logo
Four detained under Goondas Act in Tenkasi

Four detained under Goondas Act in Tenkasi

The Hindu5 days ago
Four persons have been detained under the Goondas Act in the district.
An official statement said ganja peddler M. Sudalai Manikandan, 33, of Sundarapandiapuram, A. Balaji, 20, of Paavoorchathram for carrying lethal weapons, POCSO case accused A. Ramar, 43, of Thiruvettanallur and R. Chellasamy, 41, of Ayyapuram were arrested by the police.
Since all the four posed a threat to peace and the rule of law, Superintendent of Police S. Aravind recommended to Collector A.K. Kamal Kisore their detention under the Goondas Act. Subsequently, the Collector ordered their detention under the Goondas Act on Saturday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rajasthan: Outrage after video shows over 25 stray dogs shot dead in a village
Rajasthan: Outrage after video shows over 25 stray dogs shot dead in a village

Economic Times

time2 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Rajasthan: Outrage after video shows over 25 stray dogs shot dead in a village

A shocking video surfaced from Kumawas village in Rajasthan. It shows individuals shooting and killing over 25 stray dogs. The incident occurred on August 2 and 3. Police have identified Shyochand Bavariya as one of the accused. A case has been registered under the Animal Cruelty Act and the Arms Act. Authorities are investigating the matter. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Police have identified the accused Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Public demands strict action A video showing at least two individuals shooting and killing more than 25 stray dogs in Kumawas village, located in the Nawalgarh area of Rajasthan's Jhunjhunu district, has triggered widespread outrage. The killings occurred on August 2 and 3, but police only began action after the video surfaced on social media on video footage, now widely circulated, shows two individuals riding a motorcycle while firing at stray dogs, leaving their bodies across village streets and fields. A third person, partially visible and riding a second motorcycle, is seen following and filming the act. It remains unclear whether this individual was directly involved in the a preliminary investigation, police identified one of the accused as Shyochand Bavariya, a resident of Dumra village. A case has been registered against him under various sections of the Animal Cruelty Act and the Arms of Police, Jhunjhunu, Brijesh Jyoti Upadhyay confirmed the authenticity of the video and said further investigation is underway. 'We are aware of the video showing a person shooting at dogs in Kumawas village. Immediate steps were taken to investigate the matter,' Upadhyay stated. Head constable Shubhkaran has been assigned to lead the local inquiry, reported by incident has drawn condemnation from animal rights groups and local residents, with many calling for stricter legal measures and stronger enforcement to prevent such acts of cruelty.(With inputs from TOI)

Punish incestuous assault severely: SC
Punish incestuous assault severely: SC

Hindustan Times

time6 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Punish incestuous assault severely: SC

