Law doesn't recognise marital rape: Delhi High Court quashes case against husband
6Saying the law doesn't recognise the concept of marital rape, the Delhi High Court has quashed an order directing prosecution of a man for performing "unnatural" sex with his wife.The court noted Section 377 of IPC penalising such acts won't apply in a marital relationship particularly when the allegation of consent was missing.Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma was dealing with the man's plea against a trial court order which directed framing of Section 377 (punishment for unnatural offences) charge against him for allegedly performing oral sex with his wife.advertisement
The verdict said the law did not recognise the concept of marital rape."There is no basis to assume that a husband would not be protected from prosecution under Section 377 of IPC, in view of exception 2 to Section 375 of IPC since the law (amended Section 375 of IPC) now presumes implied consent for sexual intercourse as well as sexual acts, including anal or oral intercourse within a marital relationship," it said.The high court noted the wife did not specifically allege if the act was performed against her will or without her consent."The essential ingredient of lack of consent – central to constituting an offence under Section 377 of IPC post-Navtej Singh Johar (case) between any two adults – is clearly missing. Thus, there is not only a lack of prima facie case, but even the threshold of strong suspicion is not met," the court said.advertisementThe top court in the Navtej verdict de-criminalised consensual sex among adults, including those from the same sex."No prima facie case is made out against the petitioner for the offence under Section 377 of IPC. The impugned order directing the framing of charge is, therefore, unsustainable in law and is liable to be set aside," the court added.The court further said acts such as anal intercourse or oral sex were included within the ambit of offence of rape under the Section 375(a) of IPC and there was no basis to assume that the petitioner would not fall within the immunity granted to husbands under the "exception" to the offence of rape."In the context of a marital relationship, Section 377 of IPC cannot be applied to criminalise non-penile-vaginal intercourse between a husband and wife. Such an interpretation would be in line with the reasoning and observations of the Supreme Court in Navtej Singh Johar (case)," said the court in its May 13 order.It came on record that the wife claimed the man was "impotent" and their marriage was the result of a conspiracy by him and his father to establish illicit relations and extort money from her family.advertisementThe man argued the marriage was legally recognised and there was an implied presumption of consent for consensual sexual acts and its nature could not constitute an offence under Section 377.The judge underlined an "inherent contradiction" in the statement of the wife who on the one hand alleged sexual incapacity of the man and levelled allegations suggesting the performance of oral sex on the other.Must Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
Mocking Husband's Disability Is Mental Cruelty: Orissa High Court Upholds Divorce Without Alimony
Last Updated: The court confirmed that such conduct destroyed the sanctity of the marital relationship, making cohabitation untenable The Orissa High Court has upheld a divorce granted to a physically disabled man after it was proven that his wife had mocked his disability, terming such conduct as mental cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act. The bench of Justices BP Routray and Chittaranjan Dash, while dismissing the wife's appeal, observed that her repeated insults toward the husband's physical infirmity, including calling him names like 'Kempa" (cripple) and 'Nikhatu" (useless), clearly amounted to mental cruelty, warranting dissolution of the marriage under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Act. The marriage between the parties was solemnised on June 1, 2016. According to the husband's testimony, the wife left the matrimonial home merely three months later on September 15, 2016, returned briefly in January 2017, but ultimately left for good on March 25, 2018. She later filed a criminal case under Section 498-A IPC and other provisions, accusing the husband and his family of cruelty. The husband filed a divorce petition on April 3, 2019, on the ground of mental cruelty. He examined two witnesses to support his claims. Despite cross-examining them, the wife neither examined any witnesses nor produced any evidence to counter the allegations. The family court in Puri, in its judgment dated July 10, 2023, ruled in favour of the husband, granting a decree of divorce without awarding permanent alimony. The wife challenged this order before the high court. Dismissing the appeal, the high court said that the evidence on record clearly showed the wife's demeaning behaviour toward her husband's disability. 