U.S. federal court rules against Trump's fentanyl and ‘Liberation Day' tariffs
President Donald Trump speaks during a swearing in ceremony for interim U.S. Attorney General for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro, Wednesday, May 28, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled today that U.S. President Donald Trump does not have the authority to impose his sweeping 'Liberation Day' tariffs or his fentanyl-related duties against Canada and Mexico.
The decision marks the first major legal pushback to Trump's broad use of tariffs to upend global trade.
The three-judge panel says Trump cannot wield tariffs on nearly every country through the use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act.
Trump hit Canada with economywide tariffs in March after he declared an emergency at the northern border related to the flow of fentanyl.
He took his trade war to the world in April with duties on nearly every nation.
Trump walked back the most devastating duties a few hours later but left a 10 per cent universal tariff in place for most countries.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 28, 2025
Kelly Geraldine Malone, The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
22 minutes ago
- CBC
Stratford townhouse proposal would be destructive to wetland, nearby residents warn
Social Sharing Some residents of Stratford are calling on the P.E.I. town's council to postpone a vote on a rezoning application, fearing it will destroy a wetland in their neighbourhood. The developer, R&D Builders, has applied to the town to rezone an area of the Forest Trails subdivision from medium to high density to allow the general contractor to build 32 stacked townhouses, along with two apartment buildings with a total of 78 units just across the street. Residents who opposed the project say the development would quadruple the area's housing density, as well as being partially built on protected wetlands. "There is a… development plan signed by Stratford that protected all of this area and there was to be no disturbance acceptable," said Bonnie Gray, who lives on Dr. John Knox Way, across from the proposed development. "You couldn't build a birdhouse on this land — and now they want to put 32 townhomes here." CBC News reached out to R&D Builders, but the company declined to comment on the issue. Stratford held a public hearing on the rezoning application last October, during which councillors heard significant objections to the proposal. Given the pushback, the residents who took part thought Stratford's planning committee would recommend against the proposal, but that wasn't the case. In May, the homeowners were told the committee had supported the developer's rezoning request, and council had already passed the plan at the first reading stage. Council will decide whether to grant final approval of the project at its regular meeting Wednesday night. According to the minutes of the June 2 planning committee meeting, R&D Builders hired the private company Fundy Engineering to assess the wetland area in November of last year. I don't believe that developers paying a penalty for destroying protected areas is the solution. — Susan Csatari, Forest Trails resident The residents say the results of that survey revised the wetland's boundaries. They also took issue with the timing of the company's assessment. "It was done in the winter when you cannot accurately assess a wetland," Gray said. "Why the Town of Stratford would accept that as a revised boundary — I don't understand why they would even consider it." In a letter to Fundy Engineering and the developer dated Jan. 31, a land management manager with the provincial Environment Department said two of the four lots on the property could be developed without affecting the wetland. "Right now, it looks like you would be able to develop Lot 4 and possibly Lot 3 without impacting the wetland identified. There may be more wetland on Lot 2 that would be impacted by development, which may require compensation. However, this cannot be determined until spring," the letter states. "Either way, we would be willing to work with you on the development of Lots 2-4 so long as wetland impact is minimized and potential compensation for Lot 3 would have to be determined in the spring." P.E.I.'s wetland policy allows for developers to contribute to a compensation fund in the event of a development on a wetland, as long as the government determines that the loss can't be prevented. Residents of Forest Trails don't want that to happen. They're calling on Stratford council to delay Wednesday night's vote on the rezoning application until the province can do a new environmental impact assessment at the site. WATCH | P.E.I. Watershed Alliance says permits to develop wetlands