Incestuous sexual violence by a parent tears through the foundational fabric of familial trust and must invite the severest condemnation in both language and sentence, the Supreme Court held on Wednesday, dismissing a petition filed by a man convicted of repeatedly raping his minor daughter Punish incestuous assault severely: SC 'The home, which should be a sanctuary, cannot be permitted to become a site of unspeakable trauma, and the courts must send a clear signal that such offences will be met with an equally unsparing judicial response,' said a bench of justices Aravind Kumar and Sandeep Mehta. To entertain a plea for leniency in a case of this nature, the court stressed, would not merely be misplaced, but constitute a betrayal of the court's own constitutional duty to protect the vulnerable. 'When a child is forced to suffer at the hands of her own father, the law must speak in a voice that is resolute and uncompromising. There can be no mitigation in sentencing for crimes that subvert the very notion of family as a space of security,' said the bench, affirming the life sentence for the convict. Rejecting outright, the plea to consider his bail in the 2013 crime, the court added that any leniency in such cases would amount to 'a judicial insult to the sanctity of womanhood' and 'a betrayal of the constitutional promise made to every child of this country.' 'When a father who is expected to be a shield, a guardian, a moral compass, becomes the source of the most severe violation of a child's bodily integrity and dignity, the betrayal is not only personal but institutional. The law does not, and cannot, condone such acts under the guise of rehabilitation or reform,' it said. Upholding the Himachal Pradesh High Court's July 2024 judgment that affirmed the man's life sentence under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, the court said the case reflected a horrifying abuse of trust, where the father became the 'source of the most severe violation of a child's bodily integrity and dignity.' The court noted that the victim was around 10 years old when the assaults began, which were not isolated but sustained violations inside the home – 'a place where every child expects protection.' Referring to the father's repeated acts of aggravated penetrative sexual assault, the bench said the crime 'assumes a demonic character' when committed by a parent, and warrants the 'severest condemnation in both language and sentence.' 'No daughter, however aggrieved, would fabricate charges of this magnitude against her own father merely to escape household discipline,' observed the bench, rejecting the convict's claim that he was falsely implicated due to strained domestic relationships. It acknowledged that 'incestuous sexual violence constitutes a distinct category of offence that tears through the foundational fabric of familial trust', holding that such offences deserve nothing but the severest condemnation and deterrent punishment. 'To pardon such depravity under any guise would be a travesty of justice and a betrayal of the child protection mandate embedded in our constitutional and statutory framework,' maintained the bench, underlining the court's zero-tolerance approach. Reiterating that justice must not be limited to conviction, the court also emphasised the importance of restitution and rehabilitation, especially for child survivors. Invoking Article 142 of the Constitution, the bench directed the state of Himachal Pradesh to pay a compensation of ₹10.5 lakh to the now-major survivor, exceeding the maximum prescribed under the NALSA Compensation Scheme by 50% due to the gravity of the offence and age of the victim. Of this amount, ₹7 lakh is to be fixed in a nationalised bank for five years in the survivor's name, with quarterly interest accessible to her. The remaining ₹3.5 lakh is to be transferred directly to her account. The process will be monitored by the Himachal Pradesh State Legal Services Authority. 'In awarding this compensation, we reaffirm the constitutional commitment to protect the rights and dignity of child survivors, and to ensure that the justice delivered is substantive, compassionate and complete,' held the court.

Man sentenced to 20-years of rigorous imprisonment for kidnapping, raping minor girl
Man sentenced to 20-years of rigorous imprisonment for kidnapping, raping minor girl

Hindustan Times

time8 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Man sentenced to 20-years of rigorous imprisonment for kidnapping, raping minor girl

A city court sentenced a 22-year-old man to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment for kidnapping and raping a minor girl in May 2021, said police officers on Friday. The incident occurred on May 6, 2021. (Getty Images) The verdict was pronounced by additional sessions Judge Jasmine Sharma, who presides over a designated special fast-track court. The convict was found guilty under Sections 363 (kidnapping) and 366 (kidnapping with intent to compel marriage) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 6 (aggravated penetrative sexual assault) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act. Along with the sentence, the court imposed a fine of ₹50,000 on the convict. Special public prosecutor Sunil Kumar Parmar said the time already spent by the accused in judicial custody will be deducted from the overall sentence, as per court orders. 'The incident occurred on May 6, 2021, when the victim, a Class IX student from a private school in Bilaspur, was found missing by her parents as she failed to leave for school,' Parmar said. After failing to locate her, her father lodged a missing person's complaint with the police. During the investigation, police learned that a man from the same neighbourhood had abducted the girl. However, tracking the duo proved difficult, as the girl did not have a mobile phone, and the accused refrained from using one to avoid detection, officers added. The victim was eventually rescued on July 4, 2021, from Hoshiarpur in Punjab, where she had been held captive. 'Based on her statement, the accused was arrested within hours from Panchgaon Chowk in Manesar,' Parmar said. Parmar added that the minor's medical examination confirmed she was raped multiple times. 'She testified against the accused in court and revealed he had lured her on the pretext of marriage. Other witnesses also supported the prosecution's case,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store