Politics at the Met Gala: Brad Lander appears to court big mayoral endorsement with daughter's union-logo jacket
The biggest fashion statement at Monday's Met Gala wasn't any of the flamboyant outfits worn by celebrities, but a smartly tailored black blazer sporting a giant union logo.
The jacket — featuring the logo of the International Ladies Garment Workers Union, once an affiliate of the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) emblazoned on the back — was worn by Rosa Lander, the daughter of New York City Comptroller Brad Lander, who is also a Democratic candidate for mayor.
The University of Chicago student accompanied her dad who, as an ex-officio member of the museum's board (along with opponents Eric Adams and City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams), gets free tickets to the star-studded fundraiser for the Metropolitan Museum of Art's Anna Wintour Costume Center.
New York City Comptroller and mayoral candidate Brad Lander and his daughter Rosa attended the Met Gala on Monday, with Rosa donning a pro-union political statement on her jacket. WireImage
Rosa explained that her outfit, designed by Parron Allen, honored union activist Floria Pinkney, a Brooklyn-born seamstress who was the first African-American woman to lead the International Ladies Garment Workers' Union. Getty Images
But one political analyst accused Lander of using the Met Gala to bolster his campaign and court much-needed union backing from the New York City Central Labor Council AFL-CIO, a federation of about 300 unions which represents more than a million workers including teachers, construction workers, truck drivers and hospitality workers.
'Lander's campaign is flagging, so of course he is absolutely courting anyone to endorse him at this point,' said strategist Hank Sheinkopf. 'At this point he'll take anybody he can get to endorse him.'
He added that state assemblyman Zohran Mamdani, a socialist candidate for mayor, is taking far left-wing support away from Lander's campaign. Last month, the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees Local 161 — the union representing theatrical and stage workers —
In 2021, the New York City branch of the AFL-CIO endorsed Lander for city comptroller and Eric Adams for mayor. But the powerful union, known as the New York City Central Labor Council, has not yet endorsed a candidate for the June Democratic primary, a spokesperson said. (Adams is running as an Independent.)
Lander is in a distant third place for the Democratic primary, behind Andrew Cuomo and Zohran Mamdani. Paul Martinka
On April 20, The Post reported that the Democratic primary for mayor was increasingly turning into a two-person race, with support growing for both ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Mamdani, according to a poll by the Honan Strategy Group.
Lander remained a distant third.
'Come get ready with me to be the least famous person at the Met Gala,' said Rosa Lander in a TikTok video — ending with the 'Lander for Mayor' logo — that also features her father explaining why they are attending the event.
In 2022, New York City Mayor Eric Adams donned a tuxedo with an anti-gun message at the Met Gala. REUTERS
New York City Mayor Eric Adams wore a tuxedo with anti-gun messages designed by Brooklyn artist Laolu Senbanjo at the Met Gala in 2022. Getty Images
The city allocates more than $30 million a year to the Met, including more than $11 million to cover utilities.
'Hey, my dad's running for mayor,' said Rosa in a behind-the-scenes TikTok on her father's account that showed the two of them entering the museum.
Rosa explained that her outfit honored union activist Floria Pinkney, a Brooklyn-born seamstress who was the first African-American woman to lead the International Ladies Garment Workers' Union in the 1920s.
'Brad and his family have a deep commitment to workers rights,' said a spokeswoman for Lander's campaign Tuesday. 'Rosa was honored to work with Brooklyn-based designer Parron Allen to design a piece that represented the Met Gala's theme and the contributions that black garment workers and designers have made to fashion.'
New York City Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez donned a gown with the slogan 'Tax the Rich' on the back during the 2021 Met Gala. Getty Images For The Met Museum/Vogue
The theme of this year's event and accompanying exhibit is 'Superfine: Tailoring Black Style.'
In recent years, politicians have used the heavily covered celebrity event, hosted by Vogue editor Anna Wintour, to publicize their positions.
In 2022, Mayor Adams modeled an anti-gun violence tuxedo jacket designed by Brooklyn-based artist Laolu Senbanjo.