must be 'a last resort, not for resorts': P.E.I. Watershed Alliance says permits to develop wetlands must be 'a last resort, not for resorts' 21 days ago Duration 2:24 The P.E.I. Watershed Alliance says it's disappointed that the province granted a permit to fill in a wetland as part of a golf course development in Summerside. The government received $406,500 compensation for the 27.1 acres of wetland involved. A spokesperson for the developer says they will be adding new lakes and enhanced wetland systems. CBC's Nancy Russell has more. "I think that opens the door for other areas like this to be rezoned and built on, regardless of what current environmental controls are," said Susan Csatari, who lives on Autumn Lane. "This province is fragile. We need to protect what we can…. I don't believe that developers paying a penalty for destroying protected areas is the solution." Csatari said the issue isn't that neighbours don't want development in their subdivision. She said they just want to see it done appropriately. "We bought our homes and moved to the area based on knowing there would be development," she said. "We absolutely do need more housing, but my feeling… is that density housing belongs on a main corridor like the Trans-Canada Highway perhaps, with public transportation, with access to services." 'Hopefully shovels would not go into the ground' In a statement, P.E.I.'s Environment Department said it has received the residents' request for an environmental impact assessment at the site, but that it's the Town of Stratford's responsibility to deal with such planning concerns. "Provincial staff have already been working with the developer to minimize their impact on any sensitive environmental features in the area," the statement reads. "[The department] will ensure that environmental impacts are minimal, and this can be accomplished using existing legislation and regulation." Coun. Jeff MacDonald, chair of Stratford's planning committee, said in a statement to CBC News that the town is following all provisions and guidelines on the proposed rezoning and has been working with the province throughout the process. The resolution before Stratford Town Council is for a rezoning only. An environmental impact assessment, if required, would not occur at the rezoning stage. "Currently, the resolution before Stratford Town Council is for a rezoning only," the statement reads. "An environmental impact assessment, if required, would not occur at the rezoning stage." That answer isn't good enough for residents like Gray. She said if council votes to rezone the area, it's equivalent to destroying the wetland. "Hopefully shovels would not go into the ground," she said. "We've been lobbying with our representatives at every level, so we're trying everything to bring a halt to this destruction of our wetland."
CBC
22 minutes ago
- CBC
More funding first, says Charlottetown police about joining new P.E.I. joint enforcement unit
Social Sharing Charlottetown police Chief Brad MacConnell says he's seen the province fund various policing initiatives, but that funding is often not sustained, leaving police departments on the hook for commitments made by the province. Last month, a letter sent by MacConnell and Charlottetown Mayor Philip Brown to Justice Minister Bloyce Thompson was made public. It outlined some of the reasons why the Charlottetown Police Services would not be joining a new Joint Enforcement Team aimed at tackling the illicit drug trade and organized crime. The team is made up of members from Summerside Police Services, the Kensington police agency and RCMP. The province is spending $800,000 on the project. MacConnell has seen similar initiatives in the past and they haven't worked out, he said, such as when the previous provincial government created a similar group to tackle biker gangs. "The government had certainly the best intentions to form a task force to deal with outlaw motorcycle gangs, but I can tell you logistically it broke down. Partners retreated. Bikers are still here. And Charlottetown police were left with expectations to try to manage that," he said. "We certainly realize drug enforcement and drug issues are at the forefront of Islanders' minds. While we agree in the spirit of this initiative, we have concerns over logistics, over sustainability of the model." 