'Such behaviour by the wife…definitely in our opinion amounts to mental cruelty," the court observed. It emphasised that in a marital relationship, mutual respect is essential, and ridiculing a spouse's physical shortcomings can gravely impact their dignity and emotional well-being. The court cited key precedents, including V Bhagat v. D Bhagat and Samar Ghosh v. Jaya Ghosh, to explain the evolving contours of 'mental cruelty" in matrimonial law. It reiterated that conduct which causes deep mental pain, making it unreasonable to expect the spouses to live together, can be sufficient ground for divorce. 'A person is expected to give respect to another person in general and where it comes to relationship of husband and wife, it is expected that the wife should support the husband despite his physical infirmity, if any," court said. On the issue of permanent alimony and return of Streedhan, the court noted that no material was presented on the income or assets of either party, and thus left the matter open for the wife to pursue separately under Sections 25 and 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act before the family court. First Published: June 12, 2025, 15:16 IST
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
2 girls sexually assaulted at Goa birthday party, 3 arrested
Three minor girls who were invited to celebrate a birthday were allegedly sexually assaulted in North Goa's Bambolim, leading to the arrest of two men. The accused, identified as Altaf Mahboob Mujawar (19) and Om Vinay Naik (21), were taken into custody by the Agashi families of the victims filed a missing complaint on the night of June 8, saying that two girls, aged 13 and 15, had been missing since June 7. Around the same time, another complaint was lodged regarding the disappearance of a 11-year-old girl. Investigations revealed that all three girls had gone North Goa Superintendent of Police Rahul Gupta allegedly tried to keep the matter under wraps. However, once the news began surfacing in the media, he formed a special police team to trace the missing girls. Following the formation of the special team, the victims were traced to a hotel in the Calangute area. Police rescued the girls and detained two men present with them. During the investigation, the girls informed the police that they had gone to Calangute to celebrate a birthday. It was then discovered that the 15-year-old and the 11-year-old were sexually registered two separate cases under IPC Sections 137(2), 64(1), 74, 75(1), Section 8(2) of the Goa Children's Act, and Sections 4, 8, and 12 of the POCSO Act. The two men detained earlier were formally Wednesday night, the police also arrested the owner of the hotel where the incident occurred. Rajat Chavan, owner of Krishna Mahadev Hotel in Baga, was arrested by Calangute police for allowing the girls to enter the hotel without parental strict action, Rahul Gupta, Superintendent of Police, said, 'The police are applying for the sealing of the hotel and the cancellation of its license.' He added, 'If any man is given a room without the presence of their family members or relatives, hotel management and owners will not be spared. It is a violation of the Goa Children's Act.' Gupta warned, 'If such violations are found in the future, strict action will be taken.' IN THIS STORY#Goa
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Terror funding case: HC rejects bail plea of separatist leader Shabir Shah
The Delhi High Court on Thursday dismissed a plea by Kashmiri separatist leader Shabir Ahmad Shah seeking bail in a terror funding case. A bench of Justices Navin Chawla and Shalinder Kaur pronounced the verdict while rejecting Shah's appeal challenging a trial court's July 7, 2023 order refusing to grant him bail. "The present appeal is dismissed," the bench said. The detailed order is awaited. The high court in August 2023 sought response of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) on Shah's appeal. Shah's counsel has sought bail on behalf of the appellant on the grounds that "it was a no material case". In his 2023 appeal assailing the trial court order rejecting his bail application, the appellant said he has been in custody for four years and the trial would take a long time to conclude. "The impugned order of the additional sessions judge is contrary to law weight of evidence and probabilities of the case. The appellant has been languishing in jail in the present case for four years, with over 400 witnesses to be examined and only 15 witnesses having been examined till date in over 4 years," the appeal said. In 2017, NIA had registered a case against 12 persons for allegations of conspiracy for raising and collecting funds for causing disruption by way of pelting stones, damaging public property and conspiring to wage war against the government of India. Shah was arrested in the case on June 4, 2019. In March 2022, the trial court framed charges against the appellant for allegedly conspiring to raise and collect funds for causing disruption and conspiring to wage war against the government of India. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
