning tanks and broader efforts to mitigate the impacts that some studies ascertained reached some 14 percent of the United States, led to a lot of concerns. "We had a lot of dispersion, which means it could be a lot of people exposed to very little or some people exposed to very lot—and we just had no idea," Reuben said. "What we are seeing in our survey today is that uncertainty is leading to a lot of concern, a lot of feeling like you're having physical health symptoms that are the kind you would experience if you had been exposed. "Then, a lot of mental health problems that actually are significant and numerous and severe enough that if you were to walk into a clinic, we would diagnose you with a condition that needs to be treated. What we're seeing is a really unique event." Reuben said the extent to which he and fellow researchers think people will recover is going to vary person to person, adding that he wouldn't be confident that "anything would have changed" if they conducted a similar survey a year from now. Pugach said that long-term longitudinal research that samples PTSD, from a general standpoint, shows that once developed, PTSD is a fairly chronic condition among people who develop it, and it tends to kind of stick around unless people are actively seeking trauma-focused treatment. One prong of the research is finding how to help the people who have already experienced the trend in and around East Palestine. The second is how researchers can use this data to inform and improve responses to disasters when they happen in the future in other communities, he said. "Improving kind of the credibility and the quality of information people are receiving in the short-term aftermath of disasters like this is going to help, I think, address people's uncertainty around like exposure itself," Pugach said. "And we know that those factors are associated with the extent to which people are reporting things like PTSD and depression. "I think receiving that quality information from trusted officials is really going to help people in kind of managing their symptoms in the aftermath of these kinds of events." What People Are Saying Study co-author Dean Kilpatrick, of the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, at the Medical University of South Carolina, in a statement: "In the future we may need to attend more in advance to limit psychological uncertainty after these events. Providing communities with timely and credible information about the likelihood of exposures should be considered front-line responses." What Happens Next A July 2025 update from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) stated that as restoration nears completion, the cleanup area of the derailment site is shrinking and crews are assessing waterways for remaining oily sheens and to determine what additional cleanup may be needed. The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) issued a Research Opportunity Announcement (ROA) for organizations to participate in a study to address the immediate and longer-term health concerns from exposures to chemicals released during the train derailment. The proposed settlement (lodged consent decree) between the U.S. and Norfolk Southern includes creating a community health program to provide medical monitoring and mental health services. Groundwater, surface water and drinking water around the scene continue to be regularly sampled, per the EPA.

How the Energy secretary picked a fight with climate science
How the Energy secretary picked a fight with climate science

