
‘It's really scary:' Students, residents react to sudden arrest of Tufts student
'It hits closer to home, definitely,' said Elliott Riseman, a freshman. 'It's right at home.'
Advertisement
In this image taken from security camera video, Rumeysa Ozturk, a 30-year-old doctoral student at Tufts University, is detained by Department of Homeland Security agents on a street in Somerville on Tuesday.
Uncredited/Associated Press
Ozturk's attorney, Mahsa Khanbabai, said she has not been able to contact her. A federal judge in Boston ordered US Immigration and Customs Enforcement not to remove Ozturk from Massachusetts on Tuesday without prior notice.
It was unclear Wednesday why Ozturk was detained. She had voiced support for the pro-Palestinian movement at Tufts, but was not known as a prominent leader. Her lawyer said she is not aware of any charges against her.
Ellis Bedsworth, an undergraduate student at Tufts, said she read the email notifying students about the detainment Tuesday night.
'It's scary, and it's really sad that it's happening,' she said while studying in the Mayer Campus Center Wednesday morning. 'It feels really far away until it happens here, and it's hard to know how to help.'
Related
:
While Bedsworth said she was impressed by the speed with which Tufts notified students of the arrest, another student, Charlie Koenig, said he wished the email said more.
'The email Tufts sent last night was softly worded for what the situation is,' he said. 'And [the university] is not doing enough to stop it.'
Advertisement
Monish Aswani, a 19-year-old sophomore economics major who is from Hong Kong, said his visa concerns had been temporarily assuaged after he managed to reenter the country after spring break without incident, but the arrest of Ozturk brought those worries back to the top of his mind.
'Knowing that I'm an international student as well, and maybe this could happen to me, is quite frightening,' he said.
Aswani said he understood if students were being removed for violating the terms of their visas, or if their acts of protest went too far. But he added that, from what he'd seen of the demonstrations on Tufts' campus last year, they were relatively benign.
'People come from different places, they have different cultures, they have different identities, and they stand for different things,' he said. 'And university is a place where you come together and you share these ideas, so you're able to communicate freely and share your experiences and learn from others.'
'Not being able to do that does take a toll on people,' he added. 'The government taking serious actions, deporting kids back to their home nations, seems like a step too far.'
Aswani noted his background in Hong Kong, a territory subject to harsh restrictions on free speech by the Chinese government. That situation is unique, he said, but he acknowledged that Ozturk's arrest made for a worrying parallel.
'Someone who's coming from, for example, Hong Kong, would think that coming into the US, they would have some sort of freedom,' he said. 'Being able to do what they want, say what they want, protest and stand for what they stand for.'
Advertisement
Adriana Callen, a Tufts senior who lives in the area where the arrest took place, said she had noticed cars loitering in the area on Wednesday afternoon.
'We didn't even put it together until hours later,' she said. 'So it definitely was quite shocking. I wasn't even honestly sure until right now.'
When she first heard the news of what had happened, she said she was 'appalled.'
'I don't even know how to react,' she added.
Callen said she didn't know Ozturk, but that many of her international student friends who live in the area had expressed fears about going to classes on campus.
'People have a right to address problems that they see, problems in the world, problems everywhere,' she said. 'We need to make sure everyone is able to express opinions, and that people shouldn't have to fear their safety in order to do so.'
Joe Ferraro, 48, said he's lived in the same house on Mason Street for his entire life. It's a quiet neighborhood of spacious triple deckers, which is populated by as many families as it is college students — many of them, he noted, from other states, countries, and 'all over the place.'
'I live next door to a college,' he said. 'There's new, young people walking up and down this street all the time. The subway is over there, the college is over there. This neighborhood is full of people her age all the time, and different ones all the time, every couple of years.'
Neighbor Joe Ferraro gestures to where the arrest happened as he spoke to reporters on his porch Wednesday.
Lane Turner/Globe Staff
He wasn't at home when the arrest occurred, he said. But his parents, both in their 70s, had noticed a car with several people inside idling out front for around six hours. They were thinking of calling the police, he said, when the arrest happened.
Advertisement
When shown a video of the arrest, Ferraro became visibly emotional.
'It's too much,' he said. 'I don't need to live in a place where people get plucked off the street like that, just walking around. That's bananas. That's just insane.'
'I don't care what she was doing,' Ferraro continued. 'You can't just nab people off the sidewalk and throw them in a car and take them away, and expect anyone who's seen it to be alright afterwards.'
The sudden arrest has shattered the sense of calm on the residential street. After seeing the footage of plainclothes ICE agents emerging from their unmarked cars, Ferraro said he is now on edge for anyone loitering in the area.