A year earlier, New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wore a controversial white gown by Brother Vellies with 'Tax the Rich' in red letters across her back, and with a matching slogan on her bag.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Israel Strikes Iran, Killing Top Military Leaders And Nuclear Scientists
Israel attacked Iran, eliminating several of the country's top military officials and nuclear scientists. Israel launched an air strike against Iran's top nuclear and military sites overnight from June 12 to 13. The Israeli Defense Forces announced the attacks killed Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Commander Hossein Salami, IRCG Air Force Commander Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the chief of staff of the Iranian Armed Forces, and the leader of Iran's Emergency Command. According to the BBC, the strikes also killed other top military officials and nuclear scientists. Videos circulated on X soon after the attack, apparently depicting the scene in Iran's capital, Tehran. Israel sent 200 fighter jets into Iran, striking targets like Tehran and the Natanz-area uranium enrichment site – the 'largest uranium enrichment site in Iran.' The IDF said Iran was 'nearing the point of no return in its race toward a nuclear weapon,' producing thousands of kilograms of enriched uranium in 'fortified, underground sites.' 'This program has accelerated significantly in recent months, bringing the regime significantly closer to obtaining a nuclear weapon,' the IDF posted to X. 'The State of Israel has been left with no choice. The IDF has the obligation to act in defense of the civilians of Israel and will continue to do so.' Iran reportedly launched close to 100 drones toward Israel on the morning of June 13, and IDF Spokesman Brigadier General Effie Defrin said Israel was 'working to intercept the threats,' according to CBS. Israel was under a state of emergency. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said America was 'not involved' in the strikes, in a statement soon after the attack. 'Israel took unilateral action against Iran,' Rubio wrote. 'We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region.' Israel advised American officials they thought the strikes were 'necessary for its self-defense,' according to Rubio's statement. Trump said earlier on June 12 that he was seeking diplomatic solutions to the situation. 'President Trump and the Administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners,' Rubio wrote. 'Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel.' Amid ongoing tensions in the region, with Israel's war on Hamas and Iran's hostility to the Jewish state, this could soon erupt into a wider conflict.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Calls on Iran to Agree to Nuclear Deal ‘Before There Is Nothing Left'
President Donald Trump on Friday morning implored Iran to 'make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire,' hours after Israeli strikes killed several top Iranian military officials and targeted the country's nuclear infrastructure. The strikes, which began Thursday night, came as the United States was gearing up for a scheduled meeting on Sunday with Iranian negotiators in order to discuss a potential nuclear deal. 'I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal. I told them, in the strongest of words, to 'just do it,' but no matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they got, they just couldn't get it done,' Trump wrote Friday morning on Truth Social. 'Certain Iranian hardliner's spoke bravely, but they didn't know what was about to happen. They are all DEAD now, and it will only get worse!' Trump added. 'Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire. No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE. God Bless You All!' In a separate post, the president added that two months ago he had given Iran 'a 60 day ultimatum to 'make a deal.' They should have done it! Today is day 61. I told them what to do, but they just couldn't get there. Now they have, perhaps, a second chance!' Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said that Israel 'should expect severe punishment' for the attacks, which killed Mohammad Bagheri, commander of the Iranian military; Hossein Salami, commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps; Gholamali Rashid, deputy commander of the Iranian armed forces; Amir Ali Hajizadeh, leader of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps airspace unit; as well as Ali Shamkhani — the lead negotiator in Iran's nuclear negotiations with the U.S. and at least two prominent Iranian nuclear scientists. According to a Thursday report from Reuters, ahead of the strikes the Trump administration had urged Israel against military escalation, hoping to negotiate a diplomatic solution in upcoming talks and warning that they would not involve themselves in a unilateral strike. 'Tonight, Israel took unilateral action against Iran,' Trump's Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement Thursday evening. 'We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region. Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense. President Trump and the Administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners. Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel.' More from Rolling Stone Is Trump's Troop Deployment to Los Angeles Illegal? 'L.A. Was Not on Fire': Angelenos Speak on Trump's ICE Raids and 'Escalation' Judge Orders Trump to Return National Guard Control to Newsom Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is Trump's Troop Deployment to Los Angeles Illegal?
