Nurses ramp up strikes threats with ballot over 'grotesque' above-inflation pay deal
Nurses will start voting today on what they have derided as the Government's 'grotesque' 3.6 per cent pay offer as they ramp up the threat of fresh strikes.
Around 345,000 members of the Royal College of Nursing are being balloted on the latest pay award, which they have claimed will be 'entirely swallowed up by inflation '.
Last month, the Labour Goverment accepted the recommendation of a pay review body to give nursing staff in England's NHS a pay rise of 3.6 per cent.
The latest inflation figures showed the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) rate jumped by more than expected in April to 3.5 per cent.
The RCN described the award as 'grotesque', while doctors, teachers, prison officers and the Armed Forces all received a bigger increase.
An identical pay award for nurses was made in Wales, while in Northern Ireland, the health minister has announced his wish to also implement a 3.6 per cent rise.
RCN members in England, Wales and Northern Ireland are being asked whether the pay award is enough, amid warnings of yet another industrial dispute.
NHS workers, including nurses, staged a series of strikes under the previous Conservative government in bitter rows over pay.
Speaking at an international nursing conference in Helsinki today, RCN general secretary Professor Nicola Ranger will say: 'I'm with nurses from around the world today asking why it is our ministers in the UK who have once again put nursing at the back of the queue when it comes to pay.
'Nursing is an incredible career, but despite being the most valued profession by the public we continue to be weighted to the bottom of the NHS pay scale and are set to receive one of the lowest pay awards.
'It is time to show that nurses are valued and, from today, hundreds of thousands of nursing staff working in the NHS will give their verdict on whether 3.6% is enough.'
The RCN said nursing staff in England have faced more than a decade of pay erosion since 2010/11, with pay down by a quarter in real terms.
As a result, there are more than 26,000 unfilled nursing posts, while student recruitment has 'collapsed' and the numbers quitting is 'skyrocketing', said the RCN.
Professor Ranger will add: 'Over a decade of pay erosion has had a devastating impact on our profession, forcing increasing numbers into quitting while putting off the nurses of the future.
'When our members vote, they won't just be voting on the fairness of the award for themselves, but if it's enough to turn our profession around.'
As well as the threat of strikes by nurses, Health Secretary Wes Streeting is also battling the British Medical Association over the Government's offer of an average 5.4 per cent pay rise for junior doctors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
24 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Younger women could have cervical screening every five years instead of three
The changes mean that, from next month, women aged 25 to 49 in England who are negative for human papillomavirus (HPV) will receive screening invites every five years. The move has been recommended by the UK National Screening Committee and is based on analysis from King's College London showing five-yearly screening is just as safe as three-yearly, with the same number of cancers found. HPV is a sexually-transmitted group of viruses which cause no symptoms. Around 13 high-risk types of HPV are known to cause 99.7% of all cervical cancers. As at present, any woman who has HPV or has a recent history of HPV will continue to be invited to more frequent screenings to check the virus has cleared and, if not, to check for cell changes in the cervix. In a written statement to Parliament, health minister Ashley Dalton said the new change 'increases the opportunities to test and recall women and people with a cervix who have HPV, while extending the cervical screening intervals from three to five years in England for individuals who have a negative HPV test. 'This will bring England's cervical screening intervals in line with those of Wales and Scotland.' She said the NHS screening programme in England provides all women between the ages of 25 and 64 'with the opportunity to be screened routinely to detect HPV infection or cervical abnormalities at an early, more treatable stage'. She added: 'The aim of the programme is to reduce the number of women who develop invasive cervical cancer and reduce the number who die from it.' Ms Dalton said testing negative for HPV means the chances of developing cancer within five years are very small, as it can take around 10 years or more from the time HPV is detected to developing cervical cancer. She added: 'Those who test positive for HPV are already being followed up with yearly testing. 'This is important to ensure that individuals are monitored for any early signs of cervical abnormalities and provided the necessary treatment.' Experts have been concerned about falling numbers of women under 50 attending cervical screening, with around a third in England not taking up their invitations. Dr Sue Mann, NHS national clinical director for women's health, said: 'Taking a more personalised approach to cervical screening will help ensure everyone eligible can make the most of these life-saving services, while sparing women appointments that they don't need. 'The NHS is following robust evidence on how often women need to be safely screened, and by putting invitations and reminders straight in women's pockets on their phones, we're making it easier than ever to take up screening appointments. 'Make sure you come forward for your screening when you're invited, even if it was weeks, months or years ago. If you think you are due but have not yet had an invitation, speak to your GP practice.' Michelle Mitchell, chief executive of Cancer Research UK, said: 'We welcome this change to cervical screening in England, which is the result of years of vital research to make screening more effective and has shown it is safe to extend the time between tests. 'Screening, alongside the roll out of the HPV vaccine – which Cancer Research UK scientists helped develop – have seen cervical cancer rates drop by around a quarter since the early 1990s, and we look forward to even more progress. 'If you notice any unusual changes for you, do not wait for a screening invitation – speak to your doctor.' Athena Lamnisos, chief executive of the Eve Appeal, said: 'We want every eligible person to feel empowered to attend a vaccination and cervical screening appointment when they are invited so we can achieve the brilliant ambition of eliminating cervical cancer.'
