Critical mass: Why is Trump's America anti-science?
Simply, thousands of scientists and their projects are finding themselves without federal funds, or soon will. Even those whose grants survive will face intense scrutiny of their compliance with the agency's 'new standards'. To put it another way: American science is facing collapse.
The dismantling of US science continues apace. The latest blow is massive cuts to the budget of the National Science Foundation (NSF), which provides funding for just about all areas of science in the country. Incredibly, it seems the Trump administration plans to allow NSF to fund just five areas of science, identified as priorities: artificial intelligence, quantum information science, biotechnology, nuclear energy, and translational science (which converts basic research into applications of human benefit, especially in health). Previously the NSF had 37 divisions, along with an annual budget of $4bn. Trump wants to cut that by 55%.
It's no surprise that many US scientists are looking abroad to continue their research. Some have already moved; others are drawing up plans or exploring options. In a survey conducted by the journal Nature in March, 75% of the 1,600 US researchers polled said they were considering moving their research out of the country. Of course it's unlikely that anything like that proportion will do so, but the number is worth repeating: despite the immense personal and professional disruption entailed, an astonishing three in four consider that it might be worth the pain. Unsurprisingly, many of those are early-career researchers.
Who can blame them? 'This is a critical moment in our careers, and it's been thrown into turmoil in a matter of weeks,' said one young researcher in the Nature poll, who has had his grant cancelled and is now looking for work in Canada. 'Don't want to leave, but what's the alternative?', asked another. Science magazine has presented heartbreaking profiles of younger researchers whose futures currently seem in ruins. One, investigating how social factors influence the healthcare that women in racially diverse communities receive for breast and cervical cancer, has had grants abruptly terminated. 'I feel like it's kind of a personal attack against me [and] the work that I'm doing', she said.
Another, working on the lung disease Valley Fever, which kills thousands of Americans each year, has had her postdoctoral position terminated. She is now looking for a position in Europe or Canada, which will mean leaving behind friends, networks and family. 'It's like I have to choose between my life and my career,' she said. The jobs platform run by Nature Careers has 32% more applications for jobs abroad submitted by US researchers between January and March 2025 than during the same period in 2024.
Europe is an obvious destination, and European governments seem eager not to pass up the opportunity. While some have publicly deplored the assaults on US science, they can't be blind to the potential benefit of an influx of expertise. In March, ministers from 13 countries including France, Germany, Spain and Austria signed a letter to the European Commission calling for it to welcome 'brilliant talents from abroad who might suffer from research interference and ill-motivated and brutal funding cuts'.
Several universities in France, Belgium and elsewhere have pledged new funds for postdocs, PhD students and others, open to all international scientists, but clearly aimed at the US. The UK will soon announce a £50m scheme of grants and relocation funds for international researchers.
It isn't mere opportunism to capitalise on a US brain drain; there is a genuine wish to offer solidarity and succour to those who can legitimately be considered academic refugees. The resonances with the way the UK, US and Scandinavian countries sought positions for Jewish scientists leaving Nazi Germany when Hitler's racial laws excluded them from academic life in the mid-1930s are unmistakable.
In a poignant turnaround, the German Max Planck Society, the government-funded agency that runs 84 research institutes throughout the country, has launched a transatlantic programme that, among other things, will provide posts for young US researchers in its institutes. Even China has been posting messages on social media encouraging US scientists to 'pursue career development and entrepreneurship in Shenzhen'.
US science has long led the world. 'Right now, however, the administration seems hell-bent on damaging, rather than fostering, this crucial source of American strength,' says former MIT president Rafael Reif. As national self-harm goes, it's right up there with Brexit.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
3 hours ago
- Daily Record
Moon to turn red this week in best Strawberry Moon until 2043
Your best chance to see it will be at dusk The full Moon this week will appear unusual for people across the UK thanks to a phenomenon that won't be seen as well again until 2043. June's full Moon is known as the Strawberry Moon because it is the time of year, in North America, when wild strawberries were harvested. And this year the Strawberry Moon will live up to its name and could take on a red tinge. That's because the Moon will be the lowest we will see until 2043 - staying close to the horizon after it rises as a full Moon on June 10 and 11. The fact it is lower on the horizon will mean that, to people looking from the UK, it will take on a red tinge. When the Moon hangs low on the horizon, its light has to travel through a much thicker slice of Earth's atmosphere than when it's overhead. That extra distance does two things: Molecules of nitrogen, oxygen, plus tiny aerosols in the air scatter short-wavelength light (violet, blue, green) far more efficiently than long-wavelength light (orange, red). The longer the light's journey through that haze, the more of the blues are stripped away, leaving mainly reds and oranges to reach your eyes. Dust, smoke, and pollution: Close to the ground, the air contains more dust, water vapour, and human-made pollutants. These larger particles selectively absorb and scatter light, too, but they do it in a way that further mutes the blues and greens while letting the warmer colours through. Put those two effects together and the Moon takes on a coppery or crimson tint whenever it's near the horizon. The same physics explains why sunsets are red — and why a 'blood Moon' during a lunar eclipse looks red: all of the sunlight reaching the eclipsed Moon has been filtered through Earth's thick, dusty atmosphere at sunrise and sunset around the planet. The name Strawberry Moon comes from Algonquin and other Native American traditions, as well as old European naming systems. It marks the start of the strawberry harvesting season in parts of North America. Early colonists adopted and passed on this term. For the UK, the full Strawberry Moon on June 11, 2025, will be best seen in the evening of June 10 at moonrise, rather than on the morning of June 11 when it's technically 100% illuminated. Moonrise on June 10 will be between 9pm and 9.30pm and the Moon will be full in the morning on June 11 at 8.43am - after sunrise. The Moon will trace its lowest path of the year, so rising at dusk on June 10 gives it its most dramatic and reddish appearance. At meridian transit (its highest point at night), it'll only reach about 10°–12° above the horizon - about two fists held above the horizon.
Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Exactly when to see the red Strawberry Moon in best show until 2043
The full moon this week will be unusual thanks to a rare phenomenon The full Moon this week will appear unusual for people across the UK thanks to a phenomenon that won't be seen as well again until 2043. June's full Moon is known as the Strawberry Moon because it is the time of year, in North America, when wild strawberries were harvested. And this year the Strawberry Moon will live up to its name and could take on a red tinge. That's because the Moon will be the lowest we will see until 2043 - staying close to the horizon after it rises as a full Moon on June 10 and 11. The fact it is lower on the horizon will mean that, to people looking from the UK, it will take on a red tinge. When the Moon hangs low on the horizon, its light has to travel through a much thicker slice of Earth's atmosphere than when it's overhead. That extra distance does two things: Molecules of nitrogen, oxygen, plus tiny aerosols in the air scatter short-wavelength light (violet, blue, green) far more efficiently than long-wavelength light (orange, red). The longer the light's journey through that haze, the more of the blues are stripped away, leaving mainly reds and oranges to reach your eyes. Dust, smoke, and pollution: Close to the ground, the air contains more dust, water vapour, and human-made pollutants. These larger particles selectively absorb and scatter light, too, but they do it in a way that further mutes the blues and greens while letting the warmer colours through. Put those two effects together and the Moon takes on a coppery or crimson tint whenever it's near the horizon. The same physics explains why sunsets are red — and why a 'blood Moon' during a lunar eclipse looks red: all of the sunlight reaching the eclipsed Moon has been filtered through Earth's thick, dusty atmosphere at sunrise and sunset around the planet. The name Strawberry Moon comes from Algonquin and other Native American traditions, as well as old European naming systems. It marks the start of the strawberry harvesting season in parts of North America. Early colonists adopted and passed on this term. For the UK, the full Strawberry Moon on June 11, 2025, will be best seen in the evening of June 10 at moonrise, rather than on the morning of June 11 when it's technically 100% illuminated. Moonrise on June 10 will be between 9pm and 9.30pm and the Moon will be full in the morning on June 11 at 8.43am - after sunrise. The Moon will trace its lowest path of the year, so rising at dusk on June 10 gives it its most dramatic and reddish appearance. At meridian transit (its highest point at night), it'll only reach about 10°–12° above the horizon - about two fists held above the horizon.
