Canada, U.S. exchanging potential terms on economic and security deal
Canada and the United States are exchanging potential terms of agreement in closely held talks on an economic and security deal, The Globe and Mail has learned, but these do not represent the draft text of an actual pact.
These exchanges are an effort to spell out what both sides might be able to agree upon as Ottawa and Washington try to find enough common ground to end their damaging trade war, sources said.
The Globe is not naming the sources because they were not authorized to speak publicly.
It's also far from clear whether a deal will be landed anytime soon as the United States is negotiating with close to 20 other countries that are seeking relief from tariffs U.S. President Donald Trump has imposed on their products.
One government official compared the documents being exchanged to term sheets in the corporate sector, which outline the ingredients of a possible deal and serve as the basis for negotiations.
Canada and the U.S. are engaging in talks on a new economic and security relationship that could amount to the first phase of talks with a second phase being the renegotiation of the trilateral United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement possibly to follow as already scheduled in 2026.
ArcelorMittal laying off 153 workers in Hamilton as Trump tariffs hammer the steel industry
Opinion: Carney was right to not retaliate against Trump's latest tariffs
The economic-defence talks are being conducted among a very small circle of officials including International Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc, Canada's ambassador to the United States Kirsten Hillman, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Jamieson Greer, the United States Trade Representative. It's possible this deal may be an executive-handshake agreement such as the one the British government signed with the White House in May.
Sources said Canada and the United States are talking about working together to counter China's unfair trade practices, a topic that could affect U.S. tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum, and further border security arrangements to stop the illegal distribution of the opioid fentanyl. The United States also wants Canada to take a great role in securing the Arctic and join Mr. Trump's ambitious Golden Dome missile shield project – a project Prime Minister Mark Carney has publicly said would make sense for Canadians to be part of.
They said each side is putting ideas on paper and sharing them as part of the talks.
CBC News on Friday reported it had learned of the existence of a working document outlining details of a potential deal. CBC, citing an unidentified source, said the working document states that Canada is willing to participate in the Golden Dome security program, and it also mentions Canadian commitments to build more infrastructure in the Arctic, Canada's pledge to meet its NATO defence spending targets, as well as previously announced border security investments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
26 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Why QuantumScape Stock Jumped Almost 10% This Week
Some energy stocks have been soaring as investors look to get in early on new technologies that could help supply growing power demand. With electric vehicle (EV) sales continuing to increase and data centers popping up seemingly everywhere to supply increasing needs for artificial intelligence (AI) compute power, investors want to cash in too. One name that jumped as much as almost 12% this week was solid-state battery company QuantumScape (NYSE: QS). The stock was still higher by 9.3% as of late Thursday afternoon, according to data provided by S&P Global Market Intelligence. Solid-state batteries are for more than just electric vehicles Much of the recent attention on data center power needs has centered on fuel cells or small modular nuclear reactors. The technology QuantumScape is developing has been focused on the EV market as it scales into prototype production and customer testing phases. QuantumScape is making progress toward commercializing its battery technology. In its first-quarter report, the company said it is ahead of schedule to bring its next phase of manufacturing solid-state battery cells into baseline production. EV customers are getting closer to field-testing the product. The higher energy density in solid-state batteries should provide EVs with a safer alternative and better vehicle range, with lower costs and enhanced performance. But QuantumScape will have a market beyond EVs too. Solid-state batteries can be applied for renewable energy storage, consumer electronics, medical devices, and other applications. Investors see a scarcity of energy sources developing as demand ramps up from AI data centers, robotics, and self-driving car fleets. As QuantumScape gets closer to commercialization, the stock is ticking higher along with other energy names this week. Should you invest $1,000 in QuantumScape right now? Before you buy stock in QuantumScape, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and QuantumScape wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $657,871!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $875,479!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is998% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to174%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
CTV News
28 minutes ago
- CTV News
Third Link: Quebec again beguiles possibility of new project
Quebec Transport Minister Geneviève Guilbault talks about the Third Link on June 12, 2025. (LA PRESSE CANADIENNE/Jacques Boissinot) With less than a year and a half to go before the provincial election, the Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ) government is once again dangling the prospect of a Third Link project – without committing to any potential costs. The corridor, chosen by Transport Minister Geneviève Guilbault, is farther west and closer to the two existing bridges than previous proposed routes. A third link farther east would have been more expensive, according to the minister. The proposed project is a bridge-tunnel that accommodates both freight trucks and public transportation. The precise route and 'target budget' are not expected to be unveiled until the fall. From east to west The CAQ government has been very indecisive about the Third Link project in the past. In 2019, it proposed a tunnel to the east that would pass under Île d'Orléans. Then, the government changed its mind and floated the idea of a route farther west that would connect the two city centres of Quebec City and Lévis. In April 2023, Guilbault announced that her government was abandoning the project for a highway link between the cities. Instead, she proposed a tunnel dedicated to public transit. Then, in October 2023, less than 24 hours after his crushing defeat in Jean-Talon by the Parti Québécois (PQ), Premier François Legault took everyone by surprise by announcing that he, again, wanted to consult the people of Quebec City about the Third Link, and all options were on the table. The project was revived in June 2024 despite an unfavourable report from the Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec, which had analyzed several potential corridors. – This report by The Canadian Press was first published in French on June 12, 2024.
