Top Marine calls for affordable, lethal and autonomous systems
Marine Corps Commandant Eric Smith told the audience at the annual Modern Day Marine exposition Thursday that the force design decisions made over the past six years have put new capabilities in the hands of crucial formations, such as the Marine Expeditionary Unit, or MEU.
'This is about more than ships, it's about deterrence and denial,' Smith said. 'That is why the 3.0 [Amphibious Ready Group] MEU matters, it gives our leaders options.'
A 3.0 presence means a three-ship ARG-MEU, each deployed out of the East Coast, one out of the West Coast and a third on episodic deployments out of Okinawa, Japan.
Top Marine's deployment plans face familiar wrinkle: Inert Navy ships
An ARG includes an assault ship, a landing ship with helicopter platform and a dock landing ship. The MEU contains a battalion landing team, ground combat element, aviation combat element and combat logistics element to form a Marine Air Ground Task Force, or MAGTF.
To achieve that, the Corps needs 31 amphibious ships at a readiness level of 80%. Demand is higher from combatant commands, Smith said. The demand is more than five ARG MEUs, the most requested asset behind the Carrier Strike Group.
Readiness levels hover at around 50%, Smith said in early April at the Navy League's annual Sea-Air-Space Exposition. That's because following two decades of land-based wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Corps had largely not maintained its fleet. Money for maintenance and shipbuilding went to those wars instead.
And Smith wants more capabilities for those MEUs as the service battles an amphibious ship shortage.
'What I need is affordable, lethal, autonomous, light and I can fund at budget time,' Smith said.
Some of those new developments include the Marine Air Defense Integrated System, or MADIS, and its lighter version, the L-MADIS.
The system still needs more autonomous solutions to get after a major threat – drone swarms.
'The big thing that really keeps me up at night is swarms,' Col. Andrew Konicki, head of ground-based air defense for Marine Corps Systems Command, said Wednesday.
Striking those threats from aboard ship or on shore is vital to keeping Marines alive.
'That is how we're going to say ahead of the adversary, with autonomy,' Smith said.
Thirteen of 21 Light Marine Air Defense Integrated Systems, or L-MADIS, have been fielded over the past three years.
That light system was fielded to the 3rd Littoral Anti-Air Battalion, 3rd Marine Littoral Regiment in 2024. It handles group I and II drone threats.
Marine Expeditionary Units have used the system when crossing various maritime chokepoints, and it has proved effective in the maritime environment, despite the system being built mainly as a ground-based air defense system, Konicki said.
Seven more of the larger MADIS system will be fielded by September, bringing the Corps total to 20, with full fielding expected by 2033.
That's for air defense. For a more offensive approach, the Corps expects to receive four-dozen mobile fires platforms, dubbed the Navy-Marine Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System, or NMESIS.
The NMESIS is made up of a Naval Strike Missile mounted on a Joint Light Tactical Vehicle platform with semi-autonomous and autonomous capabilities to launch remotely.
The 3rd Marine Littoral Regiment, a newly created unit for fighting in the littorals, or waters near land, received the first six NMESIS in November.
The Hawaii-based unit formed in 2021. The service then established the 12th MLR on Okinawa, Japan, with plans for a third rotational MLR on Guam.
Six of the NMESIS systems are set to field with 12th MLR beginning March 2026.
All these moves and the push for new, better equipment have a singular aim, he said.