Politico

timea day ago

  • Politico

How the Energy secretary picked a fight with climate science

The Department of Energy isn't traditionally the federal government's vanguard for grand debates about climate research. But Energy Secretary Chris Wright is trying to change that — in a bid to shore up President Donald Trump's rollback of climate regulations. The most striking result to date is a DOE report issued last month that questions the traditional underpinnings of climate science. The report, inked by a tag team of climate contrarians handpicked by the secretary, came out on the same day that the Environmental Protection Agency announced it would overturn the Obama-era legal doctrine that undergirds most federal climate rules. Wright, a former fracking services executive who also serves as second-in-command of the White House's National Energy Dominance Council, personally gathered the researchers for his climate-questioning squad just weeks into the job, writes my colleague Benjamin Storrow. They included Roy Spencer, a former NASA scientist; Judith Curry, a climatologist and retired professor at the Georgia Institute of Technology; John Christy, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville; Steven Koonin, a former chief scientist for BP who also served as an undersecretary at the Energy Department during the Obama administration; and Canadian environmental economist Ross McKitrick. Each researcher has publicly questioned some of the broader findings accepted by the world's climate scientists, including numerous previously published federal reports. And several have worked to downplay the risks of fossil-fuel-driven climate change. Those proved strong credentials for Wright, who has long preached that fossil fuels can solve global energy poverty. He's accused mainstream scientists, and the media, of overhyping the risks of a planet rapidly heating up. Carbon dioxide is a 'life-giving plant food,' Wright said in a podcast earlier this month with Wall Street Journal columnist Kim Strassel. 'It does absorb infrared radiation so we can have a real dialogue about too much of it or too little of it … but calling it a pollutant is just nuts,' he said. (Note: Other kinds of 'plant food' — for example, nitrogen and phosphorus — are also pollutants when found in excessive quantities.) By May, Wright's team had compiled a 141-page report questioning the veracity of climate models, the threat of sea-level rise and the connection between burning fossil fuels and extreme weather, Ben writes. It withheld the report's release until last month to coincide with EPA's proposal to reverse the 'endangerment finding,' its 2009 legal conclusion that greenhouse gases are a harmful pollutant that the agency must regulate. The administration hasn't yet spelled out how widely it will deploy the DOE report in its coming legal and regulatory battles over Trump's efforts to smooth the path for fossil fuels — although the EPA proposal cited the report 16 times, Ben notes. But if the study was meant to disrupt mainstream science — or spawn what Strassel has hailed as a 'healthy, vigorous debate' over the research — it doesn't seem to have done that. Instead, other academics and scientists in the field have accused the team of cherry-picking or misrepresenting past research to support its favored conclusion. Andrew Dessler, a climate scientist at Texas A&M University, panned the study on the social media site X as 'a law brief from attorneys defending their client, carbon dioxide.' It's Monday — thank you for tuning in to POLITICO's Power Switch. I'm your host, Heather Richards. Power Switch is brought to you by the journalists behind E&E News and POLITICO Energy. Send your tips, comments, questions to hrichards@ Today in POLITICO Energy's podcast: Kelsey Tamborrino and Alex Guillén break down the Trump administration's latest attacks on wind and solar power. Power Centers Interior gets 'hostile' on windTrump's escalating moves against wind energy have alarmed advocates of renewable energy and free markets, Ian M. Stevenson writes. Since mid-July, the Interior Department has halted spending on projects and required high-level signoff for any action on renewables. Administration officials have said renewable power is an unreliable source of electricity, and Trump has often targeted 'windmills' during attacks on former President Joe Biden's energy policy. 'It's a hostile way to kill and bottleneck these projects,' Ashna Aggarwal, director of analysis at the research firm Greenline Insights, told Ian. 'Targeting wind specifically seems to be an agenda of this administration.' Trump 2.0's first FERC chair exitsMark Christie came in as chair of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in lockstep with Trump's vision of energy dominance, even if he was at odds with the White House on executive power in his tenure that ended Friday, Francisco 'A.J.' Camacho writes. He stepped in, for example, to write letters on behalf of FERC staff when the Trump administration asked federal workers to justify their jobs. 'He's no shrinking violet,' Albert Pollard, a former state lawmaker in Virginia, said of Christie. The exit of Republican Christie leaves FERC with a 2-1 Democratic majority. POLITICO on Friday reported that Trump plans to elevate Democratic Commissioner David Rosner to chair. If Rosner gets the nod, he could be temporary. The White House is waiting for Senate confirmation of two Republican commissioners. Either one could be named chair by Trump. The AI race gets politicalThe push by companies like OpenAI and Google to win the artificial intelligence race has led to a proliferation of energy-hungry data centers across the country. The rise of these server farms has sparked fierce battles from Virginia to Arizona and beyond. City and county governments are grappling with how to balance new jobs and new revenue streams against the strain data centers put on water and energy resources, Jordan Wolman and Lisa Kashinsky report. The surge is proving polarizing, particularly in northern Virginia — considered the tip of the spear on this issue with the world's largest and fastest-growing data center market. And across the U.S., the debate is inching up the ballot as state lawmakers race to regulate and governors rush to embrace a new economic boon. In Other News Cleaner power: A microgrid run on lithium-ion batteries and liquid hydrogen has replaced diesel backup generators in a California town that frequently lost power because of wildfires. Reuse: Aluminum recycling is a faster and less energy-intensive way for U.S. companies to get around a 50 percent tariff on imports, metals executives and analysts say. Subscriber Zone A showcase of some of our best subscriber content. Artificial intelligence could need electricity equal to half of the nation's nuclear power fleet by 2030, according to a new analysis. The majority owner of the coal-fired Four Corners power plant in New Mexico plans to extend its use rather than retire it in 2031 to help avert an electricity reliability crunch in the West. Republicans in Congress are again looking to place a federal fee on electric vehicles to boost the Highway Trust Fund. One person is dead, another is unaccounted for and at least 10 are injured following an explosion at a U.S. Steel plant near Pittsburgh. That's it for today, folks! Thanks for reading.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store