'Now every guy in normal clothes that's hanging around here, that's what I'm going to think,' he said.
Ferraro added that even his son, after hearing the news, is now afraid that his high school friends may be at risk.
'Half the kids he knows are terrified their parents will get taken off the street,' he said.
'Part of me is afraid to talk about it,' he said. 'But come pluck me off the sidewalk then, if that's what you get for talking about it.'
One international Tufts graduate student who asked to remain anonymous due to fear of retaliation said when she read the university's email, she wasn't concerned so much about herself as she was about the 'state of this country.'
'This is just a sign of the times, and it's probably not going to end well,' she said while studying in the Collaborative Learning and Innovation Complex Wednesday morning.
Advertisement
'It makes me wonder if I made the right choice coming here,' she said, adding she's thought about leaving but she 'doesn't know how bad it has to get' for her to make that decision.
'I know [Ozturk] had connections to the Palestine protests, and that makes me very cautious in participating in anything because you don't want to have your name out there any more,' she added.
Nick Stoico can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Immigrant rights groups say ICE officers 'ambush noncitizens' in courthouse arrests, ask judge to intervene
Immigrant rights groups are asking a federal judge in Washington, D.C., to provide "emergency relief" and bar the Trump administration from continuing to ramp up its use of expedited removal. The motion, filed on Tuesday, is part of an ongoing lawsuit that is challenging the administration's expansion of the process which allows the government to quickly expel migrants sometimes without going before a judge. The filing has taken a renewed sense of urgency for the groups. In recent weeks, there's been a dramatic spike of arrests in courthouses after DHS moves to dismiss cases against migrants in removal proceedings. "With no advance notice to the noncitizens, Defendants are moving for [immigration judges] to dismiss people's removal proceedings; arresting and detaining people who have appeared for their court hearings as directed; and placing them in expedited removal proceedings, thereby denying them any meaningful opportunity to be heard before quickly removing them," the groups wrote in the filing. The filing added, "This aggressive new implementation of the Rule and Guidance has sown fear in immigrant communities, as noncitizens who have been complying with their legal obligations now face the risk of arrest and summary deportation at their next court dates." MORE: 'Have mercy': Families plead as migrants arrested at routine DHS check-ins The groups accuse ICE officers of coordinating with Department of Homeland Security attorneys and "stationing themselves in immigration courts" to "ambush noncitizens" after their cases are dismissed. Even those who have pending asylum applications and other petitions for relief are being targeted for expedited removal, the groups say. They claim that those who have been detained include "man whose partner was 8 months pregnant and who had applied for asylum, gay couple who feared persecution, asylum seeker married to a U.S. citizen, and 19-year-old who appears eligible for Special Immigrant Juvenile Status." The groups are asking the judge to halt expedited removals while the court battle continues. A senior DHS spokesperson previously defended the courthouse arrests in a statement to ABC News, saying: "Most aliens who illegally entered the United States within the past two years are subject to expedited removals. Biden ignored this legal fact and chose to release millions of illegal aliens, including violent criminals, into the country with a notice to appear before an immigration judge. ICE is now following the law and placing these illegal aliens in expedited removal, as they always should have been." The statement added on the migrants, "If they have a valid credible fear claim, they will continue in immigration proceedings, but if no valid claim is found, aliens will be subject to a swift deportation." Immigrant rights groups say ICE officers 'ambush noncitizens' in courthouse arrests, ask judge to intervene originally appeared on
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pope names Chinese bishop as he keeps historic Vatican-Beijing accord
Pope Leo XIV has appointed the first Chinese bishop of his papacy, signalling that he will continue a historic agreement that sought to improve relations between the Vatican and China. Both sides have hailed the appointment of Fuzhou Auxiliary Bishop Joseph Lin Yuntuan as an affirmation of their commitment to the 2018 accord, which was reached under the late Pope Francis. The agreement gave Chinese officials some input on the appointment of bishops. However, its contents were never fully disclosed to the public. Beijing insists that the state must approve the appointment of bishops in China, running contrary to the Catholic Church's insistence that it is a papal decision. China has some 10 million Catholics. Currently, they face the choice of attending state-sanctioned churches approved by Beijing or worshipping in underground congregations that have sworn allegiance to the Vatican. On Wednesday, the Vatican said Yuntuan's ministry had been "recognised" by Chinese law. "This event constitutes a further fruit of the dialogue between the Holy See and the Chinese Authorities and is an important step in the journey of communion of the Diocese," the Vatican said. When asked about Yuntuan's appointment, foreign ministry spokesperson Lin Jian told reporters on Thursday that this showed how the 2018 agreement had been "smoothly implemented", state media reported. China is willing to work with the Vatican to continue improving relations, he said. The Pope's move shows a "willingness to support reconciliation instead of antagonism", Michel Chambon, a research fellow at the Asia Research Institute in Singapore who has written extensively about the Catholic Church, told Reuters news agency. In September 2018, Pope Francis recognised seven bishops appointed by China. The Vatican also posthumously recognised an eighth bishop who died the year before. China first broke off diplomatic ties with the Holy See in 1951, and many Catholics were forced to go underground during former communist leader Mao Zedong's rule, emerging only in the 1980s when religious practices were tolerated again. China, the Vatican and a controversial deal Pope and China in historic deal on bishops