BBC News
29 minutes ago
- BBC News
Cervical screening invites to change for younger women in England
Invitations for cervical screening will be sent out every five years instead of every three for women aged 25-49 in England, if they have a negative shows they are at very low risk of cervical cancer and can safely wait longer to be screened again, NHS England has roll out of a vaccine to protect against HPV - the virus which causes nearly all cervical cancers - has reduced cases by around a quarter since the early said the change was good news for those at low risk because they no longer needed to go for screening as often. Scotland and Wales have already introduced this change, which will start in England from 1 Research UK urged women and people with a cervix not to wait for a screening invitation if they noticed any unusual are encouraged to go for regular cervical screening between the ages of 25 and 64. Currently, those aged 50-64 are invited every five years and 25-49 year olds every three England says it now wants to spare younger women appointments they don't need as part of "a more personalised approach".Cervical screening involves testing for HPV, human papillomavirus. Some types of HPV can cause cell changes in the cervix, which may develop into cancer over time. Nearly all cases of cervical cancer are linked to high-risk that HPV test is negative, studies suggest the chances of someone developing cervical cancer over the next 10 years is very is more accurate than looking for cancer cells on their own.A recent study showed that screening every five years is as safe as doing it every three years, because the same number of cancers are found and fewer screening tests are needed. Anyone eligible will receive a notification via the NHS app to book a screening appointment, NHS England said."The NHS is following robust evidence on how often women need to be safely screened, and by putting invitations and reminders straight in women's pockets on their phones, we're making it easier than ever to take up screening appointments," said Dr Sue Mann, national director for women's health at NHS previously said it was possible to eliminate cervical cancer by 2040, thanks to improved rates of vaccination and cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer in women worldwide. Cervical cancer symptoms The main symptoms are:vaginal bleeding that's unusual for you – including during or after sex, between periods or after the menopause - or heavier periods than usualchanges to vaginal dischargepain during sex or in the lower back, lower tummy or between the hip bones (pelvis)Source:
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
One care home, three children's deaths and countless missed warnings
Three disabled children died in similar circumstances at the UK's largest brain rehabilitation centre for children despite warnings about care failings, The Independent can reveal. Five-year-old Connor Wellsted died in 2017 at The Children's Trust's (TCT) Tadworth unit Surrey, having suffocated when a cot bumper became lodged under his chin. Six years later, in 2023, Raihana Oluwadamilola Awolaja, 12, died when her breathing tube became blocked and Mia Gauci-Lamport, 16, died after she was found unresponsive in her bed. Inquests into all three deaths uncovered a litany of failings and identified common problems in the children's care at the home where multiple senior directors earn six-figure salaries. Now, police have launched a fresh investigation into Connor's death. Coroners who investigated their deaths criticised staff for failing to adequately monitor the children - all of whom had complex disabilities and needed one-to-one care - and for not sharing the full circumstances of how they died with authorities. The families of the children, who were all under the care of their local council, are demanding that the government and the regulator, the Care Quality Commission (CQC), take action. Connor's father Chris Wellsted told The Independent: 'How many more children are going to die because of their incompetence? CQC failed the NHS England failed. The government failed. Every organisation, what should have been investigating the children's trust. It's a disgrace.' Surrey Police first investigated Conor's death in 2017 but no further action was taken. The force has now admitted that it failed to deploy a detective inspector to the scene, which is protocol following the sudden death of a child - something it admitted 'was a failing on our part'. It said it would review the investigation to decide if further inquiries into his death are needed. It is not reinvestigating Raihana and Mia's deaths. 'A disgrace' Connor, from Sheffield, who had neuro-disabilities as a result of a brain injury following a heart attack after birth, was found dead in his cot at TCT on 17 May 2017 after he became trapped under a cot bumper. Following an inquest into his death, Coroner Karen Henderson ruled TCT had 'misled' authorities over the circumstances of Connor's death, initially telling the police, coroner and pathologist that the cot bumper was found on Connor's chest. Staff also failed to preserve the scene and did not tell police that he had already been dead for hours when staff found him unresponsive in the morning. The staff also failed to declare that Connor's death was sudden and unexpected, which meant police did not send a detective inspector to the scene, as is typically the case. In December 2024, the Parliamentary Health Service Ombudsman criticised the CQC for failing to take enforcement action against TCT over his death after it concluded it wasn't necessary. Connor's father complained about the police's handling of the investigation, which has now prompted the force to reinvestigate. A letter, seen by The Independent, confirming the fresh probe reads: 'I can confirm that Surrey Police are relaunching a crime investigation into the circumstances of Connor's death in order to establish whether any criminal offences have been committed.' A key concern over Connor's death, which was also brought up in probes into Raihana and Mia's deaths, was that he had no direct supervision overnight, other than staff opening the door or watching him through a glass window. 