'We'd like those core issues addressed' MacConnell pointed out despite Charlottetown police not being part of the program, there is still a lot of collaboration such as Charlottetown aiding with technology and digital forensics. "There are some core fundamental policing issues that have to be addressed in regarding the funding of policing here on Prince Edward Island, especially in the capital area, and Charlottetown in particular," he said. "So, we'd like those, you know, core issues addressed before we jump into a situation where we're increasing public expectation and we're not going to be able to deliver." The province had previously provided funding for four Charlottetown police officers to help patrol the area around the Community Outreach Centre on Park Street. There were two more which were going to be funded, but because of city council voting against keeping those services running, that money never came through, MacConnell said. MacConnell also thinks Charlottetown police aren't being recognized for the role they play in drug enforcement already, he said. "Our drug enforcement teams are out pacing any of the other drug enforcement units, I think, in Atlantic Canada. Certainly, I think there is a lack of recognition for that, for the great work Charlottetown is doing," MacConnell said. "I think it is quite unfair for the province at this point to cast any shadow over the city of Charlottetown and our police services when we are just trying to meet the demands of our own mandates." Council questions lack of consultation The issue came up during the regular meeting of Charlottetown's city council on Tuesday night. Coun. Terry Bernard wanted council to have a role in deciding if the city's police would be part of the program. "Decisions are being made that we know nothing about. That's not the way council is supposed to operate. It's more of a concern for me that the process here is you have a level of government asking another level of government, 'Will you join us?' And so, it is not up to staff or the mayor alone to make that decision to say, 'No, we're not.' It's council as a collective," Bernard said during the meeting. Deputy Mayor Alanna Jankov backed up Bernard's position, saying she would have liked to know about the letter and that it could be "politicized" in the P.E.I. Legislature before Thompson made it public. Brown didn't think the letter he signed would be made public by Thompson, he said. "I thought there was a breach there between the two offices," Brown said during the meeting, adding that he thought the correspondence was going to be private. "The chief assisted with the response because of his background in this field." MacConnell believes the matter was operational in nature and didn't need to come to council for approval, though he acknowledges more information should have been provided on what the province was asking city police to do.
Globe and Mail
24 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Fathom Nickel Expands the Gochager Lake Property and Announces Delay of Summer Field Exploration
Highlights Three contiguous mineral dispositions totaling 10,519.43 hectares have been added to the Gochager Lake Property. The Gochager Lake Property now consists of 39 contiguous mineral claims amounting to 34,409.34 total hectares. The new staking covers known mafic-hosted nickel-copper occurrences as well as known gold occurrences. The additional staked land covers the possible northeast and south-southwest extensions of the Borys Lake VMS-style trend. Wildfire conditions in the La Ronge area in north-central Saskatchewan has forced the postponement of planned field exploration at the Gochager Lake Property. Fathom plans to commence the planned field exploration later this summer when conditions permit. Company Update Webinar: Shareholders, investors and stakeholders are invited to attend Fathom Nickel's live update webinar taking place at 8:00 AM MST/10:00 AM EST today, Wednesday June 11, 2025. Link here: Calgary, Alberta--(Newsfile Corp. - June 11, 2025) - Fathom Nickel Inc. (CSE: FNI) (FSE: 6Q5) (OTCQB: FNICF) (the " Company" or " Fathom") is pleased to announce that it has expanded the Gochager Lake Property, through direct staking with the Government of Saskatchewan's Ministry of Energy and Resources. Additionally, due to the current wildfire situation in north-central Saskatchewan, the Company has been forced to postpone the planned Gochager Lake field program until later this summer. About The Expanded Gochager Lake Property Area (Figure 1): The Gochager Lake Property is host to the historic Gochager Lake deposit 1. Fathom's re-interpretation of a 2008 VTEM™ survey flown over the Gochager Lake Property area identified a very prospective structural corridor (the "Gochager Trend"). The Gochager Trend is a possible conduit that hosts the historic Gochager Lake deposit. The 2008 VTEM™ survey highlights a series of complex conductors trending along strike to the northeast and to the southwest within this interpreted structural corridor. Fathom's litho-geochemistry analyses of historic drill core from the Mal Lake Ni-occurrence 2 confirms that the Mal Lake Ni-Cu+Co mineralization and host rock is analogous to the historic Gochager