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pritzker, governors will defend immigration policies before House panel
As President Donald Trump spars with California's governor over immigration enforcement, Republicans in Congress are calling other Democratic governors to the Capitol on Thursday to question them over policies limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities. The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform posted a video ahead of the hearing highlighting crimes allegedly committed by immigrants in the U.S. illegally and pledging that 'sanctuary state governors will answer to the American people.' The hearing is to include testimony from Govs. JB Pritzker of Illinois, Tim Walz of Minnesota and Kathy Hochul of New York. There's no legal definition of a sanctuary jurisdiction, but the term generally refers to governments with policies limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Courts previously have upheld the legality of such laws. But Trump's administration has sued Colorado, Illinois, New York and several cities — including Chicago and Rochester, New York — asserting their policies violate the U.S. Constitution or federal law. Illinois, Minnesota and New York also were among 14 states and hundreds of cities and counties recently listed by the Department of Homeland Security as 'sanctuary jurisdictions defying federal immigration law.' The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. As Trump steps up immigration enforcement, some Democratic-led states have intensified their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting cooperation with immigration agents. Following clashes between crowds of protesters and immigration agents in Los Angeles, Trump deployed the National Guard to protect federal buildings and agents, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom accused Trump of declaring 'a war' on the underpinnings of American democracy. The House Oversight Committee has long been a partisan battleground, and in recent months it has turned its focus to immigration policy. Thursday's hearing follows a similar one in March in which the Republican-led committee questioned the Democratic mayors of Chicago, Boston, Denver and New York about sanctuary policies. Heavily Democratic Chicago has been a sanctuary city for decades. In 2017, then-Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner, a Republican, signed legislation creating statewide protections for immigrants. The Illinois Trust Act prohibits police from searching, arresting or detaining people solely because of their immigration status. But it allows local authorities to hold people for federal immigration authorities if there's a valid criminal warrant. Pritzker, who succeeded Rauner in 2019, said in remarks prepared for the House committee that violent criminals 'have no place on our streets, and if they are undocumented, I want them out of Illinois and out of our country.' 'But we will not divert our limited resources and officers to do the job of the federal government when it is not in the best interest of our state, our local communities, or the safety of our residents,' he said. Pritzker has been among Trump's most outspoken opponents and is considered a potential 2028 presidential candidate. He said Illinois has provided shelter and services to more than 50,000 immigrants who were sent there from other states. A Department of Justice lawsuit against New York challenges a 2019 law that allows immigrants illegally in the U.S. to receive New York driver's licenses and shields driver's license data from federal immigration authorities. That built upon a 2017 executive order by then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo that prohibited New York officials from inquiring about or disclosing a person's immigration status to federal authorities, unless required by law. Hochul's office said law enforcement officers still can cooperate with federal immigration authorities when people are convicted of or under investigation for crimes. Since Hochul took office in 2021, her office said, the state has transferred more than 1,300 incarcerated noncitizens to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement at the completion of their state sentences. Minnesota doesn't have a statewide sanctuary law protecting immigrants in the U.S. illegally, though Minneapolis and St. Paul both restrict the extent to which police and city employees can cooperate with immigration enforcement. Some laws signed by Walz have secured benefits for people regardless of immigration status. But at least one of those is getting rolled back. The Minnesota Legislature, meeting in a special session, passed legislation Monday to repeal a 2023 law that allowed adults in the U.S. illegally to be covered under a state-run health care program for the working poor. Walz insisted on maintaining eligibility for children who aren't in the country legally, Cappelletti reported from Washington, D.C. Lieb reported from Jefferson City, Mo. Also contributing were Associated Press writers Anthony Izaguirre in Albany, N.Y.; Steve Karnowski in St. Paul, Minn.; and Sophia Tareen in Chicago. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.