'Modernization with a clear purpose – to keep Marines lethal and survivable,' Smith said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
2 hours ago
- Gizmodo
DARPA Is Taking Its AI Fighter Jet Program to the Next Level
Imagine Top Gun without pilots. Not exactly summer blockbuster material. But that is what the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has in mind for the future of the military. According to an announcement spotted by The Register, the agency recently handed out a multi-million dollar contract that will push forward its autonomous pilot program that will eventually deploy planes into warfare without a human being behind the control stick. The contract, announced earlier this week, was awarded to Systems and Technology Research, a real company and not a front with the most vague name imaginable, and will provide the company with $11.3 million to work on DARPA's Artificial Intelligence Reinforcements (AIR) program. The contract is for phase two of the project, which DARPA describes as 'Developing AI-driven algorithmic approaches which enable real-time distributed autonomous tactical execution within uncertain, dynamic, and complex operational environments.' Which seems like it's probably a very technical way of saying 'operating in the air.' The expectation of the agency is that Systems and Technology Research and any other contractor participating in the program develop these systems using existing sensor and weapons technologies. They will be required, through a series of tests and simulations, to eventually meet some currently undefined benchmarks that show the capability of producing 'an uncrewed combat aerial vehicle.' According to DARPA, the AIR program aims to develop 'AI-driven tactical autonomy' that can eventually deploy unmanned combat aerial vehicles (UCAV) as part of air combat missions. The program is something of a stage two to the agency's Air Combat Evolution initiative, which previously managed to allow AI to take control of an F-16 mid-flight and engage in dogfights against human pilots. An AI system developed as part of ACE previously beat human pilots in virtual dogfights, as well. Systems and Technology Research appears to be the first company to receive an invitation into phase two of DARPA's program, suggesting it has already completed the first stated goal of 'Creating fast and accurate models that capture uncertainty and automatically improve with more data.' According to The Register, defense contracting giants Lockheed Martin and BAE Systems have also been involved in the first stages of the program, but have not been confirmed to be a part of phase two, which will see DARPA shrink its group of prospective contractors from six to four. DARPA has its eyes on the skies with this program, but it is also going autonomous in the seas. Earlier this week, it announced the christening of the USX-1 Defiant, a first-of-its-kind autonomous, unmanned surface vessel, and announced that it was preparing it for the launch of its first at-sea demonstration.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Statement from CUPE on Air Canada's Request for Binding Arbitration
TORONTO, August 15, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Air Canada Component of CUPE has respectfully urged Employment Minister Patty Hajdu not to intervene pursuant to section 107 of the Canada Labour Code thereby permitting collective bargaining to continue and allowing the parties to negotiate a resolution. The integrity of the collective bargaining process depends on allowing the parties to reach a resolution through free and fair negotiations, without undue interference. Rather than continuing to negotiate in good faith, Air Canada appears to have anticipated government intervention and has opted to suspend meaningful discussions, contrary to its legal obligation to bargain in good faith. On August 11, 2025, the Union submitted a revised wage proposal, which included the withdrawal of its long-standing position seeking the same wage adjustment previously provided by Air Canada to its pilots. Despite this significant concession, Air Canada declined to meaningfully engage with the proposal and did not present a counter-proposal. On August 12, 2025, the Union made additional and substantial modifications to its wage position. The Union did not receive a response to its proposals, instead, it learned for the first time, when meeting with Minister Hajdu on August 12, 2025, that it had been rejected. On August 12, 2025, Air Canada unilaterally declared an impasse and withdrew from the bargaining table. It has not returned. On August 12, 2025, unbeknownst to the Union, the Company made an extraordinary and premature request to the Minister seeking the application of section 107 to prevent a strike or lockout. It is clear from Air Canada's submissions to the Minister that it had planned to withdraw from bargaining and ask the Minister to interfere with the bargaining process. Early on August 13, 2025, given Air Canada's refusal to bargain, the Union issued notice of its intent to commence a legal strike beginning Saturday, August 16, 2025. Within minutes, Air Canada served a lockout notice. The Union submits that the appropriate course of action is for Air Canada to return to the table and resume good faith bargaining. Accordingly, Air Canada's request for ministerial intervention under section 107 should be firmly rejected. The mere prospect of ministerial intervention has had a chilling effect on Air Canada's obligation to bargain in good faith. Air Canada's request for intervention should be denied. Such a decision would reaffirm the principles of free collective bargaining and compel Air Canada to return to the bargaining table – where it ought to be – and engage meaningfully in negotiations, where it is likely that the Parties may be able to reach an agreement. View source version on Contacts Hugh PouliotCUPE Communications613-818-0067hpouliot@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
New York Times
3 hours ago
- New York Times
As Strike Looms, Air Canada's Flight Attendants Reject Call for Arbitration
As thousands of air passengers in Canada and around the world scrambled to adjust travel plans ahead of a potential strike by Air Canada's flight attendants, the country's labor minister asked the workers' union if it was open to government arbitration to avert a walkout. Patty Hajdu, the minister, gave the union until noon Eastern time on Friday to respond to a request from Air Canada to settle the labor dispute through binding arbitration. Government-mandated arbitration is normally used to end long and disruptive walkouts, not to block a strike before it begins. Hugh Pouliot, a spokesman for the Canadian Union of Public Employees, of which Air Canada's flight attendants are members, said it would reject arbitration. 'We will not surrender our constitutionally protected right to strike,' he said. Ms. Hajdu did not indicate what she would do if the union rejected the airline's latest attempt at arbitration. She has continually urged the two sides to resume direct negotiations, which broke down over wages and the union's demand that the company pay attendants for the hours worked before planes take off and after flights land, known as groundwork. Arbitrators rarely introduce major new changes — like groundwork compensation — in contracts they impose. Air Canada began canceling flights on Thursday, after the union issued a notice that it intended to strike at 12:01 a.m. on Saturday. The airline responded with a similar notice, saying that it planned to lock out the flight attendants at the same time. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