Lake Ni-Cu-Co deposit (Fathom Press Release July 11, 2024). Similar to Gochager Lake and Mal Lake, the Hood Creek Cu-Ni+Co showings 3 mineralization, is hosted within a gabbroic host rock. Fathom's re-interpretation of a 2013 VTEM™ survey flown over the Borys Lake VMS-style Zn-Pb-Ag deposit 4 highlights numerous conductors associated with the VMS-style mineralization and has contributed to the interpreted Borys VMS Trend. Within the Borys VMS Trend. several zones of Zn-Pb-Ag mineralization, defined by surface trenching and drilling, occur intermittently over a 3.8km strike 5. In-house re-interpretation of the 2008 and 2013 VTEM™ surveys flown over the current Gochager Lake Property area, along with a review of Saskatchewan government assessment files, was the rationale to expand the Gochager Lake Property. Immediately along strike of the Gochager and Borys VMS Trends, in the newly staked claim (MC00022552), multiple occurrences of anomalous Ni-Cu-Zn in bedrock is reported in a government assessment file 6. Within the most eastern recent claim acquisition (MC00019534), assessment files and SMDI files reference anomalous gold of up to 2.68 g/t Au associated with shear hosted quartz veins 7. Ian Fraser, Fathom CEO and VP Exploration stated, "The Gochager Lake Property area is very well endowed and not just with nickel-copper-cobalt showings and deposits. The Borys Lake VMS zinc-lead-silver mineralization cannot be overlooked. With renewed attention being drawn to gold opportunities in Saskatchewan, we feel it is prudent to not overlook gold potential at the Gochager Lake Property. The Ni-Cu-Co mineralization attracted us to the Gochager Lake property in the first place - and continues to remain our focus. However, our most recent property expansion was motivated by a number of factors, including: 1) our ever evolving understanding of the greater property area and increased potential for additional magmatic nickel sulphide deposits; 2) a very prospective (and open) regional VMS begging for a focused exploration approach, and; 3) the potential for an orogenic gold discovery. This recent property acquisition has significantly expanded our playing field. I would also like to personally, and on behalf of our Company ,express our sadness to learn of the damage and losses suffered by the residents in and around La Ronge and surrounding areas resulting from this year's wildfires. We commend the bravery and dedication of those individuals who not only protected and saved their own properties, but the property of many other La Ronge residents. I have heard the stories firsthand - the heroism and the spirit of the community continues to prevail. Our thoughts and best wishes are extended to Fathom's stakeholders, suppliers, and friends as we work through these most trying of times." Figure 1 To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: Qualified Person and Data Verification Ian Fraser, CEO, VP Exploration and a Director of the Company and the "qualified person" as such term is defined by National Instrument 43-101, has verified the data disclosed in this news release, and has otherwise reviewed and approved the technical information in this news release on behalf of the Company. About Fathom Nickel Inc. Fathom is an exploration company that is targeting magmatic nickel sulphide discoveries to support the green energy transition and to secure the supply of North American Critical Minerals. The Company now has a portfolio of three high-quality exploration projects located in the prolific Trans Hudson Corridor in Saskatchewan: 1) the Albert Lake Project, a 90,000+ hectare project that was host to the historic and past producing Rottenstone Mine 8 (produced 28,724 tons @3.3% Ni, 1.8% Cu, 9.63 g/t 3E (Pd-Pt+Au) 1965-1969), and 2) the 34,000+ hectare Gochager Lake Project that is host to a historic, NI43-101 non-compliant open pit resource consisting of 4.3M tons at 0.295% Ni and 0.081% Cu 1, and 3) the 10,000+ hectare Friesen Lake Project located 40km southwest of the historic Rottenstone Mine and 30km northwest of the historic Gochager Lake deposit. The Saskatchewan Mineral Deposit Index (SMDI #0880) reports drill indicated reserves at the historic Gochager Lake Deposit of 4,262,400 tons grading 0.295% Ni and 0.081% Cu mineable by open pit. Fathom cannot confirm the resource estimate, nor the parameters and methods used to prepare the reserve estimate. The estimate is not considered NI43-101 compliant and further work is required to verify this historical drill indicated reserve. Fathom drilling 2023-2024 has confirmed Ni-Cu-Co mineralization occurring at the Gochager Lake deposit. The Saskatchewan Mineral Deposit Index (SMID#0836) reports the location, geological details and exploration history at the Mal Lake Ni-Cu