CBC
28 minutes ago
- CBC
Bike lane proponents decry 'overreach' after committee votes not to hear them until July
Social Sharing Proponents of a protected bike lane along Winnipeg's Wellington Crescent accused city council's public works committee of a "gross overreach of power" after dozens of people slated to speak at city hall on Thursday had their delegations cancelled and put off until a meeting in July. No fewer than 27 people signed up to speak to the committee about a proposal to create a temporary bike lane on Wellington, where cyclist Rob Jenner was killed last year by a speeding motorist who lost control of his vehicle. The item was on the agenda to allow the committee to consider a request by city transportation engineers to have another month to complete a report about the temporary bike lane. Citing the request for the extension, committee chair Janice Lukes (Waverley West) moved to suspend city council rules and hear the delegations at the next public works committee meeting, slated for July 3. Lukes, as well as councillors Markus Chambers (St. Norbert-Seine River) and Ross Eadie (Mynarski), then voted not to hear the delegations. The fourth member of the committee, council speaker Devi Sharma (Old Kildonan) left the committee floor and did not take part in the vote. The decision led some people watching in the council gallery to shout at the committee, prompting Chambers to ask security to clear the council gallery of some spectators. This proved to be temporary. Linda van de Laar, who took a day off from her job as a cardiac nurse at St. Boniface Hospital to attend the meeting, said she was upset city councillors effectively silenced people unhappy with the time the city is taking to improve safety along Wellington Crescent. She accused the committee of overreaching its powers and engaging in an unprecedented move by shutting out registered delegates. "The councillors are here to represent the citizens and the residents, so I do not understand it," van de Laar said outside city hall. "A lot of people here took time off from work to be here. I personally cannot make it on July 3. I'll be on a night shift," she said. Ian McCausland, a Bike Winnipeg board member who was able to address the committee because he also registered to speak about another item on the agenda, said he is concerned about the message sent by the committee to people who take the time to engage with city councillors. "It speaks to how much the city might value the input from the average citizen," he said. "I'm hoping that this is a one-time thing and that they actually continue to engage with all stakeholders on the project." Van de Laar said she was especially upset Lukes told CBC Radio on Wednesday she would hear delegates on Thursday. 'I'm disappointed too,' councillor says Lukes, who volunteered as a bike and pedestrian trail activist prior to running for council in 2014, said she knows what it's like being on the outside of council, looking in. "I don't think there's anyone here that understands the level of frustration like I do, because I was an advocate and came down 50 to 60 times, very frustrated," she said during a break in the committee meeting. "Then I actually decided to put my name on a ballot and see if I can make change on this side of the table. Making change is not easy, I've come to learn, on either side of the table." Lukes said she was the councillor who originally pushed to reduce the speed on Wellington Crescent and she too is disappointed. "Everyone's disappointed. I'm disappointed in some of the things that have been said to me and to the committee members. They're disappointed that we don't have a plan in place," she said, referring to the delegates. "I'm disappointed too, but we will have a full report next month." Lukes said the city is moving more quickly on a protected bike lane on Wellington Crescent than it has on other protected lanes. She said a temporary barrier is the only option right now because permanent barriers are built when streets undergo full renewals — and Wellington Crescent is not slated for this work any time soon.
