Scottish schools ‘must provide single-sex lavatories for pupils'
Scottish schools must provide single-sex lavatories for pupils, a judge has ruled.
Lady Ross KC told the Court of Session in Edinburgh that she would issue a declarator, or court order, making clear that state schools needed to provide separate lavatories for girls and boys based on biological sex.
It comes less than a week after the UK's Supreme Court ruled that trans women are not legally women.
Parents had taken legal action against their councils after finding out their children had to use gender-neutral lavatories at their primary school.
Sean Stratford and Leigh Hurley took legal action against Scottish Borders Council (SBC) over the facilities at the new Earlston Primary School.
Their concerns were dismissed by head teacher Kevin Wilson and the council, which claimed it did not have to consult parents about lavatory policy.
For Women Scotland (FWS), the feminist campaign group that won last week's Supreme Court case against the Scottish Government, supported the parents with their legal action.
FWS said schools across Scotland had installed gender-neutral lavatories despite regulations introduced in 1967 mandating that separate facilities must be provided.
Trina Budge, one of FWS's directors, said SBC had conceded on Tuesday evening that it had flouted the law on school lavatories.
Ms Budge said the council had also agreed that it should not have allowed boys to compete in girls' events in the school's sports day and that pupils should not have been disciplined for misgendering other children.
She predicted it would be the first of many such cases involving public sector bodies in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling.
Lady Ross announced her intention to issue the declarator in a hearing on Wednesday morning.
Court insiders told The Telegraph the final wording had not been finalised.
However, Ruth Crawford KC, representing the council, accepted the terms of the declarator making clear that the bathroom policy had been unlawful.
JK Rowling posted a celebration emoji welcoming the court order and wrote on X: 'School girls' right to privacy and dignity has been reclaimed in Scotland.'
Ms Hurley, 39, works at Earlston Primary as a pupil support worker and first raised concerns in November 2023 about the £16.6 million school supporting the 'social transition' of another pupil.
This included allowing them to take part in sports day races in their preferred gender.
She said she later discovered that her son would face punishment if he 'misgendered' trans pupils and that the school was planning to have no separate lavatories for boys and girls.
She told The Times: 'In the end, we felt we had no choice but to pull our child out of the school, which left him devastated. As a parent, you have a right to choose where you send your children to school and ultimately we were forced out, because they were breaking the law.
'We're hoping that following this ruling, this nonsense will stop, adults pay attention and properly safeguard all children within a school setting.'
Mr Stratford, a 42-year-old firefighter, said: 'You're talking about children who still believe in Father Christmas and the tooth fairy. We've won, but common sense says we should never have been in this position in the first place.'
Rosie Walker, their solicitor, said: 'All schools in Scotland will now have to look again at whether their toilets comply with The School Premises (General Requirements and Standards) (Scotland) Regulations 1967, which require half of school toilet facilities to be for boys and half for girls.
'This case, on top of the Supreme Court decision last week, gives focus to the importance of protecting sex-based rights and single-sex spaces.'
In addition to the declarator, the council will now have to reconsider the other aspects of wider complaints made by the parents and issue a new response within 20 days.
A council spokesman said: 'Prior to the hearing, SBC had accepted and acknowledged the decision that was being sought was correct and therefore did not seek to defend this in court. Moving forward, SBC will revisit and reconsider the complaint and respond in due course.'