showing. The Saskatchewan Mineral Deposit Index (SMID#0849) reports the location, geological details and exploration history at the Hood Claims Cu-Ni showing. The Saskatchewan Mineral Deposit Index (SMID#0848) reports drill indicated reserves at the Borys Lake Deposit of 1,336,500 tons grading 1.91% combined Zn and Pb. Fathom cannot confirm this resource estimate, nor the parameters and methods used to prepare the reserve estimate. The estimate is not NI43-101 compliant and further work is required to verify this historical drill indicated reserve. The Saskatchewan Mineral Deposit Index files (SMID#'s 0848, 0857a&b, 0858) reports the location, geological details, exploration history and reserves at the Borys Lake Zn-Pb-Ag deposit and report on other Zn-Pb-Ag mineralized zones. The Saskatchewan Mineral Assessment Database (SMAD#73P15-0012) reports geologic work assessment details pertaining to base metal exploration (Cu-Zn-Ni) in the Forbes Lake area in 1997. The Saskatchewan Mineral Assessment Database (SMAD#73P15-0089) reports geologic work assessment details pertaining to gold exploration in the Forbes Lake area in 1994 and 1999. The Saskatchewan Mineral Deposit Index (SMDI #0958) reports the production grades noted above from a small open pit; the Rottenstone Mine. Fathom cannot confirm the production grade values, nor a historic resource estimate that may have been in place ahead of production. All historic records of pre-mine development and mine production are lost. The Company can confirm the historic Rottenstone open pit exists. Due to exploitation by mining (1965-1969), it is impossible to confirm production tonnage or pre-production tonnage. The Company trusts the production and grade values, as noted in SMDI #0958, to be accurate. The Company has performed test assaying of Rottenstone-type mineralization and results are consistent with reported production grades. ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD "Ian Fraser" CEO, VP Exploration, Director For further information, please contact: Ian Fraser, CEO, VP Exploration 1-403-650-9760 ifraser@ Or Doug Porter, President and CFO 1-403-870-4349 dporter@ Forward-Looking Statements: This news release contains "forward-looking statements" that are based on expectations, estimates, projections and interpretations as at the date of this news release. Forward-looking statements are frequently characterized by words such as "plan", "expect", "project", "seek", "intend", "believe", "anticipate", "estimate", "suggest", "indicate" and other similar words or statements that certain events or conditions "may" or "will" occur, and include, without limitation, statements regarding payment of terms under the Option Agreement, permitting for the Property, receipt of an exploration permit, timing of the exploration program on the Property and the Company achieving the earn-in thresholds under the Option Agreement. Forward-looking statements relate to information that is based on assumptions of management, forecasts of future results, and estimates of amounts not yet determinable. Any statements that express predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward-looking statements." Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual events or results to differ from those reflected in the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation: risks related to failure to obtain adequate financing on a timely basis and on acceptable terms; risks related to the outcome of legal proceedings; political and regulatory risks associated with mining and exploration; risks related to the maintenance of stock exchange listings; risks related to environmental regulation and liability; the potential for delays in exploration or development activities or the completion of feasibility studies; the uncertainty of profitability; risks and uncertainties relating to the interpretation of drill results, the geology, grade and continuity of mineral deposits; risks related to the inherent uncertainty of production and cost estimates and the potential for unexpected costs and expenses; results of prefeasibility and feasibility studies, and the possibility that future exploration, development or mining results will not be consistent with the Company's expectations; risks related to commodity price fluctuations; and other risks and uncertainties related to the Company's prospects, properties and business detailed elsewhere in the Company's disclosure record. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date hereof and the Company does not assume any obligation to update or revise them to reflect new events or circumstances except in accordance with applicable securities laws. Actual events or results could differ materially from the Company's expectations or projections.