'Culture of cover-up' Raihana, who was from Essex, had complex disabilities as a result of a premature birth and needed around-the-clock care, died at TCT on 1 June 2023. She had been left unattended for 15 minutes, during which time her tracheostomy tube was blocked. Ms Wilcox said that if she had been 'appropriately observed' this would have been recognised and resolved and, 'on the balance of probabilities, she would not have died at this time'. She said: 'This failure to adequately observe her was a gross failure in care by the nursing staff. This was compounded by the lack of sufficient staff on the unit where Raihana lived to provide proper 1:1 care.' Raihana's mother, Latifat Kehinde Solomon, had previously raised concerns about her daughter's care after finding that she had been left unsupervised. Making a ruling that Raihana died as a result of natural causes contributed to by neglect, Ms Wilcox warned: 'There may be a culture of cover-up at Tadworth Children's Trust.' She added that the trust had carried out a flawed investigation into Raihana's death, had blamed an 'innocent individual', and as a result, had avoided highlighting systemic failures in the running of the home. 'Warnings not heeded' Mia Gauci-Lamport, from Bracknell Forest, had Ohtahara syndrome, a severe epilepsy syndrome, and required 24-hour care at TCT. She had been at the home since 2020, but in September 2023, she was found dead in her bed. She should have had in-person checks every 15 minutes, but staff only used a video camera to check on her. An external investigation, by consultancy firm Bluebox Associates, seen by The Independent, found TCT did not carry out its obligations under law to inform Mia's family of the circumstances of her death. During her inquest, the local authority lead for Mia's care said the council was concerned over 'discrepancies' in the reports from TCT concerning when Mia was found and when the ambulance was called. Mia's sister Paige Gauci Lamport, 24, told The Independent that details of her care only came to light during her inquest. They included concerns that Mia was under the care of a private doctor, paid for by TCT, who was also employed by Great Ormond Street Hospital, when she should have been assigned a specialist NHS team. Concluding Mia's inquest, Coroner Karen Henderson, who also investigated Connor's death, raised concerns that her previous warnings about TCT's failings appeared to have been ignored. She said: 'The lack of a robust and adhered to care plan for night observations for Mia mirrors the same concern in the PFD [Prevention of Future Deaths] report I issued following the inquest touching on the death of Connor Wellsted at TCT in 2022.' Mia's sister has called for action from the government to prevent further deaths: 'When will this end? When is it they're going to finally take some action?' 'I just think one child, accident, two a coincidence, three is a pattern. I think more action needs to be done. I think people with disabilities don't have a voice, really.' 'I just think they [The Department for Health and Social Care and CQC] have a duty to make sure that these kids are being looked after… I just think because they are disabled kids and they don't have a voice, it's just easy to pass it on.' In response to the deaths, Mike Thiedke, chief executive of TCT, said the trust was 'determined to learn and improve, not to hide or minimise if something has gone wrong'. He said that where the trust has not met its own high standards, it had acknowledged and apologised. He added the trusts had since adopted a new patient safety approach that involves families. Commenting on the fresh police probe into Connor's death, he added: 'The Children's Trust continues to send our most heartfelt condolences to Connor Wellsted's family. We understand that Surrey Police are conducting a review of how Connor's death has been handled, including by the police. We will make ourselves available to the police and cooperate fully.' Lucy Harte, deputy director of multiagency operations at CQC said: 'Our sincere condolences go to the families of Connor, Mia and Raihana. The impact of such a loss is deep and profound. The importance of understanding what happened and what can be done to keep people safe in the future can't be overstated.' She said the CQC had provided detailed responses to coroner's concerns for Mia and Connor and was reviewing its response to Raihana's inquest. The Department for Health and Social Care would not comment directly on what action should be taken concerning TCT but said it would expect the CQC to use its powers where providers are failing to give adequate care to patients.