A federal judge issued an order to block Donald Trump from deploying California National Guard troops to crack down on Los Angeles protests or to stand guard over his immigration raids. Ruling Thursday night, United States District Judge Charles Breyer found that 'an injunction restraining the president's use of military force in Los Angeles is in the public interest' and ordered Trump to return control of thousands of National Guard troops to Gov. Gavin Newsom. The injunction came in response to a California lawsuit claiming Trump is violating bedrock American law and the constitution. However, the president's commitment of 700 Marines to the streets of L.A. is apparently ruling was met by an emergency appeal by the Trump administration to the Ninth Circuit court of appeals, which has now stayed the lower court's injunction until at least June 17. The back-and-forth court battle over Trump's troop deployments poses a thorny question: Can the president of the United States really unleash the military on U.S citizens? Here's what you need to know: Trump, an authoritarian, has long dreamed of using the military to counter his domestic opposition. The pretext for Trump's move is unrest following protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. ICE agents have been making provocative arrests and detentions of community members in Los Angeles, including of garment workers downtown and day laborers at an area Home Depot. These protests were largely peaceful, but in several locations, devolved into skirmishes between agitators on one side and cops, sheriff's deputies, and/or paramilitary federal agents on the other. The unrest had largely calmed over the weekend, until Trump decided to federalize units of the California National Guard and send them to the streets of L.A. Trump mobilized as many as 4,000 members of the California National Guard along with 700 Marines to deploy in Los Angeles. The military described the National Guard's mission as 'protecting federal personnel and federal property in the greater Los Angeles area.' The Posse Comitatus Act stands as America's legal guarantee against military occupation. Like so much of American history, passage of the Posse Comitatus Act is tarnished by racism. This law dates from the late 1870s. It was born out of backlash to Reconstruction in the South after the Civil War, at a time when former Confederates bridled under occupation by federal troops. These forces, for example, ensured access to the ballot box by Black voters. The act's passage barred the Army from being deployed in a domestic law enforcement capacity; it effectively ended Reconstruction and ushered in decades of Jim Crow segregation in the South. Over time, the law's restriction on the standing military being deployed inside the United States became bedrock U.S. law and a marker of state sovereignty. It is seen as a vital check on authoritarian abuses by a U.S. president, and it allows the military to focus on defeating foreign adversaries, leaving policework to cops. The act has been updated periodically, including as recently as 2021 to clarify that its restrictions apply even to the Space Force. (The phrase 'Posse Comitatus' itself is Latin for 'power of the county' and has a complicated legacy dating back to English common law.) National Guard forces are usually under the control of state governors. They have long played a role in responding to state-level natural disasters and public unrest. Under state control, National Guard forces are not restricted by the Posse Comitatus Act. State-ordered National Guard deployments have also been controversial. In one of the darkest episodes in recent American history, National Guard troops, called up by the Governor of Ohio to crack down on protesters at Kent State in 1970, opened fire on anti-war activists, killing four and injuring nine. To federalize the National Guard, as Trump did this over the weekend, the president invoked an authority established in Title 10 of the federal code. Under that provision, the National Guard may be pressed into federal service under one of three conditions: The U.S. 'is invaded or is in danger of invasion by a foreign nation.' There is 'rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority' of the federal government. The president is 'unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.' In any of these cases, the president 'may call into federal service' the requisite National Guard forces to 'repel the invasion, suppress the rebellion, or execute those laws.' Invocation of this provision has little case history; Richard Nixon used it to call in the National Guard to deliver mail during a postal strike in 1970. But in all cases, the statute states, orders to the National Guard 'shall be issued through the governors of the states' — appearing to require agreement between the president and the governor, which does not exist in this case. The state of California sued in federal court in San Francisco to block Trump's National Guard deployment as 'unlawful,' insisting his Title 10 authority is a nonstarter in the case of the Los Angeles protests. 'To put it bluntly, there is no invasion or rebellion in Los Angeles,' the lawsuit states. It describes instead common 'civil unrest' that should be handled by 'state and local authorities.' The lawsuit underscores that Gov. Newsom was not a party to Trump's decision to federalize the National Guard: 'The governor never issued such an order or gave consent.'California is making the case that troops under Trump's command are already unlawfully integrated into a policing function. 'Military forces are pervasively intertwined with civilian law enforcement activities,' the latest update to suit argues. 'Armed troops are working side by side with ICE agents in conducting arrests and raids in the streets, homes, and workplaces of Los Angeles.'In the court of public opinion, the state is highlighting past comments by Trump and members of his cabinet to argue that administration officials know what they're doing is illegal. A post on the governor's website, calls back to Trump's comments during the 2020 federal incursion into downtown Portland, Oregon. 