Daily Mail
13 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Dramatic move by Pentagon hint Trump could be siding with another billionaire amid Musk fallout
The Pentagon appears to be contemplating pivoting away from Elon Musk 's SpaceX following the almighty blowup between President Donald Trump and the world's richest man earlier this week. The fallout appears to be impacting the nation's space program as the Trump administration looks toward another billionaire to replace Musk in the race to Mars. Officials at NASA and the Pentagon quietly reached out to SpaceX's competitors, urging them to accelerate development of alternative rockets and spacecraft. Decisions appear to have been taken quickly after Musk made a defiant threat to pull SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, a lifeline to the International Space Station, after Trump first threatened to cancel SpaceX's lucrative government contracts. 'It turned really terrifying,' one NASA official admitted to the Washington Post after initially finding the feud 'entertaining.' Although Musk eventually walked back his threat, the damage was done. Officials from NASA and the Pentagon, already uneasy with their reliance on SpaceX, were rattled to the core. SpaceX has become indispensable as it transports astronauts and cargo to the ISS, launches sensitive military satellites, and operates Starlink, the world's largest satellite constellation. The flare-up served to remind officials of the risks of tying national interests to a mercurial billionaire. 'When you realize that he's willing to shut everything down just on an impulse … that kind of behavior and the dependence on him is dangerous,' a former space agency official said. NASA insiders said Musk's threat 'crossed a line,' invoking memories of the 2018 episode when Musk smoked marijuana during a podcast interview, which prompted NASA to launch a safety investigation into SpaceX. The clash was also inflamed by the White House's decision to abruptly withdraw Jared Isaacman's nomination as NASA Administrator. Isaacman, closely aligned with Musk, had twice flown to space aboard SpaceX vehicles. In the aftermath, government officials reached out to Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin, RocketLab, and Stoke Space, querying when their rockets might be ready to shoulder critical missions. Fatih Ozmen, CEO of Sierra Space, which is developing the Dream Chaser spaceplane, confirmed that NASA was 'working closely' with his company stating, 'NASA mentioned to us that they want diversity and do not want to rely on a single provider.' For some insiders, it wasn't hard to connect the dots: Jeff Bezos, the founder of Blue Origin, has long been a rival to Musk. Now, with the Biden-era antagonism between Trump and Bezos thawing, some see a political recalibration. Bezos' Blue Origin has lagged behind SpaceX for years, but its New Glenn rocket is finally gaining traction, albeit slowly. The Pentagon's recent 'lanes' strategy to diversify launch providers now looks prescient, with officials seeking to avoid 'overreliance on any single provider or solution.' A source familiar with the Defense Department's strategy said the White House sees an opening to back Bezos as a counterweight to Musk's volatility. 'They want someone who's predictable,' the person said to The Post. Even Congress appeared to be spooked by the behavior. A key committee demanded updates on Boeing's long-delayed Starliner capsule, which has struggled to match the reliability of Musk's Dragon. NASA, under pressure, said Friday that Starliner's next mission could come 'early 2026,' though it remains unclear whether it will fly astronauts or cargo only. Indeed, just how reliant NASA were on SpaceX was illustrated last year when American astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams were left on the International Space Station by Boeing's troubled Starliner capsule. Wilmore and Williams had set off for an eight-day Starliner test flight that swelled into a nine-month stay in space Boeing, which has taken $2 billion in charges on its Starliner development, faces a looming decision by NASA to refly the spacecraft uncrewed before it carries humans again. Boeing spent $410 million to fly a similar uncrewed mission in 2022 after a 2019 testing failure. Reflying Starliner uncrewed 'seems like the logical thing to do,' Williams said, drawing comparisons with Elon Musk's SpaceX and Russian capsules that flew uncrewed missions before putting humans aboard. She and NASA are pushing for that outcome, Williams added. 'I think that's the correct path,' said Williams, who is 'hoping Boeing and NASA will decide on that same course of action' soon. Results from Starliner testing planned throughout the summer are expected to determine whether the spacecraft can fly humans on its next flight, NASA officials have said. Todd Harrison, a defense analyst at the American Enterprise Institute, likened Musk's social media post to 'an embargo of the space station.' 'Musk was saying he is going to cut NASA off from its own laboratory in space,' he added. Harrison also recalled Musk's refusal to activate Starlink Internet for a Ukrainian military strike in 2022, a decision that raised alarms about national defense being at the mercy of a single CEO. 'The nation's missile defenses could be held hostage to the twittering whims of Elon Musk,' Harrison warned. Former NASA astronaut Garrett Reisman, who worked at SpaceX, voiced the fears of many in the astronaut corps: 'When your hopes and dreams are tied up in this, you can't help but think, "Oh my goodness, am I going to fly in space?"' Meanwhile, Trump, who once championed Musk as a visionary, appears to be cooling. His allies note that the president has no tolerance for perceived disloyalty and Musk's defiance has not gone unnoticed. Some aides believe Trump's sharp pivot is personal as much as political. RocketLab's CEO Peter Beck had previously warned how Musk's acquisition of Twitter, now rebranded as X, and his flirtation with politics could backfire. 'It certainly makes people uncomfortable. At the end of the day, if you're delivering important national security missions, the buck stops with the CEO,' Beck said. Pentagon officials remain wary, not least because few companies have rockets certified for critical national security missions. Blue Origin's New Glenn has flown once, and United Launch Alliance's Vulcan only twice. RocketLab's Neutron has yet to launch at all. SpaceX's Falcon 9 still dominates, launching with near clockwork precision. But now, Trump's administration appears ready to gamble on fostering competition, even if it means leaning more heavily on Bezos. 'Sierra Space stands ready,' Ozmen declared. Others in the sector are similarly jockeying for position, sensing that Musk's once-unshakable grip may be loosening.