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service confirmed that the court order had yet to be finalised.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
31 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Swinney: Only independence can fix UK's broken system
An independent Scotland, he will add, is "within reach." READ MORE Last week, The Herald revealed that senior SNP figures had warned the First Minister he had two weeks to do more to push Scottish independence or face a potential leadership challenge at the party's conference in October. Some party critics argue he is not doing enough to make the case for independence—failing to energise members or mobilise the SNP's core vote in seats like Hamilton, where Labour won by just 602 votes. Mr Swinney scrapped Humza Yousaf's minister for independence and ended Nicola Sturgeon's series of Scottish Government independence papers. One source told The Herald: 'The ability to make the case for independence is not a desirable part of the job description — it is essential — and he has failed on probation." Over the weekend, MSPs loyal to the First Minister told the Sunday Times that the SNP would need a fresh independence offer in time for next year's Holyrood election. In his speech to the Scotland 2050 conference, Mr Swinney is expected to say: 'It is only by taking charge of our own destiny, with our own hand on the tiller, that we are better able to ride the waves of change, that we are better able to shape our own future. 'I have long believed that Scotland is an afterthought to successive UK governments. Scotland is not on Westminster's radar in the same way, say, as London, the Midlands or the South East. 'It holds us back in ways big and small, leaving us waiting and praying, hoping that decisions taken at Westminster are not too damaging. 'We are prey to a broken system and a failing economic model—a system that delivers for a very few at the very top, while living standards stagnate and real wages are squeezed for the vast majority. 'All this when we have the capacity to stand and flourish on our own two feet.' He will argue that independence is the 'defining choice for this generation' because the status quo 'has proved itself incapable of delivering on the hopes and ambitions of the people of Scotland.' 'That is why, like a clear majority of Scots, I believe that our nation should have the right to choose. 'A Scotland that is modern, dynamic and forward-looking, living in anticipation of what more can be done, what else can be achieved. Moving forward as one, moving forward with hope and self-belief. 'Such a Scotland is within reach, I have no doubt. But if we want it, we have to work for it, we have to vote for it, we have to actively, purposefully, and I hope also joyfully, make it happen.' The most recent Norstat poll for the Sunday Times had support for leaving the UK at 54%. The eight-point lead—excluding don't knows—increased to 16 points if people were asked to imagine Nigel Farage as Prime Minister. The lead was also 20 points higher than support for the SNP. However, polling also shows that the constitution is not a top priority for Scots, who are generally more concerned about health, the economy and education. There is also seemingly little prospect of a second referendum in the near future. Earlier this month, Sir Keir Starmer said he could not imagine one taking place during his time as Prime Minister. Asked if there would be another independence referendum if a nationalist majority emerged after next year's Holyrood election, Sir Keir said: 'I think it's really important to focus on the priorities that matter most. 'We got a big election win last year on the basis that we would stabilise the economy and ensure that on that foundation we build a stronger Scotland in a stronger United Kingdom, and that's what I intend to do.' Pressed further, he said: 'No, and nobody's raising that with me as their first priority. 'Certainly, in the discussions I'm having with the First Minister, that is not—we're talking about jobs, energy, security, and dealing with the cost-of-living crisis.' READ MORE Meanwhile, in his speech to the Scotland 2050 summit, Anas Sarwar will say it is time to move on from the 'same old arguments.' The Scottish Labour leader is expected to say: 'All of us have a stake in the future of our country and all of us want to see a thriving and fairer Scotland in 2050. 'But if we want Scotland to thrive by 2050 then we face a choice—are we going to be a Scotland that is having the same old arguments and talking about only what Scotland cannot do, or are we going to have a hopeful, outward-looking Scotland that is maximising our potential? 'That is the choice before us, and to make sure we thrive by 2050, we need to reject the old ideas and divisions now. 'That is why I am clear that we need big, bold, meaningful change to deliver a brighter future for Scotland. 'That is why Scottish Labour has bold plans to fix our NHS, renew our public services, fix our schools, end the housing crisis and unlock the potential of our businesses. 'This is the choice we face—managed decline with the SNP or a new direction and a thriving Scotland with Scottish Labour.'
Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Scotland to dump 100 truckloads of waste in England a DAY amid incinerator shortage
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) SCOTLAND is set to dump up to 100 truckloads of waste a day in England due to a shortage of incinerators, it has emerged. SNP chiefs have been ridiculed after it came to light that rubbish will have to be shipped down south after an imminent ban on 'black bag' refuse being sent to landfill. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Around 100 truckloads of waste from Scotland will be dumped in England amid a shortage of incinerators Credit: Alamy 2 Non-recyclable black bag waste will be banned from landfill in Scotland from December 31 Credit: Alamy The Scottish Government hasn't got enough incinerators in place to cope with demand - despite the new rules already being delayed for more than four years. Scottish Conservative shadow net zero and energy secretary Douglas Lumsden: 'Shipping this amount of waste every single day down to England will undoubtedly harm Scotland's economy and nationalist politicians would be frothing at the mouth if the reverse was true.' Scottish Labour net zero spokeswoman Sarah Boyack said: 'This farcical policy speaks volumes about the SNP's sticking-plaster approach to government. "Once again the SNP has set ambitious targets and completely messed up the delivery.' Scottish Lib Dem climate emergency spokesperson Liam McArthur said: 'Carrying lorry loads of rubbish to be landfilled just beyond Berwick is even worse for the environment than landfilling it here due to the emissions generated by these journeys. 'If this was happening in reverse, the SNP would be up in arms.' The Scottish Government's new ban - kicking in from December 31 - covers biodegradable municipal waste and will apply to virtually all domestic and commercial waste. But BBC Scotland's Disclosure show was told a lack of incinerators - Scotland currently has eight - means a 'capacity gap' estimated to be around 600,000 tonnes in the first year of the ban. And some Scots councils and waste companies have approached rubbish firm operators in England about 'bridging contracts", which it's feared could be in place for several years. Waste expert David Balmer, from ERS Remediation, said: 'You're looking at the equivalent of between 80 and 100 trucks minimum running seven days a week to take this material to a facility in England or abroad.' Grim video shows piles of rubbish bags dumped in Glasgow housing estate after bin collections scrapped for six weeks But Alasdair Meldrum, director of waste management consultants Albion Environmental, said: 'We've probably not got the trucks and vehicles to actually move it.' The ban was meant to be in place from 2021 but was one of a number of policies delayed due to the pandemic and fears that businesses weren't ready. It will apply to non-recyclable black bag municipal waste, as well as materials like wood, textiles, paper and food, which breaks down to produce methane greenhouse gas. Climate Action and Energy Secretary Gillian Martin said: 'The reason for the incineration gap is due to outside factors, particularly inflation and the cost of initially building them. 'We've got plans for more incinerators, with energy from waste schemes, to come on in the next year, and over the next three years - so it is a temporary situation.' Scotland's recycling rates have barely shifted in the past decade. In 2013, homes recycled 41.6 per cent of waste but by 2023 that figure had only risen to 43.5 per cent.
NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
Supreme Court orders reconsideration of religious objection to N.Y. abortion care requirement
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday ordered a lower court to take a second look at a religious challenge to a New York state requirement that employers provide health care plans that include abortion coverage. The justices said the case should be reviewed again in light of their ruling ear l ier this month that Wisconsin had unlawfully denied charitable groups associated with the Catholic Church a state tax exemption. In a separate action Monday, the court also took up a case from New Jersey arising from the state's investigation of anti-abortion pregnancy centers that provide guidance to pregnant women. The technical issue is whether the state can enforce subpoenas against First Choice Women's Resource Centers Inc., which runs five centers, seeking information about donors. First Choice says the subpoena violates its free speech rights and freedom of association under the Constitution's First Amendment. The New York case revolves around a regulation issued by New York in 2017 that requires employer-provided health insurance plans to include abortion coverage in certain situations, including in cases of rape and incest. It includes a religious exemption that applies to institutions but does not extend to religious-affiliated groups that serve the general public, such as those that provide food to low-income people. The Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany and other organizations sued, saying the exemption is so narrow it violates the Constitution's First Amendment, which protects the free exercise of religion. In addition to Catholic entities, Lutheran, Episcopalian and Baptist groups are also among the challengers. Lawyers for the religious groups say that, based on recent Supreme Court rulings, narrowly drawn religious exemptions can be just as problematic as no exemption at all. They argue that the justices should overturn the 1990 precedent, a case called Employment Division v. Smith. The New York case has been litigated for years and already reached the Supreme Court once. Then, the justices ordered the state court to revisit an earlier ruling against the diocese. That followed a 2021 Supreme Court ruling on the same legal question in which the justices ruled in favor of a Catholic Church-affiliated group in Philadelphia that was barred from participating in the city's foster care program because of its opposition to same-sex relationships. In another case with some overlap, the Supreme Court in 2020 endorsed a broad religious exemption to a provision of the Affordable Care Act that requires insurance coverage for birth control. In a May 2024 ruling, the New York Court of Appeals again ruled for the state, saying that neither the regulation nor the religious exemption violated the free exercise clause. The state's lawyers argued in court papers that the religious exemption 'provides a denominationally neutral accommodation' based on objective criteria. As such, the measure — since codified into law by the state Legislature — is a 'generally applicable' law under the Supreme Court's 1990 precedent, they wrote.