'We have to go by the laws,' Trump said at the time. 'We can't call in the National Guard, unless we are requested by a governor.' Likewise Kristi Noem, Trump's Homeland Security Secretary, said in 2024 as governor of South Dakota that a president seizing control of National Guard forces would be an unacceptable affront: 'If Joe Biden federalizes the National Guard,' she said, 'that would be a direct attack on states' rights.' In deciding to impose an injunction, Judge Breyer wrote that California had 'shown a likelihood of prevailing' on their argument that Trump's federalization of the National Guard was 'not in fact not lawful, both exceeding the scope of his authority and violating the Tenth Amendment.' (The judge leaned hard on the that amendment which reserves many powers for the states: 'It is well-established that the police power is one of the quintessential powers reserved to the states by the Tenth Amendment,' he wrote.) Breyer recognized that the Trump administration has an ''interest in protecting federal agents and property' but insisted that the 'the citizens of Los Angeles face a greater harm from the continued unlawful militarization of their city.' He added that the state faces harm of being deprived of 'thousands of National Guard members to fight fires, combat the fentanyl trade, and perform other critical functions.' The judge underscored as well that that Trump's troop deployment threatens to 'chill legitimate First Amendment expression.' He wrote that he was 'troubled' by the administration's stance that 'protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion.' The temporary injunction forbids Trump from calling up the National Guard and directs Trump to return control over these forces to Newsom. The ruling by the district judge was immediately appealed to the Ninth Circuit, which quickly stayed the injunction Thursday, pending a hearing Tuesday, June 17. It is unclear what authority Trump has invoked to deploy active duty Marines to Los Angeles. A statement by U.S. Northern Command says the Marines' mission is to 'seamlessly integrate with the Title 10 forces' — i.e. the National Guard troops. The state of California lawsuit claims the Marine mobilization is a violation of Posse Comitatus. (It also argued that using federalized National Guard troops as military police violates that act.)The suit reads, in part: 'The Marine Corps' deployment for law enforcement purposes is… unlawful. For more than a century, the Posse Comitatus Act has expressly prohibited the use of the active duty armed forces and federalized national guard for civilian law enforcement.' The judge in San Francisco did not make any ruling as to the Posse Comitatus Act arguments 'at this early moment in the litigation,' explaining that both parties would soon have an opportunity to make their arguments in court. The nativist Trump White House adviser Stephen Miller has been posting incessantly on X about the unrest in Los Angeles as an 'insurrection.' Trump has also called protesters 'insurrectionists.'This over-the-top rhetoric has dangerous implications. The president has a trump card he can play if he seeks to expand this foray into martial law. That is the Insurrection Act. This law gives the president authority to side-step the restrictions of Posse Comitatus and to direct active duty military to suppress insurrection, domestic violence, and even 'unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages.' The act was pieced together from 1792 to 1871, and the liberal Brennan Center for Justice describes it as so 'poorly' crafted and 'bafflingly broad' as to 'leave virtually everything up to the discretion of the president.' The law is contradictory. Some provisions require the participation of the governor and/or legislature in the target state. Other parts give the president sole decision-making power. The Insurrection Act has been used both ways. It was famously invoked by President Dwight Eisenhower to enforce desegregation in the South after the Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education. Its most recent use was in Los Angeles in 1992, by President George H.W. Bush, during the Rodney King riots — a move requested by the state. Lyndon B. Johnson was the last president to invoke it against the wishes of a governor, sending in troops to protect Civil Rights marchers in segregationist Alabama in 1965. Trump has been coy so far about his intentions, saying of the act from the Oval Office this week: 'If there's an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it. We'll see.' Under Trump, any invocation of the Insurrection Act would mark a dangerous step on a path toward dictatorship. In theory, the law only empowers the president to use federal military might to support local law enforcement, or ensure that the constitutional rights of citizens are defended, not to implement martial law. In practice, Trump was given near-kingly authorities last year by the Supreme Court in its immunity decision that shields the president from criminal prosecution. His administration has threatened to arrest Gov. Newsom, and even handcuffed one of the state's U.S. Senators, Alex Padilla, when he attempted to ask Noem a question during a press conference, during which the Homeland Security secretary proclaimed that the federal government was on a mission to 'liberate' Los Angeles, from the 'socialist' leadership of its mayor and does not see himself bound by any precedent or legal norm. And he is plainly not grounded in reality, rather in delusions of grandeur. In posts on Truth Social, Trump has written of his militarization as an effort to 'liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion.' On Wednesday he doubled down, adding: 'If our troops didn't go into Los Angeles, it would be burning to the ground right now.' More from Rolling Stone 'L.A. Was Not on Fire': Angelenos Speak on Trump's ICE Raids and 'Escalation' Judge Orders Trump to Return National Guard Control to Newsom Trump 'Doesn't Speak With Precision,' Justice Department Tells Judge Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
